
‘We have a car that is better than we've ever had before' – James Vowles, Williams Team Principal
The name Williams has been synonymous with Formula One for half a century. Founded by Sir Frank Williams in the late '70s, the Grove-based outfit dominated the sport for two decades, winning seven Drivers' and nine Constructors' titles before the turn of the millennium.
The British team has found the going tough over the last few years, finishing dead last in the standings four times between 2018 and 2022, collecting just 39 points over the duration.
Under the ownership of US-based Dorilton Capital, and with former Mercedes Motorsport Strategy Director James Vowles at the helm since 2023, Williams has made rapid strides. The constructor eclipsed its 2024 points tally within four races of the 2025 season and looks set to challenge for fifth in the standings for the first time since 2017.
Taking over from the Williams family, who nurtured the team for 43 years, is no easy task, but Vowles has managed to instil confidence into the struggling outfit in his role as Team Principal.
In an exclusive chat with Sportstar on the sidelines of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, Vowles spoke at length about the team's progress, his data-driven approach, preparing the garage for the soon-to-arrive regulations, the future of the sport, and more.
Five races into 2025, Williams has gotten off to a fast start compared to the last four seasons. How's the mood in the garage?
Highly positive. I think we always have to remember where we've come from. It is a privilege and a pleasure to be racing with a car that can score points every weekend — and it is — with two world-class drivers. You'd be surprised how much that carries you through the tireless and sleepless nights.
You've spoken about the continuous improvement you looked to bring when you took on this role in 2023. Two years on, do you think you're on the right track?
Yeah, I think the direction of travel is a good one. This car isn't what we've put our focus on. We've just been fixing some foundational issues, putting in system software, infrastructure, culture, technology, people — and it's nice to see that the car is moving up and corresponds to that. We have a car that is better than we've ever had before. I think the real test is breaking away from the midfield, closer to the front.
Track stars: Vowles with the two Williams drivers — Carlos Sainz (left) and Alex Albon (right). | Photo Credit: Getty Images
You touched upon your two drivers, Alex Albon and Carlos Sainz. Both of them are very experienced in the top tier of racing. What is it like working with them?
It's a breath of fresh air. First of all, there's no politics. Neither one wants anything more than for the team to be successful, which means that every meeting we have is about the greater good. How do we make it better next year? What's our direction of travel? What can I do to help? It's great to see that dedication they're putting into the team.
Over the last decade or so, Williams has given so many drivers their first shot at F1. Was it a genuine choice to go with two experienced drivers?
It was very much a case of me wanting experienced drivers by my side. I love investing in young drivers — they absolutely have a future with Williams. But we also have to acknowledge that last year, our attrition was high, and it meant we couldn't move forward in the field. For a few years, we've got to take stock and start developing this team into championship material.
Does the tag of being F1's fourth most successful team weigh heavily on you? Is there added pressure?
I don't think anything will put more pressure on me than I put on myself. That's probably the right way to describe it. The reason I'm here is because of our history. It's an incredible history. I want this team to be successful with all my heart. I'll make it my career goal to do so. That's more pressure than our legacy.
Right from your time with Mercedes, you've been very data-driven. Does it help that both your drivers are of the same ilk?
There's a reason why I've surrounded myself with individuals who are built the same way I am. That goes for our drivers, our senior management and our leaders. Data has to be at the heart of what you're doing. Because if you have someone going in a different direction, you can deviate from what is good.
This is a slightly different year for development, considering the new regulations coming in next season. Will teams focus on circuit-specific development?
You're going to find an interesting debate taking place up and down the pit lane. And that debate probably is between now and June. Do we do more, do we do less? There'll be some teams like Ferrari who came out and said, 'No! We have to fix this.' Red Bull also said that not long ago. But for teams like ourselves, our future isn't racing for 8th, 9th or 7th. Our future is racing for championships. You'll see we're making sacrifices for the next few years to bring ourselves to where we need to be.
Cut to the chase: Sainz and Albon battle it out at the Saudi Arabian GP. | Photo Credit: Getty Images
When the cost cap rule was brought in, you explained how Williams was behind the leaders in capital expenditure, leaving you short on machinery and software. Two years on, are you better placed?
