Free phone? The hidden cost of tempting offers
Bob Atkisson reached out to 7NEWS, struggling to get answers on why his free phone offer that he got with a trade-in over the holidays appears to have raised his bill over the last few months.
'I specifically said to the person on the phone, I said, now just to make sure this will not cost me anything monthly, my bill will not go up. And she said no, as a matter of fact, it's going to go down,' Atkisson said.
The Greenwood man had seen a commercial offering an 'Apple 16 pro with Apple intelligence on us.'
But he told 7NEWS, after he saw his monthly bills, the offer he thought he was getting didn't add up.
'It actually shows that I've paid more money,' he said, confused.
We'll get back to Atkisson, but 60 miles north, Leon Wiles saw the same commercial and ran into the very same bill shock.
'It was twice as much as what they explained to me…I was shocked, I was totally blown away,' Wiles said.
He was even more shocked to see the bill he received after he sent back the two new phones, a charge for more than $1800.
In a statement, a Verizon Spokesperson told 7NEWS, 'We advise customers to carefully verify that any promotions they intend to use are indeed compatible with their selected service plan. It is crucial to understand the terms and conditions of both the plan and the promotion to ensure eligibility and avoid potential issues.'
Edgar Dworsky, Founder of ConsumerWorld.org, warns that free phone offers can lock you into higher payment plans for years.'Sometimes you wind up being put into a premium plan. I'm just shocked these days when I see $60/$70/$80 a month for one line? Are they kidding at the big carriers?'Dworsky's advice, seek out plans for closer to $25 a month. They're actually offered by major carriers like Verizon and AT&T through their pre-paid service, and they generally have ample data.For instance, AT&T has an unlimited talk, text and data pre-paid plan for $25 a month, if you pay for a year upfront ($300). In addition to pre-paid plans, you could also use a Mobile Virtual Network Operator, which resells service under much cheaper brands, though they may have more usage restrictions.
Another way to potentially save money is to look into selling your old phone outright instead of trading it in.
Many online sites typically offer more than your carrier, and you'll get cash, which means you are not locked into a lengthy plan.
Sites like Swappa, Decluttr and Gazelle specialize in electronic resale, and are generally trusted in the industry because they verify the used phones they sell are what they say they are.
Or if you want cash in hand, sell your old phone at brick-and-mortar stores like Fix Phone.
The manager of Fix Phone in Greenville, Adam Komilov, warned that when it comes to buying used phones that do not come directly from the manufacturer, do your research on third-party sellers.
'We have a lot of customers that spend like $1000 to buy an iPhone 16, brand new phone, but when they turn it on and check it out, it's an Android phone inside and they find out that they've been scammed,' he said.
Komilov also warned, sometimes people buy phones from third-party sites and social media, and end up with a stolen phone that the original user has locked, which means the phone won't work.
Back at Atkisson's home, 7NEWS helped connect him with a Verizon rep that settled his billing issue, so he's now back to paying about $240 for four lines, and is comfortable with a credit they gave him for his used phones.
Still, he's locked into 36 months of payments, so let's do the math on what he could be saving if he had switched plans to a prepaid one.
He would have had to buy the phones directly from Apple for $1600, offset by selling his old iPhone 13 Max Pro and iPhone 11 for an estimated $600.
But even with the net $1000 expense, if he had switched his plan to a prepaid unlimited for $25 per phone line, he has 4 lines, he would save $140 each month. In 36 months, he'd have $4,400 extra dollars plus two paid-off phones.
Wiles warned that his bill arrived just after Verizon's 30-day return policy ended. And he got nowhere, until he contacted 7NEWS, we reached out to Verizon and his $1800 bill was dropped.
'It was just spiraling. So, when I contacted you, I immediately got a positive response and affirmative response and I hadn't gotten that before. So whatever your magic was, it made a tremendous difference,' Wiles said to our 7NEWS Here to Help crew.
