
Today in Politics: Stalin to Left, parties condemn Presidential reference; Rahul Gandhi to address press conference
Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi will address a press conference in New Delhi on Friday.
This comes a day after the President Draupadi Murmu, in a reference to the Supreme Court, posed 14 crucial questions over the top court's April 8 verdict that fixed timelines for Governors and the President to act on Bills passed by state Assemblies.
Seeking the Supreme Court's opinion under Article 143(1), Murmu sought to know whether the actions of the Governors and President are justiciable and whether such timelines can be imposed on them in the absence of any such provision in the Constitution.
The reference pointed out that 'there are conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court as to whether the assent of the President of India under Article 201 of the Constitution of India is justiciable or not'.
Under Article 145 (3), when the President makes a reference for the court's opinion, it is placed before a five-judge bench. In the Ayodhya dispute, the apex court, citing pendency of the case, had declined to answer the question referred to it on whether a temple existed below the disputed structure.
This saw a range of reactions from Opposition states. One of the first criticisms came from Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin whose government has been in a protracted standoff with Governor R N Ravi over Bills.
Stalin called the Presidential reference a 'desperate attempt to weaken democratically elected state Governments'. 'I strongly condemn the Union Government's Presidential reference, which attempts to subvert the Constitutional position already settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Tamil Nadu Governor's case and other precedents,' he said in a post on X.
In a post on X, CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby quoted Stalin's post and said his party is opposed to the move. 'The governors are acting at the behest of the ruling party BJP and obstructing the functioning of opposition-led state govts. They are violating the federal principles enshrined in our Constitution. All the non-BJP state govts should condemn this move and join together in the fight against centralisation of powers at the cost of states' rights,' he said.
IN CONTEXT: Several governments in the past, including that of the Congress, have used the Presidential Reference route to either resolve vexed legal issues with political undertones, seek clarity on important Supreme Court judgements which impact matters of policy and governance, or at times to lob uneasy and uncomfortable political issues into the Court's domain.
These include issues like the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, the Cauvery water row, the timing of elections after the 2002 Gujarat riots and the alleged 2G licence allocation scam.
Manoj C G details all the times the provision has been used
Congress rallies
The Congress is looking to organise rallies across the country in protest of the BJP's alleged attempts to 'politicise' Operation Sindoor.
Another central focus of these rallies, the party added, was to question Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'silence' on US President Donald Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan.
Addressing a joint press conference after a meeting attended by several Congress Working Committee members and senior leaders Thursday, party general secretary Jairam Ramesh and Congress' media and publicity department head Pawan Khera said the BJP was trying to spin the military action as a 'brand' for itself.
A series of 'Jai Hind Sabhas' rallies will be held in various states, the party said, to demand answers from the government.
At the meeting, the CWC adopted a resolution saying the Pahalgam raised 'deeply troubling' questions about an 'apparent intelligence failure'.
'Despite heightened tensions and known threats in the region, the terrorists managed to execute a major attack, claiming precious lives. While we wait for an official assessment, it is unfortunate that no accountability has yet been fixed,' the resolution said.
'National security cannot be managed through public relations exercises on television; it demands professional rigour, vigilance, and institutional accountability,' the resolution said.
The resolution also talks of the ceasefire.
'The sudden halt (of military action), without clarity or communication, has led to speculation and concern across the country. Adding to this is the deeply problematic statement by US President Donald Trump, who was the first to claim that a ceasefire was brokered with the use of trade threats and pressure on India,' the resolution said.
The government's silence on this matter is inexplicable and unacceptable, it said.
