
Opinion - Why the SEA Games must remain untouched by politics
PHNOM PENH: A Thai proposal to exclude Cambodia is not just misguided, it's a warning sign for Asean's moral compass.
In times of tension, our region does not need louder threats, it needs clearer principles. That is why recent comments from Thailand's Minister of Tourism and Sports, suggesting that Cambodia could be excluded from the upcoming SEA Games, demand more than quiet dismissal. They demand correction.
Let us start with the facts.
Cambodia is a full and cooperative member of the SEA Games Federation Council. We are under no sanctions. We have not violated a single rule, nor have we used sport to provoke, retaliate or disrupt. Our athletes are training. Our coaches are preparing. Our participation in the December 2025 Games is rooted in merit, not politics.
So when a host minister publicly floats the idea of barring our delegation not due to misconduct, but due to 'public sentiment' and 'safety concerns' the question must be asked: what is the real motive behind the suggestion?
Because this is not about sport. It is about narrative control.
What we are witnessing is a familiar tactic. When internal pressure builds, when truth becomes inconvenient, governments look outward. They create symbols. They look for something to reject. And in this case, Cambodian athletes are being used as that symbol.
The problem with this strategy is not only that it's unjust, but also dangerous. If a host country is allowed to politicise who can or cannot attend the SEA Games, we no longer have sport. We have spectacle. We no longer have neutral ground. We have leveraged terrain.
To his credit, the president of the SEA Games Council, Chaiyaphak Siriwat, responded swiftly and clearly. He reminded all parties that the SEA Games are governed by the Olympic Charter, a document built on non-discrimination, neutrality and inclusion. No host nation has the authority to exclude another. Not now. Not ever.
Yet the damage from the minister's remarks is already visible. Even without formal enforcement, the idea was seeded. Doubt was created. And that, too, is a form of soft warfare not between armies, but between truths.
For Cambodia, we do not respond with outrage. We respond with clarity. We will not step aside. We will not play into the hands of provocation. Our flag will fly in Bangkok. Our athletes will show up. Not because we were permitted, but because we belong.
And this is no longer just about Cambodia. This is about Asean.
If the region stands by while exclusion is entertained under the language of 'safety' or 'healing', then we endorse a precedent where every future host can wield emotion as a weapon. Tomorrow it may not be Cambodia. It may be another country, another delegation, another excuse.
This is not the SEA Games we were told to believe in. This is not the Asean we swore to protect.
Sport must remain a space for merit, not manipulation. For unity, not leverage. For healing, not distraction. Cambodia understands this. Our conduct in the 2023 SEA Games proved it when we hosted every nation with dignity, respect and neutrality.
The coming months will test not just the border, but the moral border of our region. The line between disagreement and disqualification. Between politics and principle.
I ask my readers, fellow Southeast Asians, and institutional leaders to hold that line with us.
Because if we surrender it now, there will be no game worth playing. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN
[Ponley Reth is a Cambodian writer and commentator based in Phnom Penh. The views and opinions expressed are his own.]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
8 minutes ago
- The Star
Malaysia to continue coordinating Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire efforts, says Anwar
PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia will continue to play its coordinating role in the ceasefire efforts between Thailand and Cambodia, without a need for a full-scale Asean intervention, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The Prime Minister said he had met with both Defence Ministers of Thailand and Cambodia to discuss the details of the protocols that must be observed at the contested borders. "Thankfully, as of now, both countries have expressed their desire for Malaysia to continue playing a coordinating role. 'They have committed to upholding the conditions necessary to ensure the ceasefire is fully respected. "In light of this, Malaysia will continue its role in facilitating the process," said Anwar after attending the 2026 Budget Consultation Council at the Finance Ministry here on Thursday (Aug 7). "At this point, we do not see the need for full Asean intervention. "Both sides support this initiative and it is sufficient for Malaysia to facilitate the cooperation between Thailand and Cambodia," he said The United States and China will not be involved to monitor the contested border area, he added. "They, however, have offered full cooperation in terms of logistical assistance or support should the need arise," said Anwar. Asked to reveal the challenges faced to reach a consensus, Anwar said at the moment both sides have agreed to a ceasefire. "This is an important milestone. "It's important to recognise that border issues between the two countries have persisted for hundreds of years. "Although there are some differences in opinion, it should not lead to conflict," he said. Thailand and Cambodia agreed to implement a ceasefire effective midnight on July 28 through a special meeting in Malaysia chaired by Anwar, that brought both South-East Asian neighbours to the negotiating table following heightened tensions. Tensions between the two countries peaked on May 28 when fighting broke out in the disputed Preah Vihear area, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier.


