Rwanda agrees to take in up to 250 migrants deported from the US
Foreign US deportees, originally from other nations, had earlier been sent to South Sudan and Eswatini; a US Department of Homeland Security spokesperson described both groups as 'barbaric' criminals.
Rwandan government spokesperson Yolande Makolo confirmed to CNN on Tuesday that the East African nation had 'agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants,' in a deal that allows the government 'to approve each individual proposed for resettlement.'
When approved, the migrants, she said, 'will be provided with workforce training, health care, and accommodation support to jump start their lives in Rwanda,' allowing them to 'contribute to one of the fastest growing economies in the world over the last decade.'
Rwanda, a nation of less than 15 million people, is not new to discussions around third-country deportations to its territory.
It has previously partnered with the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) to temporarily host asylum seekers and refugees evacuated from North African nation Libya, with nearly 3000 arrivals recorded between 2019 and 2025, according to the UN organization.
In 2022, it reached a controversial migrant deal with the United Kingdom to receive deported asylum seekers who arrived illegally in the UK.
The deal did not materialize due to legal disputes and was subsequently scrapped after Keir Starmer became prime minister last July. Rwanda suggested at the time that it had no plans to reimburse the more than $300 million it received from the UK for the deportations.
Makolo did not tell CNN how Rwanda stands to benefit from housing US deportees. She also did not disclose whether the US migrants would be kept in the same accommodation that Rwanda had planned to house deported UK asylum seekers.
'We will provide more details once these have been worked out,' Makolo said.
Rwanda revealed in May that the nation was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the US, according to Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe.
The Trump administration has persevered in its attempts to strike agreements with several African countries to accept its unwanted deportees despite outrage from Africans who insist that their continent should not be treated as a 'dumping ground' for individuals considered unfit to live in the US.
In early July, the US Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to deport certain migrants to countries other than their homeland with little notice. One major hurdle for previous administrations had been dealing with countries who refuse to accept returns of their own nationals, and US President Donald Trump had directed top officials in a January executive order to facilitate international agreements to send migrants elsewhere.
'The United States is constantly engaged in diplomatic conversations with foreign nations who are willing to assist us in removing the illegal aliens that (former US President) Joe Biden allowed to infiltrate American communities,' a White House official told CNN Tuesday.
The US has also faced criticism for allegedly pressuring some of Africa's powerhouses, such as Nigeria and South Africa, to take in its foreign deportees.
In the case of Rwanda, concerns linger over the safety of refugees given the nation's human rights record.
During the heated debate over Rwanda's deal with the UK, the UNHCR commended Rwanda for 'generously hosting thousands of refugees…on a temporary basis,' but warned there were 'serious risks' that 'externalization poses to refugees, including refoulement (sending refugees to a country where they could face persecution).'
At the time, Rwanda pushed back against the UNHCR, insisting it 'does not refoule asylum seekers.'
CNN's Kit Maher contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Victims feeling exhausted and anxious about wrangling over Epstein files
LOS ANGELES — Women who say they were abused by Jeffrey Epstein are feeling skeptical and anxious about the Justice Department's handling of records related to the convicted sex offender, with some backing more public disclosures as an overdue measure of transparency, and others expressing concerns about their privacy and the Trump administration's motivations.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
U.S. plans to ease human rights criticism of El Salvador, Israel, Russia
Leaked drafts of the State Department's long-delayed annual human rights reports indicate that the Trump administration intends to dramatically scale back U.S. government criticism of certain foreign nations with extensive records of abuse. The draft human rights reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia, copies of which were reviewed by The Washington Post, are significantly shorter than the ones prepared last year by the Biden administration. They strike all references to LGBTQ individuals or crimes against them, and the descriptions of government abuses that do remain have been softened. The draft report for El Salvador, which, at the Trump administration's urging, has agreed to incarcerate migrants deported from the United States, states that the country had 'no credible reports of significant human rights abuses' in 2024. The State Department's previous report for El Salvador, documenting 2023, identified 'significant human rights issues' there — including government-sanctioned killings, instances of torture, and 'harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.' Several Venezuelans whom the Trump administration sent to the Salvadoran prison said they were subjected to repeated beatings. The leaked draft reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia underscore how the Trump administration is radically rethinking America's role in global human rights advocacy. The documents also are consistent with internal guidance circulated earlier this year by State Department leaders who advised staff to truncate the reports to the minimum required by statutory guidelines and executive orders signed by President Donald Trump, and to remove references to government corruption, gender-based crimes and other abuses the U.S. government historically has documented. The State Department declined to address questions about the leaked documents reviewed by The Post. 'The 2024 Human Rights report has been restructured in a way that removes redundancies, increases report readability and is more responsive to the legislative mandate that underpins the report,' a senior State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to brief the news media, said Wednesday. 'The human rights report focuses on core issues.' This official said the Trump administration would bring a new focus to some issues, including backsliding on freedom of expression in some countries allied with the United States, even as the administration has itself faced criticism on free-speech grounds for seeking to deport foreigners studying in the United States who have criticized Israel's conduct in Gaza. U.S. diplomats have compiled the State Department's annual human rights reports for almost 50 years. Their findings are considered the most thorough and wide-ranging of their kind and are routinely relied upon by courts inside and outside the United States. The human rights reports are congressionally mandated to be sent to lawmakers by the end of February. Public release typically happens in March or April. The State Department is yet to officially release this year's reports, which cover activities and observations made in 2024. Current and former U.S. officials say most of this year's reports were nearly completed when the Biden administration transitioned out in January. The drafts for El Salvador and Russia are marked 'finalized,' while the draft for Israel is marked 'quality check.' All were edited in the last few days, the documents show. It is unclear