Yes, I was able to get us USD 20 million more, but by the time we finished the meeting, I think it was all spent. The rules are changing in 2026. You can spend whatever you want on capital expenditure, but you have to pay for the depreciation in your annual operating cap.
The 20 million allowed us to do the short-term bits that were needed, and the remainder will be done in conjunction with those rules.
An interesting topic came up in the press conferences in Saudi Arabia, about the V8 and V10 engines being brought back. What is your take on it? Is that the direction F1 should take?
Let's race with the rules that we've spent three years and hundreds of millions of dollars developing. After we've been racing for some time, let's take an honest step back. Are we doing the right thing for the sport, for the world?
I love the sound of the old V10s and V8s, but we also have to be honest with ourselves. I think what we are asking for is, let's make sure we have a tone to the engine — a sound that has emotion to it.
Both drivers have mentioned a fundamental issue affecting performance, which is a characteristic of the Williams car in itself. How difficult is it to handle an issue related to the structure?
The important thing is an open, honest discussion about what the real problems are, to make sure that we are not taking them into future cars. It's a problem that has been here for many years.
Though we've made improvements between 2023–24 and 2024–25, it's nowhere near the level of the top three teams. We need a bigger change to improve it considerably — and that's what Carlos and Alex are bringing to the party.
F1 requires fast cars to win championships. But how important is the team behind it? How much does the backroom staff influence a team?
Everything is about people and culture. People create your systems, processes and communications. The fast car is just an output from a thousand people working well together. I am not the reason why this team will be successful. My job is just to bring the right people together. If you don't have a set of people pointing the right way, the team will not win a world championship. Every single person matters.
Related Topics
Williams /
Formula One
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Novak Djokovic's new challenger: The lefty Brit who dares to break the King's clay reign
Cameron Norrie, the British left-hander known for his relentless baseline play, has been making waves at the 2025 French Open. After a challenging 2024 season marred by a torn biceps and a drop in rankings, Norrie has rediscovered his form and passion for the game. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His journey to the fourth round at Roland Garros has been marked by significant victories. Norrie stunned former world No. 1 Daniil Medvedev in a five-set thriller, marking his first win over the Russian in five attempts. He then dispatched Federico Gomez in straight sets and overcame fellow Brit Jacob Fearnley, despite external distractions from nearby fireworks. Djokovic's Milestone March , the 24-time Grand Slam champion, continues to etch his name into the history books. Fresh off his 100th career ATP title at the Geneva Open, Djokovic is now eyeing his 100th match win at Roland Garros—a feat only Rafael Nadal has At 38, Djokovic remains a formidable force. His straight-sets victory over Filip Misolic in the third round showcased his enduring dominance on clay The Anticipated Showdown Norrie and Djokovic are set to clash in the fourth round, a rematch of their 2022 Wimbledon semi-final. While Djokovic holds a 5-0 record over Norrie, the Brit's recent form suggests a more competitive encounter. Norrie acknowledges the challenge ahead: "I need to step up and bring my best game against Novak." With renewed confidence and a series of impressive wins, Norrie aims to test Djokovic's quest for another milestone. Norrie vs. Djokovic: What's at Stake For Djokovic, a win would not only mark his 100th victory at Roland Garros but also keep him on track for a record-extending 25th Grand Slam title. For Norrie, it's an opportunity to cement his comeback and make a deep run in a major tournament. As the tennis world watches, this clash promises high-quality rallies, strategic play, and a test of resilience. Whether the seasoned champion or the resurgent challenger prevails, fans are in for a treat.


