Dark Matter Search Could Lead Us to a New Kind of Star
Dark matter is expected to pervade the Universe, but being… well, dark, it's hard to find. It doesn't reflect or emit light – its existence is only inferred through its interactions with regular matter via gravity. No direct evidence of it has been found, despite decades of searching.
Now, astrophysicists in the UK and US propose a new place we might find dark matter – hiding in the hearts of brown dwarfs.
Bigger than gas giant planets but smaller than stars, these substellar objects never gather enough mass to kickstart the nuclear fusion process that powers stars. Instead, they float around space as large, dim, cold worlds.
Related:
But in some cases, the new study proposes, brown dwarfs might transform into something more intriguing. In areas with a higher density of dark matter, the strange stuff could accumulate in the brown dwarf's core. And if it's a certain type of dark matter, the particles could interact with each other to produce energy that powers the brown dwarf.
The team calls these theoretical bodies "dark dwarfs".
"These objects collect the dark matter that helps them become a dark dwarf," says Jeremy Sakstein, astrophysicist at the University of Hawai'i.
"The more dark matter you have around, the more you can capture. And, the more dark matter ends up inside the star, the more energy will be produced through its annihilation."
A hypothesis is only as strong as its testability, and the researchers include a way astronomers could verify the existence of dark dwarfs: look for lithium-7.
This particular isotope burns away quickly inside stars due to their intense heat. But in cooler objects like brown dwarfs, lithium-7 can stick around. Astronomers already use the presence of lithium-7 as a signal to confirm that an object is a brown dwarf.
However, if the extra energy from dark matter annihilation is powering a brown dwarf, it could appear larger and brighter than even red dwarfs of the same mass. So if you find something that looks like a red dwarf but has a lithium-7 signature, you might just have a black dwarf – and confirmation of dark matter.
Of course there are a lot of ifs. For one, dark matter would need to exist in a specific theorized form, made up of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs). One of the leading candidates, WIMPs would barely interact with regular matter, besides its gravitational influence, but would interact with themselves.
WIMPs would be their own antiparticles, meaning if two of them touch, they'd annihilate each other in a burst of energy.
When you cram them densely into a confined place – like the core of a brown dwarf – the energy released from all those collisions would power the object. Not to the extent of a star, of course, but more than your garden-variety brown dwarf.
Because this process gives them a constant size, temperature, and brightness, dark dwarfs would be effectively eternal, the team says.
However, if dark matter happens to take on a different form, like axions or dark photons, there'd be no way to tell from the outside that it's accumulating inside brown dwarfs.
That's if dark matter exists at all – there's always the chance that the effects we attribute to it are caused by some other unknown physics.
Still, it's important to come up with various ideas about what dark matter could be and how we might detect it. Different observatories and experiments can look out for different potential signatures of dark matter, allowing us to investigate a wide range of possibilities at once.
In this case, the researchers say that the best place to look for dark dwarf signatures would be toward the center of our galaxy, where dark matter would gather most densely.
