Senior Tories and big landlords discuss ways to thwart renters' rights bill
Senior Tories have held private talks with big landlords about how to thwart the government's renters' rights bill, the Guardian has learned, with ideas including launching a legal challenge under human rights law.
Jane Scott, the shadow housing minister, recently hosted a roundtable meeting with several of the country's largest landlords and estate agents, at which they discussed a number of ways to delay or stop the bill altogether. The ideas included challenging it in the courts and delaying it with repeated rounds of Lords amendments, according to three people in attendance.
The discussions have prompted accusations of collusion between the Tories and property industry. They also give an indication of how hard the Conservatives are likely to fight the bill in its final stages, even though the party tried to pass a similar version of the proposals when it was in government.
Anny Cullum, policy officer at the campaign group Acorn, said: 'The comments by Baroness Scott have confirmed what we suspected: that there is a coordinated attempt by landlords and their supporters within the Lords to frustrate the progress of the renters' rights bill.'
She added: 'Unelected and unaccountable Tory peers are using underhand tactics to deliberately delay this vital legislation even more – legislation that many of them supported in its previous guise under the last government.'
Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, said: 'England's 11 million private renters have been waiting years for genuine security and safety in their homes. With reform finally on the horizon, it's utterly disgraceful that a handful of self-interested peers are resorting to cynical delay tactics designed to slow the progress of the renters' rights bill to a crawl.'
A Conservative party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have been warning that this bill is deeply flawed, as it will lead to a reduced supply of rental homes … As is standard practice with all legislation, the official opposition engages privately with a range of stakeholders to hear their views.'
At the heart of Labour's renters' rights package is a ban on no-fault evictions, due to come into force as soon as the bill received royal assent. Other measures in the bill include preventing landlords from accepting more rent than the amount for which a property has been listed, and enacting 'Awaab's law' to force landlords to carry out essential repairs within fixed time periods.
Michael Gove attempted to enact a similar set of proposals when he was housing secretary in the last government, but his bill failed to pass before the election was called. Since then, the new Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, has hardened her party's stance against such reforms.
Scott's meeting with landlords and estate agents included representatives from the property group Get Living, Dexters estate agents and the National Residential Landlord Association, among others.
Get Living told the meeting they had instructed a senior barrister to examine bringing a legal challenge to the bill on human rights grounds, an initiative which Scott welcomed, according to two attenders. One said she told the meeting the legal challenge might stop the bill 'dead in its tracks'.
The Scottish Association of Landlords launched a similar challenge against the Scottish government's attempts to bring in a temporary rent cap, arguing it violated the right to property as enshrined in the European convention on human rights. That challenge ultimately failed.
A spokesperson for Get Living said the company wanted the bill to succeed. The spokesperson added, however: 'There is a group in the professionally managed rental sector that significantly contributes to new housing stock that are concerned about the legal issues the government faces if the bill proceeds in its current format.'
Scott also told the meeting she would do everything she could to force debate on multiple amendments as a way of delaying the bill, telling those who attended she thought she could hold it up until the autumn at least.
At one point, according to one attender, she complained she could not find enough statistical evidence to say landlords were leaving the market as a result of the bill. In response, attenders said they would try to find the data she was looking for.
Scott also defended the Conservatives' decision not to bring in Awaab's law, saying landlords were not sufficiently well organised to be able to respond to tenants' problems within strict deadlines. One of those who attended, who said they were playing devil's advocate, wondered aloud whether landlords should not be forced to become more organised.
