The Russians captured a US Bradley, and now they really want their own
The Bradley offers more protection and can fire more accurately than its Russian equivalent, the BMP-3, according to a Russian report that was leaked onto a Telegram channel earlier this month.
Experts told Task & Purpose that the report appears to be legitimate.
The United States began providing Ukraine with Bradleys in January 2023. The following year, drone video emerged showing two Ukrainian Bradley Fighting Vehicles scoring hit after hit against a Russian T-90 tank with their 25mm cannons.
The captured M2A2 may have allowed the Russians to use live ammunition against a Bradley in testing for the first time, said Steven Zaloga, an expert on Russian and Soviet armor.
Finding out the Bradley is better than the BMP-3 should not have been a surprise to the Russians, as reports about the Bradley's operational performance are readily available, said retired Marine Col. J.D. Williams, of the RAND Corporation.
'Having an actual vehicle does enable the Russians to confirm those reports (they may have been skeptical of the reporting and attributed some of those reports to western propaganda) and to understand the detailed materials and construction of the various components, in particular the armor protection, optics, and combat systems,' Williams told Task & Purpose in an email.
The differences between the Bradley and BMP-3 represent how the U.S. and Russian philosophies diverge, Williams said. First, the Soviets and then the Russians built their fighting vehicles under the assumption that they would lose many of them in battle, so they emphasized firepower over crew protection.
The Bradley may have a better main gun than the BMP-3, but the Russian vehicle has more weapons available, he said.
'Fielding a large number of vehicles that were easy to operate and had a lot of firepower was more important than having a smaller number of high-end systems,' Williams said. 'Other deficiencies highlighted in the report reflect long-standing Russian limitations in development and fielding of technical or precision components like electronics, optics, and combat systems that give the Bradley a huge advantage in battlefield performance.'
However, the Russian analysis of the Bradley vs. the BMP-3 was not entirely one-sided, said retired Marine Col. Mark Cancian, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington, D.C.
The Russians did find that the Bradley had more protection against mines, bullets, and projectiles, and they have more space for crews, Cancian told Task & Purpose.
But the report also found that the BMP-3 is better than the Bradley in other areas, such as its ability to float, and the BMP-3s also have more firepower, including a 100mm gun and 30mm autocannon, Cancian said.
Navy fires commanding officer, command master chief of expeditionary security squadron
The Marine Corps has settled the debate over the size of a rifle squad
Leg day: Army cuts down on number of paid parachutists
Navy commissions its newest submarine, the USS Iowa
Why veterans are the real target audience for 'Helldivers 2'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
24 minutes ago
- American Military News
Trump Says Putin Ready For Deal As Zelenskyy Shores Up Support With Starmer
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. Russian President Vladimir Putin is ready to make a deal over the war in Ukraine, US President Donald Trump said on the eve of a summit between the two world leaders in Alaska. Speaking in an interview on Fox News Radio on August 14, Trump said he believes Putin is 'convinced that he's going to make a deal' at the summit to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to, and we're going to find out,' Trump said. In Moscow, Putin praised Trump's efforts to end the war in a short video released by the Kremlin adding the White House was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Hours before Trump spoke, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was in London to discuss security with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength,' Zelenskyy said following the meeting at 10 Downing Street, the prime minister's residence in central London. 'We discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,' he added, suggesting such a possibility could arise if the United States succeeds 'in pressuring Russia to stop the killings.' Zelenskyy's visit to London followed his visit to another European capital, Berlin, on August 13, where he attended a video conference with several major European leaders who feared being sidelined by Trump and Putin. Trump appeared to try and allay those fears by saying in the Fox News interview that 'depending on what happens' during the Putin meeting, he could call Zelenskyy to quickly set up a second meeting involving all three leaders. 'Depending on what happens with my meeting, I'm going to be calling up President Zelenskyy, and let's get him over to wherever we're going to meet,' Trump said. 'The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy things up,' but you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term, OK?' he added. Zelenskyy has said he warned Trump during an August 13 call that Putin was 'bluffing' about his desire to end the war. Trump has warned Russia of 'very severe consequences' if it doesn't halt its war against Ukraine, but fears remain that the exclusion of Kyiv and Brussels in the talks could sideline their desire for the protection of fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests. He gave no details on what consequences Moscow could face if it doesn't put an end to more than 3 1/2 years of war in Ukraine, but he said the aim of the talks, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson just outside Anchorage, Alaska, is 'to end the war.' Can Trump-Putin Talks Lead To A Cease-Fire? The talks between Trump and Putin are aimed at finding a path to end the conflict, the biggest in Europe since World War II. Trump has said both sides will have to swap land to end intense fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives on both sides and displaced millions of Ukrainians. Appearing to be on the outside looking in ahead of the talks, European leaders and Zelenskyy have been scrambling to make their voices heard. Washington appears to be preparing Kyiv and Moscow for major compromises to end the war, with US Vice President JD Vance warning any peace deal will likely leave both sides 'unhappy.' But French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump was 'very clear' in the August 13 call that he wants to achieve a cease-fire at the summit and that Trump had been clear that 'territorial issues relating to Ukraine…will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president.' 