The moral of the story, be sure you get in writing exactly what your charges will be including taxes and fees for any 'free phone,' and if you're paying more than 25 to 35 dollars a line, know there are other plan options, some even unlimited, that could drastically lower your bill.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jury orders Elon Musk's Tesla to pay massive sum for fatal crash allegedly caused by Autopilot: 'Will send shock waves to others in the industry'
A federal jury has determined that Tesla "bore significant responsibility" for a deadly crash in Florida involving Autopilot, an advanced driver assist system intended to reduce driver workload and traffic collisions, as reported by the Associated Press. The ruling comes as Tesla grapples with lagging sales, declining revenue, volatile stocks, damaged brand trust, and eroding consumer loyalty, with CEO Elon Musk's polarizing politics and public disputes playing a role in these struggles. What's happening? A Miami jury ordered Tesla to pay more than $240 million to the victims of a 2019 crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. According to the AP, the jury ruled that because its Autopilot failed, Tesla was partially responsible for the crash even though driver George McGee was distracted by his cellphone. Brett Schreiber, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, argued that Tesla misleads drivers to believe its Autopilot is more capable of handling road situations than it is because other automakers use terms like "driver assist" and "copilot" to prevent overreliance on similar technologies. "Words matter," Schreiber said. "And if someone is playing fast and loose with words, they're playing fast and loose with information and facts." Why is this news worrying for Tesla? Teslas are generally among the safest cars around and offer long-term environmental perks and cost savings on energy and maintenance, like other electric vehicles. However, like any vehicle, they aren't perfect. The jury's verdict could further erode consumer trust in the brand at a time when Tesla is pivoting to AI and robotics to boost profitability. Already, Tesla's fight to keep crash data involving its Autopilot and Full-Self Driving systems private has raised eyebrows. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also opened multiple investigations into the automaker after crashes involving several of its autonomous features. Do you think a majority of Americans will have EVs in 20 years? Absolutely Only in some states No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. In the latest case, the families of Leon and Angulo alleged Tesla lost or hid crucial evidence — a claim Tesla disputed as an honest mistake after evidence came to light, according to the AP. While similar cases against Tesla have previously been dismissed or settled out of court, the jury's $240 million verdict could set a precedent. "It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry," Wedbush Securities financial analyst Dan Ives said. "This will open the floodgates," added car crash attorney Miguel Custodio, who wasn't involved with the federal case. "It will embolden a lot of people to come to court." What are Tesla's next steps? Lead defense attorney Joel Smith said Tesla warns drivers that it is their responsibility to stay alert and be ready to take over when using its Autopilot and FSD features, putting the blame on McGee for being distracted after dropping his cellphone, per the AP. For its part, Tesla said in a statement to the AP that it will appeal the jury's decision. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology," Tesla said. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio

Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
The White House just joined TikTok a month before it's set to be banned (again)
A lot can change in a year — just ask TikTok. Last year, the US government took the extraordinary step of voting to ban the popular app used by millions of Americans, citing national security concerns. On Tuesday, the White House became its latest user. The White House TikTok account launched with a video montage of President Donald Trump narrated by the man himself. "Every day I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation," Trump says over images of him with UFC head Dana White, law enforcement officers, and American workers. "I am your voice!" The account's second post featured various shots of the White House during different seasons. The White House joined the app less than a month before it's set to be banned in the US on September 17 unless it's sold to a US buyer, though that deadline has already been extended several times. "The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said in a statement to Business Insider. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before." The White House did not respond to questions about whether the divest-or-ban deadline would be extended again or if a deal was expected by the deadline. Lawmakers in April 2024 voted to ban TikTok unless its China-based parent company, ByteDance, sold its American assets. Some officials cited concerns that sensitive data belonging to American users could end up in the hands of the Chinese government, and members of Congress have said it could be used for Chinese Communist Party propaganda. TikTok has said it does not share data with the Chinese government. The TikTok divest-or-ban law, signed by President Joe Biden last year, gave TikTok until January 19 to sell or risk shutting down. The app briefly went dark that day for US-based users before coming back online, with TikTok crediting Trump for its return. The White House has said the president does not want TikTok to go dark and prefers it be sold. Trump has delayed the divest-or-ban deadline three times since taking office in January. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC last month that TikTok will go dark again unless China agrees to a deal that will give Americans control over the app. "We've made the decision. You can't have Chinese control and have something on 100 million American phones," Lutnick said, adding that China's decision would be coming "very soon."