The Star
8 minutes ago
- The Star
‘All we want is peace': Cambodian evacuees long for return to their pre-conflict lives
PHNOM PENH: As the shadow of armed conflict once again casts its darkness across Cambodia's northwestern border, the number of displaced civilians continues to rise — yet their message remains clear: they do not seek revenge. They want nothing more than peace, and to return to their homes. Not one of the 124,940 civilians displaced by border tensions across five Cambodian provinces wants to remain in the crowded, makeshift camps. From elderly farmers to young schoolchildren, all share the same heartfelt wish: to return home as soon as possible. Forced to flee their villages amid rising tensions along the Cambodian-Thai border, families now endure overcrowded shelters, uncertain futures and the emotional toll of separation from loved ones and livelihoods. Their voices remain united in one clear message — these camps are not home, and peace is the only path that can lead them back. 'I'm afraid the Thai troops will launch another attack,' said Yen Bopha, 35, from O'Smach commune, in Oddar Meanchey province's Samraong town. 'My family left home to find safety.' Bopha said none of them ever wanted to be so far from their homes. They want peace and to return as soon as possible. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN Sweeping water from her tent shelter after a heavy downpour, Bopha said none of them ever wanted to be so far from their homes. They want peace and to return as soon as possible. On Aug 5, driven by rumours of a renewed assault by Thai forces, more than 1,500 families — over 8,000 people — fled their homes. The majority arrived at emergency centres in Srei Snam district, Siem Reap province. Wat Chroy Neang Nuong, one of the largest camps in the area, received over 1,000 families alone, from the O'Smach area of Oddar Meanchey province. Local authorities pray for peace Mon Ngy Rainsy, deputy governor of Siem Reap, welcomed a delegation of diplomats from 11 nations and representatives of 15 UN agencies and partner organisations to the site. She expressed the pain of displacement, while remarking at the resilience of the Cambodian people. 'Wat Chroy Neang Nuong is already full but we cannot say 'no' to our people,' she said. 'They came with nothing. We gave them tents, food and even temporary schools and health services for their children,' she added. Rainsy told the international guests that life in the camps is difficult, and support — no matter how generous — cannot replace the comfort and dignity of home. 'They left their homes, their belongings, and in some cases even their children or husbands to watch over the houses. The cows and buffalo are still there. This is not life — it's survival,' Her appeal was heartfelt and urgent. 'We want to strongly urge all ambassadors and international organisations to help end the fighting. Our people want to go home. They want to work. The children want to go to school,' she implored. As she ended her remarks, Rainsy raised her voice above the crowd: 'We love peace!' Her call was met with cheers and applause from evacuees and volunteers alike. International support An EU representative met with refugees at the Wat Chroy Neang Nuong camp to learn about their living conditions. Speaking in Khmer, Bryan Fornari, head of cooperation at the European Delegation, asked, 'Does the rain affect your living? Are there many mosquitoes?' Several UN agencies in Cambodia joined a field visit organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation to meet with displaced communities in Oddar Meanchey and Siem Reap provinces. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN He expressed concern about their daily struggles, inquired about their hopes of returning home and wished them a safe and speedy return. Several UN agencies in Cambodia — including FAO, ILO, IOM, OHCHR, UN Women, UN-Habitat, UNDP, UNDSS, Unesco, UNFPA, Unicef, Unido, WFP and WHO — joined a field visit organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation to meet with displaced communities in Oddar Meanchey and Siem Reap provinces. 'We listened to the concerns of displaced families and assessed the situation on the ground. In coordination with national authorities, the UN — together with international and local humanitarian partners — has begun mobilising a humanitarian response to address the immediate needs of displaced communities,' announced the UN in Cambodia. 'Above all, we hope for a lasting peace that will enable communities to return home safely and rebuild their lives without fear,' it added. A lingering threat At the same camp, the Cambodian Mine Action Authority (CMAA) is leading emergency awareness campaigns to protect displaced families from another deadly threat: landmines and unexploded ordnance (UXO). 'Even though they haven't returned home yet, we must prepare them,' said Eng Pheap, CMAA director of public relations. 'We are showing them what mines look like and teaching them not to touch anything suspicious. They should report any suspicious discoveries to village chiefs, commune heads or the police,' he added. The CMAA's efforts are supported by the UN through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). So Lina, a programme analyst with the UNDP, stressed the importance of the awareness campaign. 'This is an opportunity,' she said. 'When they go home, they will be aware of the risks and know how to stay safe,' she continued. Despite fear and uncertainty, the spirit of peace still runs deep. For thousands of Cambodians displaced once more by border tensions, their plea is simple: let us go home in peace. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN


New Straits Times
8 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Asean needs emergency override mechanisms to address regional crises
