Police in Bangladesh use batons and tear gas to disperse rally by banned Islamist group
Police used batons and stun grenades on Friday to disperse thousands of members of the banned Hizbut Tahrir group as they marched near Bangladesh's main Baitul Mokarram Mosque in the country's capital.
Police said that many people were injured and several protesters were arrested during the violence which came after weekly prayers.
Masud Alam, a deputy commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police, said that attempts were made to disperse the rally after marchers broke away from the police barricade. Witnesses said that scores of people were injured.
The clashes happened as between 3,000 and 5,000 protesters joined the procession, chanting slogans such as 'Freedom has one path, Khilafat, Khilafat,' or caliphate, and 'Naraye Taqbir, Allahu akbar,' meaning 'Cry, God is the greatest.'
The Islamist group had mounted a social media campaign in recent days and distributed leaflets and used posters across Dhaka urging people to join the procession, dubbed 'March for Khilafat.'
Hizbut Tahrir says it wants unification of all Muslim countries over time in a unitary Islamic state or caliphate, headed by a caliph elected by Muslims. Its supporters believe this is an obligation decreed by Allah, warning that Allah will punish those Muslims who would overlook this duty. It also wants the introduction of Sharia law.
The group was banned in 2009 as a 'threat to public security' by the government of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina under an anti-terrorism law.
Hasina was forced to flee last August after weeks of protests over a quota system for allocating government jobs turned into a broader challenge to her 15-year rule and an interim government was established under Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus. Hasina has been in exile in India since her ouster.
Bangladesh, a nation of about 170 million people, is largely Muslim-majority and is governed by mostly secular laws based on British common law. But many Islamist groups and hard-line political parties want to establish tough Sharia law in the country, which has experienced extremist attacks in the past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Abergavenny mosque site vandalised by racist graffiti
Plans to turn a former Gwent library into a mosque have been met with support when the Argus went to canvas opinion, but some, including local Senedd member Laura-Anne Jones, have questioned the plan. The old Abergavenny library on Baker Street has been unused since 2015 after the library was relocated to the Town Hall. In May, Monmouthshire council agreed to grant a 30-year lease to the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association who plan to use the building as a mosque. This would be the county's first mosque. The former Abergavenny library which could be a mosque covered in racist graffiti (Image: NQ) Sadly overnight (June 10) the site was the target of racist graffiti. Written in Arabic the word 'masjid' meaning mosque appeared next to the word 'no.' Also graffitied were crosses symbolic of the Christian faith. When the Argus spoke to locals in Abergavenny, they were upset and angered by the vandalism. Francis Buxton 83 and Caroline Lewis 81 next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 83-year-old local Francis Buxton is a Christian. When asked about the painted crosses Francis said the following. 'I deplore the fact there's a cross there as if it's supporting this protest and I do hope there can be some statement from the local Christian churches, to say we stand alongside the Muslims and support them in having a regular prayer place.' 32-year-old Jenny McConnel next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) Reacting to the graffiti 32-year-old Jenny McConnel said: 'I just feel really upset and it's basically on my doorstep that people would oppose a peaceful place for people to worship it's just really upsetting.' 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf is new to Abergavenny. She said: 'I only moved here in November, and I thought it was a lovely community and all this sudden hatred it's just disgusting. 'Vandalising a building. I don't understand it it's hateful for no reason.' 62-year-old Hayley Ward shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) When asked about the idea of the mosque taking over the former library, 62-year-old Hayley Ward said: 'Well, it is different, but I think it's important to encourage and allow all sorts of diversity it's important we are all equal I think it's only fair and right that there should be access to all sorts of cultures in Abergavenny.' Catherine Evans 67 and Anne Jenkins 90 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 67-year-old Catherine Evans 67 and mother 90-year-old Anne Jenkins also supported the idea of a new religious site. Catherine said: 'I think it's great I think we should be inclusive it's somewhere for the Islamic community to be able to worship instead of having to travel long distances. 'I think we should be embracing multiculturalism. That's what it's about isn't it?' Catherine commented why some people may be against the mosque. 'In this world people have got different opinions and some people are more right wing than left wing.' Joshua Jones 35 and Stephen Hopkins 54 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 35-year-old Joshua Jones 54-year-old Stephen Hopkins were also in favour of a new mosque. Stephen said: 'It's brilliant I haven't heard of it but it's good.' 'Another religious site is good it's a good idea.' Joshua added: 'I think it's great to have that in the community. 'I think everyone has the right to practise their religion. What they believe in is up to them.' 43-year-old Dylan Roberts shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 43-year-old Dylan Roberts had the following to say: 'I've got no issue with it I think its fine people need a place to worship. 'I think there's a lot of sentiment in the country a lot of it aimed by Muslims and I think a lot of scepticism comes from that.' 65-year-old Sue Holden shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 65-year-old Sue Holden said: 'It's good the building isn't standing derelict and that it's in use and there is a need for a Mosque.' 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny (Image: NQ) 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen said: 'Wonderful, it's more inclusive in terms of libraries going there's a hell of a lot of online resources going. 'So, we don't have to worry about that being an issue in my opinion.' The plan was given approval by Monmouthshire Council last week but the decision was called in, meaning further discussion will take place. A meeting is due to take place on Wednesday, June 11, to discuss the plans.