'There are currently no serious territorial exchange schemes on the table…. I think that's a very important point in this regard. And we hope that it can be held in Europe, in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties,' he added. If Trump's insistence on involving Ukraine is confirmed, it would help ease fears among Ukraine and its allies that leaders of the two superpowers could reach an accord that sells out Europe's and Ukraine's security interests and proposes giving Ukrainian territory to Moscow. 'Trump's thinking is apparently closer aligned with that of the Europeans than first feared by some,' one European official told RFE/RL after the call. Russia has consistently given the idea of a meeting with Zelenskyy the cold shoulder, suggesting it should only happen once the sides are close to signing a peace deal, not just a cease-fire agreement. That moment seems far off given the huge gap between the Russian and Ukrainian positions that persists on several major issues, including territory and security, despite three rounds of direct talks in Turkey since mid-May. The talks come at a pivotal moment, with Trump increasingly frustrated with Putin and the Russian president showing no signs of bending on the Kremlin's maximalist demands. Trump and Putin have held six phone calls, and the White House's lead envoy has traveled to Moscow at least three times. The decision to meet Putin face-to-face — something Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, refused to do following the invasion — reflects Trump's belief that his relationship with the Russian leader will yield a durable peace agreement.
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bolton: Trump tariffs may push India closer to Russia, China
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Wednesday said President Trump's tariffs may push India further away from the U.S. and into deeper alliances with Russia and China. The president previously threatened to impose a 25 percent tariff on India for purchasing oil from the Kremlin absent of similar punishments for China, who purchases more fuel from Russia. 'I can tell you the reaction in India to that, particularly with no tariffs slapped on China, which bought an awful lot more oil and gas from Russia, is the Indians are incandescent about this and there's talk of Putin coming to India later this year,' Bolton said during a Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'AC360.' 'There's talk of Prime Minister Modi of India going to China for the first time since 2018. Obviously, both Moscow and Beijing are going to try to bring India closer to them,' he added. China and the U.S. engaged in a high stakes trade war earlier this year, where tariff rates soared to triple digits, resulting in market scares and consumer anxiety about skyrocketing prices. Trump and his counterpart Xi Jinping agreed to lower rates to a moderate 10 percent for American exports and 30 percent for products imported from China. The president has shied away from engaging in another war with leaders in Beijing with tariffs over their dealings with the Kremlin. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was notably close to Trump during his first term. The two held rallies together in both India and Texas to celebrate bilateral relations. At the time, Trump said India was 'America's greatest, most devoted, and most loyal friends.' But his tone has become more pointed over the country's tariff rates. 'What people don't like to say about India — they're the highest tariff nation. They have the highest tariff of anybody. We do very, very little business with India because their tariffs are so high,' Trump said last week. 'So we settled on 25 percent, but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be very happy,' he added.
NBC News
25 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump ramps up his campaign for the Nobel Prize, hoping to cement a legacy as a 'peacemaker'
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Toward the end of Donald Trump's first term, his national security adviser turned to him in the Oval Office and said he should win the Nobel Peace Prize for his work normalizing relations between Israel and some Arab states. Another aide chimed in, saying the last president, Barack Obama, had won the award 'for nothing.' 'Trump's attitude was, 'Whatever,'' recalled the adviser, Robert O'Brien, in an interview. 'He wasn't concerned about the recognition.' Any whiff of indifference is now gone. Back in office, Trump and his aides are intensifying a public campaign to snag the award, citing a string of peace deals while making a case that snubbing him again would be an injustice. Day by day, the White House is amplifying Trump's role in curbing hostilities and putting out the message that this most combative of presidents is at heart a " peacemaker." Aides have highlighted his role in settling disputes between Israel and Iran, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Cambodia and Thailand, and Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, promoting " worldwide calls" from the heads of several of those nations for Trump to win the peace prize. Trump is also touting his efforts to end a worrying conflict between two nuclear-armed combatants, India and Pakistan. He suggested he used trade as an inducement to stop the fighting, though an Indian official has denied that Trump's mediation made any difference. Speaking last month, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the president has 'brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' she added. A difference between this term and the last is that now, 'he actually wants it [the Nobel Peace Prize]," a senior official in Trump's first term said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'He doesn't just want to talk about it.' Now comes his best shot. On Friday, Trump will fly to Alaska for a sit-down with Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed at ending a war with Ukraine that has produced close to 1.5 million casualties on both sides. The odds of a breakthrough are tough, but if Trump brokers a truce on terms that are fair to Ukraine, that would be a diplomatic triumph that eluded both Obama and President Joe Biden. In the run-up to the summit, the Nobel prize has appeared to be top of mind in Trump's circle. Without prompting, Leavitt portrayed Trump as deserving of the prize in three out of her four press briefings in July. In prior months, she hadn't brought up the award. Trump has posted about the prize a total of seven times on his social media site since his second term began, six of them in June and July. A theme of his is that while he's earned the accolade, he won't win it. 