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
AT&T plans to replace legacy copper network in California finds resistance from landline holdouts
AT&T is pushing to get rid of its legacy copper landline services and instead replace them with advanced fiber optic networks. But not everyone is on board with getting rid of their landline. If Assembly Bill 470 passes, the company said it will implement a phased, multi-year approach to eliminate the old copper network, which a spokesperson said less than 5% of customers are currently on. AT&T is the designated carrier of last resort in many parts of the state, which means it must provide traditional landline phone service to any customer in the service territory. AB 470 would allow AT&T to request relief from its COLR obligations in certain eligible areas, where there is no population or areas served by multiple fiber optic or wireless providers with comparable service prices. "No customer will be left without access to voice or 911 service. We're committed to working with state leaders and community members on policies that create a thoughtful transition to bring more reliable, modern communications to all Californians," Susan Santana, president of AT&T California, said in an email to CBS News Bay Area. "We're the largest and fastest growing fiber provider in the nation and continue to invest to bring reliable, high-speed connectivity to our customers across the state. This bill also includes a requirement to build fiber to additional residential locations across California." For at least one Berkeley woman, however, there is more at stake in this landline battle. "This landline phone is my lifeline," author Cynthia Larson told CBS News Bay Area. "I absolutely need it. This is the way I would get notification, whether it's time to evacuate or if it's just high winds and we're okay, there's a big difference." Larson, who does not own a cellphone, says she needs her landline to inform her of fire danger in her area. "Rolling power shutoff, because they sometimes do those shutoffs for the utilities to be fire safe in high wind situations," she said. "And so whenever that is happening, I rely upon my landline to find out what's going on outside of my area." Larson said having a beeper at her IT several years ago put her off from ever purchasing a cellphone for herself. "There's no way that I wanted to be on call to anyone, answering anything that rings," Larson said. "Because it just makes me jump out of my skin. They would be calling at all the worst times." And so she would use her landline or the internet to communicate with her loved ones. "I'm not against technology, but I recognize it should be a partner and a friend," Larson said. "Not something we should give our brains and minds away to." But now, her lifeline, the AT&T copper services landline, is in jeopardy. State Assemblymember Tina McKinnor penned the carriers of last resort bill. The Public Utilities Commission rejected a similar proposal last year, but this year the legislation is now headed to the Senate Appropriations Committee for a vote on August 29. "Nobody will be without phone service, 99.9% of Californians will have phone service," McKinnor told CBS News Bay Area. "They have to have three other services. Two wireless and one hardline service, which is a [Voice over Internet Protocol]. If you don't have that in your area, they can't pull out, and you'll just keep your copper lines. But if you have that, we'll be able to go into certain areas, pull out those copper lines and put in fiber optics." She added, "In the next 10 to 15 years, copper will be obsolete. No one will have a home phone anymore. So we'll still need to do those upgrades in those areas that we didn't do in this round." Utility watchdog groups say, however, the bill would impact about 1.5 million Californians who rely on copper services, especially when cell service is down. "It wants to be able to turn out the lights and walk away from serving areas that it thinks that are not as profitable as others," Regina Costa, the telecommunications policy director of The Utility Reform Network, told CBS News Bay Area. "In a major power outage that happens during a disaster like an earthquake or when the power's shut off during the fire, those lines continue to work. They do not need electricity from PG&E in order to keep functioning." "If you only have a wireless phone, you're not going to have service. You will not be able to call 911, you will not be able to get emergency alerts," Costa added. "Because if you're in a place where the power is out and there's a wildfire and people are not getting the information because the networks are down, that house might be the only one getting those alerts." Meanwhile, the Californians for a Connected Future coalition fully supports the legislation. "Assembly Bill 470 includes a careful, phased-in, multi-year approach that protects all Californians during the transition to a next-generation communications network. Importantly, AB 470 includes a number of consumer protections to ensure that no one is left without reliable communications service and is an infrastructure investment bill that includes an aggressive buildout requirement that is unmatched in scale," a spokesperson told CBS News Bay Area. "That's why such a broad and diverse coalition of Tribal leaders, social justice advocates, veterans, ethnic businesses, education, youth, community and non-profit organizations supports AB 470. The bill outlines a responsible, balanced approach to expanding California's broadband network and accelerating investments in communication technologies that will strengthen connectivity and prepare California for the future. Larson, however, said she is concerned about the reliability of these new services in areas that already have spotty connections. "The issue with the cell service is that it's not that reliable inside the house, and not even outside the house," Larson said. "So, for example, sometimes my family or friends, they need to go outside on the porch to use the phone." She said she hopes that AT&T will answer their call to continue offering copper services to longtime customers like her. "They know what they're doing and they're maintaining the copper wires for landline networks and giving us reliable phone services that so many of us depend upon," Larson said. "Do we really have something that's equal or better than copper landlines in these emergency situations?"