— With PTI inputs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
IAEA chief warns of potential backlash from Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear facilities
A strike could push Iran to pursue nuclear weapons or leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi warned in an interview read more IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi holds a news conference after the first day of the agency's quarterly Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria. Reuters Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), stated that Iranians told him that an Israeli assault on Iran's nuclear facilities may make Iran more determined to obtain a nuclear weapon, in an interview which was broadcast and published on Monday. 'A strike could potentially have an amalgamating effect, solidifying Iran's determination – I will say it plainly – to pursue a nuclear weapon or withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,' Grossi said in an interview published on the Jerusalem Post website and aired on i24 TV on Monday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, according to the Jerusalem Post, Grossi did not believe that Israel would attack Tehran's nuclear facilities. Grossi told the Jerusalem Post that the Iranian nuclear program 'runs wide and deep'. He also added that 'disrupting them would require overwhelming and devastating force.' Tehran and Washington recently had nuclear negotiations, which were mediated by Oman. Iran is preparing to send a counter-proposal for a nuclear agreement to the United States via Oman, Iranian foreign ministry spokeswoman Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday, in response to an 'unacceptable' US offer. Last week, US President Donald Trump stated he advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take any moves that may jeopardise nuclear talks with Iran. 'I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution now,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'That could change at any moment.' Trump and Netanyahu are expected to speak over the phone on Monday.


The Wire
13 minutes ago
- The Wire
Ahead of G7 Summit, Canada Lists ‘Foreign Interference and Transnational Crime' as Key Priority
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now World Ahead of G7 Summit, Canada Lists 'Foreign Interference and Transnational Crime' as Key Priority The Wire Staff 7 minutes ago Last week, Prime Minister Modi announced that he had received and accepted the invitation to attend the G7 summit. It was an unusually late invitation, considering other non-G7 states had got it by the first half of May. Canada Prime Minister Mark Carney. Photo: AP/PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: Canada has identified countering 'foreign interference and transnational crime' as a key priority for the upcoming G7 Summit, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to attend after accepting a late invitation last week. Unveiling the host country's agenda ahead of the summit's opening on June 15, Prime Minister Mark Carney outlined three 'core missions.' The first, titled 'Protecting our communities and the world', includes strengthening peace and security, coordinating efforts to combat forest wildfires and, notably, 'countering foreign interference and transnational crime'. The second priority focuses on 'building energy security and accelerating the digital transition' by strengthening supply chains for critical minerals and leveraging artificial intelligence. Carney also said Canada would seek 'securing the new partnerships in the future' aimed at unlocking large-scale private investment to develop resilient infrastructure, generate better-paying jobs and expand access to competitive, high-growth markets. As the Canadian media observed, these outlined 'core missions' are aligned to Carney's domestic agenda. It remains unclear how prominently Canada's stated priorities will feature in the G7 summit discussions, but traditionally, the host nation's agenda tends to receive significant emphasis in the summit's joint declaration. Canada's emphasis on foreign interference and transnational crime also carries particular diplomatic weight. Ottawa has been outspoken about attempts by foreign governments to meddle in its domestic affairs – especially election processes. The pairing of 'foreign interference' with 'transnational crime' was also seen as a signal that Ottawa is referring to efforts by foreign governments to target individuals on Canadian soil. Last Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that he had received and accepted the invitation to attend the G7 summit during a phone call with the Canadian prime minister. It was an unusually late invitation, as it was just over a week before the summit was to begin, while other non-G7 states, like Mexico, Brazil, Ukraine and South Africa had got their invitation by the first half of May. Carney's invitation to India has drawn some domestic criticism, forcing him to clarify the decision publicly. 'We have now agreed, importantly, to continued law enforcement dialogue,' he said. 