Mitigation part of FEMA's plan for flood-prone communities
welch — Helping flooded communities reduce the chances for future devastation through new flood mitigation efforts is one of FEMA's goals, according to the federal agency's acting director.
Acting FEMA Director Cameron Hamilton visited McDowell County March 21 with U.S. Senator Jim Justice, R-W.Va., to see damage from the Feb. 15 flood firsthand and talk to county and municipal officials about what local recovery efforts need.
On March 20, Gov. Patrick Morrisey said that President Donald Trump had approved his request for Public Assistance in Mercer, McDowell, Monroe and seven other Southern West Virginia counties impacted by the Feb. 15 flood.
Morrisey said the Public Assistance declaration provides supplemental grants to state and local governments and certain private non-profits to cover their costs for debris removal, emergency protective measures and infrastructure restoration.
FEMA has a competitive grant program called Flood Mitigation Assistance, according to agency officials. This program offers funding to state, territory and local governments. Since the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 was signed into law, funds are used for projects that reduce or eliminate the risk of repetitive flood damage to buildings insured by the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA chooses recipients based on the applicant's ranking of the project, eligibility, and cost-effectiveness of the project.
'There is a program specifically in the FEMA grant system,' Hamilton told an audience at the Welch Armory. 'There are various different programs we're looking to partner with the community to ensure that we rebuild and we rebuild back in a way that makes sense that could mitigate future risks.'
Hamilton said he had spoken with Sheriff James 'Boomer' Muncy about possible flood mitigation remedies near the county 911 center which is next door to the sheriff's department in Welch. FEMA will be looking at other ways to reduce future flood hazards.
'What we encourage you all to do is speak with your local counterparts, speak with public officials so they can categorize and document and grab as many of those requests as possible and they'll route those up to our public assistance programs and that will be routed up to FEMA,' Hamilton said. 'We will then receive those applications and look at areas where we can ensure if there is a chance to recover and also mitigate future risks, those are certainly areas we are certainly very interested in partnering with to ensure we can address them.'
William Swain of Elbert Road, part of Gary in McDowell County, recently visited the Bluefield Daily Telegraph and said that he has seen the results of flood mitigation.
In 2013, a coal mining operation had cut down trees above the end of Elbert Road.
'And when it would rain, the rain would come down the back where they had cut down those trees down the mountain to the road, down another mountain onto the railroad track, over the railroad track, down the street onto a coal boom, United States Steel broken-up sidewalk,' Swain said. 'And this is at Elbert Road, 1303.'
Swain said that the flood waters reached his property and was up over his ankles. Later he went to the McDowell County Commission and later the town of Gary, but was told there nothing they could do, so he decided to go to Charleston and speak with the state Department of Transportation. There he spoke with Paul Mattox, who was then the state's transportation secretary.
'I said Okay, I'm going to call Charleston.
Swain said the chief engineer at that time, Jimmy Wriston, who later become transportation secretary, and a District 10 engineer looked at the problem on Elgood Road.
Work on flood mitigation at Elgood Road started in September 2013 and was finished before Christmas that same year. The old U.S. Steel sidewalk which had been in place since the 1950s was removed.
Swain said the Feb. 15 flood tested the changes that were made back in 2013.
'If it wasn't for Paul Mattox, this flood we had in 2025 would have washed everybody out of Elbert Road,' he said.
