logo
Israeli strikes back Iran's leadership into a corner

Israeli strikes back Iran's leadership into a corner

Japan Times14 hours ago

Israel has gutted Iran's nuclear and military leadership with airstrikes that leave a weakened Tehran with few options to retaliate, including an all-out war that it is neither equipped for nor likely to win, four regional officials said.
The overnight strikes by Israel — repeated for second night on Friday — have ratcheted up the confrontation between the arch foes to an unprecedented level after years of war in the shadows, which burst into the open when Iran's ally Hamas attacked Israel in 2023.
Regional security sources said it was unlikely that Tehran could respond with similarly effective strikes because its missile capabilities and military network in the region have been severely degraded by Israel since the Hamas attacks that triggered the Gaza war.
State news agency IRNA said that Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel on Friday in retaliation. But the Israeli military said the missiles numbered fewer than 100 and most were intercepted or fell short. No casualties were immediately reported.
The regional security sources said Iran's leaders, humiliated and increasingly preoccupied with their own survival, cannot afford to appear weak in the face of Israeli military pressure, raising the prospect of further escalation — including covert attacks on Israel or even the perilous option of seeking to build a nuclear bomb rapidly.
"They can't survive if they surrender," said Mohanad Hage Ali at the Carnegie Middle East Center, a think tank in Beirut. "They need to strike hard against Israel but their options are limited. I think their next option is withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty."
Withdrawing from the NPT would be a serious escalation as it would signal Iran is accelerating its enrichment program to produce weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb, experts said.
Iran's leadership has not confirmed whether it would attend a sixth round of deadlocked talks with the United States over its nuclear program scheduled for Sunday in Oman.
Tehran's regional sway has been weakened by Israel's attacks on its proxies — from Hamas in Gaza to Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq — as well as by the ousting of Iran's close ally, Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Western sanctions have also hit Iran's crucial oil exports and the economy is reeling from a string of crises including a collapsing currency and rampant inflation, as well as energy and water shortages.
"They can't retaliate through anyone. The Israelis are dismantling the Iranian empire piece by piece, bit by bit ... and now they've started sowing internal doubt about (the invincibility of) the regime," said Sarkis Naoum, a regional expert. "This is massive hit."
Israel strikes targeting key facilities in Tehran and other cities continued into the night on Friday. The Iranian Foreign Ministry did not respond to requests for comment. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was defiant on Friday, saying Israel had initiated a war and would suffer "a bitter fate."
The nuclear option
Abdelaziz al-Sager, director of the Gulf Research Center think tank, said Iran has been backed into a corner with limited options.
One possibility would be to offer assurances — in private — that it will abandon uranium enrichment and dismantle its nuclear capabilities, since any public declaration of such a capitulation would likely provoke a fierce domestic backlash.
He said another option could involve a return to clandestine warfare, reminiscent of the 1980s bombings targeting U.S. and Israeli embassies and military installations.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivers a televised message in Tehran on Friday, following Israeli strikes on the country. |
Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader / WANA / via REUTERS
A third, and far more perilous option, would be to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and accelerate its uranium enrichment program.
Such a move, al-Sager warned, would be tantamount to a declaration of war and would almost certainly provoke a strong international response — not only from Israel, but also from the United States and other Western powers.
Trump has threatened military action to ensure Iran doesn't obtain an atomic weapon. He reiterated his position on Thursday, saying: "Iran must completely give up hopes of obtaining a nuclear weapon." Iran is currently enriching uranium up to 60% purity, close to the roughly 90% it would need for nuclear weapons. It has enough material at that level, if processed further, for nine nuclear bombs, according to a U.N. nuclear watchdog yardstick.
Israel's strikes overnight on Thursday targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories, military commanders and nuclear scientists. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said it was the start of a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon.
At least 20 senior commanders were killed, two regional sources said. The armed forces chief of staff, Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, Revolutionary Guard chief Hossein Salami, and the head of the Revolutionary Guard Aerospace Force, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, were among them.
"It's a big attack: big names, big leaders, big damage to the Iranian military leadership and its ballistic missiles. It's unprecedented," said Carnegie's Hage Ali.
Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), said Israel would probably not be able to take out Iran's nuclear project completely without U.S. help.
"Therefore, if the U.S. will not be part of the war, I assume that some parts of (Iran's) nuclear project will remain," she told reporters Friday.
Shaken to the core
Friday's strikes have not only inflicted strategic damage but have also shaken Iran's leadership to the core, according to a senior regional official close to the Iranian establishment.
Defiance has transformed into concern and uncertainty within the ruling elite and, behind closed doors, anxiety is mounting, not just over the external threats but also their eroding grip on power at home, the official said.
"Panic has surged among the leadership," the senior regional official said. "Beyond the threat of further attacks, a deeper fear looms large: domestic unrest."
A moderate former Iranian official said the assassination in 2020 of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the overseas arm of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, on the orders of President Donald Trump, started the rot.
Since then, the Islamic Republic has struggled to reassert its influence across the region and has never fully recovered. "This attack might be the beginning of the end," he said.
If protests erupt, and the leadership responds with repression, it will only backfire, the former official said, noting that public anger has been simmering for years, fueled by sanctions, inflation and an unrelenting crackdown on dissent.
In his video address shortly after the attacks started, Netanyahu suggested he would like to see regime change in Iran and sent a message to Iranians.
"Our fight is not with you, our fight is with the brutal dictatorship that has oppressed you for 46 years. I believe the day of your liberation is near," he said.
The hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, throwing the Iranian security establishment into a state of confusion and chaos.
"These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime," said Shine.
Iranian state media reported that at least two nuclear scientists, Fereydoun Abbasi and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, were killed in Israeli strikes in Tehran.
Empire in decline
Iran's most powerful proxy in the region, Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, is also in a weak position to respond.
In the days leading up to the strikes on Iran, security sources close to Hezbollah said the group would not join any retaliatory action by Iran out of fear such a response could unleash a new Israeli blitz on Lebanon.
Israel's war last year against Hezbollah left the group badly weakened, with its leadership decimated, thousands of its fighters killed and swaths of its strongholds in southern Lebanon and Beirut's suburbs destroyed.
A direct war between Israel and Iran could swiftly expand to Gulf states whose airspace lies between the two enemies, and which host several U.S. military bases.
Gulf monarchies allied with Washington issued internal directives to avoid any provocative statements following the attacks that might anger Iran, one official Gulf source said.
Analysts said Trump could leverage the fallout from the Israeli strikes to bring Iran back to the nuclear negotiating table — but this time more isolated, and more likely to offer deeper concessions.
"One thing is clear: the Iranian empire is in decline," said regional expert Naoum. "Can they still set the terms of their decline? Not through military terms. There's only one way to do that: through negotiations."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran and Israel exchange deadly military strikes
Iran and Israel exchange deadly military strikes

