Who killed Patrice Lumumba, DR Congo's first prime minister? – DW – 06/18/2025
For more than 60 years, Juliana Lumumba has had questions. Who murdered her father? How did the Americans help? What did the United Nations do? Did they stand idly by, even though he was under their protection?
They are uncomfortable questions, political questions. And Juliana will not rest until she has answers.
"You cannot be the child of Patrice Lumumba without this impacting your life" she says.
Her gaze is composed as she looks out of the window of her house in Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Lumumba murder case could go to trial
On June 17, the Belgian federal prosecutor's office announced that it has requested that the case in connection with the assassination of Juliana's father be referred to a Brussels criminal court. It follows more than a decade of investigation.
On Congo's independence day in 1960, Patrice Lumumba spoke about the atrocities inflicted on Congolese people under Belgian colonial rule, angering King Baudouin (in white) Image: Belga/IMAGO
The Belgian state is partly responsible for the murder. A 2001 parliamentary investigation established that King Baudouin, Belgium's then-monarch, knew about the assassination plan but did nothing to stop it.
Juliana's brother Francois, the plaintiff in a 2011 complaint, accused the Belgian state of war crimes and torture, and of having been part of a conspiracy aimed at the political and physical elimination of his father.
Lumumba fought for the Congo's independence
On June 30, 1960, Patrice Lumumba freed the Congo from Belgian colonial rule and became the country's first prime minister. He promised democracy, prosperity and an end to the exploitation of Congolese minerals by foreign powers. But that never happened.
The West – in particular Belgium and the US — opposed Lumumba's plans to nationalize Congo's raw materials and his proximity with the Soviet Union in the midst of the Cold War.
On January 17, 1961, half a year after Lumumba was elected the first prime minister of a free Congo, Congolese separatists took him to the hostile province of Katanga – with Belgian and American blessing.
Lumumba and two of his aides were shot in the forest under the command of Belgian officers. The facts only came to light thanks to investigations by the likes of Belgian sociologist and writer, Ludo De Witte, whose findings were detailed in his 2003 book, "The Assassination of Lumumba."
Patrice Lumumba gives a press conference in Leopoldville in August 1960. He would be dead 5 months later at only 35. Image: AFP
Another Belgian officer, Gerard Soete, sawed the bodies in pieces and dissolved them in sulfuric acid. Two teeth were all that remained of Lumumba. Soete kept them as a trophy. Juliana learned about this on television, in a 2000 report on a German broadcaster in which Soete himself recounted the details and held the teeth into the camera. This gruesome memory still angers Juliana.
"How would you feel if they told you that your father was not only killed, buried, unburied, cut in pieces but they also took parts of his body?", she asks. "To many, he was the first prime minister of the Congo, a national hero. But for me, he's my father."
Still fighting for the truth
Years later, Juliana wrote a letter to the Belgian king demanding one of the teeth be returned. No one knows where the second one is. Soete had claimed that he had thrown it into the North Sea. He died shortly after, but later his daughter showed the golden tooth to a journalist. Ludo De Witte then sued her and Belgian authorities confiscated the remains.
Lumumba's children at the ceremony in Brussels, receiving the last remains of their father Image: Nicolas Maeterlinck/Belga/AFP
In 2022, then prime minister Alexander de Croo returned the tooth to Lumumba's children at a ceremony in Brussels and apologized – unlike King Philippe, a direct descendant of King Baudouin, who did not utter the word "sorry." He merely expressed his "deepest regrets" for the violence inflicted on the Congolese people under Belgian rule.
But apologies are not the point for Juliana.
"It's not a problem of apology. It's a problem of truth. Verité," she says. "I need to know the truth."
Growing up in exile
When her father was murdered, Juliana was just five years old. She learned of it while in exile in Egypt. A few months before Lumumba's assassination, she and her siblings were smuggled out of their house in Congo, where their father was placed under house arrest, and taken to Cairo with fake passports.
Patrice Lumumba knew he was going to die, Juliana says. He also hinted at it in his last letter to his wife.
In Cairo, Lumumba's children grew up with Mohamed Abdel Aziz Ishak, a diplomat and friend of Lumumba. But they couldn't escape their own history.
"We are a political family," says Juliana. "We came to Egypt for political reasons, hosted by President Nasser. Politics is the core of our lives, whether we like it or not."
The children also entered politics. Juliana held various ministerial posts, and her brother Francois is the leader of the Congolese National Movement, the party his father founded.
In 2022, Patrice Lumumba was finally laid to rest in a ceremony in Kinshasa Image: Samy Ntumba Shambuyi/AP Photo/picture alliance
Juliana says that she always knew that her father's assassination was political, even when she was still a child in Cairo. The news of Lumumba's death in 1961 spread quickly in the city.