'The president feels that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, but does not think he will get it,' a White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'He has remarked that it will go to someone who writes a book about how Donald Trump thinks rather than Donald Trump himself.' In a visit to the White House in April, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre was asked about Trump's prospects of winning the award, announced annually in Oslo. He didn't bite. 'On that prize, that is a committee taking care of that which is completely working on its own terms and I cannot comment on that,' Støre said. Trump smiled and looked across the Cabinet Room table at the prime minister: 'I like that question,' he said. The award is solely in the hands of the Nobel selection committee; politicians don't pick the winner. But Trump has reportedly raised the issue with Norway before. Last month, he called the country's finance minister, former NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg, to talk tariffs and brought up the peace prize, a Norwegian news outlet wrote Thursday. The White House official said that the president and Stoltenberg did speak, but could not say that the conversation was focused on the prize. Stoltenberg's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump is surrounded by reminders of past presidents who've won what is arguably humanity's most prestigious award. Obama, whose portrait hangs in the White House, won it less than a year into his presidency and even he acknowledged at the time that his accomplishments were 'slight' in contrast to other Nobel laureates. Just a few paces from the Oval Office, Theodore Roosevelt's Nobel Prize is on display, signifying both the challenge and opportunity that Trump faces. Roosevelt won in 1906 for bringing an end to another Russian conflict: a war with Japan. As much as he aligns himself politically with working Americans, Trump has long been attuned to elite opinion. He takes pride in recounting that his late uncle, John Trump, taught at the acclaimed Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has described his alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, as 'the hardest school to get into, the best school in the world.' In announcing the Kennedy Center honorees on Wednesday, Trump said that he had long wanted one for himself. The president now plans to host the Kennedy Center Honors this year, teasing to reporters, "maybe ... next year we'll honor Trump." A Nobel Peace Prize would be the ultimate validation. "If the Israel-Hamas/Iran and Russia-Ukraine conflicts get resolved, there's no way that they can't give President Trump the Nobel Peace Prize," O'Brien said. 'The Nobel committee may not like Trump," he added. "They may not like his personality. They may not like his populism, but if the award has any meaning, they have to give it to him.' Of course, the Nobel selection committee has its own ideas about what it takes to win. The five-member body appointed by the Norwegian parliament may be weighing other criteria apart from the peace deals the White House has tallied. In his will, Alfred Nobel stated that the prize should go to those 'who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations.' Since Trump took office, some longtime U.S. allies have seen fraternal bonds fray. Trump has rolled out stiff tariffs in pursuit of an 'America First' agenda meant to create more jobs at home. He stunned various world capitals with his calls for acquiring Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal. 'Trump's desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize has become something of a joke in foreign capitals,' a former British diplomat said. 'His claims to Canada, Panama, Greenland, etc., as well as tariff wars and the assaults on America's democratic institutions, incline governments in the opposite direction.' What happens in the Nobel committee's closed-door deliberations is a closely guarded secret. The panel accepts nominations through the end of January and announces the winner in October. It waits 50 years before revealing even a list of nominees. Handicapping possible winners of the 2025 prize, a Norwegian think tank didn't mention Trump's name. The handful of front-runners the group cited included 'Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms,' the prime minister of Qatar, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, and the Women's International League for Peace & Freedom. It's far from clear that the Nobel committee is susceptible to persuasion. Pressure, publicity and coalition-building work in politics, the arena Trump knows well. But the Nobel committee is insulated from that world. The prize 'is not something you campaign for,' a Western diplomat said. 'This is a decision made by people who are independent and have their own point of view. You can't buy it. Norway doesn't need the money.' Last week, Trump held a meeting at the White House with the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to mark a rapprochement between the two countries. Questioned by a reporter, both leaders plumped for Trump's Nobel candidacy. Nikol Pashinyan, prime minister of Armenia, said, 'We will promote for that.' Turning to Trump, he said, 'Hopefully you will invite us' to the award ceremony. 'Front row,' Trump said.