India Gazette
25 minutes ago
- India Gazette
India and China are promising alternatives for investment, says Mirae Asset VC
ANI 02 Jun 2025, 12:10 GMT+10 New Delhi [India], June 2 (ANI): India and China emerge as promising alternatives for investments, said Mirae Asset Securities Vice Chairman Heo Sun-ho while speaking at a global asset allocation forum in Seoul on Thursday, reports Korea Herald. With the return of US President Donald Trump to the Oval Office, crack seems to emerge 'in the US-centered investment landscape'. Speaking at the summit hosted by Mirae Asset, Heo-Sin-ho said the over-dependence on the US as its primary growth engine needs to be re-examined. 'The recent depreciation of the US dollar reflects weakening global confidence, spurred by growing nationalism and ballooning fiscal deficits,' Heo said, urging investors to pivot from a US-centric strategy and realign their portfolios with the shifting global innovation vice chairman mentioned that India is emerging as a vast consumer market, driven by robust digital infrastructure and a rapidly expanding to Heo Sun-ho, 'Innovative technology that once fuelled US growth is no longer its exclusive domain.'He also cited how Chinese AI Startup, DeepSeek positioning itself as a challenger to OpenAI, alongside Chinese automobile company BYD which in April overtook Tesla in the European electric vehicle market for the first to the director and head of Asia Pacific Research at Mirae Asset Hong Kong, policy shifts in China are also creating a more favourable environment for foreign investors. He also echoed the call for a diversified investment South Korean exports to US were down 8.1 per cent for the month of May, as compared to same month last year, weighed down by the US President Donald Trump's tariff, as it took a toll on automobile supplier Foxconn is set to invest USD 1.5 billion in its India unit, Reuters reported, citing a company filing. (ANI)
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China accuses US of violating trade truce over chip curbs, vows retaliation
China has accused the United States of breaching the terms of a recent trade agreement, escalating tensions between the world's two largest economies just weeks after a temporary truce brought hope for renewed dialogue. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Monday issued a statement rejecting US President Donald Trump's claims that Beijing had violated the trade consensus reached in Geneva last month. The ministry denounced a series of fresh US trade measures as "discriminatory", warning that China would take "resolute and forceful measures" to protect its interests if the US continued on its current path. Beijing cited Washington's unilateral actions, including new export restrictions on advanced AI chip technologies and chip design software, as well as the revocation of Chinese student visas, as evidence of the US breaching the agreement. The ministry also referenced an earlier understanding between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on January 17, suggesting the latest US moves violated that accord as well. 'If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,' the ministry said. Trump accuses China of trade violations, threatens fresh tariffs On Friday, Trump claimed via a post on his Truth Social platform that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US", accusing Beijing of backsliding on its trade promises without specifying details. Trump declared the US would double tariffs on both steel and aluminium imports from China, to 50 per cent from 25 per cent, beginning next week. Although China is the world's largest steel exporter, it has sent minimal volumes to the US since Trump imposed 25 per cent tariffs in 2018. However, China is currently the third-largest supplier of aluminium to the US. Trump also alleged that the temporary May deal to ease triple-digit tariffs for 90 days had been made to save China from what he called 'a devastating situation' of factory shutdowns and civil unrest. The brief tariff rollback, hailed by markets at the time, had reduced the effective US tariff rate to the mid-teens, down from around 25 per cent earlier this year. Did China violate US trade agreement? While Trump did not specify how China had allegedly violated the trade agreement made in Geneva, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer accused China of failing to accelerate exports of critical minerals essential for advanced electronics. Greer told CNBC that China was 'slow-rolling their compliance', calling Beijing's approach 'completely unacceptable'. He added that the US would need to address the issue, though he did not elaborate on what actions may be taken. The Geneva agreement in mid-May included a 90-day pause on sweeping tariffs. Are US-China trade talks in limbo again? Earlier last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged that talks with China were 'a bit stalled' and indicated that direct intervention from both Trump and Xi might be necessary to break the deadlock. 'Getting a deal over the finish line will likely need the direct involvement of Trump and Xi,' he said in an interview with Fox News. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett had also earlier said a phone call between the leaders was likely this week, but no confirmation has come from Beijing. Despite the rising political rhetoric, US stock markets ended last week relatively flat. Trump's renewed complaints came just two days after he was reportedly angered by a journalist's reference to Wall Street's new acronym 'TACO', short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out', used to describe expectations that he will ultimately soften on aggressive trade actions.