Turkey: Police detain dozens at banned LGBTQ+ Pride parade
AP Image
Police in Istanbul on Sunday blocked attempts to hold a banned LGBTQ+ Pride demonstration, detaining more than 50 people who tried to march, according to activists and an opposition politician.
Istanbul Pride has been banned annually by Turkish authorities since 2015, including this year.
The governor of Istanbul had earlier banned the LGBTQ+ community from holding a Pride Parade, saying it "undermines social peace, family structure, and moral values."
A strong police presence in key areas of the city prevented large gatherings. Officers were seen clashing with activists holding rainbow flags in the city center.
Crack down on LGBTQ+ community in Turkey
"The palace regime cannot maintain power by demonizing the LGBTQ community," Kezban Konukcu, a lawmaker from the opposition DEM Party who attended the march, said.
Homosexuality is not a crime in Turkey, but President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has adopted increasingly harsh rhetoric against the LGBTQ+ community over the past decade.
In January, Erdogan declared 2025 the "Year of the Family," describing Turkey's declining birth rate as an existential threat and accusing the LGBTQ+ movement of threatening the traditional family.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
"The primary goal of the gender neutralization policies, in which LGBT is used as a battering ram, is the family and the sanctity of the family institution," he said at the time.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have warned that the government's rhetoric and actions are creating a hostile environment for LGBTQ+ people, leading to increased discrimination and violence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Homeland Security Kristi Noem got $80K from dark money group, but hid it from federal disclosure forms
When Kristi Noem was chosen by US President Donald Trump to be the head of Homeland Security , people started to look more closely at her finances. But new tax records show that she made a colossal amount of money in secret from a dark money nonprofit as the former governor of South Dakota and never reported it on federal disclosure forms. This situation raises a lot of ethical questions. She secretly accepted a cut of the money she raised for a nonprofit that supports her political career in 2023, while she was serving as governor of South Dakota. According to experts, she most likely violated ethical standards by failing to disclose this income on her federal disclosure forms. ALSO READ: Dear Mr Japan? Trump's tariff letter opener sparks mockery and memes on social media by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is It Possible to Get a Flatter Tummy After 50—And How? Lulutox Undo Why wasn't the $80K disclosed publicly? The nonprofit transferred funds to a personal business of Noem's that had just been founded in Delaware, in what experts called a very unusual arrangement. That year, the $80,000 payment was a substantial increase over her approximately $130,000 government salary, as per a report by ProPublica. The $80,000 payment was then not made public by Noem. The original source of the funding is still unknown because the nonprofit is a so-called dark money organization, which is exempt from disclosing the identities of its donors, as per a report by ProPublica. Live Events Noem was required to publish a thorough accounting of her assets and revenue streams starting in 2023 after President Donald Trump appointed her as his secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. ProPublica was informed by experts that Noem's personal embezzlement of funds from political donors was concerning. The American Resolve Policy Fund , a nonprofit organization, claimed in a filing that the $80,000 was a payment for fundraising. According to the group, Noem generated hundreds of thousands of dollars. Could this break any ethics or state laws? It is unremarkable for a politician to solicit funds for nonprofits and other organizations that advance their campaigns or objectives. Experts indicated that it is atypical for a politician to retain a portion of the funds for personal use. 'If contributors to these nonprofits not only influence an elected official's political prospects but also directly furnish their income, that is unprecedented and troubling,' stated Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney who currently directs the Brennan Center's campaign finance initiatives. Lee Schoenbeck, a seasoned Republican politician and lawyer who served as the state Senate's leader until recently, speculated that Noem's outside income might have violated South Dakota law. The governor and other high-ranking officials are required by law to dedicate themselves entirely to their official duties. Details of the payment were found by ProPublica in the American Resolve Policy Fund's annual tax form. The American Resolve Policy Fund is a part of a network of political organizations that support Noem and her agenda. What has Noem's lawyer said in her defense? Trevor Stanley, Noem's attorney, stated that the Office of Government Ethics had examined and approved her financial information pertaining to this organization and that Noem complied with the law in both letter and spirit. Follow-up inquiries concerning whether the ethics office knew about the $80,000 payment and whether Noem fully disclosed all of her income on easily accessible public documents were not answered by Stanley. What else has Kristi Noem come under fire for financially? Noem has come under fire for using public funds to pay for travel to Houston, Canada, and Paris. Despite being one of Trump's least wealthy Cabinet members, her personal spending patterns have drawn notice. FAQs What's up with Noem's $80,000 payment? She obtained it from a nonprofit involved in political fundraising but did not include it in required federal financial disclosure forms . According to experts, this most likely violates ethical standards. Did Kristi Noem admit to owning the LLC that received payment? Yes, but only for her Cabinet confirmation. Until then, the LLC, which she formed while still governor, had never been made public.