Cross-party body seeks to tackle divisions in wake of 2024 summer riots
It has support from across the political spectrum, including the backing of Sir Keir Starmer's Government.
The group will develop a series of evidence-based recommendations for measures to build more social cohesion across the four nations.
Former Green Party leader Caroline Lucas, ex-Tory mayor of the West Midlands Sir Andy Street, and former counter-extremism tsar Dame Sara Khan are among its members.
Sir Sajid, who served in the Cabinets of David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson, said successive administrations had treated social cohesion as a 'second-tier' issue.
He said governments had responded 'only when tensions spill over and too often ignoring the root causes.'
'This commission has been established to do what governments alone cannot: take a long view, propose radical policy changes and — crucially — help forge a cross-society consensus about how we want to live together now and in the future,' Sir Sajid said.
Former veteran Labour MP for Dagenham and Rainham Mr Cruddas said the commission would seek to respond to one of 'the most pressing and persistently neglected issues' facing Britain.
He said: 'This won't be a top-down exercise. Over the next year, we'll be listening directly to people across the UK – drawing on their experiences to help shape practical, long-term answers to the forces pulling us apart.'
The commission is being facilitated by the Together Coalition founded by Brendan Cox, the husband of the Labour MP Jo Cox who was murdered by a far-right extremist.
It was established in the aftermath of a wave of violent disorder that swept across parts of the UK last summer following the Southport stabbings.
False information spread on social media about the identity of the attacker, later found to be 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, was widely seen as playing a role in fuelling the unrest.
The disturbances, which saw mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers targeted, were denounced at the time as 'far-right thuggery' by Prime Minister Sir Keir.
Although not officially Government-sponsored, the commission is being supported by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
A spokesperson for the ministry said: 'We want to put an end to community division, which is why we are driving £15 million into towns and cities across the country through the Community Recovery Fund.
'This will provide vital support to areas affected by recent unrest – such as £5.6 million for Southport to help rebuild the town.
'We are supportive of the work that the Together Coalition is undertaking, and we look forward to following the commission's progress.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour is sneaking through a wealth tax in all but name
It's impossible to overstate how dangerous this moment is for Britain. The economic choices of the chancellor this autumn will determine whether we as a country leave the door ajar, even if only slightly, for the aspirational and the affluent. The attitude of this Government, and sadly the last government to some extent, has so far has been little short of hostile. Changes to inheritance tax, a second home premium on council tax, VAT on private schools and the abolition of non-dom status are just the headline policies that make this country an increasingly barren economy for those with the temerity to be successful. After overnight reports that the Government is also considering radical reforms to council tax and stamp duty, it could be Christmas come early for Lord Kinnock and all the other Labour politicians who suffer from that most toxic of traits in British politics: the politics of envy. What is the proposal? Well, according to reports, what Labour are considering is a replacement of stamp duty and council tax with a tax on the value of a property, paid by the owner. It's not all bad, at least at face value. These proposals are based on a report by the think tank Onward, which seeks to radically reform council tax and stamp duty, two of Britain's worst, most despised taxes. The proposal is to replace the levies with a 'horizontal, proportional' property tax. Councils would levy an average rate of 0.44 per cent on homes up to the value of £500,000, with a minimum charge of £800. Revenues from this would go to local government. Above £500,000 there would be a national property tax at an annual rate between 0.54 per cent between £500,000 and £1,000,000. Above £1,000,000 it would be 0.81 per cent. These revenues would go to the national government. Confusingly, there are reports that the national property tax element would only be levied at the point of sale, although that would surely mean a loss of revenue. As part of a wholesale reform of the taxation system, these proposals are not without merit. There are reasonably sound, non-distortionary tax systems with echoes of these measures. If accompanied by, for example, the abolition of inheritance tax, capital gains tax, corporation tax, the higher rate of income tax as well as stamp duty and council tax then the introduction of a tax directly proportional to the value of a property could be a feasible measure. But as for Labour's interpretation of these proposals, there are not just questions to be asked, there are fears to be addressed. Key to Onward's proposal is that any properties that have already been charged stamp duty at the point of purchase would be exempt from the national property tax. Will this be the case with Labour's policy if it is to bring it in? Also key is that it is revenue neutral, with the aim being to reshape the system in a less distortionary way while ensuring no increase in borrowing: a sound principle. Do not bet against Labour dismissing these questions though, and using the positive headlines of abolishing stamp duty to justify a revenue-raising tax raid on the nation's wealth. Because critically, if Labour does advance these proposals, it will not be accompanied by the broader reforms to the tax system needed. Instead, what we will more likely end up with is a wealth tax in all but name. A wealth tax that allows cowardly politicians to temporarily delay the confrontation with reality they need: the fact that we simply cannot go on spending the way we are. It would also protect the Prime Minister's vulnerable left flank. And at the level that is being proposed — a tax on the value of all homes above £500,000 — this will not be a mansion tax, it will be a family home tax. It almost feels hollow to warn of the many high earners and high net wealth individuals that may end up leaving Britain under these policies if they are bungled. Because in so many cases they've already left.
