
How AI Could Reshape Global Education — And What Comes After
AI is changing how students learn worldwide. But gaps in policy, teacher support and access could ... More leave millions behind.
Artificial intelligence could be moving from an optional add-on in educational institutions to being an integral part of how students learn. That's, at least, what developments like Ohio State University's decision to roll out AI-fluency modules across its undergraduate programs by autumn of 2025 suggest. And it's not an isolated development. Back in October, 2024, California passed a bill mandating schools to incorporate AI literacy into their curricula.
In April of 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that aims at ensuring America's youth are provided with 'opportunities to cultivate the skills and understanding necessary to use and create the next generation of AI technology.' This order came just after China mandated AI education for all primary and secondary students across the country, starting this fall.
Without a doubt, AI's potential has drawn attention from educators, policymakers and entrepreneurs alike. And as Waqas Suhail — cofounder and CEO of DaMeta1, who has worked closely with public and private institutions deploying intelligent learning systems — put it, 'we're entering a phase where AI in education is less about novelty but more about infrastructure and becoming part of the system itself — quietly, quickly and unevenly.'
While ethical questions about how these tools are being used continue to be asked and bubbles of hype are already bursting, the major trends suggest that this technology is disrupting things dramatically, even in education.
From Hype To Reality
Suhail believes that the most meaningful AI applications in education don't just automate but adapt. And that's why he argues that the true promise of AI in the global education sector is not in replacing teachers, but in augmenting their time and insight.
One example is DaMeta1's Ilmversity platform, a tool that builds virtual classrooms where AI tutors personalize lessons and provide teachers with real-time insights. Backed by accelerator programs at Microsoft and AWS, it's part of a broader wave of platforms pushing adaptive learning into the mainstream. Though the metaverse may have faded from headlines, AI-powered personalization — one of its more practical ideas — is still gaining traction in education.
DaMeta1 CEO Waqas Suhail (Middle) with the company's U.S. team
Other tools are also pushing AI-powered learning into classrooms — from Khan Academy's Khanmigo, which offers Socratic-style tutoring, to Google's LearnLM, a model trained specifically for educational dialogue. Together, these platforms are testing what personalized, AI-native education could look like.
'The best AI tools free teachers from administrative overload and give them space to do what no system can — build trust, motivate and respond to nuance,' Suhail told me. 'The future isn't AI versus teachers; it's AI with teachers.'
That vision is beginning to take hold. Paul Tudor Jones told Bloomberg's Open Interest that AI-powered virtual tutors could 'dramatically improve learning outcomes for low-income students, reducing educational inequality.' In the U.K., Jill Duffy of Cambridge University Press & Assessment warned in a letter published in Financial Times that AI should 'enhance, not replace, human involvement in teaching,' adding that 'instead of questioning whether students have used AI, we should ask how.'
Data also supports them. One study by Common Sense Media found that 70% of U.S. teens now use genAI tools for schoolwork. The World Economic Forum, meanwhile, projects that AI will eliminate nine million jobs by 2026, but also create eleven million. According to Suhail, that's not just a labor shift. 'It's a literacy gap in motion.'
That gap is not limited to the U.S. In the UAE, for example, public-private initiatives are underway to bring AI curriculum into public high schools by 2026, according to recent government announcements. South Korea also plans to phase in AI-powered digital textbooks for school children as young as 8, with full integration across multiple subjects by 2028.
The Race To Get It Right
Around the world, educational leaders are scrambling to keep pace. UNESCO's Education 2030 agenda urges schools to prioritize AI tools that are inclusive, equitable and human-centered. The OECD and European Commission have also introduced AILit, a framework that 'outlines the essential knowledge, skills and attitudes young people need to understand and interact with AI systems in a confident and critical manner.'
But implementation hasn't been at the same pace. Some schools have banned AI outright, while others deploy it without clear guidelines or training. Suhail, however, sees the inconsistency as both a risk and sign of progress. 'Every education system is at a different starting point. What matters now is whether we can build capacity, not just technology,' he noted. 'You can't solve an institutional problem with a software patch.'
That warning resonates with education leaders who caution against tech overreach. 'Too much tech risks sidelining teachers, who should instead focus on nurturing learning and curiosity,' Duffy said.
Still, the global race is underway — not just to adopt AI, but to do so responsibly. From how teachers are trained to how students are evaluated, countries are rethinking what learning should look like in an AI-native world.
What Comes After
The challenge now isn't just about who has access to AI, but also about how it's taught and who gets left behind if systems fail to adapt. Suhail believes that we have a rare window right now to shape how AI is used in education. That means investing not just in platforms but in people, policies and purpose.
AI literacy mandates across the world and the rise of AI-first learning tools undoubtedly mark a structural shift in global education, where learning is entering an AI-native era. But as experts note, adoption alone doesn't equal progress. What matters is who gets to benefit, how equitably tools are deployed and whether they actually deliver better outcomes.