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
India readies another water shock for Pakistan
In the wake of the Pakistan-sponsored terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India intensified its strategic response, not only diplomatically and militarily but also hydrologically -- by suspending the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) which governs sharing of water flowing to Pakistan from the Indus river system. Pakistan, which depends largely on water flowing from India for its agricultural production, has warned that India blocking the water flowing to Pakistan will be considered an act of war. However, undeterred by Pakistan's threats, India is preparing another water shock for Pakistan. The Indian government is set to revive the long-stalled Tulbul Navigation Project in Jammu & Kashmir, PTI has reported based on information from sources. A detailed project report (DPR) for the Tulbul project is being prepared and is expected to take about a year to complete. This move, which comes amid the suspension of the IWT, underscores a significant policy shift: leveraging water resources as a means of strategic assertion. Also Read | Pakistan will be starved of water and India will never restore Indus water treaty, says Amit Shah Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo What is the Tulbul Navigation Project? The Tulbul Navigation Project (TNP) is a controlled storage facility on the Jhelum River near Sopore in the Kashmir Valley. Originally conceived in 1984, the project aimed to construct a 439-foot long and 40-foot wide navigation lock-cum-control structure at the mouth of the Wular Lake, one of the largest freshwater lakes in Asia. The purpose of the project was to ensure navigability of the Jhelum River during lean seasons by regulating outflows from the Wular Lake. By storing around 300,000 acre-feet of water, the project was designed to maintain a minimum draught of 4.5 feet, enabling barge traffic between Baramulla and Srinagar. This would not only facilitate inland water transport, but also improve irrigation and generate potential for hydropower optimization downstream. Live Events The Central government had started work on this project in 1984, but stopped it a year later following Pakistan's strong objections. Pakistan in 1986 took the issue to the Indus Waters Commission , following which the project was abandoned in 1987. The work was restarted in 2010, with the then irrigation minister of J&K, Taj Mohideen, stating that Article 9 of IWT permitted such projects meant for non-consumptive use. In 2012, unidentified terrorists lobbed a grenade towards a bund raised by the workers for the project. In 2016, Taj claimed that the Omar-led NC-Congress (2008-2014) govt had completed almost 80 per cent of the project after redesigning it with a total estimated cost of Rs 50 crore, in contrast to the original project designed in 1980s at Rs 500 crore. He accused the PDP-BJP (2015-2018) govt of abandoning the project. Taj argued that water storage in the Wullar barrage would significantly benefit the downstream power projects by sustaining electricity generation during the winter months, when they see a sharp decline in output. Also Read | India slams Pakistan's 'charade' on Kishenganga, Ratle dams; trashes 'illegal' Court of Arbitration's new ruling How Tulbul project can benefit India, and why Pakistan opposes it Under the IWT, India was allocated the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas and Sutlej), while the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum and Chenab) were allocated to Pakistan, with limited rights for India. India is allowed to use water from the western rivers for non-consumptive purposes like navigation, power generation and limited storage. The Tulbul Project aligns with these permissible uses. By regulating flows, India can maximize its share of water under the treaty, avoiding wastage of its rights while improving water availability during lean periods. In the context of cross-border terrorism and Pakistan's continued hostility, the project serves as a pressure point. Water, historically viewed as a cooperative resource, is now being reconsidered as a tool of strategic diplomacy. The resumption of Tulbul sends a strong signal that India will no longer remain passive while its treaty rights are undermined or while Pakistan continues to support non-state actors across the border. The Jhelum river route was historically a vital trade artery. Reviving this navigation route will boost local commerce, create jobs and improve connectivity in the Kashmir Valley. Given the government's broader push for inland