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Gavin Newsom locks horns with Trump in a politically defining moment
Amid immigration raids, peaceful protests, attacks on law enforcement officers and the threat of his own arrest by federal agents, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is immersed in what could be the most consequential political fight of his career. The battle between the president and the governor of the nation's largest state instantly turned Newsom into the face of resistance to President Donald Trump's expansive interpretation of the authorities of his office and mass-deportation campaign. It comes at a time when Newsom, who is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, has been taking heavy criticism from within his own party over his efforts — in part through his new podcast — to cast himself in the role of conciliator. 'For someone like Newsom, the balance is: Is he able to be tough enough? Will he stand up to Trump? How does he lead at this moment?' said Democratic strategist Karen Finney. 'This is unprecedented. There's not a right answer. So far, he's doing the right things, being clear, consistent, clear communication.' Newsom could try to turn the situation on Trump by pointing to government overreach, but at the same time, there is real risk of an eruption violence from rogue actors, said Matt Bennett, co-founder of Third Way, a center-left think tank. 'The images of the militarization of this for no reason should be enough for Newsom to win this debate as long as they can keep control of the worst of the violence," he said. 'Trump always goes too far,' Bennett added. 'Last time, he went too far with the Muslim ban. Then he really went too far with child separation — those images really hurt Trump. Here, it's a real question. It's a much closer call this time. We just don't know yet.' As it is, Newsom must balance forces that are both inside and outside of his control. That includes competing with messaging from Trump (who frequently refers to the governor as "Newscum") and the president's top lieutenants, who are ever-present on cable news, social media and political podcasts. And it involves attempting to quell violent actors while pointing to Trump's actions — which have included deploying the U.S. Marines — as an overreach. For its part, the White House maintains it is winning the public relations battle, with officials tapping a refrain this week that it was the fight they wanted replete with made-for-TV images. That included images of billowing black smoke and Waymo vehicles that protesters had set on fire. On Monday, California filed suit against Trump for using emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area over the weekend. Trump, citing a statute that allows the president to activate the guard to repel a foreign invasion or quell a rebellion, accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to protect federal agents and property from demonstrators. Newsom has slammed the step as escalatory, and said existing law enforcement could have handled any violence or destruction. He argued that the move was 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions' and that there was 'currently no unmet need.' Newsom has also been mounting his own messaging offensive, including on X, where he posted what appeared to be photos of troops crowded on a floor, apparently attempting to rest. "You sent your troops here without fuel, food, water or a place to sleep. Here they are — being forced to sleep on the floor, piled on top of one another. If anyone is treating our troops disrespectfully, it is you @realDonaldTrump," Newsom said on X. On Sunday, Newsom chided Trump border czar Tom Homan, saying in an MSNBC interview: " Tom, arrest me. Let's go." Late Monday, Newsom sat for a "Pod Save America" podcast recording in which he cast Trump's actions as unconstitutional and noted some of those assigned to Los Angeles — in his view, unnecessarily — were pried away from fentanyl investigations, and potentially from border operations, for "this theatrical display of toughness by a president of the United States who is unhinged." By Tuesday morning, Newsom accused Trump and his top White House deportation architect Stephen Miller of sheltering insurrectionists. "The only people defending insurrectionists are you and @realDonaldTrump. Or, are we pretending like you didn't pardon 1500 of them?" On Tuesday afternoon, the two were locked in another public squabble after Trump told reporters he delivered some tough words to Newsom in a phone call Monday. Newsom said the two hadn't spoken since Friday, then posted an interview with NBC News from over the weekend in which Newsom contended he and Trump had a pleasant conversation and that the president barely talked about the issue at hand. The White House had a different take. 'The President called Gavin Newsom to tell him to get his ass in gear," White House spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement. "The only liar here is Newsom who continues to fail his state as he prioritizes doing interviews with leftist media to gaslight the public instead of helping his state.' At that, Newsom responded on X: "Donald Trump is a stone cold liar." Since November's presidential election, Newsom seemed content to lay low and get a better measure of Trump's political appeal as he contemplated a run for the Oval Office. He's also taken some heat from his own party for hosting MAGA figures on his podcast and saying he opposes allowing trans athletes on girls' teams in college and youth sports. Trump's move on the protests, however, has forced Newsom to pick sides on an issue that the president and White House officials believe they have the political edge. Now, Democratic leaders say their party is galvanizing behind Newsom — at least for the moment — and it would be difficult for prospective rivals to do anything but fall in line behind him when he is taking a stand on turf that is popular with Democratic voters. Friends of Newsom say it would be an unexpected political boon for the governor if Trump and Homan follow through on their threat to arrest him if they decide he has broken the law. That would be "a Nelson Mandela moment" for Newsom, said one longtime ally, referring to the imprisonment of the anti-apartheid leader and recalling that indictments helped Trump win the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. At