Bill to connect local farmers, ranchers with food banks moves to House floor
New food bank bill would connect ranchers and organizations serving meals. (USDA photo by Bob Nichols via Flickr)
Freshman Rep. Shelly Fyant, D-Arlee, was nervous waiting for the House Agriculture Committee to decide the fate of one of her first bills, about food security.
House Bill 649 would create a $3 million grant program connecting local food producers with food banks. Committee discussion zeroed in on the bill's financial impact and any overhead costs, as well as how many food pantries and food hubs would qualify.
The grants would help food banks purchase food from local farmers and ranchers and open up a new market for them.
Following about 45 minutes of discussion and a strong defense of her bill, Fyant left and waited outside in the hallway. One of the members of the committee, Rep. Jennifer Lynch, D-Butte, even walked over at one point to tell Fyant they were about to go into final discussions on her bill.
But Fyant didn't go in and watch, and later found out it passed on to the House floor with an 11-6 vote when an aide gave her a thumbs up. In an interview with the Daily Montanan, Fyant said she fought to work on these problems for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes during her eight years on Tribal Council, and
now in the Legislature, Fyant has an opportunity to talk about the issue to an even broader audience.
'Food sovereignty has been my passion since 2016,' Fyant said. 'I started a food sovereignty committee because I could and pushed my agenda, because it was a healthy one, right? A long term vision. If we can't feed ourselves, we're not truly sovereign.'
One of the things Fyant did was study work by the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians. Essentially the tribe bought a farm and started producing food over a period of about three years, Fyant said.
Fyant wanted to bring the idea back to the Flathead Valley. Then, COVID-19 got in the way.
'I developed this team, a specialist in water, a hydrologist, one of the local tribal producers, a guy from legal who was like-minded,' Fyant said. 'I put together this team, sent them down there, (and) then the pandemic hit.'
The tribe has since developed some space to have a commercial kitchen, Fyant said, and there are other ongoing and upcoming projects related to the issue of food insecurity in the Flathead.
She's also trying to reach youth.
'When I do food security talks with young people, I tell them, 'There were no obese hunters, there were no diabetic warriors,'' Fyant said. 'You know, there's a lot of physical activity related to getting food, and so not just getting your food, but processing it. You know, after the buffalo hunt, you gotta process. I remember the first time I tanned a hide. I thought, 'That's some upper body workout.''
The Farm to Food Bank proposal is similar to some work already being done in Montana, including the University of Montana's PEAS Farm. Student interns work the farm over the summer, which is run in coordination with Garden City Harvest. They do two things — provide Community Supported Agriculture boxes for sale and produce about 15,000 to 20,000 pounds for the Missoula Food Bank and other places, including a farmers market for low-income seniors.
The PEAS Farm program is over 25 years old and Garden City Harvest was started by Missoula County Commissioner Josh Slotnick.
Nearly one in nine Montanans face hunger and about 58,000 Montanans live in areas with limited access to grocery stores or supermarkets, according to the Montana Food Bank Network.
In 2023, the organization served 13,896,595 meals to food pantries and program partners.
Kiera Condon, an advocacy specialist with Montana Food Bank Network, spoke in favor of the bill.
'The investment provided through this legislation will build both food security and economic security by connecting Montana's food banks and pantries to growers and ranchers in their area,' Condon said. 'Strengthening local food systems and ensuring access to fresh, nutritious foods creates healthier families and stable communities.'
The Montana Farmers Union also supported the bill.
'It's a priority for our membership to promote regional, resilient Food Systems and diverse markets in order to achieve these goals The Farm to Food Bank program builds both resilient food systems and diversifies the market opportunity for farmers and ranchers,' Rachel Prevost, with the Farmers Union, told the committee. 'It's a win-win across the board for our food systems and our producers.'