'The question isn't whether AI is coming to schools. It already has,' Suhail said. 'The question now is whether we're building systems that serve all learners — or just some of them.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Canada's Digital Services Tax Stays in Place Despite G-7 Deal
Canada is proceeding with its digital services tax on technology companies such as Meta Platforms Inc. despite a Group of Seven agreement that resulted in removing the Section 899 'revenge tax' proposal from US President Donald Trump's tax bill. The first payment for Canada's digital tax is still due Monday, the country's Finance Department confirmed, and covers revenue retroactively to 2022. The tax is 3% of the digital services revenue a firm makes from Canadian users above C$20 million ($14.6 million) in a calendar year.


Washington Post
41 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump Mobile's phone service actually exists and it works
When President Donald Trump's family business announced its new wireless company early last week, I was stuck in customer purgatory that made me doubt it was real. I now have personal proof that Trump Mobile's wireless service exists and it's fine. In my testing, it's basically T-Mobile with a Trump-branded sheen. There are more questions about Trump Mobile's promised T1 smartphone. The company's website has altered its language about some phone details, including dropping that it's 'made in the USA.' A Trump Mobile spokesman told me that the company has facilities in the United States to put together the T1 phone, and that it's looking at a late summer launch. Mostly, my Trump Mobile experience offers a guide to test-driving alternatives to America's big three mobile behemoths of AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon. A new analysis suggests that switching to an alternative — though maybe not Trump Mobile — could save you hundreds of dollars a year. It's easier than ever to flirt with other phone carriers without divorcing your current one. Many newer smartphones have the option of 'eSIMs,' or virtual instructions to communicate with a wireless carrier. With an eSIM, you can almost instantly turn on a mobile carrier's service in addition to the one you're already using. The secondary option will have a different phone number. That's how I got started with Trump Mobile, but you can try it for most other carriers. After three days of limbo when I couldn't turn on the Trump Mobile service I was charged for, I finally got a customer service email with a QR code and instructions to activate the mobile service via an eSIM on my iPhone 13 Mini. (For iPhones, eSIMs are typically available for models from 2018 onward. Many Samsung and other Android phones let you use eSIMs, too.) With a couple of taps, I turned on Trump Mobile and temporarily turned off the current Verizon service. For now, that means I would pay for both. Trump Mobile charged $64.70 a month including unspecified fees, which likely makes it among the most expensive alternative providers. Next I used two apps, from Ookla and Opensignal, to track the wireless internet speeds I was getting from Trump Mobile at home, my office and around New York City. To compare, I tapped off the Trump Mobile service on my phone, turned Verizon back on and re-ran the speed tests. The mobile data speeds were often as good or better than what I was seeing when my iPhone was connected to Verizon, though occasionally much worse. Your mileage may vary. Based on my tests for the past week, Trump Mobile works fine for me. That shouldn't be surprising. Alternative providers like Trump Mobile, Mint Mobile, U.S. Mobile and the cable-and-internet companies Xfinity and Spectrum pay to use the big three carriers' networks. Trump Mobile appears to use the T-Mobile network. (The Trump Mobile spokesman said customers have a choice of the big three networks. I wasn't given that option.) If you have a good experience with T-Mobile where you live, that suggests you could also have good coverage with Trump Mobile or other carriers that use T-Mobile's network like Mint, Google Fi and Ting. Stephen Brodeur, a mobile industry expert with the wireless price comparison site Navi, told me that real-world test-drives of a mobile provider, as I'm doing with Trump Mobile, is the best way to know if it will work well for you. Brodeur also said trying phone calls is essential to stress test a mobile provider. If you decide to switch to an alternative wireless provider, you have the legal right to transfer your mobile number. You might need to pay off your smartphone if your current bill includes monthly device payments. The cost savings of switching can be huge. For example, if you have one phone line on Verizon's $72-a-month Unlimited Welcome plan and upgrade to a free iPhone 16, Navi calculates that you'd pay about $2,574 over three years. If you switched to a comparable Spectrum Mobile plan, you'd pay nearly full price for the iPhone 16 from the carrier, but your monthly bill would be $30 at most. Over three years, Navi calculates you'll save about $1,200. Phone plans aren't directly comparable. They might have different perks like streaming subscriptions or Trump Mobile's promised telemedicine service. Ahmed Khattak, U.S. Mobile's CEO, also said some smaller alternative carriers might not have all the device features you expect such as visual voicemail. James Gray from the telecom consulting firm Graystone Strategy said that you should also consider the ease of getting customer service from mobile providers. If you prefer to walk into a store for help, that might not be an option with all the non-big three providers. In a recent survey of Consumer Reports members, though, alternative providers U.S. Mobile, Consumer Cellular and Ting were the only carriers that received top marks for customer support.


Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
The AI Education Gap: Why Schools Need Policies Now
Schools need clearer AI policies that support teachers and students. American educators have rapidly adopted AI, but a critical gap has emerged: most schools aren't teaching students how to use these powerful AI tools responsibly. Sixty percent of teachers now report using AI in their lessons, yet a stark disconnect exists between AI adoption and implementation. Survey data from the RAND American Educator Panels indicate that only 25% of teachers have integrated AI into their instruction, while 35% stated that their school has established guidelines for AI use, and 27% reported that their school has no AI rules in place. This disparity reveals a concerning pattern across U.S. K-12 education: AI tools like ChatGPT are proliferating in classrooms without the necessary guardrails or educational frameworks to maximize their potential. Teachers Adopt AI, Schools Lag Behind The numbers tell a story of individual innovation outpacing institutional planning. While three in five teachers experiment with AI tools, only one in four has moved beyond casual use to meaningful classroom integration. Teachers describe using AI for lesson planning, generating discussion prompts, and creating differentiated materials. Some craft personalized math problems for students interested in sports statistics or business scenarios. Others use AI to translate materials for English language learners or generate reading comprehension questions at varying difficulty levels. However, this experimentation often occurs in isolation. Without formal training or institutional support, educators navigate AI implementation through trial and error. AI Policy Vacuum Creates Wild West Environment More than eight in ten schools operate without clear guidelines on when, how, or whether to use AI in educational settings. This approach leaves teachers uncertain about boundaries: The absence of guidance creates inconsistent experiences for students. AI use might be encouraged in one classroom, prohibited in another, and ignored entirely in a third—all within the same building. Missing the AI Educational Opportunity The real challenge isn't AI adoption—it's educating about AI. Schools that rush to implement tools without teaching responsible use miss a fundamental opportunity to prepare students for a technology-integrated future. Students require instruction on prompt engineering, understanding AI limitations, recognizing bias in AI-generated outputs, and maintaining academic integrity when utilizing AI assistance. These skills represent essential digital literacy for the next generation. Some forward-thinking educators have begun incorporating AI literacy into their curricula. Students learn to critically evaluate AI-generated content, understand when human expertise remains irreplaceable, and develop strategies for ethical collaboration with AI. The AI Integration Challenge Proper integration requires rethinking lesson design, assessment strategies, and learning objectives. It requires understanding how AI can enhance, rather than replace, critical thinking, creativity, and human connection in the educational process. Teachers deserve clear direction and dedicated time to master these tools effectively. Professional development cannot be a one-time workshop or brief orientation. Instead, educators deserve ongoing training that recognizes the rapidly advancing capabilities of AI. This includes practical sessions on tool selection, classroom management with AI present, and designing assignments that leverage AI strengths while developing student capabilities. Equally important is teaching students to develop discernment and ethical practices regarding the use of AI. Students must learn to critically evaluate AI-generated content, understanding when outputs may contain errors, bias, or inappropriate information. They need instruction on academic integrity boundaries—when AI assistance enhances learning versus when it undermines skill development. Successful AI integration also requires teaching students to ask better questions. The quality of AI responses depends heavily on prompt engineering skills. Students who learn to craft thoughtful, specific prompts develop stronger analytical thinking than those who rely on basic queries. Ethical considerations extend beyond cheating prevention. Students should understand AI's limitations, recognize when human expertise remains essential, and develop strategies for maintaining their own creative and critical thinking abilities while using AI as a collaborative tool. Without this foundation of discernment and ethics, AI tools risk becoming crutches rather than enhancement tools that prepare students for responsible AI use throughout their academic and professional careers. Building A Responsible AI Culture Schools that have successfully integrated AI share common characteristics: clear policies, comprehensive teacher training, and explicit instruction on responsible use. These institutions treat AI as they would any powerful educational tool—with intentionality, preparation, and ongoing evaluation. They establish guidelines that protect academic integrity while encouraging innovation. At WIT (Whatever It Takes), the educational organization I founded in 2009, we recognized early that AI adoption required proactive policy development and usage practices. This led us to create WITY, a platform that teaches AI usage with transparency and accountability. Our experience revealed how schools can effectively integrate AI tools while maintaining educational integrity. The AI Path Forward Schools can either harness AI's educational potential through thoughtful implementation or allow haphazard adoption, which can undermine learning outcomes. Three priorities emerge for educational leaders: Develop comprehensive AI policies that provide clear guidance for educators and students while remaining flexible enough to evolve with rapidly changing technology. Invest in educator training that moves beyond basic tool familiarity to pedagogical integration and ethical considerations. Develop AI literacy curricula that educate students to utilize these tools effectively, responsibly, and with a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and limitations. The 60% adoption rate demonstrates educators' recognition of AI's potential. Now, schools must catch up with policies, training, and instruction that match this technological enthusiasm with educational wisdom. Students deserve more than exposure to AI tools—they need education about how to wield them thoughtfully. The future workplace will demand these AI skills. Schools that act now to build responsible AI integration will prepare students for success. Those that don't risk leaving graduates behind in an increasingly AI-integrated world. The AI technology has arrived in classrooms. The question now is whether schools will rise to meet the educational moment.