whether the reports eventually transmitted to Congress and released to the public will mirror the drafts. The internal guidance circulated by State Department leaders earlier this year instructed diplomats responsible for drafting reports to remove references to numerous potential human rights violations, including governments that had deported people to a country where they could face torture, crimes that involve violence against LGBTQ people and government corruption. The internal guidance was written by Samuel Samson, a Trump political appointee at the State Department. Samson, initially little known in Foggy Bottom, attracted attention after writing an article for the agency's Substack in May criticizing Europe for what he alleged was the continent's descent into 'a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance.' Samson was tasked with reviewing the country reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia. While all three reports continue to describe human rights abuses in those countries, each was whittled down considerably from a year before and all bear significant changes to the language used to describe alleged abuses. The draft prepared for Israel, for instance, is 25 pages long; last year's report was more than 100 pages. Meanwhile, a comparison of the documents covering El Salvador shows the Trump administration downplaying the country's history of prison violence, emphasizing that there has been a reduction overall while stating that purported deaths were under government review. Trump has expressed fondness for El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, and hosted him in the Oval Office earlier this year after the administration secured an agreement to deport people to the country's notorious CECOT megaprison. The Salvadoran Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Scrutiny of corruption and judicial independence also is significantly scaled back in the draft report for Israel. The 2023 report compiled by the Biden administration addresses the corruption trial of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, another of Trump's international allies, and judicial overhaul efforts, which critics say threatens the independence of the country's judiciary. The Trump administration's draft report for Israel makes no mention of corruption or threats to the independence of Israel's judiciary. Previous human rights reports also have mentioned Israeli surveillance of Palestinians and restrictions of their movement, including an Amnesty International finding on Israel's use of 'experimental facial recognition system to track Palestinians and enforce movement restrictions.' This issue is not addressed in the draft report either. The Israeli Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The draft reports examined by The Post contain no reference to gender-based violence or violence against LGBTQIA people. Keifer Buckingham, who worked on these issues at the State Department until January, said it was a 'glaring omission' in the case of Russia, where the country's Supreme Court had banned LGBTQIA organizations and labeled them 'extremist,' with raids and arrests last year. The Russian Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Buckingham chastised Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who as a U.S. senator for many years was a vocal defender of human rights. 'Secretary Rubio has repeatedly asserted that his State Department has not abandoned human rights, but it is clear by this and other actions that this administration only cares about the human rights of some people … in some countries, when it's convenient to them,' said Buckingham, who now works as managing director at the Council for Global Quality. During his time on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio praised the State Department's annual human rights reports. In 2012, he said 'the world has been a better place [for two centuries] because America has strived to defend these fundamental human rights both at home and abroad.' 'The State Department's annual human rights report sheds light on foreign governments' failure to respect their citizens' fundamental rights,' he said a statement then, adding that it was important for the world to know that 'the United States will stand with freedom-seeking people around the world and will not tolerate violations against their rights.' U.S. officials have repeatedly pointed to a speech given by Trump during a visit to the Middle East in May as an example of the new way Washington relates to the world, with an emphasis on sovereignty over universal rights. Speaking in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Trump had criticized 'Western interventionists … giving you lectures on how to live or how to govern your own affairs.' This shift of the U.S. role in promoting human rights has coincided with a change in U.S. promotion of democracy. In a cable sent in July, Rubio instructed diplomats to no longer publicly comment on other countries' elections, including making an assessment of whether the election was 'free and fair,' unless there is a 'clear and compelling U.S. foreign policy interest to do so.' The move was a shift from long-standing U.S. practice — even under Rubio himself. The secretary had personally congratulated world leaders in Trinidad and Tobago and Ecuador for conducting 'free and fair' elections since January. Last month, the Trump administration tightened sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, stepping up a feud with the Brazilian government for the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, for his alleged role in a violent coup plot in 2022. In announcing those sanctions, the U.S. Treasury Department invoked the Magnitsky Act, a law that allows the American government to impose penalties on foreign nationals accused of corruption and human rights violations. In a statement, Rubio said that Moraes had committed 'serious human rights abuse, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and violations of the freedom of expression.' Moraes has said that the court would not yield to foreign pressure, but on Wednesday eased some house arrest restrictions on Bolsonaro. Clara Ence Morse and Meg Kelly contributed to this report.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Return of Family Separation
It was one of the most explosive policies of President Trump's first term: the systematic separation of migrant children from their parents as the families crossed into the United States from Mexico. Now, a more targeted version of that practice is back, far from the border. My colleague Hamed Aleaziz, who covers immigration, found at least nine cases in which migrant parents already in the country were separated from their children after they refused to comply with deportation orders. 'Interior separation is approved,' officials with Immigration and Customs Enforcement wrote in one case. Officials denied that there was any new policy on family separations. They told Hamed that parents had the option of staying with their children by leaving the country with them. Today, I called Hamed, who told me the effort represented a new front in the administration's effort to persuade as many people as it could to leave the country. JB: You spoke with several parents who have been separated from their children in recent months, all of whom were in ICE custody. What did they tell you? HA: They expressed anguish, first and foremost, at being separated from their kids. They were still coming to grips with this idea that they were not with their children — and that there weren't any prospects of being with their children anytime soon. Americans are frustrated with both political parties Percent who say they have a favorable opinion of ... Source: Gallup surveys conducted between 1992 and 2025 By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