WHAT happens when a neighbourhood's long-standing "mind your own business" rule becomes a dangerous barrier during a life-threatening crisis? This question perfectly captures Asean's current dilemma with Myanmar's political upheaval. Imagine living in a community where houses are built close together, and when one catches fire, the flames quickly spread to others. Yet the neighbourhood association has a strict rule: never interfere in your neighbour's problems. On Feb 1, 2021, the elected Myanmar government was overthrown, halting a decade of democratic progress. The military arrested key leaders, including Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, dissolved its Parliament, and declared a state of emergency. What followed was a systematic assault on Myanmar's civil society that launched the country into chaos and violence. The coup's aftermath has been devastating, with the military launching brutal crackdowns on peaceful protesters, using live ammunition against civilians, and conducting mass arrests. The numbers confirm an alarming humanitarian crisis because of the large number of casualties. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners reports that over 4,000 civilians lost their lives while 25,000 people were arbitrarily detained, and 1.2 million people were forced to abandon their homes. The military purposefully attacked hospitals and healthcare staff leading to the destruction of public health infrastructure, according to Physicians for Human Rights. Schools remain closed while teachers encounter persecution as a result. Military operations actively target educational institutions to weaken civilian resistance while they consolidate their control over the country. Myanmar's situation extends beyond domestic political issues because it threatens to disrupt the stability of the whole region for Asean. Due to military actions, there are large refugee movements into Thailand, Bangladesh and India, and border areas have turned into centres for drug trafficking and arms smuggling. Asean members must decide how to handle situations where internal member state crises evolve into security threats that demand collective action. Myanmar's problems have become everyone's problems. The military's control extends beyond politics through massive business conglomerates that control jade mining, telecommunications, banking, and real estate — generating billions annually. This economic power makes them resistant to external pressure. Economically, Myanmar has suffered severe decline with the kyat currency depreciating sharply, and foreign investors withdrawing. The World Bank last year reported Myanmar's economy contracted by 18 per cent in 2021, with continued deterioration affecting vulnerable populations. Asean's response came through the Five-Point Consensus, adopted during an emergency summit in Jakarta in April 2021. For an organisation historically committed to non-interference, this represented a significant departure — like a quiet neighbour finally calling the police when the house next door becomes too dangerous. The consensus established five commitments: immediate violence cessation, constructive dialogue among all parties, appointment of a Special Envoy, humanitarian assistance provision, and unrestricted envoy access. However, implementation has proven catastrophically ineffective. Myanmar's military has systematically violated each point. Violence has intensified rather than ceased. Dialogue has been rejected outright, with the junta refusing to engage meaningfully with opposition groups or Asean representatives. Humanitarian aid has been blocked. Special Envoys have been denied meaningful access, often shown only what the military wants them to see. Myanmar's ability to obstruct collective action demonstrates how the "everyone must agree" rule paralyses response mechanisms when decisive action is needed. Subhadra, [7/8/2025 1:08 PM] The non-interference principle, once Asean's strength in preventing inter-state conflicts, has become a shield for authoritarian behaviour and protects member states from accountability for actions threatening regional stability. Asean also lacks early warning systems and rapid response capabilities, typically reacting to crises after they have escalated. Myanmar's crisis has created a domino effect across Southeast Asia. Thailand, sharing a 2,400-kilometre border with Myanmar, faces enormous pressure from refugee flows and cross-border criminal activities. Bangladesh, already struggling with over a million Rohingya refugees, now faces additional refugee burdens. India's northeastern border areas deal with refugee influx, straining local resources. Criminal networks have exploited Myanmar's governance vacuum, using the country as a base for transnational crime. The crisis has severely damaged Asean's international credibility. Despite these challenges, Malaysia's Asean chairmanship in 2025 presents a crucial opportunity for institutional renewal. Malaysia has historically played a constructive role in regional diplomacy and has the experience to lead meaningful change. The organisation urgently needs emergency override mechanisms allowing decisive action during humanitarian crises, even without unanimous consent. This doesn't mean abandoning consensus entirely, but creating exceptions for situations threatening regional peace and security. Asean must develop early warning systems and rapid response capabilities to prevent future crises from escalating. A reformed approach should combine traditional diplomatic engagement with targeted economic measures and broader stakeholder inclusion — engaging civil society organisations, the National Unity Government, and ethnic groups alongside state actors. International partnerships with the United Nations and major powers can provide additional leverage and resources. Success in resolving the Myanmar crisis will determine whether Asean can maintain its role as Southeast Asia's primary security architecture. The path forward requires balancing sovereignty respect with responsibility to protect regional peace and human rights. Asean must upgrade institutional capabilities while preserving the cooperative spirit that has made Southeast Asia peaceful.