Donald Trump gets the Royal treatment in Riyadh, as he seeks it back home
Walking through the lavish palaces of Riyadh, surrounded by royalty and riches that dwarf his own, and brushing shoulders with a leader who does not have to concern himself with courts and judges, Donald Trump appeared to be living his dream.
There were many reasons for Trump to visit Saudi Arabia this week, but for a man who has declared his desire to be both a dictator and a monarch, the chance to experience both up close stood above them all.
The royal treatment began before his plane had even touched the ground, when Saudi F-15 fighter jets appeared alongside the president's plane and escorted it as it came into land at King Khalid International Airport. He stepped off the jet to be greeted by Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman and a line of Saudi dignitaries, walked along an endless lavender carpet watched over by an honor guard with golden swords, onto a motorcade that was escorted by riders on Arabian horses, emerging from his car at the Royal Court to the sound of horns.
"I really believe we like each other a lot," Trump said of the prince as they sat on golden chairs at the royal palace.
The president was clearly impressed.
'What a great place, what a great place,' he said later at the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in front of a giant screen showing U.S. and Saudi flags, where he continued to praise the Crown Prince.
'He's an incredible man. Known him a long time now. There's nobody like him,' Trump said of the man who, just a few years ago, U.S. intelligence agencies blamed for the killing of an American journalist, Jamal Khashoggi.
'We have great partners in the world, but we have none stronger and nobody like the gentleman that's right before me…I like him a lot. I like him too much. That's why we give so much,' he said.
Trump's embrace of Saudi Arabia is all the more significant coming after he all but abandoned or sparked disputes with many of America's traditional democratic allies in Europe.
The message couldn't be clearer: This administration is not here to lecture about human rights or democracy - it is here to make money.
Trump arrived on stage to his usual entry music — Lee Greenwood's 'Proud To Be An American' — which seemed somewhat out of place. He left to his usual exit music, which seemed extremely out of place — The Village People's 'YMCA.'
In the evening, Trump was treated to a lavish state dinner in the historic city of Diriyah, just above Riyadh.
Trump has tried to build his own version of a royal dynasty back home for years. He bought a faux palace, covered the White House in gold trim, and even made a solid effort at getting rid of democracy altogether.
Just before leaving for the Middle East on a tour of oil-rich monarchies, the president announced that he would accept a gift of a plane from Qatar — a $400 million 'palace in the sky' that would eventually replace Air Force One.
That was too brazen even for his supporters who stayed with him through the insurrection and the rape trials. MAGA influencer Laura Loomer, a right-wing influencer who wields a Rasputin-like influence over the president, called the acceptance of the gift a 'stain' on the administration. Even Josh Hawley of Missouri, Trump's ride-or-die in the Senate, wasn't keen on the idea.
Like the Saudi Royal Family, Trump's own family's financial interests were seemingly intertwined with the state's on this visit. The Trumps have significant pending deals with Saudi companies in real estate and cryptocurrency.
Eric Trump, who runs the Trump Organization, recently announced a high-rise Trump hotel in Saudi and a sprawling Trump golf course in Qatar.
The president's son-in-law Jared Kushner had previously secured a $2 billion investment from Saudi's sovereign wealth fund, which is overseen by the crown prince himself.
While Trump's family did not come with him on this tour, he did bring with him a full royal court of friendly business leaders and CEOs who hope to drum up their own investments and deals along the way.
At the top of the list was Elon Musk, a wannabe prince of darkness, who was joined by oil executives, bankers, private military contractors, the chiefs of Coca-Cola and Uber, and American defense contractors from Halliburton, Northrop Grumman and Boeing.
Musk used the opportunity to pitch two of his ideas that have largely failed to make a dent in the U.S. — robotaxis and his tunneling company.
Trump heads to Qatar next to take a look at his palace in the sky. He will then return home with memories of parades, honor guards, lavish ceremonies and likely a greater hunger for the royal life.