Not all of the property groups represented were comfortable with the tone of the meeting, according to some of those who attended. Some groups believe the bill is going to become law eventually, and that it would be best to pass it quickly with modest amendments to give landlords more certainty.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Mel Stride: We will never do a deal with Reform
Sir Mel Stride has vowed the Tories will never make a pact with Reform as he attacked the party's 'fantasy economics'. The shadow chancellor said Nigel Farage's party would put the economy on 'the road to ruin' and said: 'I don't want to be a populist that runs around saying we can do this, that and everything else for you without any plan behind it. I just think that's recklessness.' Sir Mel also attacked Rachel Reeves's 'huge borrowing splurge' to fund spending plans until the next election, but warned that Reform's pledges were even more 'dangerous'. While some influential Tories have called for the parties to work more closely together, Sir Mel said the Conservatives would never strike a deal under his watch. 'I don't want to get involved with a party that peddles fantasy economics,' he told The Telegraph. 'Why would I want to do that? I want to be with a party that is going to be four-square behind fiscal responsibility and manage our economy in a way that doesn't imperil the livelihoods of people up and down our country.' His comments come as the Conservatives seek to fight back against Reform, which has surged past the party in the polls to take the position of Labour's de facto main opposition. Many observers believe the Tories are still paying the price of Liz Truss's mini-Budget of unfunded tax cuts, which triggered the market chaos that led to her downfall. The Conservatives' polling numbers collapsed in the wake of the crisis and have never recovered. Sir Mel has chosen to disavow the policies of Ms Truss as the Conservatives seek to rebuild. He also warned that a Reform victory may lead to a sequel. Reform's central election pledge is to raise the amount people can earn before they start paying tax to £20,000. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has estimated this could cost up to £80bn, although Reform has insisted its plans would be fully funded by sweeping cuts to Whitehall departments and said it would not cut taxes until it had slashed spending first. However, raising the tax threshold is just one of several costly promises made by Mr Farage's party. Reform has also pledged to cut corporation tax and abolish the two-child benefit cap that restricts payments to families with three or more children. Sir Mel said: '[They're] promising everybody everything they want to hear, without any credible plan as to how they're going to pay for any of this. Certainly, if Reform were in No 10 now, I think the economy would be in a very dangerous position.' While he now spends much of his time in attack mode, Sir Mel offers up little of substance when it comes to policies of his own. He says Britain is failing the young and suggests the Government should do more to crack down on Mickey Mouse degrees that do little to increase people's job prospects. But just as he suggests universities may have a role in sharing the financial burden of dead-end degrees, he stops himself to insist the proposal is just 'blue-sky thinking in an interview'. This caution has allowed Reform to steal the limelight with its eye-catching proposals as the Tories struggle to get their mojo back. Sir Mel, who almost lost his Central Devon seat at the last election, admits his party 'lost connection entirely with the British electorate and we have to win that back – and that will take time'. For now, he believes the best way to do that is by highlighting the flaws in Reform's policy platform. 'What we've got to do is be out there making the case that people need to think long and hard about whether the numbers add up, because if they don't, that is the road to ruin,' Sir Mel says. 'Right now, Reform is ahead in the polls [and] they are out there saying they will take everybody out of tax up to £20,000 at a cost of £50bn to £80bn – about a third of what we spend on the NHS every year, with its 1.3m employees. Really? How are they going to fund that?' The Conservatives' slump in the polls had to put pressure on Kemi Badenoch but Sir Mel said she was 'absolutely' the right person to lead the party. This is Sir Mel's 11th interview of the day and he's only halfway through his commitments. Stationed in the shadow cabinet room in Westminster, he's armed with two copies of the cornflower blue spending review book, one of which is covered in scribbled notes that include a reminder to talk about GDP figures out that morning to attack lines such as 'summer of speculation, fear of what will come'. Sir Mel, a self-confessed history buff, suggests the Tories would be prepared to take the tough decisions to slash the size of the state if they got back into power. The man who led a series of sweeping reforms to the benefits system insists 'we need to get a grip on welfare' as he opened the door to a conversation about the NHS. While qualifying that the health service is an 'absolutely vital part of what we are as a civilised society', he signals there will be choices to come 'around what the health service does'. Sir Mel says: 'What is possible at different points in time changes. For example, the idea of my grandparents going to hospital, getting both hips replaced and leaping around like a mountain goat within weeks would have been entirely fancy. We have drugs today that can do things that we didn't have the drugs to do in the past. So it will be an evolving terrain. 'But my fundamental point is that if you run a health service that is not productive, that is consuming ever larger levels of resources and is not really producing in the way that it can, then you're not serving the British people properly.' While he is reluctant to talk specific policies, he suggests one of his priorities is to address tax traps that can leave people facing punishing tax rates for every extra hour worked, including the so-called 60pc trap where people who earn above £100,000 gradually have their personal allowance withdrawn. 'There are definitely aspects of the complications within the tax system that slow economic activity,' he says. 'The personal allowance gets withdrawn above a certain level of income and that leads to high marginal tax rates. 'The interaction with the benefit system can produce similar effects to the withdrawal of child benefit where you can actually reach marginal tax rates of 70pc or more. So there are all sorts of things that we need to think very deeply about within our tax system.' Young people are also firmly on his mind, with Sir Mel frequently citing the fact that the average Tory voter is 63. He wants to change that. 'We have to have a big, bold, credible offer that shows younger people that they can have the opportunities that I had as a young man. The education that will lead to higher-paying jobs so they can get on the housing ladder.' He has put forward a proposal for a 'Headstart' scheme under which a person in their first job would see their first £5,000 of National Insurance paid not to HMRC but into a personal savings pot which they could use as a down-payment for a house. Before he can be drawn on detail, he steps back again, saying the proposal is 'just one idea we're discussing'. 'We will have the answers through time,' he insists. 'I'm not the Chancellor, I'm not in the Treasury.' Judging by the polls, he will have to work hard to change that.