Contact Greg Jordan at
gjordan@bdtonline.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Stein is making the conservative case for FEMA
It's a classic Trump-era irony: The president's polarizing voice has triggered a burst of bipartisan agreement. When President Donald Trump floated the notion of scrapping FEMA entirely after Hurricane Helene, it sounded like the start of another bare-knuckle partisan fight. Instead, it sparked a rare consensus: FEMA is flawed, but it's also essential. Right now, the surprisingly high-profile defender of that notion is North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein. And in another ironic twist, the most liberal governor North Carolina has ever elected is sounding . . . conservative. Over the past two weeks, Stein has launched a media blitz to rescue FEMA from its own dysfunction — and from the president's crosshairs. He's appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, penned an op-ed in USA Today, lobbied Republican U.S. Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd and written directly to the Trump administration with proposed reforms. His argument is simple: Disaster response is a core function of the federal government, and it saves money and gets better results if states don't go it alone. 'It's about streamlining and reforming and improving FEMA, not eliminating it,' Stein said in a recent podcast interview with Spectrum News. That may not sound revolutionary, but in today's political climate, it's a noteworthy response. Where many Democrats, like former Gov. Roy Cooper, may have used Trump's comments to raise money or fire up the base, Stein is taking a different tack. He's responding thoughtfully, and with a message that Republicans might actually hear. FEMA makes for a convenient punching bag. After any disaster, emotions are raw as survivors try to make sense of their losses. When calls go to voicemail or a form gets rejected on a technicality, the natural response is anger. Police officers often talk about trying to give people grace because they recognize they're meeting everyone on the worst day of their life. FEMA workers are in the same position but may not always realize it, or be equipped to respond. That doesn't mean FEMA gets a pass, of course, and there were plenty of problems with its response to Hurricane Helene. Red tape kept people waiting for temporary housing. It took multiple calls from elected officials to get FEMA to extend hotel vouchers to keep people from being turned out into a snowstorm. North Carolina's own shortcomings made matters worse. An after-action report from the state's Emergency Management Division showed deep cracks in the response to Helene — unclear communications, insufficient coordination with counties and a lack of planning around debris and housing. FEMA may have failed in some areas, but so did the state. Still, it would've been easy — even expected — for Stein to point fingers or escalate the fight as President Trump continues down the path toward eliminating FEMA. Instead, he's lowering the temperature. Trump's proposal to eliminate FEMA might be a negotiation tactic rather than a policy plan. He's known for throwing rhetorical grenades to draw people to the table. Some see that as bluster, while others see leverage. Either way, if the goal is to force FEMA to improve, there's plenty of common ground. And Stein is proving to be an effective messenger. He's called for FEMA to be faster, more flexible, and less redundant. He wants a single application process, more upfront money for permanent repairs and greater use of block grants to give states more discretion. This isn't the burn-it-down approach of the MAGA right, nor is it a progressive defense of bureaucracy. It's something rarer these days: a sober, statesmanlike argument for targeted federal responsibility and reform. As a conservative, I've long believed in limiting federal power. I've written before that North Carolina should stop waiting on Washington and take control of its own future. So I sympathize with Trump's instinct to scrap FEMA entirely. There's philosophical merit to the idea. The federal government tries to do too much. State governments are more nimble, more accountable. Pushing power down is almost always the right move. But not in every case. President Reagan famously said the nine scariest words in the English language were: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' And yet Reagan also signed the Stafford Act — the law that governs FEMA to this day. That law has real flaws, and some of them are exactly what we're grappling with now. That's another classic Trump-era irony. The liberal governor of North Carolina is defending FEMA with a Reaganesque argument, to preserve a program the Gipper helped create. I still believe in federalism. But on this one, Stein has convinced me. FEMA needs to stay.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Changes at FEMA raise local worries as hurricane season begins in North Carolina
The start of hurricane season can send a shiver through eastern North Carolina, a region pounded in the last decade by two supposedly once-in-a-century storms — Matthew and Florence. But as the six-month season officially opened on June 1, there's reason to fear not just the coming of devastating winds and flooding, but also the lack of federal help. Staffing at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been reduced through terminations and voluntary retirements and the Trump administration is considering reducing the share of recovery costs the federal government will pay. But the clearest cause for worry is in western North Carolina, where the Trump administration is balking at providing expected funding to support recovery from Hurricane Helene. North Carolina's Rep. Deborah Ross (D-2nd) led a bipartisan group of House members from the Southeast who wrote to the Trump administration urging it to replenish FEMA's disaster relief fund, which is about to run out of money months before the end of the fiscal year. The lawmakers have received no reply Ross said in a statement: 'Donald Trump visited western North Carolina during his first week in office, looked hurricane victims in the eye, and promised them his full support. His administration has abandoned communities hit hard by Hurricane Helene.' In the small town of River Bend on the Trent River near New Bern, Town Manager Delane Jackson said the uncertainty around federal disaster relief has given this hurricane season a sharper edge of anxiety. 