"Nathan Lyon Is Not That Good...": How Rohit Sharma Forced Cheteshwar Pujara To Abandon Natural Game
Rohit narrated the story of the event that took place in the third Test between India and Australia in Indore, in 2023.
Pujara and Axar Patel were out in the middle, scoring at a slow pace, with Nathan Lyon bowling the bulk of the overs. However, Rohit had spotted that Lyon had kept mid-on up and promptly sent an instruction to Pujara, via Ishan Kishan.
"We wanted to get Nathan Lyon off the track a little bit. We wanted to get some runs quickly. We probably were looking at declaring or something. We thought, 'no, something needs to change now, maybe, a message would do good'. The entire time, he was bowling with mid-on up. I thought, he's not that good of a bowler to keep mid-on up. I knew it was a challenge, the pitch was turning square but we needed to get runs quickly. So I had to send Ishan," Rohit narrated.
Rohit's instruction did the trick. Soon after, Pujara freed his arms and slogged Lyon for a six over that region.
Rohit, however, admitted that batters rarely pay heed to messages sent from the dressing room.
"It's one thing that we send messages. Sometimes what batters do is whenever someone comes out with a message, we know exactly why he's there. So I would stop him there itself!" Rohit said.
Despite Pujara top-scoring for India and being the only half-centurion from the team (59 runs off 142 balls), India went on to lose the match. Australia were set a mere target of 76, which was chased down with ease.
Both Rohit and Pujara are now out of the Indian Test team. Rohit announced his retirement from the longest format ahead of India's tour of England. On the other hand, Pujara has lost his place in the side, with his last appearance coming over two years ago, for the World Test Championship (WTC) 2023-25 final against Australia, which India lost.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Glenn Maxwell lauds Brevis for rising above early AB de Villiers comparison challenges: 'All the Baby AB stuff'
Glenn Maxwell heaps praise on the young South African batter Dewald Brevis for doing all the hard work and overcoming the pressure of being compared to AB de Villiers. Dewald Brevis is creating continuous rumblings in world cricket after scoring a blistering 41-ball century against Australia in the second T20I of the recently concluded three-match series. Nicknamed 'Baby AB' due to his striking resemblance to South African legend AB de Villiers, Brevis is making significant strides in international cricket. So much so that even Australian all-rounder Glenn Maxwell has acknowledged the talent of the 22-year-old. Glenn Maxwell revealed he first noticed Brevis due to the significant impact he made at the 2022 U19 World Cup for South Africa. Maxwell said that comparisons with De Villiers pushed him to the top in the queue for selection in the South African team, but he also had to bear the large expectations due to the same reason. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Brevis has got a lot of talent. It was hard not to see the highlights when he played the U19 World Cup for South Africa", Maxwell told media, as quoted by I_ndian Express_. All the Baby AB stuff. It's a pretty heavy burden he had to have early in his career. He probably got fast-tracked a little bit into the South African side.' . More from First Cricket 'We're going to...': Alyssa Healy warns of spin challenge ahead of Women's World Cup 2025 Maxwell praises Brevis for showcasing perseverance Maxwell hailed Brevis for staying resilient when things didn't initially go his way, putting in the hard work to make a comeback, with the results now evident. 'He's gone away, worked on his game, and he's come back playing beautifully. His bat swing is really pure—he's hard to stop when he gets going,' he added. Riding on the momentum of the century in the 2nd T20I, Brevis scored an emphatic 53 off 26 balls in the 3rd T20I at the Cazalys Stadium, and inspired SA to post a fair total of 172/7 in 20 overs. However, it was the home side that got the last laugh. Glenn Maxwell smashed a flawless 62 off 26 balls to guide the Aussies towards victory. On the back of Maxwell's exceptional knock and Mitchell Marsh's vital 54-run innings, Australia clinched the victory in a thrilling match by two wickets with one ball to spare. With the win, Australia won the series 2-1.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Empty slots: Players in contention for the last two spots for India in Asia Cup squad
While most names in the Asia Cup squad may face little debate, two spots may prompt some discussion when the selection panel meets on Tuesday. Here's looking at the choices and what they bring to the table: Mohammed Siraj: After his indefatigable display in England, the only logic that should keep him out of the squad would be the much-debated workload management. If there's any player deserving of a rest, it's Siraj, who played every match of the five-Test series, bowled the most overs and got the most wickets and was instrumental in India earning a share of the spoils. Crucially, he ran in from his first ball to his last, and never let up in pace. Harshit Rana: He is known to lose pace and energy in later spells, but shouldn't have much trouble in managing four overs. He has caught the eye with wicket-taking spells for both franchise and country, and isn't lacking in aggression, as he showed in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy opener in Perth late last year, before losing his wheels in Adelaide. Head coach Gautam Gambhir has seen what he is capable of while being in charge of Kolkata Knight Riders in the IPL. Prasidh Krishna: He got better as the England series progressed, but is known to thrive more in conditions that offer bounce and some lateral movement. The tall pacer has got all the tools, but whether he would be the ideal bowler for the pitches in Dubai is debatable. His best performances in an India shirt have come when he has been handed responsibility, often in Jasprit Bumrah's absence, as was seen in Sydney and more recently at The Oval. Shreyas Iyer: If the selectors take a call on pure batting pedigree, they don't have to look beyond the player who led two different franchises, both with the willow