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Nicola Sturgeon is still as strong a voice as ever for those in need
The interview with Kirsty Wark heard Ms Sturgeon talk on many elements in her memoirs. She spoke on narrowing the attainment gap in education, stating that is only achievable if you tackle the root causes, highlighting child poverty. READ MORE: Alex Salmond's niece speaks out after Nicola Sturgeon memoir attacks To this end she spoke of one of her main achievements while serving as First Minister that got one of the largest applauses of the day: the introduction of the Scottish Child Payment that lifted 100,000 children out of relative poverty. She condemned the Westminster Labour government for bringing forth welfare reforms and cuts that will impact on the most vulnerable. So, regardless of what road Nicola Sturgeon takes on leaving Holyrood, one thing is clear: she is still as strong a voice as ever for those in need. Catriona C Clark Falkirk
The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
Careerism and shameful self-interest are a poison in our politics
Careerism and corruption are cancers in the body politic and cause blind rage and disillusionment among the public, mass abstention in elections and increasingly desperate protest votes for the multi-millionaire, former-Tory charlatans of Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Politics has always included principled people with high ideals, devoting their time and energy to liberation from repression and exploitation. But far too many of those who pass for politicians are chancers, careerists and in some cases downright corrupt. We allegedly live in a democracy. But even the right to vote took blood, sweat, tears, deportations, jailings and hangings to achieve. It took decades of struggle by the Chartists – the first working-class party in history – trade unionists, Suffragettes and socialists to break the resistance of the land-owning and industrial capitalist classes, gradually winning concessions on voting rights, first to the middle class, then male workers and much later women workers. READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: Farcical mass arrests expose Labour's failings over Palestine Even in the 20th century, the House of Commons was still stuffed full of landowners and industrial capitalists who wandered into Parliament for a few hours in their spare time to pass laws to their own class advantage. That's why Westminster sessions don't start until the afternoon, so the landed gentry and capitalist overlords had time to attend to their business interests first. This upper-class domination of Parliament was reinforced by there being no wage for MPs until 1911. Workers couldn't afford to be elected to fight for the working class. Mass industrial movements and their reflection in the political field began to break down these class barriers. Scottish miner Keir Hardie was the first working-class Labour MP, elected in 1892. But pit-head collections in mining villages had to be held to prevent Hardie's family being evicted due to rent arrears, because in his first period as an MP he got no parliamentary wage. From the 1830s, the Chartists demanded a wage for MPs, to open the hallowed halls of Westminster to working-class men and women. With the election of several Labour MPs as the political arm of the trade union movement in the early 1900s, the British ruling class showed their cunning ability to neuter dangerous opponents. In 1911, they established an MPs' salary of £400 a year. In today's money that's £40,000. More to the point, the £400 wage put MPs on a different planet from the average worker on the average wage of £70 a year. Switching from no MPs' wage to salaries which have rocketed over the decades, the British ruling class have bought off many former fighters or simply attracted the lowest form of careerists without two clean principles to rub together. MPs are on £93,904. By comparison, MSPs might think themselves mere paupers. But with the MSPs' salary just short of £75,000 (£74,506) they live in a different world from the rest of us. How can any MSP on that money understand the problems of juggling bills, feeding your family, paying rent or mortgage and transport costs, when the average Scottish skilled worker's wage is under £35,000? How can they begin to even glimpse the realities facing single parents, pensioners, disabled people, or those on the paltry adult minimum wage of £12.21 per hour? But for many, their parliamentary salary is only the start of it. Recent research showed 83 MPs – one-in-eight of all in Westminster, including four Cabinet members – are raking in £830,000-a-year in rent from a total of 170 properties they own. Some MPs have up to nine houses and commercial properties rented out. This includes 23% of all Tory MPs and 11% of those on the Labour benches. Labour's Rushanara Ali resigned as a minister with responsibility for homelessness last month after reports that she had evicted tenants from a property she owns and immediately raised rents. Landlordism is one of the poisons in politics – payment by big businesses and lobby groups is another. Last year, Declassified UK reported that 13 out of 25 of Labour Cabinet members had received more than £300,000 from Israeli lobby groups since first being elected to Parliament. Likewise, he who pays the piper calls the tune in our NHS; Health Secretary Wes Streeting has received more than £200,000 from donors linked to private health firms. No wonder former Labour voters are deserting these openly capitalist new Tories in their millions. But the shameful careerism, cynicism and corruption of the so-called 'centrist' parties – whether openly conservative or social democratic – are also fanning the flames of the far right. Desperate, furious people often lash out at the establishment parties by giving a protest vote to Reform UK. What they don't yet grasp is that Farage's outfit is part of the same establishment. In 2009, as a member of the European Parliament which he professes should not even exist, he openly boasted that he had claimed £2 million in expenses, on top of his MEPs' salary. Now he has at least 11 side jobs, enriching himself by another £1m since becoming an MP last year. So much for his carefully nurtured, entirely false image of being 'a man of the people'. The Scottish Socialist Party's (SSP) built-in principle that our MSPs will live on the average worker's wage is unique – and non-negotiable. Not one of the parties in Holyrood is prepared to follow suit. And it must be added there is absolutely no evidence the new party proposed by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana would insist on MPs and MSPs living on a worker's wage. For all their excellent qualities, neither of them has done so as an MP. But that is what the SSP believes is even more necessary now than when we had six MSPs 20 years ago, who carried out party policy by living on a skilled worker's average wage, with legitimate expenses open to public inspection. The cancers of careerism and corruption have corroded the minds of millions more since then, driving many into despair, disillusionment, or the arms of the far right. That's why in aiming to stand SSP candidates in all eight Holyrood regions next year, every one of them will commit to being a socialist MSP on a worker's wage. No political party serious about socialist change, for the benefit of Scotland's people instead of the profits of Scotland's billionaires and millionaires, can fudge or compromise on the wage their MSPs live on. Furthermore, as well as being a here-and-now measure to make politicians accountable and incorruptible, the SSP's policy is a glimpse of a future socialist democracy; what an independent Scottish socialist republic would look like. Our goal is a Scotland with elected representatives at local, regional and national levels – and on elected boards of management in publicly owned industries, banks and services – all living on the wages of the people they represent, as a measure against privileged bureaucracy. It's a measure to cut through despair, giving hope to millions that Scotland can be entirely different, with careerism and corruption cut out of politics and the state.
