McConnell: We can protect kids from THC and grow KY's hemp industry
In the commonwealth alone, calls to the Poison Control Center about cannabis have more than doubled in the past five years, and 40% have been about children younger than age 12.
Companies looking to make a quick buck have been exploiting a loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill to take legal amounts of THC from hemp and turn it into intoxicating substances. These synthetic chemicals are then used as ingredients in appealing, candy-like products. Some products contain even higher THC levels than marijuana itself. Malicious actors knowingly market these seemingly harmless items to kids by using familiar packaging and similar branding names to normal snacks and sweets.
Hemp-derived THC products are poisoning Kentucky's kids
Tommy Loving, executive director of the Kentucky Narcotic Officers' Association, told me recently that, 'Hemp-derived Delta-8 and Delta-9 THC pose increasing concerns for both drug enforcement and youth safety. These products are widely available in vape shops and convenience stores with minimal regulation making them easily accessible to middle and high school students.'
In a 2023 incident in Laurel County, a 15-year-old girl was hospitalized after eating what she thought was a piece of candy on her way to school.
Earlier this year, a Jefferson County elementary-age student shared what appeared to be harmless candy gummies with friends at school. Later in the day, five kids received EMS attention after unknowingly consuming THC.
Allison Adams, the President and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, shared with me that, 'Hemp-derived THC products pose real health concerns for children and teens. They can be extremely toxic for younger children, and we need stronger safeguards to keep these products out of their hands.'
These products are poisoning Kentucky's kids. We cannot let this go on any longer.
Opinion: McConnell would uphold his principles by voting against Trump's foreign aid cuts
A loophole in hemp legalization legislation was abused and must be closed
That is why I helped secure new language in the most recent agriculture appropriations bill, to restore the original intent of the 2018 Farm Bill's federal hemp legislation. This language helps keep dangerous products made by bad actors out of the hands of kids while preserving this industry for Kentucky's hemp farmers.
After the decline in tobacco production, Kentucky's farmers looked to hemp as a potential new cash crop. I helped initiate pilot programs in the 2014 Farm Bill that gave us confidence in hemp's viability. Four years later, hemp's legalization and continued successes gave Kentucky a promising new crop. The plant is used in food, clothing, paper, plastic and many other consumer products. However, the loophole in this legislation was abused. And it must be closed.
I will continue to fight for the health and safety of Kentucky's children
Protecting the most vulnerable has been central to my work as U.S. senator for Kentucky. That includes kids.
In 2019, I worked to secure the new minimum national age of 21 for the purchase of tobacco and vaping products to help keep children safe from nicotine addiction. This time around, I will do the same and continue to advocate for the health and safety of kids.
Some hemp industry professionals say that this is not an issue of morals, but rather of economics. Well, I've been proud to champion free markets my entire career. But I feel no obligation to excuse the exploitation of children.
This issue is clear: when our kids are being targeted, I will fight to protect them.
Letter: McConnell knows why he should vote against cutting US foreign aid
I secured the legalization of hemp. I want the industry to grow.
You'll hear from others that protecting kids will mean destroying the hemp industry. That's a false choice.
Under the language I recently secured, industrial hemp and CBD products remain legal. Period. It even delays implementation by one year to give Kentucky farmers ample time to prepare for changing markets.
Advocates for keeping the loophole also predict widespread economic downturn for Kentucky farmers if my language in the bill becomes law. But they're wrong again. Kentucky farmers grow hemp for many purposes including grain, seed, fiber and CBD, but all together, it accounts for less than .021% of Kentucky's total farming acreage. I want this number to grow exponentially. That's why I secured the legalization of hemp in the first place.
But rooting out the bad actors and reaffirming our original legislative intent is an important step toward both greater child safety and greater economic certainty.
Tell us what you think. Submit a letter to the editor.
Mitch McConnell is the United States Senator for Kentucky and serves as senior member of the Senate Agriculture Committee.
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: McConnell: Hemp can grow KY's economy and be safe for kids | Opinion
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Onion
2 days ago
- The Onion
Oreo And Reese's Team Up To Sicken Dogs
EAST HANOVER, NJ—Unveiling a much-anticipated collaboration they said fans have long been waiting for, the makers of Oreo and Reese's announced Thursday that the two iconic brands of sweets had teamed up to sicken dogs. 'The savory, aromatic peanut butter of our new treat lures the dogs in, while the chocolate coating and cookie pieces poison them,' said Oreo spokesperson Tracy King, adding that both Oreo Reese's Cookies and Reese's Oreo Cups were perfect for leaving on the edge of the kitchen table just within reach of your pet. 'It's Oreos and Reese's like you've never seen them before: being pumped out of your dog's stomach at a costly vet appointment. The beloved snacks are a natural pairing, because Oreos make dogs sick and Reese's also make dogs sick. These things are loaded with so much chocolate they could take down a Great Dane. Your dog will want to eat the whole bag, but may be violently ill and forced to leave a few for you!' In a press release, Oreo and Reese's announced the tagline for the new product is 'We will kill your dog.'