The bill moved forward with one amendment, which lowered the amount of funding that can be used for administrative costs from 20% to 5%.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers
It should be clear by now that, despite the assurances from President Donald Trump and his allies in government, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month—not only won't reduce the federal budget deficit but will in fact increase the nation's debt load by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Given that Trump came into office promising to cut federal spending, it's worth looking at how Trump's bill does the opposite of what he and other Republicans say it does. And one of the more egregious things it does is boost corporate welfare for wealthy farmers. "The government provides agricultural subsidies—monetary payments and other types of support—to farmers or agribusinesses," says the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). "While some subsidies are given to promote specific farming practices, others focus on research and development, conservation practices, disaster aid, marketing, nutrition assistance, risk mitigation, and more." "In reality, this support is highly skewed toward the five major 'program' commodities of corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice," according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an environmental advocacy organization. "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations." The new bill will only make the problem worse: According to an analysis by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the bill "would increase agriculture-facing programs spending by $56.6 billion over the next decade," of which "$52.3 billion is tied to enhancements in the farm safety net." That "farm safety net" comprises most agricultural subsidy spending in any given year. It includes price and revenue guarantees for certain crops, ensuring farmers earn a set minimum on staples like corn and soybeans, as well as crop insurance assistance, covering up to 60 percent of farmers' insurance premiums in the event of price declines or poor harvests. The programs are a bad deal for taxpayers—indeed, for anybody but the very wealthiest agribusinesses. "Just in the last 10 years, crop insurance agents and the 14 companies the USDA allows to sell and service crop insurance policies…received almost $33.3 billion from the federal Crop Insurance Program," EWG Midwest director Anne Schechinger wrote in 2023. "In some years, up to one-third of crop insurance payments are made to companies and agents, not farmers." The new bill would make the program even more generous, tying payouts to inflation and putting taxpayers on the hook for even more insurance company operating costs. The bill would also increase the price minimums for many staple crops, though the increases for those grown in southern U.S. states go up exponentially: While corn would go up by 18 percent, and wheat and soybeans by more than 70 percent each, minimum prices for seed cotton, peanuts, and rice—grown primarily in the southern states—would each more than double, with the minimum price of rice going up 185 percent. Price minimums inherently distort the market, causing farmers to prioritize favored crops even if others would be better suited to the growing conditions—after all, if you're guaranteed a minimum price for what you sell, and you're covered for what doesn't grow, what do you have to lose? At the same time, "subsidies increase land prices, which benefits wealthy landowners at the expense of the many farmers who rent," writes Nan Swift of the R Street Institute. "Young farmers can't afford to rent or buy land at inflated prices. Likewise, young farmers often have smaller farms that don't benefit from the primary federal subsidy programs." Not only does the "Big Beautiful Bill" keep these programs intact, it expands them; it even introduces an "insurance pilot program" for "poultry growers." "The farm subsidy increases in the reconciliation bill are brazen. The GOP lavished the biggest subsidy increases on GOP parts of the country," writes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute. "More importantly, in a supposed spending reform bill, the GOP doesn't just spare millionaire farmers from cuts, they aggressively expand inefficient farm giveaways by $57 billion." The post Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers appeared first on


The Hill
14 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump, Musk hint at reconciliation
The Big Story President Trump said he thinks he could make amends with tech billionaire Elon Musk, while the Tesla CEO voiced regrets over his public clash with the president. © AP Photo/Evan Vucci Less than a week after the blowup between the two men that grew increasingly dramatic as Musk called for Trump's impeachment and linked him to the Jeffrey Epstein files, the president appeared open to making peace. However, he also suggested that doing so is not a priority for him. 'I guess I could, but you know, we have to straighten out the country,' the president told the New York Post's 'Pod Force One.' 'And my sole function now is getting this country back to a level higher than it's ever been. And I think we can do that. I think we're going to do it easily.' When asked if there was anything he could do to forgive Musk, the president said he has 'no hard feelings' but was surprised by his former top adviser's public criticism of the House-passed tax and spending bill. 'When he did that, I was not a happy camper,' Trump said. Musk earlier on Wednesday also voiced regret for his public feud with the president, saying that it 'went too far' on his social media platform X. The Hill's Alex Gangitano has more here. Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: Trump, Musk spoke ahead of 'regret' post amid reconciliation talk: Reports President Trump spoke on the phone with tech billionaire Elon Musk late Monday night, according to multiple reports, as allies of both men had urged them to reconcile their feud that exploded last week with a torrent of social media barbs. The New York Times first reported on the call. The White House did not respond to requests for comment about the conversation Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week after … 2 House panels advance crypto market structure bill A pair of House panels voted Tuesday to advance legislation laying out oversight of the crypto market. The House Financial Services Committee and House Agriculture Committee held separate markups on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, with both ultimately voting to report the bill out of committee. The scenes in the two committees, however, were vastly different. The House Agriculture Committee voted 47-6 to advance … Gabbard: AI used to decide continued JFK files' classification Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the Trump administration used artificial intelligence (AI) to help determine which documents related to the assassination of former President Kennedy should remain classified. Gabbard, speaking at an Amazon Web Services conference Tuesday, touted how the agency fed tens of thousands of pages of materials into AI systems ahead of their declassification to speed up the otherwise … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner Stablecoin bill clears another Senate hurdle © Greg Nash Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. The Senate voted Wednesday to advance legislation setting up a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, bringing the crypto bill one step closer to a final vote in the upper chamber. Eighten Democrats voted with almost every Republican to end debate on an updated version of the GENIUS Act. The new bill text was reached as part of lengthy negotiations between Republicans and crypto-friendly Democrats last month, ahead of an earlier procedural vote on the Senate floor. The vote breakdown was largely similar to the May vote, although the bill picked up support from Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) while Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) switched her vote to oppose the measure. Blunt Rochester had supported the bill both in the Senate Banking Committee in March and on the Senate floor last month. She voiced some hesitation Tuesday about Senate leadership's decision to forgo an open amendment process on the GENIUS Act, emphasizing she hoped to see additional changes to the bill. 'I was really clear,' she told The Hill. 'I hoped that there would be an open amendment process, and that's what I heard Leader Thune say around last month, so I will take a look at this language, and we'll make a decision from there.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) ultimately scrapped the push for so-called 'regular order,' as controversial amendments — most notably, Sen. Roger Marshall's (R-Kan.) Credit Card Competition Act — threatened to upend support for the bill. The GENIUS Act likely faces a handful more votes before it can clear the Senate and head to the House. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told The Hill on Tuesday that she expects a final vote on the bill next week. In Other News Branch out with other reads on The Hill: Walmart expanding drone delivery service to these 5 cities BENTONVILLE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — Walmart has confirmed that it will be expanding its drone delivery program, allowing customers in five more cities to order items from the retailer and have them flown right to their doorstep. 'Now, millions of customers in Atlanta, Charlotte, Houston, Orlando and Tampa will enjoy the convenience of receiving their orders in just minutes,' the release stated. Walmart drone delivery … What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Judges probe whether immunity decision leads to wipeout of Trump conviction An appeals court panel took up President Trump's bid to fight his hush money criminal conviction in federal court Wednesday, acknowledging the extraordinary … Read more Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned Organizers with the 'No Kings' movement are planning some 1,500 demonstrations across the country to protest the upcoming military parade … Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow!


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Two House panels advance crypto market structure bill
A pair of House panels voted Tuesday to advance legislation laying out oversight of the crypto market. The House Financial Services Committee and House Agriculture Committee held separate markups on the CLARITY Act, with both ultimately voting to report the bill out of committee. The scenes in the two committees, however, were vastly different. The House Agriculture Committee voted 47-6 to advance the legislation after a relatively brief two-and-a-half-hour discussion. The House Financial Services Committee, by contrast, spent nearly twelve hours working through dozens of amendments before reaching a final vote shortly before midnight. The panel was also more split on the bill, with a 32-19 vote to advance the legislation. 'Congress has a historic opportunity to provide the clear regulatory framework needed to unlock this innovation,' House Financial Services Chair French Hill (R-Ark.) said in a statement. 'I am proud that the Financial Services Committee, along with the House Agriculture Committee, took this vital step in advancing the bipartisan CLARITY Act through our Committees,' he continued. 'I thank my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for their support as this bill is one step closer to becoming law.' The CLARITY Act splits regulation of the digital assets market between two regulators — the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The bill has to be approved by both panels since the House Financial Services Committee oversees the SEC, while the House Agriculture Committee has jurisdiction over the CFTC. The legislation has faced pushback from House Democrats, particularly as President Trump and his family have increasingly expanded their involvement in the crypto space, from meme coins to stablecoins. 'Republicans are jamming through the 'CALAMITY Act,' which not only legitimizes Trump's corruption, but also creates enormous loopholes that expose investors to fraud and weakens our national security,' Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, said Tuesday. Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, offered a more conciliatory tone while still voicing some concerns about the bill. 'The CLARITY Act is not a perfect bill, but it's an important step forward,' Craig said Tuesday, later adding, 'I still believe while many of us are going to vote here today to advance this legislation that there is still some work to do before it gets to the House floor.' The votes to advance the market structure legislation in the House comes as the Senate prepares to hold another key procedural vote on stablecoin legislation Wednesday. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) moved to end debate Monday on an updated version of the GENIUS Act, which seeks to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins, teeing up the final few votes on the legislation in the upper chamber.