especially against spin and his leadership, to IPL finals in two successive seasons. He brings calm and game awareness and can set the game up and also finish it. Shreyas has developed a swagger of late and commands respect in whichever dressing room he finds himself in. The player who defined the last IPL should logically be in the Indian T20 side. Rinku Singh: He has been designated a finisher by his IPL team as well as when he has turned out in India colours, often limiting the number of balls he gets to face. Winning a game for his team by hitting five successive sixes in the final over is a rare occurrence, and that freak achievement, while bringing him into the national spotlight, has pigeon-holed him as an endgame player. It doesn't help that Gambhir doesn't like to designate any player as a finisher in his team. Riyan Parag: He has been earmarked as a promising talent but has not quite delivered, at least not on a consistent basis. He has played the odd impressive knock for Rajasthan Royals, but is not known to win games for his side. The Assam player has a second string to his bow in the form of his part-time off-spin, but that's usually good for only a couple of overs. Selectors have been waiting for the 23-year-old to show a mature head on his shoulders to stake a viable claim to a spot in the national side. Washington Sundar: He did all that was asked of him in England – save a Test, hit some big blows in the company of the tail making the vital difference between victory and defeat, while getting crucial wickets with his underrated off-spin. His skill-set would be useful in Dubai, and he was part of the side that won the ICC Champions Trophy there earlier this year. It helps that Gambhir is fond of depth, in both batting and bowling.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Stuck in a loop: India's stagnant marathon scene
Mumbai: Three decades into his triple jump world record of 18.29m from the 1995 World Championships, Jonathan Edwards had this to say to BBC this month about it remaining untouched: 'I don't think it's a good sign for athletics as a sport that you have a record that stands for 30 years.' File image of Man Singh, winner of this year's New Delhi Marathon. (Mumbai Marathon) Every word of that sentence could also well apply to the men's marathon national record in India. Except, that mark goes much further back. The late Shivnath Singh's marathon national record of 2:12:00 set in 1978 in Jalandhar still stands the test of time. As per Athletics Federation of India (AFI) data, it remains the longest standing national mark, with PT Usha's 400m hurdles record of 1984 also equalled in 2023. Two of the country's prominent marathon races, in Mumbai and New Delhi, had Indian winners clock timings around the 2:17 and 2:15 mark. It's pretty much where India's male marathoners have been stuck over the last five years, after Gopi T came close to the national mark when he clocked 2:13:39 at the 2019 Seoul Marathon. In an event where global runners are constantly pushing the threshold – Kelvin Kiptum set the current world record of 2:00:35 in 2023 before his untimely death aged 24 – the Indians have stagnated for quite a while. 'For almost a decade, Indian marathon has been stuck in a loop – one that hovers around the 2:15 mark,' said Nitendra Singh Rawat, the 2016 Rio Olympian with a personal best of 2:16:05. A glaring ailment to that loop not breaking for a bigger leap, concur athletes and coaches, is the lack of a core group of marathoners training together. Surinder Singh Bhandari, India's renowned distance runner turned coach, recalled having a group of 10-12 runners training just under him between 2014 to 2016. Three of them – Gopi, Kheta Ram and Rawat – qualified for the Rio Games where the first two clocked PBs in the 2:15s. For last year's Paris Olympics, no Indian marathoner made the cut. This year, AFI added to the decentralisation by doing away with long-duration national camps. 'Nowadays, marathoners are scattered. And camps have also been done away with. For long distances, training in one place under one coach with a proper group helps,' said Bhandari. 'When the three of us trained together, we pushed each other,' said Kheta Ram (PB 2:15:26) of the Rio trio. 'Now most train on their own.' Rawat said: 'Ideally, 10-12 runners should be identified, supported and clubbed into a group to train together. The focus should be on a group, rather than individuals.' That group, according to both Olympic marathoners, would also benefit from a lengthy training block outside India. Both cited the example of Gulveer Singh, who rewrote the 5,000m and 10,000m national records last year, training in USA's Colorado Springs where India's other distance runners including Avinash Sable were also based. Sable, currently out injured, was later based in Bengaluru. 'We used to have weekly practice plans. Maybe in a country with better marathoners, they make monthly programmes. We need to go out and understand such things,' said Kheta Ram. AFI has, over the last few years, sent India's race walkers and relay teams for training blocks abroad. 'We need to spend 5-6 months training with runners in the 2:05-2:10 region, no matter the country. We have to observe the training methods and technology advancements of those better groups and countries,' Rawat said. Marathoners of those better countries have been aided by advancements in shoes and running equipment, which has not only challenged the world benchmark frequently but also upped qualification standards. At the 2019 Mumbai Marathon, Rawat's timing of 2:15.52 was enough to clear the 2019 World Championships qualifying cut. For next month's Tokyo Worlds, that cut is 2:06:30. The fast-evolving super shoes may have changed the pace of marathon running, yet it hasn't translated to faster times in India. 'Shoes have made a big impact overall,' said Kheta Ram. 'For Indians, they can be expensive. Some can afford it, but even for them it hasn't impacted timings to that extent.' 'In India,' said Bhandari, 'athletes can win medals and rewards with a timing of 2:15 or so. And most are happy to be in that comfort zone.' It comes back to that loop, where Indian marathon lies in danger of retreating. 'We will have to get out of that loop soon,' said Rawat.
