
South Africa's resilient wine industry learns to adapt and survive in tougher environment
South Africa's wine industry is a national asset that stretches far beyond the picturesque Winelands, says Rico Basson, chief executive of South Africa Wine, an umbrella body for the sector.
The industry's leaders know that its survival lies in reimagining every step of the value chain, from how wine is packaged, to where and how it is sold and consumed.
'It's a sector that employs 270,000 people,' Basson says. 'Wine goes back to farming from Agulhas in the south to Upington in the north.'
It's an industry that's staring down the reality of shrinking production, younger generations that are drinking less and beer still ruling South Africans' booze budget.
Trends and innovation
South Africa's wine producers are throwing out the old playbook. Lighter bottles, lower-alcohol-content wines and even cans are becoming tools in the fight for relevance, affordability and sustainability.
'Alternative packaging like cans is becoming a huge trend,' Basson says. 'It's not about the volume; it's about meeting consumer needs and accessing new channels.'
The planet is also part of the equation. A typical wine bottle weighs 450g when empty. Exporters are moving to 360g bottles, says Basson, cutting both costs and carbon.
South Africa can't beat the French on climate, but Basson believes the country has a competitive edge in the ways it is able to adapt. 'In France you can't produce Cabernet and Pinotage side by side. In Stellenbosch you can.'
Behind every sip of wine lies one of the country's most complex value chains. According to Basson, it maps no fewer than 127 career pathways. 'We've got 86,000ha of vineyards, 2,000 growers and 80,000 workers just on the primary side,' he says.
'For every one job you create on a farm, the chain creates 10 others.'
Victor dos Reis, head of Investec Private Capital, reckons the sector has much to offer investors.
'We've got fantastic resources, fantastic people and fantastic technology. So to me it makes good sense for an investor to look here.'
Dos Reis says there are several value-adding opportunities in processing and canning, and in the tech-driven solutions emerging from the Western Cape's growing digital economy.
Infographic by Kara le Roux
Expansion and challenges
The subsector of wine tourism is also growing at an exponential rate. The biggest misconception is that all wine tourists are foreigners, says Basson, who notes that about 66% of them are South Africans.
The challenge is to spread the tourist wallet to more destinations and experiences. 'We can't take more people up Table Mountain, but we can take more people to Darling,' he says.
Dos Reis says the industry must keep innovating the wine tourism experience.
'Wine tourism has quite a few factors. There are countless opportunities. You've just got to be creative around it.'
The alcohol industry is also navigating a regulatory and operational environment that is becoming increasingly strict.
'Our biggest threat right now is [excessive] taxation,' Basson says. 'We don't have a problem with regulation; we have a problem with enforcement.'
According to National Treasury figures, 14% to 22% of all alcohol trade in South Africa is illicit, adding nothing to the country's coffers. 'If you're Treasury and you can enforce [taxation], you can get back a lot of your excise,' Basson says.
At the same time, the industry is wrestling with sustainability expectations. There is much chatter about environmental, social and corporate governance issues, but Basson cautions against it being 'window dressing'. The sector is working on formal baseline standards to set tangible goals and move to greener systems, he adds. DM
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
14 minutes ago
- The Citizen
The 16-minute scam: How a cold call nearly put me under debt review
When companies can access your financial data illegally without consequence, privacy law is a farce. Sixteen minutes. That's how long it took me from receiving a cold call from a woman claiming that I 'qualify' for a 60% discount on my monthly loan repayments to being on the verge of being put under debt review. She never once mentioned the term debt review, however, at the same time, she had access to very personal information, including my ID number, phone number, and home address, and illegally accessed my credit profile. Had I not interrupted her just as she was about to cancel the mandates on my debit orders and revealed my identity as a journalist, I would have been put under debt review. The debt review industry is already viewed negatively, but this case study suggests it is fundamentally flawed. The regulations aimed at protecting South Africans are not working. Through a basic desktop search, I discovered that I was not alone; several other consumers had been placed under debt review without their knowledge, apparently by the same debt counsellor. But let's start at the beginning. I have been inundated with unsolicited marketing calls for months. I would sometimes get three calls a day. I always block these numbers afterwards. However, when I received this particular call recently, my phone was hooked up to my computer, and I could record the call. I decided to humour the call and play along to ascertain what personal information the caller had and where she had obtained it. Big was my surprise. ALSO READ: Debt Review: The good, the bad and the ugly This is what happened. I received an unsolicited call from a woman who identified herself as 'Rhadia'. She claimed she was from a company called Smart Group, 'a financial company empowered by the NCR (National Credit Regulator), as well as associated with the five major banks in South Africa.' She referred me to the website of My Debt Assistant ( Rhadia stated that the call was to inform