
The Liberal party's appointment of Sussan Ley is an historic moment – but not the one that matters
In 2018, Scott Morrison addressed the Liberal party room with an evangelical Trumpian fervour. Having just blown up Malcolm Turnbull's government to become Liberal leader and prime minister ahead of Peter Dutton and Julie Bishop, he seemed oblivious to the bloodshed he had just caused.
He pointed to the framed photographs of previous Liberal leaders and prime ministers and said, in what I'm sure he thought was a Churchillian tone: 'One day there will be a woman there.' The room was glum with silence, pierced only by Bishop's quiet quip. In which century?
That day marked the beginning of the Morrison and Dutton show. Women centrists such as Bishop, Kelly O'Dwyer and me jumped ship. Kerryn Phelps won Turnbull's seat of Wentworth and Zali Steggall won Tony Abbott's seat of Warringah in 2019, the same year as Morrison's 'miracle' win. In the 2022 election, six women – business leaders, lawyers and doctors among them – pushed men out of 'blue ribbon' seats that had been held by Liberal party since last century.
A slow but steady trail of destruction continued. The reactionary right, emboldened by Trump 1.0, and later Trump's second coming, has continued to flavour their talking points accordingly and develop copycat policies. They consoled climate deniers with a Gina Rinehart-friendly pro-nuclear stance, and reinforced their antiquated attitude to women by preselecting more men, and temporarily telling men and women that they would have to ditch working from home and return to the office.
Women voters deserted the Liberal party in 2022 and fled it again in 2025 – to the Labor party and teal independents.
The Liberals have finally appointed a women, Sussan Ley, as leader. Their excited declaration that this was an important moment in history – Ley is the first woman the party has appointed in its 80 years – contains the subtle implication that the appointment will fix their deep-seated dysfunctional woes and make up for a shocking electoral defeat.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The more significant historic moment, which the Liberal Party would prefer we not see, is that the 48th Australian parliament will include a record-breaking number of women and that about 50 of them are likely to be Labor MPs, compared with only about seven Liberals. Added to that number are the five women teal independents who held their seats in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth. The Liberals say they are 'the sort of women' who should be in the Liberal party while remaining oblivious to the fact that literally millions of women have demonstrated they wouldn't go anywhere near the Liberal Party – because they are women who care about the climate, about health and education and about the economy for future generations and who share the values of integrity, respect and equality.
After the 2022 election, Ley, as deputy leader of the party and shadow minister for women, often said she was ''alking with women', going on a 'listening tour', and that the party wanted to win back the urban seats lost to the six female teals. During this time, a 60-page post-election review of the Liberal party unsurprisingly found that a decline in support from female voters was an important factor in the loss. After this year's emphatic loss, it appears the review went unheeded; basic things such as the Liberal party's intransigent resistance to quotas remained and the community independents movement grew.
As Ley takes up the leadership, she has vowed to lead from the 'sensible centre'. But how exactly? The Liberals came out of this election beholden to the National party and remain underpinned by a Trumpian support base. They went into this election preferencing One Nation and Family First in electorates across the country – parties with longstanding positions against equality, abortion, LGBTQI+ rights, multiculturalism and renewable energy. There does not appear to be anything remotely 'sensible' or 'centrist' left in that party room, especially when it comes to the issue of women.
It's going to take more than the appointment of a female leader declaring a 'new narrative', and a 'fresh approach' to rebuild the party.
Words alone don't cut it with the Australian people.
Ley declared that her appointment sends a signal to Australian women. But does the party really believe Ley's appointment is going to fix the deeply dysfunctional and embedded problems the Liberals face?
Ley's picture will be hung on the wall with former Liberal leaders, but much more needs to be done to ensure it's not perched on one of the biggest glass cliffs in Australian history.
The most profound and meaningful signal has already been sent, and it is not the one the Liberal party sent by appointing its first female leader. It's the one the Australian people sent on 3 May.