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Scottish politics isn't necessarily as bitter and divided as it seems
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I have a confession to make. It's not something I'm proud of, because who would be, but it is something you should know. I am English. I understand it's a shock, especially if you've somehow missed our video content, award-winning podcast and my appearances on whichever broadcaster will have me. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A saltire flag and Union Jack flutter in the wind. Picture: JeffIt means, nearly five years ago, I came to Scottish politics with things to learn. I was an experienced journalist in Westminster, but had not lived the Scottish experience. I merely adopted Scotland, I wasn't born in it. Moulded in it. As such, aside from my extensive reading as a dedicated student of the game, my expectations were it would not be like any other patch. The views on both sides of the independence debate were too entrenched, the vitriol felt was too strong, the wounds were too deep. Now, as I walk off into what I hope is a sunset, I can tell you I was wrong. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish politics isn't nearly as bitter and divided as it can seem at times, especially online. Working in Westminster, I see the loudest and most vocal critics of each side having a beer together in Parliament. I listen to SNP MPs talking about trips they've been on with Tories, and the funny experiences they won't share publicly 'til they leave Parliament. Following issues that go beyond the debate of the day, I witness Labour working with the SNP, and hear of rivals having a regular snooker game. Alexander Brown has been here since Boris Johnson was Prime Minister | Getty Images More importantly, they're just nice. It's nowhere near as tribal as you think. I've routinely been called a Sturgeonista (despite my accent) or a Tory stooge online and, while I'm grateful for balance, it's also not representative of what politics is. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These people don't hate each other. They aren't arguing with each other in comment sections. Sometimes the outrage is simply manufactured, playing to the gallery encouraging people to lose their minds, shortly before going for tea in the Parliament canteen. I'd add that given how biased everyone feels the media is, we sure do spend a lot of our time speaking to all the different parties. In short, Scottish politics, despite the myth of Scottish exceptionalism, is not that dissimilar to politics in the rest of the UK. Sure, there's an independence debate, but the main issues facing the country are the NHS, education, the green transition, access to rural services. Other than the ferries' farce, it's basically the same. Now you can argue that independence could fix those, but it's still the same problems as down here. That's not an argument for unionism, just a reminder that what happens in Westminster really does matter. To paraphrase one of the few successful, albeit accidental separatists, we're all in this together. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My other main takeaway is that despite these shared values, successive UK administrations have still been a bit scared of Scotland. No prime minister has done a sit-down. Ministers avoid doing huddles in case they're caught out. You deserve better and it's appalling this has not changed since I started. This is all a long-winded way of saying I'm leaving The Scotsman, but my love of Scotland is going nowhere.