'We are really on high alert because of what is happening at FEMA,' he said. 'It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when a hurricane is going to strike.' River Bend knows what hurricanes can do. When Hurricane Florence hit in 2018, flooding from the Trent River damaged a third of the town's 1,500 homes. Jackson added, 'I don't have confidence that if something were to happen, the federal government would be there to hold hands along the way.' In Shallotte, a western Brunswick County town of 5,000 about five miles from the coast, Mayor Walter Eccard said less federal support would leave his town in 'a very difficult situation.'bHe said, 'It's an area of worry for me because they're a valuable partner in our (recovery) efforts.' In Wilmington, a city cut off by Florence for four days, Mayor Bill Saffo said he is nervously watching the problems with disaster relief in western North Carolina and FEMA's changes in Washington. 'You get around hurricane season and you don't know if one of your main agencies is going to be around for you,' he said. 'We're very concerned about it. Everybody should be.' Some at FEMA acknowledge that the agency enters this hurricane season with a hindered ability to respond. CNN recently reported on an internal report that said, 'As FEMA transforms to a smaller footprint, the intent for this hurricane season is not well understood. Thus FEMA is not ready.' But Rep. Greg Murphy (R-3rd), whose district covers much of the state's coastal area, welcomes the shakeup at FEMA. He said in a statement: 'FEMA has become an overly bureaucratic and unreliable agency that has shown a failure of getting resources to the people who need it in a timely manner. The system needs reform.' Murphy said changing FEMA will not restrict a full response. He said he and his team are 'working to ensure manpower and funding will be ready to meet any disaster that may afflict our state.' As the federal government steps back from disaster relief, the potential damage from hurricanes grows. Stan Riggs, a retired East Carolina University professor and one of the state's leading experts on coastal geology, said increased building in vulnerable areas means devastating damage is inevitable. 'It's like having a picnic on the interstate,' he said. Providing hurricane relief funding is essential, he said, but the government should also be investing more in making the state less vulnerable. Instead, the risk is rising, the response is fading and this hurricane season is becoming increasingly anxious. Associate opinion editor Ned Barnett can be reached at 919-404-7583, or nbarnett@
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sarwar accuses Swinney of 'dishonest' by-election campaign
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has accused John Swinney of running a "dishonest and disgraceful" campaign" ahead of last week's Holyrood by-election. Sarwar claimed the SNP were pushing voters to Reform UK through their tactics, which he described as "shameful" on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show programme. But Swinney justified his "two-horse race" remark by saying Labour's vote share had "collapsed" in the by-election and that his party's own data showed a surge for Reform. Scottish Labour won an unexpected victory in Thursday's by-election as Davy Russell took the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat. The first minister also told the programme he would consider a reshuffle of his cabinet "in due course" following the defeat, which saw the SNP lose a seat previously held by the late Christina McKelvie. SNP to 'learn lessons' as Labour wins crucial by-election Why Reform was the other big winner in the Hamilton by-election Labour confounds expectations with Hamilton by-election victory In the run-up to the contest Swinney declared it a "two-horse race" between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. In a combative interview with presenter Martin Geissler, Sarwar said: "The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse sent a message to John Swinney that he ran a dishonest and disgraceful campaign that attempted to push people into the arms of Reform, rather than confront the issues that he has caused in communities across Scotland." Sarwar also said the SNP campaign, in support of candidate Katy Loudon, showed a lack of ambition and was "running down the clock" on its time in government rather than offering policies that would benefit people. He added the first minister had "no idea about what's affecting the day to day lives of people in Scotland, which is a disgrace." Davy Russell won the seat for Labour with 8,559 votes, a majority of 602 over the second-placed SNP. Christina McKelvie, who died in March from secondary breast cancer, had held the seat since 2011. Reform UK finished third with 7,088 votes, following a campaign that attracted criticism for a controversial advert that claimed Sarwar would prioritise people from Asian backgrounds. The party's deputy leader Richard Tice said the result was a "massive boost" going into the May 2026 vote. Meanwhile, Sarwar urged Sir Keir Starmer's government to move faster with delivering change that would put extra money in people's pockets. He also attacked media pundits for being "obsessed with a Labour government" in Westminster. Swinney later denied his "two horse race" comment was an attempt to eat into Labour's vote by spotlighting Reform. The first minister told the programme he had been "standing up to Farage for months" and this had been crystallised during the by-election campaign. Swinney also told the programme he believed Reform voters were motivated by anger at the cost of living. When asked about the possibility of a cabinet reshuffle, the first minister replied: "I've got a cabinet minister coming back from maternity leave in Mairi McAllan, so I have to look at the team. I'll be doing that in due course." He added that his party were still in "the process of recovery" after he was sworn in as first minister last May with the SNP facing "significant difficulties" at the time. Swinney also said he would focus on improving public services - such as cutting waiting times for GPs - and mitigating the cost of living crisis before the 2026 Holyrood election.