'There's been some progress on that, which recognises issues of accountability. I extended the invitation to Prime Minister Modi in that context, and he has accepted.' Among the G7 outreach invitees, India is the only country whom the host, Canada has accused of both 'foreign interference' and involvement in 'transnational crime'. Ties between India and Canada nose-dived in September 2023 after then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused Indian government agents of being involved in the killing of a Canadian citizen, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, whom India had labelled as a Khalistani terrorist. New Delhi firmly rejected the charge, arguing instead that the real concern was Canada's tolerance of groups it considers anti-India and separatist in nature. In October 2024, Royal Canadian Mounted Police Commissioner Mike Duheme alleged that Indian officials were linked to a wider effort to intimidate or target Canadian nationals. The diplomatic rift deepened when Ottawa expelled six Indian diplomats, including High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma. India reciprocated, prompting a further freeze in official engagement. Besides, a public inquiry led by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue into foreign meddling later identified China and India as key actors attempting to influence Canadian political processes. In its January 2025 report, the commission noted: 'Intelligence holdings also reveal that a government of India proxy agent may have attempted to clandestinely provide financial support to candidates from three political parties in 2021,' adding that 'the source of any such financial contribution could have been unknown to the candidates.' Responding to the report, India's Ministry of External Affairs issued a sharp statement that it was Canada that had been 'consistently interfering in India's internal affairs.' The ministry also claimed that such interference had encouraged 'illegal migration and organized criminal activities'. In the run-up of the snap parliamentary polls in April that was won by Carney, a senior Canadian intelligence official said in a public briefing that India, along with China, has the potential to interfere in the country's upcoming general elections next month. Meanwhile, Indian officials are working against the clock to finalise logistics for the prime minister's visit, rushing to obtain visas and secure accommodation for the delegation on short notice. The Indian team is also preparing for possible confrontations from pro-Khalistani groups, despite protest zones being restricted to three designated areas away from the main summit venue. In addition, Indian diplomats are hurriedly coordinating two stopovers for Prime Minister Modi's travel to and from Canada. On the outbound leg, he will transit through Cyprus, marking the first visit by an Indian prime minister to the country since 2002. On the return journey, Modi is scheduled to pass through Croatia, a visit that was originally planned as part of last month's Europe tour but had to be cancelled following the Pahalgam terror attack. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Canada Placed Law Enforcement Conditions Before Modi for G7 Summit Invite: Report Marking Turnaround in Ties, Modi Accepts Late Canadian Invitation to Attend G7 Summit Next Week As the G7 Clock Ticks, Silence over India's Invite and What it Means Nijjar & After: Facing Flak, Canadian PM says Progress in 'Accountability' Paved Way for Modi G7 Invite India's Disastrous Isolation Around the World As India and Canada's Foreign Ministers Speak Over Phone, Signs of a Further Thaw in Ties Has Development in Northeast India Undermined Its Environmental Sustainability? Israel Allows Limited Aid To Enter Gaza; France, UK, Canada Call Move 'Wholly Inadequate' G20 Is Too Elite. There's a Way To Fix That Though – Economists View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Manesar land scam: Court to rule on charges against 3 more accused
Panchkula: In a significant development in the Manesar land scam, a special CBI court has opted to first decide on framing charges against three more people before consolidating the chargesheet against former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and 30 others. Special CBI Judge Rajiv Goyal made the ruling last Friday, following the Punjab and Haryana high court's vacation of a stay on proceedings. The three individuals facing potential charges are former IAS officer D R Dhingra and private persons Dhare Singh and Kulwant Singh Lamba. The court has scheduled July 10 for resumed arguments regarding the chargesheet against this trio. The extensive case implicates former CM Hooda, his three ex-principal secretaries – Murari Lal Tayal (also facing another trial), S S Dhillon, and Chhattar Singh – as well as various companies and their office bearers involved in the controversial land transactions. The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings against another accused bureaucrat, Rajiv Arora, who was named in the initial chargesheet. The scam revolves around 914 acres of land in Manesar, Gurugram district, originally slated for acquisition to develop an Industrial Model Township (IMT). Following the Aug 2004 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, a rush to acquire land at low prices ensued. Builders and land mafia reportedly capitalised on residents' panic, acquiring plots at "throwaway rates". Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo In 2007, the industrial department released the land from the acquisition process. Allegations of political patronage in the builder-official-land mafia nexus led aggrieved parties to court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to probe the matter, leading to the chargesheet naming former CM Hooda. MSID:: 121731795 413 |