waterways, this project fits into a national strategy of reducing dependence on road transport and improving logistics efficiency. Though Tulbul itself is not a hydropower project, its ability to regulate water flow can support downstream hydropower generation at projects like Uri-I and Uri-II. It can help stabilize water flow, enhance efficiency and reduce flood damage risks in the valley. Pakistan has consistently objected to the Tulbul Navigation Project since its inception, and construction was halted in 1987 due to Islamabad's protests. The core of Pakistan's opposition lies in the perceived violation of the IWT provisions. Pakistan argues that the storage capacity of 300,000 acre-feet gives India the ability to manipulate water flows during critical periods, especially during the sowing season in Pakistan's Punjab province. While India views the project as permissible under the IWT (which allows non-consumptive use including navigation), Pakistan sees it as an attempt to store water in violation of the treaty's constraints on India's use of the western rivers. India's revival of the Tulbul Project can be seen in light of a broader reassessment of the IWT, which has long been criticized within India for being overly generous. In suspending the treaty after the Pahalgam attack, India is signaling a willingness to challenge long-standing conventions that no longer serve its security or developmental interests. This policy shift is also likely influenced by China's assertive use of water in the Brahmaputra basin. India now seems to be shedding its past restraint and adopting a more realist doctrine on transboundary rivers. However, this move also raises the stakes in the ongoing India-Pakistan tensions. Pakistan has already warned that any attempt to block or manipulate water flows would be considered an 'act of war". The Kashmir politics over Tulbul The Tulbul project has been a contentious issue in J&K. After suspension of the IWT, local politics is simmering over the Tulbul project. In May, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and former CM Mehbooba Mufti engaged in a war of words over reinstating the Tulbul Navigation Project. The argument started after Abdullah suggested a possible resumption of construction at the Tulbul Navigation Barrage on Wullar Lake, considering the suspension of the IWT. "The Wular lake in North Kashmir. The civil works you see in the video is the Tulbul Navigation Barrage. It was started in the early 1980s but had to be abandoned under pressure from Pakistan citing the Indus Water Treaty. Now that the IWT has been 'temporarily suspended' I wonder if we will be able to resume the project," Abdullah posted on his personal X handle. Taking to X, Mufti replied to Abdullah's post: "At a time when both nations have just stepped back from the brink of war—with Jammu and Kashmir once again paying the highest price through loss of innocent lives, destruction, and suffering—such provocative statements are deeply irresponsible." She stressed that J&K residents need tranquillity and constancy, rather than political actions that could heighten tensions. "Weaponizing water—a source of life—is not only inhumane, but it also threatens to internationalize an issue that must remain strictly bilateral," she noted. Replying to Mufti's remarks, Abdullah wrote, "Actually what is unfortunate is that with your blind lust to try to score cheap publicity points & please some people sitting across the border, you refuse to acknowledge that the IWT has been one of the biggest historic betrayals of the interests of the people of J&K. I have always opposed this treaty & I will continue to do so. Opposing a blatantly unfair treaty is in no way, shape, size or form warmongering, it's about correcting a historic injustice that denied the people of J&K the right to use our water for ourselves." (With agency and TOI inputs)
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Zohran Mamdani: Trump's 'worst nightmare'- or his best campaign gift?
Mamdani's identity makes him a compelling symbol: the first Muslim, first South Asian, and youngest candidate poised to lead the city. On paper, Indian-American politician Zohran Mamdani checks every box on US President Donald Trump 's list of what's wrong with America. He is a Muslim, brown, proudly socialist, and a walking rejection of every American ideal the right clings to with MAGA-red knuckles. 'Donald Trump's worst nightmare,' Mamdani called himself on the trail. But ask Republican strategists what they think of his victory, and you'll hear a different story: they're thrilled. Mamdani's upset win over former governor Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary has energized progressives and panicked centrists-but perhaps no one is as gleeful as the GOP. For months, Republicans have been searching for the perfect avatar of the 'radical Left.' Now, in Mamdani, they believe they've found him. 'The single most effective foil for Republicans nationally,' Rep Elise Stefanik told CNN. 'You couldn't script it better.' Trump himself wasted no time branding Mamdani a '100% Communist Lunatic' on Fox News, suggesting he'd cut off federal funding to New York City if Mamdani becomes mayor. It wasn't just a threat. It was a signal: this man will be the GOP's bogeyman in 2026 and beyond. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The symbol the GOP needed Mamdani is not the fringe figure Republicans would have had to invent. He's the real thing. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, he wants rent freezes, city-run supermarkets, and free buses. He supports the BDS movement and has refused to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada'-language many Jewish New Yorkers see as violent. He's criticized Israel's war in Gaza and once said he'd have Netanyahu arrested if he set foot in New York. That last part alone might be worth millions in Republican fundraising emails. For a GOP eager to paint the entire Democratic Party as captured by the far Left, Mamdani is the perfect proof point. He's not a coastal consultant whispering about policy. He's the possible next mayor of the largest city in America-and his critics say he wants to reshape it in the image of a Brooklyn food co-op crossed with Havana circa 1962. The more Democrats embrace him, the easier it becomes for Republicans to argue that the party is out of touch with Middle America. 'He's pure communist,' Trump said. 'It's very bad for New York.' But maybe good for Trump. The Democrats' dilemma It's a problem the Democratic Party can't ignore. Mamdani is not just a leftist curiosity. He's charismatic, savvy, and-unlike many Democratic hopefuls-he won. And not just in downtown Brooklyn. He flipped areas that Trump carried in 2024, including parts of Staten Island and Queens. 'He's run a really smart messaging campaign,' Jesse Arm of the Manhattan Institute told the Economist. 'It's not just about ideology. It's about talent.' His message-affordability, dignity, housing-resonated far beyond the activist base. Mamdani's campaign mobilized an estimated 46,000 volunteers. They didn't just tweet. They knocked on doors, hit subway stops, and turned out voters who had never before shown up to a primary. 'He connected,' Reverend Al Sharpton told the Atlantic. 'Democrats need to keep showing up.' But that connection may come at a cost. Many Jewish Democrats are unsettled by Mamdani's views on Israel and his refusal to distance himself from phrases they associate with violence. The Anti-Defamation League has called out his rhetoric. State Senator Kirsten Gillibrand publicly asked him to disavow the 'global intifada' slogan. He declined. 'This is the end of Jewish New York as we know it,' Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf told the AP. He predicts a coming exodus of religious Jews and a loss of influence in the city's progressive circles. And yet Mamdani also drew support from a number of Jewish progressives, including Jewish Voice for Peace Action and city comptroller Brad Lander. 'This is not in spite of his support for Palestinian rights,' Beth Miller of JVP Action told reporters. 'It is because of it.' What's happening in New York is a preview of the national Democratic identity crisis: can a party split between suburban moderates and city-based leftists find common ground-or at least a common messenger? How he won That Mamdani made it this far is, in itself, a shock. When he entered the race in October, he polled under 1%. Cuomo, for all his baggage, had name recognition, establishment support, and deep pockets. What he didn't have was energy. Mamdani had that in spades. He launched what the Atlantic called 'an invigorated, modern campaign,' showing up everywhere, walking the entire length of Manhattan on foot, and running a TikTok-optimized operation that made him the most visible candidate in the race. Voters weren't just choosing a mayor; they were joining a movement. The slogan was simple: affordability. Freeze the rent. Free the bus. Feed the people. And it worked. Mamdani flipped neighborhoods that had previously gone for Trump, not by hiding who he was, but by showing up-and listening. His background helped. Born in Uganda to Indian parents, the son of a post-colonial scholar and a renowned Indian filmmaker, Mamdani has the kind of biography that makes him a symbol of the city's future. He speaks multiple languages. He rapped under the name Mr Cardamom. And he understands the immigrant hustle in a way that feels earned, not manufactured. What happens next The general election in November won't be a walk in the Central Park. Eric Adams, the scandal-scarred incumbent, is running as an independent. Curtis Sliwa, a far-right Republican and former Guardian Angel, is back on the ballot. Cuomo may yet jump back in. But even if Mamdani wins, the bigger story is what he represents: a generational realignment inside the Democratic Party-and a narrative goldmine for the GOP. For Republicans, he's not just the mayor of New York. He's the face of the Democrats. Every proposal he floats will be repackaged and used against swing-state Senate candidates in 2026. A double-edged victory For now, Mamdani is forging ahead. He's vowed to defend New York's sanctuary city status. He's leaned into the attacks, telling Meet the Press, 'The president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from… because he wants to distract from what I'm fighting for.' If he wins in November, it will be a first: first Muslim mayor, first South Asian mayor, and the youngest in the city's history. But it will also test whether the Left's vision can govern without becoming the right's favorite scare story. Mamdani says he wants to make New York more livable for working people. Trump wants to make Mamdani the face of the new Democratic Party. In their own ways, they both might get exactly what they want.