Miami Herald
5 days ago
- Miami Herald
FDA is coming for your Doritos, Oreos, and other favorite snacks
Growing up, Oreos were my thing. Every day after dinner, I'd open the fridge (yes, I liked them cold), grab two from the sleeve, and savor them slowly. Even in college, when I barely had groceries, I always had Oreos. I loved trying every new flavor that hit shelves - Mint was my favorite. They were reliable. Comforting. A little ritual I didn't think twice about. But over the past few years, I've shifted how I eat. Less processed, more whole foods. Not perfect, but intentional. And slowly, Oreos stopped showing up in my pantry. Related: FDA eliminates 52 food standards in sweeping deregulation move Then one weekend, I was visiting my niece and nephew. They were showing me their snack stash and pulled out one of the new limited-edition Oreo flavors. Obviously, I had to try it. Once an Oreo girlie, always an Oreo girlie - right? I bit in. And I literally spit it out. It tasted…fake. Like chemicals wrapped in a memory. And I couldn't stop thinking about it. How did something I loved so much now feel so off? How had my taste changed that much? Had my taste buds finally woken up to just how ultra-processed and sugary it really was? Turns out, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration might finally be thinking the same thing. Image source: rblfmr/Shutterstock Under the leadership of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins, the FDA just launched a major initiative to define what counts as an "ultra-processed food." This may sound simple, but it's a massive shift. Right now, there's no official federal definition for ultra-processed food. That means your snack labels may tell you about sugar or fat, but they don't say a word about how chemically engineered or heavily modified those foods really are. This new FDA push? It's part of a broader strategy to tackle what they're calling a chronic disease crisis. Related: These clean food brands are rightfully challenging the FDA According to the government, roughly 70% of packaged foods in the U.S. qualify as ultra-processed. And kids get over 60% of their daily calories from them. Dozens of studies have linked these products to obesity, diabetes, cancer, and neurological conditions. The agency has now issued a formal Request for Information to help develop a national definition. That may sound wonky - but it's the first step toward labeling, regulating, and potentially warning consumers about what they're actually eating. Honestly, this feels like something we can all get behind. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary called the issue "clear and convincing," noting that the health threats from ultra-processed foods are too serious to ignore. This isn't just about what we eat. It's about how food companies will be allowed to operate moving forward. Once a federal definition is in place, it could open the door to all kinds of new policies: mandatory labeling, advertising restrictions, school food reform, even reformulations of the products themselves. If a company can't market its cereal, frozen meals, or snacks without acknowledging they're ultra-processed, it changes how they sell food in America - if they even still can. This move could also shift consumer behavior. Just like "organic" or "low fat" once influenced the way people shop, "ultra-processed" might soon become a new red flag on store shelves. Of course, some of the biggest food companies in the country are watching this closely. For them, this isn't just a definition. It's a threat to the foundation of their business model. And for those of us who grew up with those brightly colored boxes in the pantry, it could mean the snacks we thought we knew are about to change for good. If this shift helps make eating clean more accessible, I'm all for it. Related: Ziploc, Rubbermaid face alarming lawsuits over food safety risks The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Buzz Feed
23-07-2025
- Buzz Feed
20 Foods Americans Say Should Never Be Banned
Everyone has a favorite food, but some people have a food they love so intensely that they'd start a revolution if it were ever banned, and with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s continuous crackdowns on the nation's food supply, the possibility seems ever more realistic. I was curious about what foods people could never give up, so I asked Tasty readers about the snacks that would make them march the streets in protest if they were ever banned. Let's just say there were some very passionate answers. Here are 20 different foods that would surely cause people to revolt if they were forbidden, as told by their most loyal fans: "Lay's potato chips are my life. The crunchy yet thin chip and the salty goodness are so amazing that no other chip can compete. If it were banned, I think I would just cry. It's my favorite snack and is a staple in my house." —Esti, 25, New York "Krispy Kreme donuts!" "Oreos. You can pry my black-and-white circles of deliciousness from my cold, dead hands." —Sonia, 25, Massachusetts "The BUILT Puff Protein Bars are my favorite snack, and it's like eating a giant chocolate-coated marshmallow. If the FDA banned them, I would literally petition and protest all I could in front of them until I could eat them and buy them again." "Smartfood White Cheddar Popcorn. It was a big staple of my childhood, and I would hate to see it go." —Matilda, 25, Oregon "Bacon. Specifically, American-style bacon (I like Canadian bacon, but I could survive without it). If they try to ban it, there will be rioting in the streets." "I would be so sad if they got rid of those really terrible, super soft cookies with the half-inch of icing on top of them. I don't buy them often, but sometimes that craving hits hard." —Allie, 36, Arizona "Mint Milanos." "Annie's Mac 'n' Cheese, as childish as it is. It's always been my American staple, and I would hate to see it banned in the US." —Anonymous "I think that if the US banned Gushers, I would start hyperventilating." Want to cook recipes in step-by-step mode right from your phone? Download the free Tasty app right now. "Animal Crackers." —Leanna, 13, Michigan "Reese's Peanut Butter Cups." "Diet Coke." —silverdreamer30 "Gummy Bears and Watermelon Sour Patch Kids — the best candies ever!" "Nutella!!!!!" —fedora-the-explora "Doritos, specifically Nacho Cheese and Cool Ranch." "Goldfish." —Khylah "Blue Raspberry is the superior candy/slushie/Slurpee flavor. I would be DEVASTATED if that got taken away." "Starbursts." —littlemintmunchin "UnMeat Luncheon vegan meat. It is not my favorite food, but it is the junkiest, most trashy food I eat. It is absolutely not good for me, but I enjoy it once in a while, and I will not feel guilty. Unpopular opinion: It tastes better than SPAM." Do you have a favorite food that belongs on this list? Let me know in the comments! You know what we'll never ban? Tasty recipes! So download our free app to browse and save everything from 30-minute meals to show-stopping desserts — no subscription required.