me 'that we did get a request from Capitec Bank that you do qualify for the 60% discount upon the accounts or loans which you are paying for'. In response to a question about how this is possible, Rhadia responded: 'The bank (Capitec) has noticed, sir, that they were overcharging you too much high on the interest rate.' This is despite my not having any retail banking relationship with Capitec. I then questioned her on how her company would benefit from this offer to reduce my monthly repayments, and she said the company would not benefit at all: 'We do not get paid by or through a consumer. We do get paid by the government, as we are associated with the five major banks. We do get paid by the banks as well. You do not pay us on a monthly basis, sir.' The interaction continued, and it was quickly clear she had all of my relevant personal information. She read my ID number and asked me to confirm the last three digits. Then, the interaction spiralled out of control. ALSO READ: Debt review: should you or shouldn't you? Within seconds, she accessed my credit profile, reciting my monthly payments to the cent without ever asking for my consent. A few minutes after the call, I received an SMS from the credit bureau confirming that My Debt Assistant had accessed my credit report, citing 'Affordability Assessment' as the reason. This confirmed that the company was behind the call and served as proof that they had unlawfully accessed my confidential financial information without permission. Rhadia then claimed that she could reduce my monthly payments by 27%, as well as my outstanding bond and vehicle finance balances by 21%. In both cases, she quoted the amounts by which the actual payments and capital would be reduced. When pressed again on how this was possible, she stated: 'Like I said, sir, we do, they do negotiate with the credit providers to remove the interest rates.' I asked where she accessed this information, and she responded: 'It is on the system, sir.' The conversation continued until Rhadia stated that she was about to cancel the current debit order mandates on my accounts and that I would receive a schedule of the reduced payments by email. This was 16 minutes into the call, and I then realised she was about to put me in debt review. At that point, I disclosed that I was a journalist to stop the entire process. When I confronted her about why she had not informed me that she was about to put me under debt review, or even mentioned the term during the conversation, she said she would still explain it. Suddenly, she began experiencing difficulties with the connection, and our call ended. ALSO READ: Leaving debt review too early could come back to bite you My Debt Assistant I started researching the company, My Debt Assistant. It is based in Cape Town, and the registered debt counsellor is Washeemah Isaacs. Her NCR debt counsellor number is NCRDC3989. I attempted multiple times to contact her directly. I emailed the address and called the phone number listed on the NCR register. I also phoned the number and email address listed on the My Debt Assistant website. I sent several messages to a WhatsApp number, but received no response. The experience I encountered is not isolated. Numerous other consumers have complained on HelloPeter that My Debt Assistant placed them under debt review without their knowledge or consent. ALSO READ: Credit providers must not delete your whole credit history after debt review — NCR The NCR responds Following the call, I sent detailed questions about the interaction to the NCR. From their response, it is clear that debt counsellors are not permitted to cold call members of the public, and that accessing my credit profile without my consent was illegal. The NCR refused to disclose whether other consumers have lodged official complaints against Isaacs or if any enforcement actions have been taken against her, citing this information as 'confidential'. In response to a question about whether the NCR has oversight mechanisms in place to monitor debt review companies' cold calling and marketing tactics, the NCR responded: 'The NCR have several oversight mechanisms being used to regulate and oversee debt review companies. This includes compliance monitoring both on-site and desktop, complaint investigations and special investigations where compliance monitoring indicates possible prohibited conduct.' The NCR also invited me to lay an official complaint, 'to ensure that the conduct described in your email under reply receives the attention it deserves.' ALSO READ: Debt counselling – this is what you are letting yourself in for Debt review industry The debt review industry already suffers from a poor reputation, and this case study suggests that the perception may well be justified. I do not know whether 10% of debt counsellors are giving the other 90% a bad name, or whether 90% are giving the 10% a bad name, but what is clear is that the NCR must become far more proactive in identifying and expelling counsellors who engage in this kind of conduct. The behaviour I experienced represents blatant misrepresentation and possibly outright fraud. Consumers are lured in under false pretences, duped by the illegal use of their personal information, and placed under debt review without their consent, believing they are being offered savings or 'discounts'. Adding insult to injury is the failure of regulations designed to protect consumers. For instance, the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia) has become little more than a punchline when companies can so easily access sensitive financial data without consequence. Until there is visible enforcement and meaningful accountability, consumers will continue to fall victim to these practices. It is a joke. Stay vigilant! This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.