NHK

time2 hours ago

  • NHK

Iran and Israel exchange deadly military strikes

Iranian forces have attacked Israel with ballistic missiles in retaliation for Friday's airstrikes on its nuclear facilities and other targets. Israel has also continued to attack Iran. Casualties have been reported in both countries. Iran's state-run TV quoted a senior revolutionary guard corps official as saying at least 150 Israeli targets were struck. He reportedly said the attacks will continue as long as necessary. Israeli media say three people have been killed and more than 70 others injured in and around Tel Aviv. Israeli forces attacked more than 100 targets on Friday. Nearly 80 people were killed, including top Iranian military commanders. On Saturday, the Israeli military said it also killed nine scientists and experts involved in Iran's nuclear program. It said their deaths constitute a significant blow to Tehran's ability to develop weapons of mass destruction. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, "They triggered a war. We will not allow them to walk away unscathed from the great crime they have committed." Iran's state-run TV said there could be chemical or radioactive contamination inside the facility. But officials at the International Atomic Energy Agency say radiation levels outside the complex have not risen. They say they will continue to monitor the situation. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said, "I have repeatedly stated that nuclear facilities must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment." US news site Axios quoted President Donald Trump as saying Israel used what he called "great American equipment" and that Iran now has a stronger incentive to reach a nuclear deal. Trump used a social media post to urge leaders in Tehran to come to an agreement before they have "nothing left."

Editorial: Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities an outrageous act spoiling diplomatic efforts
Editorial: Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities an outrageous act spoiling diplomatic efforts

The Mainichi

time8 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Editorial: Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities an outrageous act spoiling diplomatic efforts