the same time, that ally and others are careful to depict the governor as focused on the substance of the battle with Trump, rather than the political risks or rewards. "He's not going to stand by idly while President Trump aims to destroy California," said California state Rep. Buffy Wicks, a Democrat who often aligns with Newsom. "I do not think it's a political calculation. It's genuinely how he feels, and he's leading with his heart on it." Another observer had a different take: 'This whole fiasco could make Gavin president,' Anthony Scaramucci, the short-lived White House communications director in Trump's first term, wrote on X Monday. The obvious pitfall for Newsom is that Trump could take credit for restoring order or, if violence escalates, continue to pour blame on him. Democrats in the state say that they believe Trump is intentionally sowing discord and that Newsom's best political move is to do his job well. "The most important thing he can do is show he can manage a crisis," said Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. "Good governance is always the best politics — to just show competence contrasting with Trump's chaos." Trump has deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles to support the roughly 300 National Guard members already on the ground. The president had already ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops. It remains to be seen how the courts will come down on California's lawsuit. The relevant law allows the president to activate the National Guard domestically in order to quell a foreign invasion or a rebellion against the U.S. government, and Trump, calling protesters "insurrectionists," declared the demonstrations a "rebellion." The California attorney general argues in the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Northern California, that Trump has illegally usurped the authority of the state by fabricating a rebellion and that the presence of guard forces is exacerbating tension between protesters and law enforcement officers. The powers to deploy the National Guard are divided between presidents and governors, with state executives generally controlling when they are activated within their own state — as opposed to being deployed to foreign wars. Former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, said in an interview with NBC News that governors routinely work with the White House, regardless of party, to mobilize National Guard forces for a variety of tasks, including the response to natural disasters. At times, governors have asked presidents to deploy guard forces to restore order in their states during riots. But not since the Civil Rights era has a president called up the National guard to enforce the law over the objection of the state's governor. Democrats say that it's up to state and local law enforcement to keep the peace and that there was no need for Trump to federalize troops — especially without the consent of the governor. "Gavin's mad as hell and he should be," McAuliffe said. "This is the governor's responsibility, not the president's." Bennett flagged concerns about introducing the U.S. Marines into the situation, saying they are not trained in controlling crowds of Americans. 'This is a very, very dangerous thing," Bennett said. "God forbid, if they hurt somebody … that's real trouble for Trump. But [we're] not rooting for that.'
Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Alleged sword attacker ‘smiled' after slashing man in the neck, court hears
Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, is on trial accused of murdering schoolboy Daniel Anjorin and attempting to kill four others during a 20-minute rampage in Hainault, north-east London, on April 30 last year. He denies the charges. On Monday, jurors were shown CCTV of the first alleged attack, which showed Monzo's grey Ford Transit mounting the pavement and hitting Donato Iwule, a Co-op security guard on his way to work. Footage captured Mr Iwule screaming in agony as he was struck by the van before it collided with a house. Monzo is then seen exiting the vehicle and walking after him while brandishing a sword. Giving evidence, Mr Iwule said: 'I thought I was dying.' He told the court he tried to escape into a nearby garden but was struck on his knee, face and shoulder and knocked to the ground. Marcus Arduini Monzo (Elizabeth Cook/PA) He said Monzo got out of the van, pulled a sword from a cover 'right in front of my face' and threw the cover aside. 'I said 'I don't know you'… I said it multiple times,' Mr Iwule told prosecutor Tom Little KC. 'He said 'I don't care – I'm going to kill you'.' Mr Iwule said he tried to defend himself and raised his arms but Monzo swung the sword, catching him on the neck. 'I saw blood coming out of my neck,' he said. 'I pressed my thumb to not bleed out… I shouted 'God is greatest' in Arabic – because I'm Muslim. 'When that happened, he was smiling like it was something that he was happy about.' Mr Iwule said Monzo became distracted and he jumped over a fence to escape, later shouting at a schoolboy, believed to be Daniel, to go back inside. Under cross-examination, Mr Iwule said he was standing upright when he was struck and could clearly hear Monzo say he was going to kill him. Last week jurors heard how Monzo had skinned and deboned his own cat before carrying out the alleged attacks, and was under the influence of cannabis that may have led to drug-induced psychosis. However, the prosecution says this does not amount to diminished responsibility. Mitchell Hayes, a witness who was also on his way to work at the Co-op, said he saw the van 'going faster, slowing down, going faster' before the collision. He said he later heard screaming, saw the driver walk around the van and then get back in and reverse away, appearing to hold what looked like a sword. Mr Hayes said he stayed with Mr Iwule, who was holding his neck and bleeding, for 10 to 15 minutes before becoming aware of another incident nearby. He said another colleague, Nathan Hutchinson, began shouting that the attacker had a sword and they saw a body on the other side of the road. 'He was running around with it like a maniac,' Mr Hayes said of the man he believed to be Monzo. Monzo has admitted possessing two swords but denies murder, attempted murder, wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article. The trial continues.