The research is available on preprint server arXiv and will be published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
3D Time Could Solve Physics' Biggest Problem, Says Bizarre New Study
Physicists Catch Light in 'Imaginary Time' in Scientific First
Not All Uranium Can Be Used in Weapons. Here's What 'Enrichment' Means.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Stanford scientists 'totally surprised' by potential Parkinson's treatment discovery
A recent study from Stanford Medicine that "totally surprised" researchers highlighted what could be a promising approach to slowing Parkinson's disease progression. The research, published in the journal Science Signaling, took a closer look at enzymes — proteins in the body that speed up chemical reactions and are essential for digestion, liver function and other key functions, according to Cleveland Clinic — and their role in Parkinson's. The team found that targeting a certain enzyme helped to restore neuron and cell communication in mice. Lead author Suzanne Pfeffer, PhD, the Emma Pfeiffer Merner Professor in Medical Sciences and a professor of biochemistry at Stanford, told Fox News Digital that the team was "totally surprised that we saw as much improvement as we did." In about 25% of Parkinson's cases, the culprit is some form of genetic mutation. One of the most common mutations creates an overactive enzyme called LRRK2, according to a Stanford press release. When there is too much LRRK2 activity, it changes the structure of the brain cells, disrupting important communication between neurons and cells. This system is crucial to movement, motivation and decision-making, according to the researchers. The goal of the study was to determine whether a specific molecule — the MLi-2 LRRK2 kinase inhibitor — could reverse the effect of overactive enzymes. Using mice that had the genetic mutation that causes overactive LRRK2 and also had symptoms consistent with early Parkinson's disease, the scientists tried feeding them the inhibitor for two weeks. There were initially no changes detected in brain structure, signaling or function of the dopamine neurons. However, after three months of eating the inhibitor, mice affected by the overactive enzyme appeared to have restored their neurons to the point where they were virtually the same as those without the genetic mutation, the study found. "Findings from this study suggest that inhibiting the LRRK2 enzyme could stabilize the progression of symptoms if patients can be identified early enough," Pfeffer said in the press release. The study did have some limitations, the researchers acknowledged. "This was in mice, not people, but our current results indicate that similar pathways are important in humans," Pfeffer told Fox News Digital. While the study focused on a specific genetic form of the disease, overactive LRRK2 is also present in other cases, meaning this treatment could help multiple types of Parkinson's patients and possibly those with other neurodegenerative diseases, the reseachers claimed. Looking ahead, the team plans to investigate whether other forms of Parkinson's could benefit. Parkinson's — a disease that involves the slow death of dopamine-producing neurons, leading to symptoms like tremors and stiffness — affects nearly one million Americans, according to the Parkinson's Foundation, which has offices in New York and Miami. Experts agree that early intervention is key, as Parkinson's symptoms often appear years after the disease begins. "These findings suggest that it might be possible to improve, not just stabilize, the condition of patients with Parkinson's disease." Identifying and treating at-risk individuals sooner could potentially halt or reverse neuron loss. "These findings suggest that it might be possible to improve, not just stabilize, the condition of patients with Parkinson's disease," Pfeffer said. For more Health articles, visit The researcher told Fox News Digital that it's important to encourage patients to undergo genetic testing to learn more about their suitability for clinical trials and future treatments. The study was funded by The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, the Aligning Science Across Parkinson's initiative and the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Franklin W. Stahl, 95, Dies; Helped Create a ‘Beautiful' DNA Experiment
Franklin W. Stahl, a molecular biologist who helped create a methodology to confirm how DNA replicates that was so elegant it has been remembered for more than five decades as 'the most beautiful experiment in biology,' died on April 2 at his home in Eugene, Ore. He was 95. The cause was congestive heart failure, his son Andy Stahl said. His death was not widely reported at the time, and there was no announcement about it from the University of Oregon in Eugene, where he was a professor and researcher. At his death, Dr. Stahl was an emeritus professor of molecular biology and genetics at the university's Institute of Molecular Biology. He had been at the university since 1959. Dr. Stahl's name and that of his collaborator, Matthew Meselson, were immortalized by the Meselson-Stahl Experiment, which is referenced in biology textbooks and taught in molecular genetics courses worldwide. In 2015, 'Helix Spirals,' a musical tribute to the experiment, was composed by Augusta Read Thomas and performed by a string quartet in Boston. The two biologists proved a theory advanced by the Nobel Prize winners James Watson and Francis Crick, who discovered DNA's helical structure in 1953. Watson and Crick posited in the journal Nature that DNA replicates in a so-called semi-conservative fashion. In 1958, Dr. Meselson and Dr. Stahl, postdoctoral fellows in Linus Pauling's laboratory at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., proved that Watson and Crick were correct, by using an experiment that was celebrated for its design, execution and results. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Screen Geek