Israel has attacked nuclear-related facilities across Iran with a wave of strikes by fighter jets and other means that also killed Revolutionary Guard officials and scientists. The strikes infringe upon Iran's sovereignty in contravention of international law and are unacceptable. The outrageous acts trample on the international community's diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear issue through negotiations. While Iran has maintained that its nuclear development program is for peaceful use, Israel has been wary that Tehran could be close to possessing nuclear weapons. Global pressure against Iran had also been intensifying, with the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors adopting a resolution at a June 12 meeting condemning Iran for violating the inspection agreement over its nuclear facilities. Meanwhile, the United States and Iran resumed bilateral negotiations in April over Tehran's nuclear program, and a meeting between the two parties had been scheduled for June 15. Regardless, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went ahead with the attacks, apparently thinking that the prolonging of negotiations would benefit Tehran. There is no doubt that the latest strikes have placed a resolution through dialogue a long way off. The Iranian military has vowed to retaliate, saying "the enemy will pay a high price," and unleashed drone attacks on Israel. Israel has declared a nationwide state of emergency and cautioned its people to be vigilant. U.S. President Donald Trump is also responsible for aggravating the situation. In 2015, six world powers including the U.S. and European nations reached a nuclear accord with Iran. In exchange for lifting sanctions against Tehran, caps were placed on Iran's uranium enrichment levels. However, Trump unilaterally pulled the U.S. out of the nuclear deal during his first administration. Iran has since continued its nuclear development and raised its uranium enrichment level to 60%. Even after bilateral talks resumed under the second Trump government, the rift between Washington and Tehran has not been mended. While Washington had asked Israel to exercise self-restraint out of concern that the latter's attacks would adversely affect U.S.-Iran talks, it failed to stop Israel from launching the strikes. There are concerns that the turmoil in the Middle East could grow even further. In the Palestinian autonomous region of Gaza, Israel has continued fierce attacks in a quest to sweep away the Islamic group Hamas. Last year, the Netanyahu administration carried out military attacks against Tehran and other locations on the grounds that Iran was aiding Hamas, triggering tit-for-tat exchanges. If the conflict between Israel and Iran -- both regional military powers -- intensifies, it will further destabilize the Middle East. Israel is backed by the U.S. while Iran is bolstering its ties with Russia. Both Washington and Moscow need to exercise their influence to prevent the conflict from escalating any further.

Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: regime change
Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: regime change

Japan Times

time10 hours ago

  • Japan Times

Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: regime change

Israel's surprise attack on Iran had an obvious goal of sharply disrupting Tehran's nuclear program and lengthening the time it would need to develop an atomic weapon. But the scale of the attacks, Israel's choice of targets, and its politicians' own words suggest another, longer-term objective: toppling the regime itself. The strikes early on Friday hit not just Iran's nuclear facilities and missile factories but also key figures in the country's military chain of command and its nuclear scientists, blows that appear aimed at diminishing Iran's credibility both at home and among its allies in the region — factors that could destabilize the Iranian leadership, experts said. "One assumes that one of the reasons that Israel is doing that is that they're hoping to see regime change," said Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior official under President George W. Bush. "It would like to see the people of Iran rise up," he said, adding that the limited civilian casualties in the initial round of attacks also spoke to a broader aim. In a video address shortly after Israeli fighter jets began striking Iranian nuclear facilities and air defense systems, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, appealed to the Iranian people directly. Israel's actions against Iran's ally Hezbollah had led to a new government in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, he said. The Iranian people had an opportunity too: "I believe that the day of your liberation is near. And when that happens, the great friendship between our two ancient peoples will flourish once again," Netanyahu said. But despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity toward Israel — not only among Iran's rulers but its majority-Shiite population — raises questions about the prospect for fomenting enough public support to oust an entrenched theocratic leadership in Tehran backed by loyal security forces. Singh cautioned that no one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to coalesce in Iran. Friday's assault was the first phase of what Israel said would be a prolonged operation. Experts said they expected Israel would continue to go after key Iranian nuclear infrastructure to delay Tehran's march to a nuclear bomb — even if Israel on its own does not have the capability to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu points to a red line he drew on a graphic of a bomb used to represent Iran's nuclear program as he addresses the United Nations General Assembly at the U.N. Headquarters in New York in September 2012. | REUTERS Iran says its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only. The U.N. nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel's first salvos targeted senior figures in Iran's military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country's air defense system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran's nuclear site. "As a democratic country, the State of Israel believes that it is up to the people of a country to shape their national politics, and choose their government," the Israeli Embassy in Washington said. "The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people." Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran's government, including in September. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, while acquiescing to Israel's strikes and helping its close ally fend off Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, has given no indication that it seeks regime change in Tehran. The White House and Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter. Israel has much further to go if it is to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, and military analysts have always said it might be impossible to totally disable the well-fortified sites dotted around Iran. The Israeli government has also cautioned that Iran's nuclear program could not be entirely destroyed by means of a military campaign. "There's no way to destroy a nuclear program by military means," Israeli national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi told Israel's Channel 13 TV. The military campaign could, however, create conditions for a deal with the United States that would thwart the nuclear program. Analysts also remain skeptical that Israel will have the munitions needed to obliterate Iran's nuclear project on its own. "Israel probably cannot take out completely the nuclear project on its own without the American participation," Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, told reporters on Friday. While setting back Tehran's nuclear program would have value for Israel, the hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos. "These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime," said Shine. "In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that," she said. But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now at the Atlantic Council. If Israel succeeds in removing Iran's leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hard-line in pursuit of conflict with Israel. "For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day — that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime," Panikoff said. "But history tells us it can always be worse."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store