Sky Blues seeking ‘smart' display
Sydney FC coach Ufuk Talay has urged a 'smart' away performance from the Sky Blues in the first leg of their AFC Champions League Two quarter-final against South Korean outfit Jeonbuk on Thursday night.
With the second leg to take place at Allianz Stadium next Thursday, Talay wants to ensure his team remains on target to reach the semi-finals at the conclusion of the first leg at Yongin Mireu Stadium,
'We'll never set up the team not to lose, and we'll always set up the team to try to win but also we need to be smart, need to manage the game and realise that we do have another 90 minutes after this first game,' Talay said on Wednesday.
'It's very important that we get a positive outcome away from home, which will give us a good opportunity back at home in a week's time.'
Our first look at the Yongin Mireu Stadium 🏟️#WeAreSydney | #ACLTwopic.twitter.com/5lykX8W76z
— Sydney FC (@SydneyFC) March 5, 2025
The Sydney squad has been in South Korea since last Sunday night, and despite the cold conditions, Talay has been pleased with his team's preparations for what he described as a 'massive game'.
'The travel was long but it was OK. Being here longer has helped, the couple of training sessions we've already had here has helped, and the climate being fresh and cold will help us with the way we want to play,' he said.
'There are no nerves. It's another game against a good opponent, and we've shown in the past that we lift for these big occasions so we're looking forward to the challenge.
'This competition is very important for us as a club. We want to play in these big games.'
Talay said the big-game experience of Sydney's Brazilian marquee man Douglas Costa would be vital against a Jeonbuk team coached by former Tottenham star Gus Poyet.
'He's a great player … and he does influence games and he does change games,' Talay said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
World Oceans Day: How SailGP's Impact League Is Pioneering Sport As A Force For Good
The Australian SailGP Bonds Flying Roos Team This World Oceans Day, SailGP—the high-speed, close-to-shore international sailing championship where national teams race identical F50 catamarans at iconic venues around the world—is having a zeitgeist moment. Hollywood icons Hugh Jackman and Ryan Reynolds just announced they're becoming co-owners of the Australian team (now rebranded as the BONDS Flying Roos SailGP Team), while Anne Hathaway joined a consortium of investors acquiring Red Bull Italy. With star power firmly aboard, SailGP is fast becoming the Formula 1 of the ocean. But behind the glitz and glamor lies something even more revolutionary—a social impact approach that could totally redefine how sport can be harnessed to create positive change. At the heart of this transformation is the SailGP Impact League, a world-first initiative that turns environmental and social good into a competitive sport. Running alongside the championship leaderboard, the Impact League awards points to teams not for how fast they sail—but for how meaningfully they contribute to sustainability, inclusion, and innovation. As Fiona Morgan, SailGP's Chief Purpose Officer, explains: 'Performance isn't just about what happens on the water. It's about how we show up for the planet and each other.' Fiona Morgan, Chief Purpose Officer, SailGP Each team is paired with a nonprofit impact partner—for example, Australia works with Parley for the Oceans, while New Zealand races for Live Ocean. These partners don't just decorate boats with their logos. They collaborate closely with teams to strategize around clean energy, reduce waste, increase gender equity, and build community access to the sport. SailGP has intentionally designed the model to leverage what Morgan calls "sport's superpower: incentivizing and celebrating high performance.' But instead of rewarding only race results, the Impact League adds a new scoreboard—where points are earned for actions that cut carbon emissions, diversify leadership, and engage underserved communities. Having previously worked at Sky on sustainability and behavioral science campaigns, Morgan brought deep insight into how to shift habits at scale. 'Athletes now have more influence than politicians or scientists,' she says. 'But they need education, confidence, and authenticity to speak up. If you give them a way to score points, they'll not only want to win, but they'll want to understand the issue.' That education is baked into the Impact League's structure. Teams compete across four carefully selected categories: clean energy, circular economy practices, gender equity, and wider inclusion. Their performance is judged by a rotating panel of experts and global icons—from women's football leaders to climate scientists—who bring credibility and visibility to the movement. The results speak for themselves. Teams have slashed their energy consumption, redesigned operations to be more inclusive, and launched lasting legacy programs in their race cities. ' The model doesn't just motivate athletes—it's also changing how SailGP works with nonprofits. Unlike traditional sponsorships, impact partners only receive prize funding if their team finishes in the top three of the Impact League. 'We've given NGOs skin in the game,' says Morgan. 'That investment shifts the dynamic. These organizations are not just beneficiaries—they're strategic collaborators, helping teams win.' That mindset was echoed at SailGP's World Oceans Week event at the Wall Street Hotel (with generous support from the Paspaley Group) , where Parley founder Cyrill Gutsch shared, 'Sailors know the seas—and they know the impacts of plastics and climate change are real. Who better to push for the transformation away from fossil fuels than problem-solvers who are already at the helm and collaborating with the elements?' He added that their alliance with the Impact League is expanding ocean education and empowering new voices in the fight against climate change: 'We're inviting sailors everywhere to explore and share the connections between plastics and climate, and making ocean experiences more accessible.' Sponsors are responding with equal enthusiasm. Longtime SailGP partners like Rolex, Oracle, Emirates, and Mubadala are also finding ways to contribute to real impact. Emirates, for example, is funding localized Ocean Impact Projects in every host city, from restoring oyster reefs in New York to youth empowerment in Abu Dhabi. And then there's the celebrity factor. Jackman and Reynolds, announcing their new co-ownership of the Australian team, said: 'We're incredibly excited to set sail together in this new adventure. Hugh brings a deep love for and pride in his home country, as well as being an avid fan of sailing. He will also be bringing his overly clingy emotional support human along for the ride. Apologies in advance to Australia. No comment on whether we're writing this in our BONDS. No further questions.' The Australian Sail GP Bonds Flying Roos Team But the fun belies a serious commitment. Their involvement helps amplify the Impact League's message to global audiences—and shows that celebrity can be a catalyst for purpose, not a distraction from it. As for what's next, Morgan has her eyes set on finding the right global storytelling partner to take the Impact League to the next level. 'We're looking for a purposeful brand or media company that understands how to communicate this vision at scale,' she says. 'It's not just about sponsorship—it's about alignment and ambition.' She believes SailGP is just scratching the surface of what's possible. 'Sport gives people hope,' she says. 'And hope is exactly what the planet needs right now. Athletes never give up—they're always asking: how do we improve? That mindset is what the world needs.' The SailGP Impact League is more than a side project. It's a blueprint for how sport can evolve into a force for systemic change. SailGP has engineered a model where climate action, social equity, and thrilling competition live side by side. In a world where most sports are still practicing more traditional models of philanthropy, SailGP has built a scalable platform where teams are pioneering a whole new model which could be adopted by any sport - where the competitive spirit drives real impact. Morgan sums it up perfectly: 'Sport can be the planet's comeback. And we're just getting started.'