The South African
44 minutes ago
- The South African
South Africans in THIS city pay more for groceries than anywhere else
The cost of groceries in South Africa's major metros continues to soar, with Johannesburg once again emerging as the most expensive city for groceries in July 2025. This marks the third consecutive month that the city has held the unenviable top spot, according to the latest report by the Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice and Dignity (PMBEJD) group. The price of the average household food basket in Johannesburg hit R5 656.43 last month – R213.71 more than the national average of R5,442.72 and a 2.2% increase year-on-year. The basket comprises 44 essential items reflecting typical urban household consumption patterns. Cape Town followed closely behind with a July basket price of R5 371.35, while Durban remains the most affordable metro at R5 358.09, despite also seeing a steady increase. Nationally, the annual cost of the household basket rose by 3.6% – higher than the current consumer price index (CPI) inflation rate of 3.0%. Month-on-month, the basket price saw only a marginal dip of 41 cents, offering little relief to cash-strapped South Africans. Driving the increase is a surge in meat prices, especially beef. According to Stats SA, stewing beef rose by 21.2% year-on-year, the sharpest increase since January 2017. The jump is attributed to a combination of foot-and-mouth outbreaks and rising feed costs. Prices for vegetables such as beetroot, lettuce, and carrots also climbed sharply. While Durban remains the cheapest city to fill a grocery basket, prices there rose by 0.9% month-on-month and 2.8% year-on-year. Cape Town saw the highest annual increase among the three cities at 6.7%, despite a 0.5% monthly decline. The rising cost of groceries is compounding broader cost-of-living pressures and is particularly hard on lower-income households. 'This consistent rise in food costs is not just about numbers – it reflects growing household insecurity,' said a PMBEJD spokesperson. The report has renewed calls for urgent interventions to curb food inflation and address food security, especially in urban areas. Johannesburg: R5 656.43 R5 656.43 Cape Town: R5 371.35 R5 371.35 Durban: R5 358.09 R5 358.09 National Average: R5 442.72 As South Africans grapple with rising prices and economic strain, food affordability remains one of the most pressing challenges facing the country's urban population. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Stellenbosch's new inclusionary zoning policy: A blueprint for affordable housing in South Africa
To date 144 units have been built - all in the the Newinbosch Neighbourhood Estate development - taking "a significant step" toward redressing spatial inequality. Image: Sebastian Machill (2025) A new and exclusive estate development in Stellenbosch has 144 affordable units built in as part of the municipality's inclusionary zoning policy. "Stellenbosch's policy isn't just a local breakthrough; it's a blueprint for the Western Cape and the country," said Helen Rourke, programme director at Development Action Group. "In a country where spatial and income divides still define daily life, this is how real spatial transformation takes shape." The policy requires private developers that are planning to build a new residential or mixed-use development of 20 units or more in Stellenbosch, Klapmuts or Franschhoek to include 20% inclusionary housing. In the catalytic area of the Adam Tas Corridor, a spatial overlay zone provides for developers to unlock development rights if they contribute 30% inclusionary housing. Stellenbosch Municipality is only the second municipality in South Africa to adopt an Inclusionary Zoning Policy and, since its inception June 2023, over 900 new inclusionary housing unit applications have been approved. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ There have been discussions about inclusionary housing policies for almost 20 years, since the early 2000s, and these discussions have often been shut down by resistance from property developers and owners, said Associate Professor Ivan Turok (University of Free State). "This makes Stellenbosch's policy development and initial implementation all the more significant - as this is only the second municipality in the country to adopt an inclusionary housing policy." Rourke explained that the overarching goal of inclusionary zoning is to ensure social inclusion and counteract the legacy of spatial segregation that continues to define South African cities. For many South Africans, home is still on the outskirts and far from major economic opportunities - designed that way during apartheid South Africa. 'Stellenbosch has stepped up where it matters most, showing that bold municipal leadership and political support for innovative land policy tools can help tackle South Africa's deep inequalities head-on," says Rourke. Construction of the Newinbosch Neighbourhood Estate development in 2025 where 144 inclusionary housing units (11% of the entire development) were developed. Image: Sebastian Machill (2025) There are currently additional applications under review. Stellenbosch mayor, Jeremy Fasser, said through the policy, "we are attempting to rewrite the narrative on affordable and dignified housing". "We want to show that access to housing can be integrated and future-focused and that local government can lead the way in creating replicable models for other communities across South Africa. "This is about transforming policy into action and then action into impact. "Our Inclusionary Zoning Policy is already yielding results. Since its adoption in 2023, more than 900 new inclusionary housing units have been approved, with many more in the pipeline.' The policy at present stipulates that beneficiaries should be employed households with a stable income (excluding students), with preference for Stellenbosch residents, key workers, vulnerable groups, first-time homeowners, and female-headed households. Beneficiaries should have a monthly household income of between R3 500 – R22 000 (2022 FSC rates updated annually) and the sales cost of an affordable housing unit should fall between R300 000 – R1.2 million. Proportional allocation across the affordability range is encouraged and units must stay affordable for at least 30 years. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus