logo
Drinking A Coke Could be Worse Than Eating A Candy Bar

Drinking A Coke Could be Worse Than Eating A Candy Bar

Yahooa day ago

The way you consume sugar might play a role in how bad it is for your health, according to a new study.
Researchers at Utah's Brigham Young University, alongside institutions in Germany, found that drinking sugar was linked to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to eating it. They claim their findings are the first time a clear dose-response relationship was determined between different sources of sugar and type 2 diabetes prevalence.
'This is the first study to draw clear dose-response relationships between different sugar sources and type 2 diabetes risk. It highlights why drinking your sugar—whether from soda or juice—is more problematic for health than eating it,' said Karen Della Corte, lead author and BYU nutritional science professor, per BYU News.
While it may be the first study to establish a clear dose-response relationship, it is not the first time sugary drinks have been identified as a major driver of diabetes. Earlier this year, The Dallas Express reported on another study that found that in 2020 alone, an estimated 2.2 million new cases of diabetes and 1.2 million new cases of heart disease globally were attributed to sugar-sweetened beverages.
One reason drinks like soda may be worse is the metabolic effects. Drinks like Coke contain isolated sugars or sugars extracted from sources like fruit and then added to processed foods. These added sugars, found in everything from lemonade to cereals to soda, can drive a greater glycemic impact, which can overwhelm the liver's ability to metabolize them. In turn, this can lead to more liver fat and insulin resistance.
The latest study used data from over half a million people worldwide. The researchers found that for each additional daily 12-ounce serving of soda and other beverages sweetened with sugar, a person's chances of developing type 2 diabetes rose by 25%.
Notably, the inverse effect was seen for 20 grams of table sugar and total sugar consumed in the same time frame.
'Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form,' said Della Corte.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drinking A Coke Could be Worse Than Eating A Candy Bar
Drinking A Coke Could be Worse Than Eating A Candy Bar

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Drinking A Coke Could be Worse Than Eating A Candy Bar

The way you consume sugar might play a role in how bad it is for your health, according to a new study. Researchers at Utah's Brigham Young University, alongside institutions in Germany, found that drinking sugar was linked to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to eating it. They claim their findings are the first time a clear dose-response relationship was determined between different sources of sugar and type 2 diabetes prevalence. 'This is the first study to draw clear dose-response relationships between different sugar sources and type 2 diabetes risk. It highlights why drinking your sugar—whether from soda or juice—is more problematic for health than eating it,' said Karen Della Corte, lead author and BYU nutritional science professor, per BYU News. While it may be the first study to establish a clear dose-response relationship, it is not the first time sugary drinks have been identified as a major driver of diabetes. Earlier this year, The Dallas Express reported on another study that found that in 2020 alone, an estimated 2.2 million new cases of diabetes and 1.2 million new cases of heart disease globally were attributed to sugar-sweetened beverages. One reason drinks like soda may be worse is the metabolic effects. Drinks like Coke contain isolated sugars or sugars extracted from sources like fruit and then added to processed foods. These added sugars, found in everything from lemonade to cereals to soda, can drive a greater glycemic impact, which can overwhelm the liver's ability to metabolize them. In turn, this can lead to more liver fat and insulin resistance. The latest study used data from over half a million people worldwide. The researchers found that for each additional daily 12-ounce serving of soda and other beverages sweetened with sugar, a person's chances of developing type 2 diabetes rose by 25%. Notably, the inverse effect was seen for 20 grams of table sugar and total sugar consumed in the same time frame. 'Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form,' said Della Corte.

Coca-Cola actually cures an uncomfortable health problem
Coca-Cola actually cures an uncomfortable health problem

