Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini urges citizens to follow Ahilyabai Holkar's legacy to realise PM Modi's vision of a developed India
1
2
Kurukshetra: Haryana chief minister Nayab Singh Saini on Saturday called on citizens to emulate the values of Ahilyabai Holkar by championing girls' education, gender equality, and social service — aligning with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of a developed India by 2047.
Addressing a state-level event in Pipli, Kurukshetra, marking the 300th birth anniversary of the iconic Maratha queen, Saini described Ahilyabai as a symbol of woman power who shattered social barriers in an era that denied women education and autonomy. To honour her legacy, the CM announced the construction of a museum dedicated to Ahilyabai on a 2-acre site to educate youth about her life and contributions. He also pledged the creation of a ceremonial gateway in her name, to be located in a city or village with input from the Pal-Gaderia community.
In support of community development, Saini committed ₹31 lakh from his discretionary fund for the Pal-Gaderia Dharamshala in Kurukshetra. State ministers and MPs, including Krishan Lal Panwar and Naveen Jindal, each pledged ₹11 lakh toward the initiative. Saini highlighted Ahilyabai's historic role in rebuilding major Hindu pilgrimage sites, including Kashi Vishwanath, Somnath, Mathura, Ayodhya, Badrinath, and Rameshwaram.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Elgin: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover
Reassured
Get Quote
Undo
He noted that her statue was unveiled at the Kashi Vishwanath Temple by PM Modi in 2019.
He also praised the leadership of Indian women in present-day security operations, referencing the recent Operation Sindoor and acknowledging the contributions of defence officers Vyomika Singh and Sophia Qureshi. Reaffirming his government's commitment to inclusive development, Saini spotlighted welfare programs under the 'Haryana Ek, Haryanvi Ek' banner.
These include free monthly food rations to 49 lakh below-poverty-line families, over 15 lakh free LPG connections under the Ujjwala Yojana, and subsidised ₹500 gas cylinders.
Healthcare efforts through the Ayushman Bharat-Chirayu scheme have enabled over 20 lakh patients — including senior citizens — to receive up to ₹5 lakh in free treatment. The Dayalu Yojana provides similar financial aid to low-income families in cases of death or disability.
To support backward communities, the state has established a dedicated commission, increased the reservation quota to 27% in education and government jobs, and raised the creamy layer income cap from ₹6 lakh to ₹8 lakh. For girls, free schooling up to Year 12, scholarships, and waived university fees are in place. Marking World No Tobacco Day, Saini concluded with a public call to reject addiction and embrace health, values, and service.
"Let us pledge today to root out substance abuse and build a stronger society," he said.
MSID:: 121537738 413 |
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trying to benefit friends abroad: BJP's Sinha accuses Congress over questions on 'Operation Sindoor'
New Delhi: BJP National Spokesperson Tuhin Sinha on Monday launched a scathing attack on the Congress party for questioning India's 'Operation Sindoor', and suggested that the party seems to be attempting to benefit its 'foreign allies'. Speaking to IANS, Tuhin Sinha said, 'The way the Congress party is repeatedly creating doubts about our achievements in 'Operation Sindoor', it certainly seems that it is trying to benefit its friends abroad. "The Congress keeps asking the same question: How many losses did we suffer? What were our casualties? Prime Minister Modi has already responded, and our party has also addressed this seriously. If the Congress wants a clearer answer, it will have to wait.' He claimed, 'This is the same Congress party that has never celebrated Pakistan's defeats. On May 10, a list was released of Pakistan Air Force air bases that were destroyed by our armed forces. Yet, did we ever see the Congress party celebrate that victory?" He questioned, "The Congress must decide whose side it is on. Why is it so eager to know our losses when the entire world has acknowledged this as a major achievement and a significant victory for India?' Sinha further addressed the controversy surrounding US President Donald Trump's comments, which Congress has frequently referenced. 'Trump has been changing his statements repeatedly. India's position is clear — this was a bilateral conversation limited to the DGMO level, after which a ceasefire was announced. There is no role for any third party. If a third party gives a statement contrary to our official stance, the Congress should trust its own government and its DGMO rather than mislead Indian citizens with irresponsible remarks," he told IANS. On the Congress' demand for a special session of Parliament, Sinha questioned the urgency. 