The Herald Scotland
6 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Tories struggle to be heard after election skelping
'We stopped Nicola Sturgeon converting her gender bill into law. And we have watched Labour try government — but Sir Keir Starmer keeps dropping the ball.' But for all the jibes, the problem facing Mr Findlay's party is that they are struggling to even get on the pitch. READ MORE Findlay: Tories can win seats at Holyrood election despite polls pointing to drubbing Tories unveil plans for 'Scottish first' medical student training policy For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action over Supreme Court ruling The party suffered its worst-ever defeat at last year's general election, slumping to just 121 seats UK-wide — a loss of 244. In Scotland, the scale of the collapse was slightly masked. Despite a chaotic campaign that saw Douglas Ross alienate members and then quit before polling day, the party managed to hold on to five of its six seats. Although the Tory vote halved, support for the SNP — the main challengers in each Conservative-held seat — declined even more sharply. The ghosts of Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak continue to haunt the party, while the spectre of Nigel Farage looms ever larger. The latest projections from Professor Sir John Curtice, based on last month's Survation poll, paint a bleak picture for next year's Holyrood vote. His modelling has the Tories slumping to fourth place with just 13 MSPs — less than half their current tally of 30. The SNP would return 58 seats, while Reform UK would leapfrog the Conservatives to become the main opposition on 21. Labour would win 18 seats, with the LibDems and Greens on 10 and 8 respectively. Mr Findlay did not shy away from the scale of the challenge, admitting that a huge effort would be needed to even earn the right to be heard. Yet despite the grim outlook, the party is hopeful. 'You would think we had no right to be as upbeat as we are, but it is the phenomena of the Conservative Party,' said Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland. 'Against all of the odds, we are feeling genuinely optimistic and positive.'I think we knew that 2024 was going to be terrible. Having taken that skelping, I think people are back to renew the party — and that is the strong statement of both Russell and Kemi's remarks.' 'We are sitting in a much diminished form at Westminster, our worst ever election result in over 250 years of the Conservative Party really being in existence. And really beginning the fightback,' shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie told Unspun Live, The Herald's politics podcast. 'And that is where we are right now — beginning that long, hard slog of regaining the trust of the British people, hopefully with a view to getting back into power in short order in four years' time.' Mr Findlay has settled into the role of party leader. He is much more relaxed and less like the deer trapped in the headlights he resembled when he took over from Douglas Ross last September. He is putting the effort in. One Tory staffer said the boss had rehearsed his 42-minute address at least eight times before delivering it to party members on Saturday lunchtime. It was an unashamedly Conservative speech with a raft of policies rooted in the party's traditional values: tax cuts funded by £650 million in savings from slashing quangos and civil service jobs; scrapping the SNP's 2045 net zero target; and a pledge to train more Scottish medical students to reduce NHS reliance on immigration. For years, Scottish Tory speeches at conference have been dominated by saying no to indyref2. That was in Mr Findlay's speech, of course — but it was his programme for government that was to the fore. 'The way we beat Reform is by having good, proper policies in place. We have not seen very much from Reform policy-wise,' North East list MSP Douglas Lumsden told The Herald on Sunday. 'I still think there is enough time [to turn things around]. It is 11 months before the election and this is about building a positive message we can take next year. 'We absolutely need to move on from the past.' The scale of the party's challenge — and the threat from Reform — was made painfully clear earlier this month at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where the Tories came a distant fourth. In a seat where they had won 17.5% at the last Holyrood election, they only just managed to hold on to their Reform took 26% of the vote. While Labour's surprise win has led to grumblings in the SNP, Mr Lumsden insists the party is united behind Mr Findlay. 'We are 100% behind Russell. There is no briefing at all from anyone. Russell has a brilliant personality and the more people who get to know him the more they like him — so we need to promote Russell.' READ MORE While Mr Findlay's position might be safe, the same cannot be said for Kemi Badenoch. Potential leadership hopefuls are on manoeuvres. The leader of the opposition delivered her speech on Friday. It was only her second trip to Scotland since becoming leader in November. 'There is a lot of work to be done, a lot of messaging, a lot of renewal — and she has got the runway that Russell and the rest of us do not have,' Mr Kerr said. 'I am not worried about threats to her leadership. She is letting her colleagues get on with it. She is not a leader who is lying awake worrying about a challenge to her leadership,' he added. 'Anybody who is going to contest Kemi or Russell for leadership right now is mad — because the challenges will not change.' Mr Kerr compared Ms Badenoch to Margaret Thatcher: 'I am old enough to remember our first female leader and the same stuff was being said about her in terms of her role as Leader of the Opposition and her performance and PMQs — and look what happened to her.' 'You know, we have been written off as a party before,' Mr Findlay told The Herald on Sunday. 'There are many people at this conference who have been around for a very long time, and they have seen some pretty dark days. 'And you know what keeps people going? You know that resilience that we all saw in the hall today — it is because we know that what we stand for is right. 'We stand for personal responsibility, lower taxation, fairer taxes for people, integrity and ensuring the very best public services. We want a Scottish Parliament that is entirely focused on delivering for Scotland — not the fringe obsessions of the SNP and Labour.'So we will be fighting for every single vote.' Murrayfield is used to resilience and fighting talk — it is also, however, no stranger to the wooden spoon, a fate Mr Findlay will be desperae to avoid next May.