Miami Herald

time2 days ago

  • Miami Herald

Coca-Cola actually cures an uncomfortable health problem

I can't drink Coca-Cola Zero because I think it tastes awful compared to regular Coke. And all that talk about being healthier because of no sugar seems like gibberish. Coca-Cola Zero contains the artificial sweetener aspartame, which is shown to negatively affect metabolic health, potentially cause neurological problems, and possibly even have carcinogenic effects. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter If I wanted an actually healthy option, I would squeeze my own orange juice. But if I'm in the mood for Coke after a heavy meal to help me digest, I want plain old Coke. And it really helps. What's more, I personally know doctors who unofficially recommend Coca-Cola for treating stomach flu. A few sips can help with nausea, because the soda contains substances that calm the stomach. Related: Coca-Cola finally brings viral soda mash-up There are different versions of Coca-Cola's history. Some say it was invented as a patent medicine, containing an extract of the coca leaf - otherwise known as cocaine - which at the time was considered safe in small amounts. The drink was brewed by pharmacist John Pemberton in 1886 and marketed as a tonic for various ailments including hangovers, hiccups, and headaches. Pemberton even claimed it cured his morphine addiction. Fast forward 139 years and Coca-Cola no longer contains cocaine. Its taste is different from the original, but it remains the most popular soft drink in the world. What's more, a systematic review has confirmed a legitimate medical use for the beverage. Believe it or not, Coke is a popular household cleaning and maintenance product. By now, we have all heard about many strange uses of the drink, such as cleaning toilet bowls, loosening rust, and removing stains. It is also used in some cooking and gardening applications. Related: Coca-Cola brings back iconic 1980s soda flavor But did you know that Coca-Cola can help with gastric phytobezoars? A bezoar is a foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract, commonly found as a hard mass in the stomach. A phytobezoar consists of plant material, such as cellulose, that can't be digested, writes The Takeout. These masses can cause nausea, vomiting, and a lack of appetite. Thankfully, a proven phytobezoar treatment is none other than Coca-Cola. One systematic study reviewed 24 papers on the matter, published from 2002 to 2012, and discovered that in "91.3% of the cases, phytobezoar resolution with Coca-Cola administration was successful, either as a single treatment (50%) or combined with further endoscopic techniques." The soft drink industry is projected to reach $660 billion by 2028, and 1.9 billion servings of Coca-Cola's (KO) range of drinks are consumed each day around the globe. More on soft drinks: Coca-Cola, Pepsi rival discontinues 3 popular soda flavorsCoca-Cola brings popular TikTok soda craze to store shelvesPopular beverage brand launches genius soda alternative While corporate giants and The Coca-Cola Corp. battle the global market for soft drinks, Coca-Cola is the world's most valuable soft drink brand with a market capitalization of $308.90 billion. Pepsi is the next in line with $178.19 billion. And despite the protests of Pepsi fans, there's definitely something special about the taste of Coca-Cola. In the company's first-quarter earnings call, when Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey was asked about the "wellness and functional" soda market trend, he explained that taste is still one of the most important factors. "So taste is in my mind still going to remain primary, but to the extent there are consumers that were willing to trade taste for ingredients, absolutely, we will follow that trend," he said. Related: Haribo never intended for its bears to be this happy Morgan Stanley analysts recently reaffirmed an Overweight rating on Coca-Cola stock, suggesting that it will continue to grow faster than its peers, especially in an organic sales category. Experts also praised the company's pricing power, sustained market share gains, and benefits from the Fairlife acquisition. Over the last five years, Coca-Cola shares gained 57.39%, currently trading at $71.77 per share. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Drinking sugar may be worse than eating it, study finds
Drinking sugar may be worse than eating it, study finds

The Hill

time5 days ago

  • The Hill

Drinking sugar may be worse than eating it, study finds

PROVO, Utah (KTVX) — Drinking your sugar may be worse for you than previously thought. That is, according to a recent study conducted by Brigham Young University (BYU) researchers in collaboration with several researchers from Germany-based institutions. The study, which analyzed data from over half a million people across multiple continents, found that sugar consumed through drinks, such as soda and juice, was consistently linked to a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes. Sugar from other sources reportedly showed no such link or were, in some cases, associated with a lower risk of diabetes. Karen Della Corte, the lead author on the study and a BYU nutritional science professor, said this was the first study to draw clear 'dose-response' relationships between different sugar sources and Type 2 diabetes risks. 'It highlights why drinking your sugar, whether from soda or juice, is more problematic for health than eating it,' said Della Corte. The study suggests the more problematic nature of sugary drinks may come down to differing metabolic effects. Researchers said sugar-sweetened drinks contain isolated sugars that lead to a higher glycemic impact that overwhelm and disrupt metabolism in the liver. This, in turn, increases liver fat and insulin resistance, the study says. Meanwhile, the sugars that can be found in fruits, dairy products, or whole grains do not overload the liver. The beneficial nutrients, such as fiber, fats, and proteins, help slow the blood glucose responses that dietary sugars bring. 'This study underscores the need for even more stringent recommendations for liquid sugars such as those in sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice, as they appear to harmfully associate with metabolic health,' Della Corte said. 'Rather than condemning all added sugars, future dietary guidelines might consider the differential effects of sugar based on its source and form.' The study has been published in the Advances in Nutrition journal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store