Newcastle's Christian Institute seeks civil service Pride ban
The Christian Institute said the civil service's participation in Pride showed an "overt expression of alignment" with one side of the debate on gender ideology, as many marches support trans rights.In a letter before action, a formal document sent before initiating court proceedings, the institute said it wished to uphold the right to express "gender critical" views, which support the contention that biological sex is immutable, as well as "traditional Christian views about marriage and sexual ethics".It has called for staff to be banned from doing anything which "gives or may reasonably be perceived by the public as giving the impression" the civil service supports gender ideology.
'Taxpayers expect neutrality'
Mr Calvert said the law was clear that civil servants were obliged to maintain impartiality on "controversial political issues". "Whether one agrees with it or not, no one can deny that the LGBTQ Pride movement and its hard-line gender ideology are profoundly political," he said.
Mr Calvert said he had attended meetings with the civil service about the clashes between LGBTQ politics and the Christian faith and found staff members wearing Pride lanyards during the meetings."Sitting in front of a phalanx of civil servants in rainbow lanyards gives the impression that their minds are closed on the issues we are discussing," he said. "It certainly does not communicate the kind of neutrality that taxpayers expect of civil servants."
A government spokesperson said: "The civil service is committed to an inclusive environment for all staff, boosting productivity and opening up opportunities across the country."The Public and Commercial Services Union, which represents civil servants, declined to comment on how the legal challenge could affect its members and whether the union felt they should be allowed to represent the service in Pride events.
In its letter before action, the institute referenced a recent judicial review which ruled Northumbria Police had acted unlawfully when it allowed officers to represent the force while taking part in a Pride march because this breached officers' duty to be impartial.
Follow BBC Newcastle on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
2 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
South Wales Guardian
2 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HUGO DUNCAN: The genie has burst out of the bottle - and it's all too clear who is to blame
The chickens are coming home to roost. When Rachel Reeves broke the Labour election pledge not to raise national insurance, she was warned the £25 billion tax raid on business would push up prices and cost jobs. She did it anyway. Official figures last week showed that 206,000 jobs have been lost since the election. Now we have inflation roaring back as companies push up prices to deal with the extra costs they face as a result of the Chancellor's growth-sapping, job-destroying policies. Ms Reeves used to boast that Britain was the fastest-growing economy in the G7. Not any more. But at 3.8 per cent, we do have the highest inflation rate of the seven major developed economies. In September last year, ahead of the Budget, it was 1.7 per cent. The Left-leaning Resolution Foundation says that UK inflation 'looks increasingly like an international outlier'. The bond markets are watching – and don't like what they see. Not only is the inflation genie bursting back out of the bottle, and the economy floundering, but our national debt is soaring and, in abandoning welfare cuts, Labour has shown it has no plan to bring the public finances back under control. As a result, Britain faces the steepest borrowing costs in the G7, with the 30-year bond yield at its highest level since 1998. That means the United Kingdom Government pays more to borrow on the international money markets than the United States, Germany, France, Italy, Japan and Canada. In other words, lending to Britain is seen as a riskier bet than lending to any of these other countries. The spike in inflation will not help as a large portion of UK Government debt is index-linked – meaning payments rise as inflation goes up. There are very real consequences for families across the country. Inflation is a menace that eats into the income of workers and pensioners alike, devastating living standards along the way. Yes, average prices may have been pushed a little higher by the 'Oasis effect' as fans paid through the nose for hotel rooms around concert venues. But this is also about parents struggling to pay for school uniforms, families putting the weekly supermarket shop on the credit card to make sure they have enough money to pay household bills, and then worrying about how they'll pay for Christmas after pushing the boat out on even a modest summer holiday. Rail fares – which are linked to inflation – now look set to rise by 5.8 per cent next year. There is also the prospect of energy bills rising again at the start of October – little over a month away – just in time for winter. It might seem a long way off, but it will come round soon enough for those feeling the pinch. Another Reeves boast is that interest rates have come down five times since Labour came to office, from an annual rate of 5.25 per cent to four per cent. But while she seeks to take credit for this, how much lower might interest rates now be had the Chancellor not driven up prices with her inflationary rises in national insurance and the minimum wage? With inflation nearly double the Bank of England's two per cent target, hopes of a further interest rate cut this year are fading fast. Instead, families and businesses are braced for another punishing round of tax rises in the autumn. The squeeze has only just begun.