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports
Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg were surrounded by hundreds of college athletes at AthleteCon when news broke that the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement had been approved by a federal judge. In a room full of college athletes, they felt like the only two people who understood the gravity of the situation.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports
Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg were surrounded by hundreds of college athletes at AthleteCon when news broke that the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement had been approved by a federal judge. In a room full of college athletes, they felt like the only two people who understood the gravity of the situation. 'I'm about to get paid,' Moore said a Division I football player told her. 'Yes, you are about to get paid, and a lot of your women athlete friends are about to get cut,' she responded. Moore acknowledged that her response might be a stretch, but the sprawling House settlement clears the way for college athletes to get a share of revenue directly from their schools and provides a lucky few a shot at long-term financial stability, it raises genuine concerns for others. Schools that opt int will be able to share up to $20.5 million with their athletes over the next year starting July 1. The majority is expected to be spent on high-revenue generating sports, with most projections estimating 75% of funds will go toward football. So what happens to the non-revenue-generating sports which, outside of football and basketball, is pretty much all of them? It's a query that's top of mind for Ootsburg as she enters her senior year at Belmont, where she competes on track and field team. 'My initial thought was, is this good or bad? What does this mean for me? How does this affect me? But more importantly, in the bigger picture, how does it affect athletes as a whole?' Ootsburg said. 'You look at the numbers where it says most of the revenue, up to 75% to 85%, will go toward football players. You understand it's coming from the TV deals, but then it's like, how does that affect you on the back end?' Ootsburg asked. 'Let's say 800k goes toward other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things like care, facilities, resources or even just snacks?' Moore has similar concerns. She says most female athletes aren't worried about how much – if any – money they'll receive. They fear how changes could impact the student-athlete experience. 'A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student-athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given 3,000 dollars, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don't have any, and the athletic training room isn't stocked,' Moore said over the weekend as news of Friday night's settlement approval spread. One of the biggest problems, Ootsburg and Moore said, is that athletes aren't familiar with the changes. At AthleteCon in Charlotte, North Carolina, they said, perhaps the biggest change in college sports history was a push notification generally shrugged off by those directly impacted. 'Athletes do not know what's happening,' Ootsburg said. 'Talking to my teammates, it's so new, and they see the headlines and they're like, 'Ok, cool, but is someone going to explain this?' because they can read it, but then there's so many underlying factors that go into this. This is a complex problem that you have to understand the nuances behind, and not every athlete truly does.' Some coaches, too, are still trying to understand what's coming. Mike White, coach of the national champion Texas softball team, called it 'the great unknown right now.' 'My athletic director, Chris Del Conte, said it's like sailing out on a flat world and coming off the edge; we just don't know what's going to be out there yet, especially the way the landscape is changing,' he said at the Women's College World Series in Oklahoma City. 'Who knows what it's going to be?' What about the walk-ons? Jake Rimmel got a crash course on the settlement in the fall of 2024, when he said he was cut from the Virginia Tech cross-country team alongside several other walk-ons. The topic held up the House case for weeks as the judge basically forced schools to give athletes cut in anticipation of approval a chance to play — they have to earn the spot, no guarantees — without counting against roster limits. Rimmel packed up and moved back to his parents' house in Purcellville, Virginia. For the past six months, he's held on to a glimmer of hope that maybe he could return. 'The past six months have been very tough," he said. "I've felt so alone through this, even though I wasn't. I just felt like the whole world was out there – I would see teammates of mine and other people I knew just doing all of these things and still being part of a team. I felt like I was sidelined and on pause, while they're continuing to do all these things.' News that the settlement had been approved sent Rimmel looking for details. 'I didn't see much about roster limits," he said. 'Everyone wants to talk about NIL and the revenue-sharing and I mean, that's definitely a big piece of it, but I just didn't see anything about the roster limits, and that's obviously my biggest concern.' The answer only presents more questions for Rimmel. 'We were hoping for more of a forced decision with the grandfathering, which now it's only voluntary, so I'm a little skeptical of things because I have zero clue how schools are going to react to that," Rimmel told The Associated Press. Rimmel is still deciding what's best for him, but echoed Moore and Ootsburg in saying that answers are not obvious: 'I'm just hoping the schools can make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who were cut.' ___ AP Sports Writer Cliff Brunt contributed. ___ AP college sports:
