Libel lawyer Paul Tweed claims book wrongly portrays him as covert agent for UAE
Libel lawyer Paul Tweed has asked the High Court to strike out a defence of truth being pleaded in a defamation case he is taking against a US publisher.
Mr Tweed claims part of an academic book entitled Subversion: The Strategic Weaponization of Narratives is defamatory because it falsely portrays him as a "subversive, covert agent" of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Advertisement
The book was published by the Georgetown University Press in 2023 and written by Andreas Krieg, who teaches in King's College, London.
The court heard that Mr Tweed claims, among other things, the book falsely claims he improperly writes warning letters and/or institutes legal proceedings for the purposes of silencing voices in the West who are critical of the UAE.
It also falsely claims he is portrayed as a solicitor who uses his legal practice improperly to protect or advance the UAE political regime, he says.
The book also contains an argument about how certain countries use 'decentralised networks of a variety of actors, paid agents, wilful pawns and sometimes useful idiots' in order to mobilise information networks with the ultimate goal of undermining social, political consensus.
Advertisement
Ireland
Gerry Adams labels Spotlight allegations 'grevious...
Read More
Mr Tweed claims damages and seeks an injunction requiring the removal of the book from sale or the correcting of the allegedly defamatory paragraphs.
The claims are denied and Georgetown Press pleads the defence of truth.
On Thursday, Mr Justice Micheál O'Higgins began hearing arguments on a motion filed on behalf of Mr Tweed as to why the defence truth should be struck out or alternatively the defendant should be required to amend its defence. The defence will deliver its reply on Friday.
Mr Tweed specialises in defamation law and is representing former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams whose action against the BBC is currently at hearing in the High Court. He also represents businessman Declan Ganley in a case against the US news broadcaster CNN which has yet to be heard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
20 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
1989 police probe into murder of John Devine ‘seriously defective'
The 1989 police investigation into the murder of John Devine was 'seriously defective', Northern Ireland's Police Ombudsman has found. The 37-year-old was murdered by loyalists on Fallswater Street in west Belfast on July 23rd, 1989. Advertisement The father-of-three died after armed men entered his home and shot him a number of times at close range. Police Ombudsman Marie Anderson has highlighted a 'series of failures' in the investigation. These include that a man prosecuted for Mr Devine's murder almost three decades later should have been arrested and interviewed as a suspect at the time. Mrs Anderson's report is also critical of the then police force, the RUC's wider suspect and arrest strategy, which she found resulted in police taking action against only two people on a list of 36 persons of interest, despite intelligence and other information which linked individuals to the murder. Advertisement The report identifies that house-to-house and witness inquiries were not adequately pursued and led to missed opportunities to gather evidence which may have assisted police to identify suspects or open up lines of inquiry, and that all available forensic opportunities were not fully exploited. The investigation also found no evidence that the RUC alerted Mr Devine to the fact that his date of birth had been linked to the name John Devine, in a document found in two separate loyalist paramilitary intelligence caches. Although the document contained a different address and photo, the police did not consider the potential risk presented to Mr Devine, including whether a 'threat to life' warning was appropriate. Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Marie Anderson said she believed the family of John Devine had been 'failed' by police (Liam McBurney/PA) 'Given the available evidence and other information gathered during my investigation, I consider the original RUC investigation to be seriously defective, and not capable of leading to the identification of those responsible,' she said. Advertisement Ms Anderson acknowledged that the RUC investigation of the murder was conducted at a time when policing resources in Troubles-related incidents were stretched and under significant pressure in a year when 81 people died. She also found that there was no specific intelligence available to police that, if acted upon, could have prevented the murder of Mr Devine. The Ombudsman concluded that Mr Devine was the victim of a campaign of sectarian violence mounted against the nationalist community. 'Loyalist paramilitaries alone were responsible for his murder,' she said. Advertisement 'Given the significant failings in the RUC investigation, I believe that Mr Devine's family were failed by police in their search for the truth regarding the perpetration of his murder.' Solicitor Padraig O Muirigh (Rebecca Black/PA) Solicitor Padraig O Muirigh, who acts for Mr Devine's family, said they welcome the findings of the Ombudsmans' report. 'Mrs Anderson has concluded that the failings in the RUC investigation of Mr Devine's murder were so fundamental that the murder investigation was 'incapable of detecting potential offenders and supporting a prosecution',' he said. 'There were a litany of serious deficiencies identified in the Police Ombudsman investigation including a failure of RUC Special Branch to disseminate intelligence to the police investigation team, the failure to arrest and interview key suspects and multiple forensic shortcomings. Advertisement 'These findings are a damning indictment of the RUC investigation into John Devine's murder. 'The breadth and nature of these failings cannot be explained by mere incompetence. 'The Devine family have a long-held view that those involved in the murder were protected from prosecution by the RUC and that the security forces colluded with loyalist paramilitaries. 'That view has been reinforced by these findings. The Devine family commend Mrs Anderson and her staff for the diligent investigation they have conducted.'
BreakingNews.ie
38 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Taoiseach expects rent caps to be extended nationwide by this summer
The Taoiseach has said he expects rent caps to be extended nationwide by this summer. Tánaiste Simon Harris told the Dáil on Thursday that the emergency legislation would be brought forward next week to extend rent caps nationwide. Advertisement Micheál Martin also denied that the government 'flew kites' on its rent control proposals, which he described as 'modest'. He accused opposition politicians of being 'completely over the top' in response to his comments on Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) earlier this year. As part of the government's rent and tenancy reforms announced on Tuesday, rent caps for ares of high demand – caps of 2% or linked to inflation, whichever is lower – will be extended nationwide. This will apply to around a fifth of tenancies not already in an RPZ, including Donegal, Carlow, Cavan and parts of Cork. Advertisement Asked whether this extension would be passed by the summer recess, Mr Martin said he expected it would be done 'very quickly'. He added: 'Yes, I mean, the first part will be extending it nationally and that should happen very quickly, because it's a short bill.' He said the RPZ extension would be included in the Planning bill, which will be done before the summer recess, or in a standalone 'shorter' bill. 'There's no big deal about that, that's not a big issue for us, but it's one we can do fairly quickly.' Advertisement When put to him that he had earlier this year refused to say whether RPZs would be retained, Mr Martin said: 'No, I did not. I did not. 'I said they were being reviewed. The response to what I said was completely exaggerated and over the top and motivated by politics. 'Politicians came up and said in the Dáil in March 'you're getting rid of RPZs'. I never said we were getting rid of RPZs. 'Everybody knew that in October, a review was under way, the Housing Agency was asked to do it. It was commissioned in October last and people just raced away and said 'we're getting rid of RPZs'. We never said we were getting rid of RPZs.' Advertisement He said he told Sinn Féin and the Social Democrats in the Dáil 'repeatedly' that they would not get rid of RPZs. 'It was a great line to put the fear up people. I didn't put the fear up anybody,' he added. He said he expected the opposition to support the rent cap extension and that the 'modest' proposals have been 'broadly' welcomed by the construction industry. He added: 'Many people in the housing would say there's a modest plan, actually, because I think a lot of the opposition didn't see the protections coming with it. Advertisement 'People feel that the combination of the linking of future rents of new apartment buildings or units to CPI (inflation), along with the capacity to reset after six years, the combination of those two should encourage investment, which wasn't coming up to now.' In Leaders' Questions on Thursday, Sinn Féin TD Pearse Doherty accused the Government of a 'headless chicken approach' to its rent control plans. He said: 'This is a charter for higher rents. This is a charter for the vulture funds and for property developers. It is benefiting landlords, that is the only people who will benefit here.' Mr Harris said the government proposals 'didn't fall from the sky' and accused Mr Doherty of continuing to 'misinform' people. The Fine Gael leader said they were based on the Housing Agency's review, which raised challenges with the suggestion of 'reference rents'. Mr Harris said that RPZs would be extended to Mr Doherty's constituency of Donegal for the first time and asked did he not welcome that. He said Mary Lou McDonald is in favour of rent pressure zones and doesn't want institutional investment in Ireland, while Eoin O Broin is in favour of reference rents and has met institutional firms regularly, with Mr Doherty. 'Sinn Féin are all over the place on housing,' he said.
BreakingNews.ie
38 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Martin says defamation reforms will happen ‘quickly'
Defamation laws in Ireland will be changed as quickly as the Government can achieve it, the Taoiseach pledged, as he praised a 'first-class' BBC journalist at the centre of Gerry Adams' successful libel action. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Advertisement Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. At the time, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said there were 'profound' implications from the jury's decision. 'As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it's hard to see how anyone's could – and they warned that today's decision could hinder freedom of expression.' Advertisement Spotlight reporter Jennifer O'Leary said she had entered the witness box in the trial with 'nothing to hide, only sources to protect and I want to thank them for trusting me'. The broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it takes time to consider an appeal. Asked if he agreed with the BBC's assessment of the case on Thursday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said: 'I think the defamation laws need to be changed – we're going to change them.' Mr Martin said the Government would pass the legislation 'as quickly as we can' and paid tribute to Ms O'Leary. Advertisement 'I think we do need to get it through to create a balanced environment for commentary and for investigative journalism.' He added: 'Jennifer O'Leary is a first-class journalist.' Former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams outside the High Court in Dublin, after the libel action concluded (Brian Lawless/PA) Among the key provisions in the Defamation Bill highlighted by government are the abolition of juries in High Court defamation actions, which is hoped to reduce delays and legal costs; and of protections against strategic lawsuits, also known as SLAPPs actions, viewed as having a chilling effect on public interest journalism and press freedom. The draft laws also include a statutory power for the Circuit Court to issue a 'Norwich Pharmacal' order, allowing a digital services provider to identify an anonymous poster of defamatory statements online. Advertisement Mr Martin, who took legal action against Google at the High Court for information about who had financed fake ads which claimed he had endorsed specific cryptocurrencies, added: 'We've published heads of the bill, and (Justice Minister Jim) O'Callaghan is going to proceed, we're going to do it in this Government.'