Julia Banks is an author, leadership consultant, keynote speaker, lawyer, and former Liberal and Independent MP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Watch: TV reporter shot in leg by LA police
An Australian journalist was shot by Los Angeles police with a rubber bullet as she covered the protests against immigration raids in the city. In the middle of a live broadcast, a police officer appeared to aim and shoot from close range at Lauren Tomasi, the US correspondent for Nine News, with a non-lethal live round during the third day of the unrest. On Sunday, the demonstrations against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown intensified as the LAPD and National Guard clashed with large crowds. Standing near a police barricade, Tomasi told the camera: 'After hours of standing off, this situation has now rapidly deteriorated, the LAPD moving in on horseback, firing rubber bullets at protesters, moving them on through the heart of LA.' Seconds later, she was shot with a rubber bullet. The footage, posted online by Nine, shows an officer lift a gun and fire in the direction of the journalist and her camera operator. Tomasi screams out in pain and grabs her calf as a man's voice then yells: 'You just f---ing shot the reporter!' Asked if she was OK, the reporter replies: 'I'm good, I'm good.' In a statement on Monday, Nine said: 'Lauren Tomasi was struck by a rubber bullet. Lauren and her camera operator are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events. 'This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the front lines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information,' the network told The Guardian. Tomasi was reporting close to the centre of the protests, which started on Friday, in down-town LA. The LAPD had advised the press to 'keep a safe distance from active operations'. Sarah Hanson-Young, an Australian lawmaker, has urged Anthony Albanese, the Australian prime minister, to raise the incident with the US president, describing it as 'shocking' and 'completely unacceptable'. The incident came shortly after Nick Stern, a British news photographer, underwent emergency surgery after being hit by a rubber bullet while covering the protests in Paramount, a city in LA county. 'My initial concern was, were they firing live rounds?' he told the PA news agency, describing how protestors carried him to safety as blood poured down his leg. 'I intend, as soon as I am well enough, to get back out there,' he added. The large-scale protests, which were triggered by a wave of immigration raids in the city, escalated on Sunday after Mr Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops onto the streets. The White House said the move was 'essential', but Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, condemned their deployment as 'purposefully inflammatory'. Tens of thousands joined the protests over the weekend, blocking off a major motorway and setting cars on fire as the authorities used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. By Sunday evening, protesters had dispersed as police declared an unlawful assembly, a move that comes ahead of officers moving in to make arrests of those who do not leave.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Chaos erupts outside Anthony Albanese's office as pro-Palestine demonstrators demand action after Greta Thunberg was detained by Israeli forces
Dozens of protesters have descended on Anthony Albanese 's electorate office to demand action after Greta Thunberg 's 'Freedom Flotilla' was seized by Israeli defence forces. More to come.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
New details emerge about Anthony Albanese's super tax and the bold move to win over supporters
Labor's new plan to tax superannuation balances above $3million will reportedly allow people to pay the charge from their super funds, rather than having to sell assets to cover the costs. The federal government wants to impose an extra 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances above $3 million, bringing the total tax rate to 30 per cent for those in that bracket. The proposal has sparked criticism for including unrealised capital gains, meaning that assets that have increased in value, such as property or shares, could also be taxed even before they're accessed. There were fears this could force self-managed super funds to sell assets like properties and shares to avoid being slugged. But Sky News Australia reports that individuals in that tax bracket could pay the levy out of their super balances, rather than being forced to sell assets. This mirrors existing arrangements for people who are already taxed more on earnings above $250,000. Treasurer Jim Chalmers reportedly believes the fact that people can pay the tax out of their super should quieten critics who claim people will be forced to offload assets to pay for it. The Coalition confirmed last week it would consider voting in favour of Labor's policy to raise taxes if it scrapped the unrealised gains element and indexed the $3million threshold. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers dropped a major hint that he will not negotiate with the Opposition as the government does not need the Opposition's approval as it has the numbers to get any bill through the Senate with the help of the Greens. Dr Chalmers told 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson the government would prefer to deal with the Greens than the Coalition. 'I'm not convinced that they're fair dinkum when it comes to making superannuation tax concessions a little bit fairer, and I think my opposite number has made that clear that they're not interested in that,' he said. 'We'll obviously have discussions with other parties in the Senate to do what we can to pass that legislation.' This refusal to negotiate with the Opposition was made despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week saying the government would negotiate with the Coalition over super policy. 'We do not have a majority in the Senate; we obviously work with different parties,' the Albanese said. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it needs the support of 10 other senators to get any legislation passed through the upper house. The Greens are enthusiastic about the proposed tax, and in fact want it to kick it on balances of $2million and above, not $3million. Crossbencher senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie last year refused to support Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains, meaning the government could only rely on the Greens in the Senate. Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien this week said the Coalition would be open to negotiating with the government on super provided it dropped plans to tax unrealised gains and indexed the $3million threshold. 'When it comes to all policies, including this one, the Coalition will always be open however that doesn't mean a blank cheque,' he told Sky News. 'If indeed, Jim Chalmers wants to come and have a discussion with the Coalition about his super tax, he would have to firstly walk away from the unrealised capital gains component, at least. 'He should be compromising on indexation. Now, if he caves in on all of those things and wants to talk about super reform, let's have a chat about super reform.' Accountants argue taxing unrealised gains would stop self-managed super funds from investing in assets that can quickly appreciate in value, such as technology start-ups; starving that sector of funds. Concerns have also been raised about Labor's decision no to index the proposed $3 million tax threshold to inflation. This means that far more people will be pushed into that tax bracket in future. , even if compulsory employer super contributions stayed constant. They are rising to 12 per cent on July 1, up from 11.5 per cent.