That could mean more gold trim at the White House, or fewer judges to get in his way.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Israel's Dermer: Want to Remove Iran's Ballistic Threat
US President Donald Trump says Iran wants to talk about de-escalating the conflict with Israel even as the two sides exchanged deadly fire for the fourth consecutive day. Israeli National Security Minister Ron Dermer, a key ally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his main liaison with the US, speaks with Bloomberg Television about the conflict. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Travel Ban Could Target Dozens of Countries, U.S. Memo Reveals
The U.S. government is reportedly considering a dramatic expansion of its travel restrictions, which could bar citizens from 36 more countries from entering the United States. According to an internal State Department cable obtained by Reuters, the potential expansion hinges on national security concerns and cooperation benchmarks. The memo, signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, outlined a 60-day window for these countries to address U.S. concerns or face partial or full travel suspensions. The list includes nations across Africa, the Caribbean, and parts of Asia, such as Angola, Ghana, Cambodia, and Syria. Citing issues like unreliable identity documentation, lack of cooperation in deportation cases, and visa overstays, the document emphasized the need to maintain the integrity of U.S. borders and public safety. The State Department pointed to passport security and anti-American activity as additional risk factors. While not all concerns apply equally to each country, the message is clear: cooperate or face consequences. If enacted, this would mark one of the largest expansions of U.S. travel restrictions in recent memory. Earlier this month, a proclamation suspended entry from 12 countries under similar national security justifications. Now, with this latest proposal, that number could more than triple. A senior State Department official declined to discuss the specifics of the memo but emphasized that visa policies are under constant review to ensure the safety of Americans. For travelers with ties to any of the listed nations, or for global mobility at large, the potential fallout could be significant. Business trips, academic visas, family reunifications, and tourism could all be impacted by this travel ban expansion depending on how the final policy takes shape. As the 60-day clock begins to tick, all eyes are on diplomatic responses and whether these countries will meet the U.S. government's requirements, or risk being shut Travel Ban Could Target Dozens of Countries, U.S. Memo Reveals first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 15, 2025
13 minutes ago
Judge extends block on Trump ban prohibiting Harvard students from entering US
A temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump barring foreign Harvard University students from entering the U.S. will remain in effect until next Monday while a federal judge considers arguments made for a preliminary injunction. The temporary block was due to expire on Thursday before being extended Monday by U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs. Harvard's lawyers argued Trump's proclamation violates its First Amendment rights and is outside the authority of the executive branch. Listing the actions taken by the government against Harvard in recent weeks, attorney Ian Gershengorn argued in a court hearing Monday in Boston that the move was retaliation and viewpoint discrimination against the institution. Gershengorn argued the president is not restricting entry, but instead limiting what you do and who you associate with after you enter. The permissible way to classify a class of aliens is based on the character of the alien, he argued. The government pushed back, arguing the administration does not "trust" Harvard and that it did not monitor the "aliens" that it brought into the U.S. The government said bringing in foreigners is a privilege not a right, according to Tiberius Davis, counsel to the assistant attorney general. "We don't trust Harvard to vet, host, monitor or discipline" foreigners, Davis argued. Davis also raised concerns about Harvard's "foreign entanglements" with the Chinese government and said it did not provide sufficient information to the government on foreign students -- which Harvard has denied. Harvard University filed the lawsuit against the government after U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced it was canceling Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which would bar the school from enrolling foreign students. The suit was later amended to include the proclamation and Harvard moved to request a second block on Trump's proclamation. That would have gone into effect for at least six months before it was blocked by Burroughs. The judge questioned arguments made by the government over its concerns about Harvard that motivated the proclamation. "I can't imagine that anything that you just described applies only to Harvard," Burroughs said. Davis argued the government is free to investigate other institutions and said that "a lot of these other universities are willing to" do more to address issues on campus. Davis also argued that different government agencies chose to terminate grants with Harvard because they believed the institution was not following the law, saying that move was not retaliation either. Davis also said Harvard is not being singled out with grant terminations because other institutions have suffered the same. The government argued it is not singling out Harvard, but rather other institutions have been more willing to take action to address issues on campus, while Harvard has not, Davis said. "There's a lack of evidence of retaliation here," Davis said in court. Burroughs said if the point is to root out antisemitism, "Why aren't we letting in people from Israel?" Davis argued antisemitism was just one part of the issue, along with foreign entanglements and not providing sufficient information to the government. Because of their other conduct on campus and their inattentiveness to it "we don't trust them," Davis said. "They don't have to pull over everybody who's speeding. Frankly they can't do that," Davis said. Pushing back on arguments that it did not monitor its students, Harvard said it is the government's responsibility to vet students being allowed into the country. "The vetting is done by the State Department in their visa process," Gershengorn said. At one point in the Monday hearing, the judge asked Harvard's attorneys why it did not name the president in its lawsuit, asking if he needed to appear in this case. Gershengorn said it sued the people who are tasked with implementing the proclamation. Gershengorn argued Trump's usage of the proclamation to block entry of foreign Harvard students is a "vast new authority to regulate the domestic conduct of domestic institutions," a departure from how this proclamation has been used in the past. Gershengorn said it has been used to block the entry of individuals or nationals of a country that have "done something bad." The question is not whether the action is lawful or not, Gershengorn argued. If lawful action is taken as a First Amendment-motivated action, it is no longer lawful, he added. Gershengorn said what Harvard has suffered over the last two months is probably the most "irregular" and "improper" action any institution has suffered. Harvard pushed back against claims there is widespread violence on campus, saying the story the government cites identified two incidents of violence on the basis of religion. The government is "throwing things at the wall to see what sticks," Gershengorn said. Harvard has alleged that the administration is in an "escalating campaign of retaliation" against the school. After Harvard publicly refused to comply with demands made by the Trump administration, the administration responded by freezing more than $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to the school.