"They set fire to the library of the American university and looted the Belgian embassy," she recalls. "People in the streets shouted 'Lumumba, Lumumba.'"
Guilt, accountability and colonial continuities
It wasn't until 1994, when Congo's Mobutu dictatorship was on the verge of collapse, that Juliana returned to her homeland after years in exile. This had been her father's wish.
"He told us, no matter what happens, you have to come back home. So, when it was safe for us again, we came back home, where we belong," she says.
Today, Juliana is less active in Congolese politics. She doesn't want to talk about the current situation, the conflict between the Congolese army and the rebel militia M23, or the ongoing exploitation of natural resources by Western nations, China, Rwanda, and other foreign powers.
Juliana Lumumba, the daughter of Patrice Lumumba, wants justice for her father. Image: privat
Nor does she want to speak about the potential trial in Brussels of the last living suspect who might have been complicit in her father's killing, 92-year-old Etienne Davignon.
A former top Belgian diplomat, businessman and former vice-president of the European Commission, Davignon is the last of 10 Belgians who were accused of involvement in the murder in the 2011 lawsuit filed by the Lumumba children.
With little progress in over six decades, Juliana is losing hope that someone will finally face justice for her father's death.
"No one has been held accountable. No Belgian, no European, no Congolese. No white, no Black. Everybody agrees that there was an assassination. There is a crime. But nobody has done it," she says.
On July 2, 2025, Patrice Lumumba would have been 100 years old.
Edited by Stuart Braun
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
5 hours ago
- DW
Trump's new executive order threatens US scientific freedom – DW – 08/11/2025
A new executive order grants Trump appointees authority over all US federal research funding. Critics say the order is an authoritarian assault on science. The US position as a global leader in science has long hinged on its research freedom and independence from political interference. A new executive order signed by US President Donald Trump on August 7 now threatens to overturn this paradigm. The executive order, titled "", grants political appointees sweeping authority over all federal grant funding. If implemented, political appointees — not scientists — would take control over decisions about research grants. It would, among other changes, allow political appointees to overrule advice from scientists on award decisions, and let them terminate ongoing grants based on political criteria. Scientists and research advocates have slammed the executive order, saying it enhances Trump's control over scientific research and universities. They warn it will replace scientific merit with ideological loyalty to the Trump administration. Victor Ambros, who won the 2024 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of microRNA, called the order "unpatriotic in the extreme." "[The order is] a shameless, full-bore Soviet-style politicization of American science that will smother what until now has been the world's preeminent scientific enterprise. Until this administration, the single overarching priority for public funding of research has been scientific excellence. That is why our country has been so successful in delivering life-saving and life-enriching discoveries," Ambros said in a statement. In the last decade, the US Congress awarded ~$200 billion (€172 billion) in research grants annually to advance critical research on diseases, new technologies like AI and life-saving medicines. US-based researchers have applied for research grants from federal science agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). Whether scientists are awarded grants they've applied for depends on independent peer review. Panels of experts evaluate research proposals based on evidence, methodology and potential impact. The August 7 executive order changes that. Peer review from scientific experts is now only advisory — final grant-making decisions have been placed in the hands of political appointees. Those appointees can refuse to fund new grants that don't align with Donald Trump's political agenda. "[Funding] awards must, where applicable, demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities," the paper states. The order cites critical race theory, transgender sexual education programs and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) research as "far-left initiatives" that are an "offensive waste of tax dollars." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This executive order is the latest attack on scientific research and US universities by the Trump administration. "Much of this executive order is predicated on misinformation," Jeremy Berg, a former director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH and member of Stand Up For Science's advisory board, said in a statement. Trump froze all US federal science funding in February, then again in July, and has cut top science roles at NASA. Funding has also been cut in climate science , gender-related topics and research on potentially life-saving mRNA vaccine technologies. Kenneth Evans, an expert in science and technology public policy at Rice University in Texas told DW in February that the Trump administration has made the US "a hostile place for researchers." Medical associations warn that the President's ongoing assault on science is derailing the US' reputation as a scientific powerhouse and crippling vital research. "Grant review by political appointees will further impede the work of the scientific community to provide solutions and fight public health threats," said American Society for Microbiology CEO Stefano Bertuzzi. "With strong and responsible oversight, we need to harness — not suppress — all perspectives and approaches in the effort to solve these problems," said Bertuzzi in a statement. Given that the executive order faces such strong criticism, it will almost certainly also face legal challenges. Opponents are likely to argue that the order violates safeguards designed to keep scientific research free from political oversight. Science advocates are hoping Congress will act to block or modify its provisions, much like it did to protect the NIH's federal budget in view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Senate Tax Reform Debate Intensifies Over Middle-Class Relief And Deficit Impact
The U.S. Senate is currently engaged in heated negotiations over a comprehensive tax reform bill aimed at providing much-needed relief to middle-income Americans. The proposed legislation, which seeks to increase child tax credits and expand healthcare deductions, has sparked debate over its potential effects on the federal deficit. According to The Hill, the bill would raise the child tax credit from $2,000 to $3,000 per child and broaden deductions for health insurance premiums and medical expenses, targeting the financial pressures faced by middle-class families amid rising inflation. President Donald Trump has expressed conditional support for the measure but emphasized the importance of safeguarding small businesses from tax increases embedded in the plan. As reported by The Hill, Trump highlighted the need for a balanced approach that aids families without stifling economic growth. However, several Republican senators have voiced concerns that the tax relief could worsen the nation's budget deficit. The Congressional Budget Office recently projected that government borrowing may top $1.5 trillion this fiscal year. According to budget analysts cited by The Hill, adding expansive tax credits without corresponding spending cuts or revenue increases could exacerbate this trend. Democratic lawmakers have largely supported the focus on middle-class tax relief but are pushing for even broader provisions, including additional benefits for lower-income households and increased social program funding. Meanwhile, moderate Republicans are urging caution, advocating for reforms that avoid increasing the deficit. Economic experts warn that the bill's passage could have significant consequences. As stated by The Brookings Institution, tax cuts aimed at the middle class tend to boost consumer spending and economic growth, but unchecked deficits may lead to higher interest rates and reduce private-sector investment. With a Senate vote expected later this month, lawmakers face pressure from voters demanding immediate relief and from fiscal conservatives stressing responsible budgeting. The outcome will likely influence political dynamics ahead of next year's midterm elections, as reported by The Hill.


Int'l Business Times
16 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Four Days Left To Square The Circle On Global Plastic Pollution Treaty
Countries remained at loggerheads Monday over how to tackle plastic pollution, with only four days left to craft a landmark global treaty on reining in the ever-growing scourge. While plastic has transformed modern life, plastic pollution poses an increasing threat to the environment and the human body -- and every day the garbage accumulates on land and in the oceans. The 184 countries meeting at the United Nations to sculpt a first international accord setting out the way forward return to the negotiating table after a day off Sunday to reflect on their differences. The first week of talks in Geneva fell behind schedule and failed to produce a clear text, with states still deeply divided at square one: the purpose and scope of the treaty they started negotiating two and a half years ago. Last week, working groups met on technical topics ranging from the design of plastic to waste management, production, financing for recycling, plastic reuse, and funding waste collection in developing countries. They also discussed molecules and chemical additives that pose environmental and health risks. A nebulous cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group -- including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Iran, and Malaysia -- want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. The United States and India are also close to this club. At the other end of the spectrum, a growing faction calling themselves the "ambitious" group want radical action written into the treaty, including measures to curb the damage caused by plastic garbage, such as phasing out the most dangerous chemicals. Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. The ambitious group wants a clause reining in plastic production, which is set to triple by 2060. The club brings together the European Union, many African and Latin American countries, Australia, Britain, Switzerland and Canada. It also includes island micro-nations drowning in plastic trash they did little to produce and have little capacity to deal with. Palau, speaking for 39 small island developing states (SIDS), said the treaty had to deal with removing the plastic garbage "already choking our oceans". "SIDS will not stand by while our future is bartered away in a stalemate," and "this brinkmanship has a real price: a dying ocean," the Micronesian archipelago said. The treaty is set to be settled by universal consensus; but with countries far apart, the lowest-ambition countries are quite comfortable not budging, observers said. "We risk having a meaningless treaty without any binding global rules like bans and phase-outs. This is unacceptable," Eirik Lindebjerg, global plastics adviser for the World Wide Fund for Nature, told AFP. "Expecting any meaningful outcome to this process through consensus is a delusion. With the time remaining, the ambitious governments must come together as a majority to finalise the treaty text and prepare to agree it through a vote." Without touching on whether ambitious countries would ultimately abandon consensus and go for a vote, the EU's environment commissioner Jessika Roswall, due in Geneva on Monday, urged countries to speed up negotiations and not "miss this historic opportunity". The draft treaty has ballooned from 22 to 35 pages -- with the number of brackets in the text going up near five-fold to almost 1,500 as countries insert a blizzard of conflicting wishes and ideas. In total, 70 ministers and around 30 senior government officials are expected in Geneva from Tuesday onwards and could perhaps help break the deadlock. Women sorting through plastic waste in Pekanbaru, Indonesia AFP Countries are trying to negotiate a groundbreaking international treaty on combating plastic pollution AFP Global plastics production could almost triple between 2019 and 2060 AFP Workers pack food containers made with virgin plastics at a factory on the outskirts of Kolkata, India AFP