'Why is the Congress so restless? The Monsoon Session will begin in less than a month. What is the need for a special session now? Do they want to use it to make statements that become headlines in the Pakistani media? Are they aiming to benefit their foreign friends with such remarks? This is a direct question to Mallikarjun Kharge.' He added, 'All the necessary information regarding the strikes has already been shared multiple times. Even Congress leaders like Manish Tewari and Shashi Tharoor have clarified it abroad. So, the Congress should stop misleading the country.' On the Murshidabad violence, Sinha professed, 'Many pieces of evidence have now emerged proving that the violence was sponsored by Mamata Banerjee's party. It is appropriate to call it 'state-sponsored terrorism.' During the time of the violence, the Waqf law was becoming an issue, and Mamata Banerjee was inciting the Muslim community against it. She even claimed she would not allow anti-terror laws to be implemented in Bengal. Under what law does she have the right to block central legislation in a state? No state has this authority.' He further added, 'By making such statements, Mamata Banerjee was indirectly encouraging those involved in the violence. A committee appointed by the Calcutta High Court has also provided supporting evidence. Whenever the deployment of BSF in Murshidabad is discussed, Mamata Banerjee openly opposes it. One of our party workers approached the High Court, after which BSF was deployed under the court's order.' Sinha questioned Banerjee's opposition to central security forces. 'Why does she hate the BSF? Is it because they're preventing illegal migration from Bangladesh? Her apparent intention to alter Bengal's demographic profile is deeply concerning. Many unanswered questions remain regarding the Murshidabad violence. It is alarming that such incidents, involving Trinamool leaders, have become common in Bengal's border districts.' Reacting further on illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, Sinha pointed out recent actions taken post 'Operation Sindoor'. 'In the last few weeks, BJP-ruled states have deported thousands of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants. Gujarat alone deported many. Similar actions are underway in Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, and even Odisha.' However, he criticised Opposition-ruled states for inaction. 'States governed by the INDIA bloc are actively settling illegal Bangladeshis. The Santhal Pargana division of Jharkhand is heavily impacted, yet the Hemant Soren government shows no interest in tackling it. In fact, illegal immigrants are grabbing tribal lands with the state's support,' he claimed. He warned that illegal migration poses a significant threat. 'After 'Operation Sindoor', elements from Pakistan and Bangladesh may resort to proxy warfare. The presence of illegal migrants within our borders is a serious national security concern. BJP governments are taking decisive action, and we expect the same from Mamata Banerjee, Hemant Soren, and other INDIA bloc leaders. This is a national issue. No political compromise can be accepted when it comes to India's security," he concluded.
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Viksit aim: India's progress will depend on Centre-state relations
The 10th Governing Council Meeting of the Niti Aayog, the Indian government's think-tank, took place last week. It was attended by representatives of 24 states and seven Union territories, in addition to several dozen cabinet ministers. For the past three annual meetings, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been exhorting Indian states and regions to develop 'Viksit Rajya' vision statements. Each of these visions is to incorporate a laddered set of vision statements from cities, towns and villages within the state. Also Read: Indian states should adopt AI for inclusive growth and governance The CEO of Niti Aayog said that 17 states had completed such a plan. The framework for this exercise is designed to integrate state plans into one grand one that envisions the whole of India as a developed (or 'viksit') country by the time it completes a century as an independent nation in 2047. In some ways, this is a wonderful project. It brings the Centre and states together for a collective mission whose broad goal is to nurture inclusive prosperity in the country. At the same time, each state is encouraged to think of its own strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (a 'Swot' analysis) and build plans that are unique to its endowments. A land-locked state could focus on fields that differ (say, agriculture) from one with a coastline (say, logistics), and a hilly state with natural beauty can elect suitable policies (say, tourism) that may differ from those of an arid state (which could focus on solar energy). Also Read: Plug data gaps: State-level statistical surveys could help Early indications from states that have put elements of their plan in the public domain show exactly this diversity. Gujarat envisions a $3.5 trillion state economy by 2047 focused on urban development, female participation in the workforce and the pursuit of net-zero carbon emissions. Andhra Pradesh plans to attract investments, prioritize skilling, use technology for public-service delivery and governance, and 'eliminate' poverty. Of course, states can and will enact these plans very differently. Some will gather dust, while others will have enabling and monitoring cells that keep track of progress. These plans are part dream, part industrial policy and part roadmap. As of now, they lack detailed implementation plans, and from what is available in the public domain, do not reveal a nuanced sense of the enabling steps required to deliver results. Other countries that have tried these envisioning exercises have succeeded to different degrees. The most spectacular showcase of success is the transformation of Dubai, UAE. The emirate transformed itself from being dependent on oil revenue in the 1960s and 70s into a diversified economy based on tourism, financial services and trade. A similar transformation is underway in Saudi Arabia, with some large projects on track and others like its phantasmagorical Neom City derailed. Bangladesh's Vision 2041 was binned with the departure of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Also Read: Why Montek Singh Ahluwalia is right: India needs new states and new cities In India, superficial bonhomie hides differences. Last year, Tamil Nadu boycotted the whole Viksit project, and this year, Karnataka has done so; both states are led by political parties that pose opposition to the Centre's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. This lack of trust arises because there is no political forum for discussing issues between the Centre and states. The Interstate Council (ISC) is a non-permanent body that was born as a result of the Sarkaria Commission in 1990, in part to address this. The ISC can be called at any time by order of the President. It has met 12 times since then, but has not met since 2017. While its constituent members broadly resemble those who met during the recent Niti Governing Council meeting, its agenda is not set by only one side. The purpose of the ISC is to 'resolve' difficult political conflicts, not merely to create PowerPoint documents. There are other issues as well. Except for Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, Indian state-level development models are heavily state-led. The private sector is mostly uninvolved in the creation of these visions. Moreover, the philosophy of the state being only an enabler of commerce —by setting up infrastructure, for example— and enforcer of fair play is alien to most states, except a few in the South and West. Also Read: Watch those disparities: We must track the state of Indian states Given the Centre's emphasis on the power of the administrative state, it does not actively encourage an organic 'flowering' of the economy. Paradoxically, the Sanskrit word 'viksit' is translated into English only as 'developed,' but its semantic meaning is closer to 'opening' or 'blossoming.' For this flourishing to happen, the role of the government must diminish over time and the country's Vision Plan must be less of a government-manicured garden and more of a natural habitat of freely growing biodiversity led by the private sector. The right balance to strike is one where the Centre and states create enabling infrastructure. States may need roads, ports, airports, multi-modal freight stations, inland waterways, etc. To generate human capital, the government should work to improve the quality of education and employability of college graduates. Beyond this, it should incentivize the private sector to participate in the economy through business-friendly policies. Any large-scope industrial policy at the Centre or state level is akin to central planning and is bound to result in relatively poor returns on allocated funds. It would also risk India missing the goal of creating an inclusively prosperous country. P.S: 'All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way," said Leo Tolstoy in 'Anna Karenina'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
PM Modi likely to skip G7 summit being hosted by Canada- a first in six years
Strained bilateral relations, lingering tensions over pro-Khalistan separatist activities, and potential security concerns are among the key reasons PM Modi is unlikely to attend the G7 summit in Canada. He has also not received an official invitation read more Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is unlikely to attend the Group of Seven (G7) summit being hosted by Canada later this month, marking the first time in six years he will miss the high-profile gathering of world leaders. PM Modi has not received an official invitation for the June 15–17 summit in Alberta, and Indian officials say he was unlikely to travel to Canada even if one were issued. Strained bilateral relations, lingering tensions over pro-Khalistan separatist activities, and potential security concerns are among the key reasons, Times of India reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A Canadian G7 spokesperson declined to confirm whether PM Modi would be invited. Indian officials say any last-minute invitation is unlikely to be accepted due to logistical challenges and concerns over possible disruptions by Sikh separatist groups. Relations between the two countries soured sharply last year after then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly accused the Indian government of involvement in the killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada. India denied the allegation and criticised the lack of evidence. The fallout led to a diplomatic standoff, with both nations expelling senior diplomats. Trudeau's successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, has not directly addressed the Nijjar case but has expressed interest in rebuilding ties with India through expanded trade. India, in turn, has expressed hope that Carney will take a more measured approach than his predecessor and has reiterated its willingness to engage based on mutual trust. India has urged Ottawa to ensure the safety of Indian diplomats and take stronger action against extremist and secessionist elements operating on Canadian soil. Although Canada has not publicly announced its guest list for the summit, local media reports indicate invitations have been extended to leaders from Australia, Ukraine, South Africa, and Brazil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Modi has attended every G7 summit since 2019, when France invited him as a guest. His participation in the forum of leading industrial democracies has been seen as a sign of India's growing influence in shaping global policy and addressing cross-border challenges.