2 hours ago
- Screen Geek
'Jurassic World: Rebirth' Review: It's Fine And That's Okay
It's been ten years since audiences were reintroduced to the world of dinosaurs with the release of 2015's Jurassic World . Yeah, I feel like that Matt Damon aging gif too. The legacy sequels to 1993's Jurassic Park gave us three movies, whose entertaining quality dropped like a pterosaur nose-diving into the ocean. However, the trilogy generated enough of a box office return that Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment gave it another try with Jurassic World: Rebirth . Rebirth is set to be another step in continuing to build the franchise by giving us what we love about dinosaurs in the modern world. The combination of director Gareth Edwards and David Koepp's writing showcases that the franchise still has legs. This somewhat new direction for the series leans further into a Dino Crisis-like setting and might be worth exploring in future films. Jurassic World: Rebirth , directed by Edwards, takes the script by Koepp and adds a more horror and adventure element to the franchise. The story revolves around a group of mercenaries on a mission to reach a research island—formerly owned by InGen—where dinosaurs were previously experimented on. Heading the group is veteran former ex-military covert operative, Zora Bennett (Scarlett Johansson), and paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey). Bennett and Loomis are recruited by Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend) of ParkerGenix to travel to the island and gather pure dinosaur biomaterial samples. The hope is that these samples may lead to the development of a medical drug that could potentially bring significant benefits to humanity. Koepp's script hits the ground running with some of its characters in the first Act. The writing cleverly explains how dinosaurs have impacted the world and how the world, in turn, has affected them. It simultaneously brings interest back into this world and reflects how we, as a society, have kind of moved on from dinosaurs. This was actually great for Koepp and Edwards to work in conjunction in sprinkling in moments of amazement when the dinosaurs were on screen. It harkened back to the days of the '93 film, which tapped into that nostalgic feeling that we have all grown accustomed to. Yet, Koepp dug a bit deeper to give the movie its entertaining spin. Jurassic World: Rebirth draws on concepts from the Michael Crichton novel, The Lost World , and injects some horror and more intense scenes. The idea of mutated dinosaurs and the high threat level in the movie is something that kept it entertaining for the most part. Edwards has a history of working in monster films, and his talent was the perfect addition to the movie. There were several scenes in Jurassic World: Rebirth where I held my breath due to the extreme peril some of the characters faced. It allowed the movie's action to escalate in multiple settings and locations where the characters found themselves. Additionally, the character work is both a positive and a negative aspect of Jurassic World: Rebirth . Johansson excels with the material and portrays her character in a way that is reminiscent of her portrayal of Natasha Romanoff, albeit in a more enjoyable manner. Johansson came across as a tour guide on a wild jungle ride, which had fundamental elements of danger. Bailey's character felt like a cross between Alan Grant and Ian Malcom. There were moments where Bailey showed an authentic love and passion for dinosaurs, like Grant, while playing up the realistic and no-nonsense characteristics of Malcolm. Another positive aspect of the acting came from Mahershala Ali, who played Duncan Kincaid. He and the family caught in the middle of this excursion were basically the heart of the movie. Luna Blaise, David Iacono, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Audrina Miranda, along with Ali, carried most of the emotional beats of the movie, giving the film that much-needed human connection. Although it did work when needed, it felt forced at times. Jurassic World: Rebirth stumbled during the first Act because the movie required me to connect with its characters too soon. Some of the emotional beats at the beginning and to some extent in the middle of the movie felt forced, as if they were demanding a reaction from me. There's a particular moment in Jurassic World: Rebirth where Johansson and Ali are reunited after being separated for years. The two were giving these heartfelt moments that might have looked good on paper, but ended up falling flat because they were too vague, as if setting up something that was never truly paid off. Lastly, there was a level of predictability in parts of the movie. Several characters were either not properly introduced or their presence was given short shrift. That action pretty much telegraphed who was going to die. Krebs is a character who might as well have been twirling his mustache as he grips the knife behind his back tightly. Philippine Velge and Bechir Sylvain barely have names for their characters and might as well have been referred to as Person 1 and Person 2. The movie tries to make their fates impactful, but I didn't feel anything. Jurassic World: Rebirth feels like a theme park ride for most of the movie, and that works for the B-level story. The movie might have thrived as a direct sequel to '93's Jurassic Park , and it works on some level in today's cinema world. The large, deadly dinosaur depicted in the 3rd Act has a unique appearance that lends a horror monster feel to the movie. The franchise's new direction can breathe new life into this series and is sure to be another hit for moviegoers. It's popcorn cinema for audiences, and that's okay. Grade: C