Swinney apology to Gypsy Travellers ‘significant milestone', campaigner says
Roseanna McPhee welcomed the apology, which she said was the result of years of campaigning.
John Swinney made the formal apology at Holyrood on Thursday over 'unfair and unjust policies' that caused 'trauma' in what was known as the 'tinker experiment'.
Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in.
First Minister Scotland John Swinney issued a formal apology over 'unacceptable' policies against Gypsy Travellers (Jane Barlow/PA)
A report published by the Scottish Government stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'.
Ms McPhee, whose family was among those settled in Pitlochry on the former Bobbin Mill site, had grown up in a prefabricated Second World War-style Nissen hut which had no electricity and used candles for light.
She welcomed the First Minister's apology, but said more needed to be done to stop the discrimination that her community continues to face.
First Minister @JohnSwinney has apologised in @ScotParl for historical policies affecting Gypsy/Traveller communities, acknowledging they were unacceptable and caused enduring harm.
More information here: https://t.co/hG5NqF1Br8 pic.twitter.com/B84NTjpmPn
— Scot Gov Fairer (@ScotGovFairer) June 25, 2025
She told the PA news agency: 'It's a milestone that we have reached in our long, long campaign, with no resources and just two or three generals and few food soldiers, really, because most people want to hide.
'I think the fact we managed to achieve that apology from the Government is a significant milestone.
'We're hopeful that discussions shall move forward, and perhaps something may be done about the general level of racism which we suffer, particularly in relation to public bodies.'
Gypsy Traveller campaigner Roseanna McPhee welcomed the First Minister's apology (Craig Meighan/PA)
Ms McPhee said the apology could have been 'more robust' and expressed disappointment that Mr Swinney did not label the Tinker Experiment as 'cultural genocide', the description used in the report published by the Government.
'Cultural genocide is a crime against humanity,' she said. 'They did not name the offence. They did not say they took full responsibility of the offence.
'However, it's a positive step on the road towards the discussion around restitution and just satisfaction.'
Asked if she believed the Scottish Government should offer redress to affected families, she said: 'I absolutely believe it.
'If you'd been kept in degrading conditions as long as I have, with 16 health conditions and prevented from working with a joint-honours degrees and two post-graduates I think you might see some reason to have redress too.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
34 minutes ago
- Metro
Every phone in the UK is going to get an emergency alert warning very soon
Millions of phones will blare with the sound of a 10-second siren this year as part of a drill to prepare the UK for potential danger. The announcement about this year's test alert comes as the government issued a warning about the UK needing to 'actively prepare' for the possibility of the country coming under 'direct threat'. It also comes after the world has been watching the Middle East amid fears of a wider conflict igniting after tensions between Iran and Israel boiled over. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is designed to warn the public if there is a danger to life nearby. When it was last tested, the message that appeared on phones said: 'This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a new UK Government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby. In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe. 'Visit for more information. This is a test. You do not need to take any action.' After this year's alert (the exact date will be announced in the future), the system will be tested once every two years. The practice test of the system comes as the government's National Security Strategy stressed the importance of Brits being prepared for any emergency – weather, war, and more. Earlier this year, the European Union went as far as warning the nearly 450,000,000 people who live within its borders to stockpile emergency supplies to last 72 hours in case of war or natural disaster. The advice, issued to nearly half a billion people across 27 countries, includes telling people to buy bottled water, energy bars, a torch, and waterproof pouches for IDs. And EU households could get a handbook to help them prepare for 'various crises, from potential conflict to climate disasters, pandemics and cyber threats.' The EU's announcement came after France decided to issue 20-page survival manuals, with 63 measures on how the French can protect themselves from armed conflict, natural disasters, industrial accidents and nuclear leaks. It also included the essentials needed in these scenarios, like six litres of water, canned food, batteries, a torch, paracetamol and bandages. More Trending But the French government insisted it was not released because of the looming threat of Vladimir Putin. Instead, it said the manual has been in the works since 2022, after the COVID-19 pandemic, to prepare the country for a similar type of scenario. Many countries in the EU are already well prepared for natural disasters, including Finland, where Metro toured one of the underground bunkers which will serve as a refuge for Finns in case of war or emergency. The nation has an astounding 50,500 bomb shelters in case of emergency or conflict – a stark contrast to those available and operational in the United Kingdom. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Fraudster made £500,000 by conning luxury brands into buying fake 'Scottish tea' MORE: Glasgow city council hit by cyber attack that 'may have stolen residents' data MORE: I stayed in the 'rundown dump' named the UK's worst city to visit — it stole my heart
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Making concessions on benefit cuts 'not enough', says Scots Labour MP
Brian Leishman said "the real Labour thing to do" is "to create a welfare system that looks after people". Concessions on the UK Government's benefit cuts are "not enough" and the bill should be dropped, a Scottish Labour MP has said. Brian Leishman said "the real Labour thing to do" is "to create a welfare system that looks after people". It comes as reports suggested Prime Minister Keir Starmer is considering watering down his welfare reforms because of a major rebellion. This could include changing the points needed to get Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or backtracking on the measures affecting Universal Credit (UC). amendment which would bring down the cuts it goes to a vote on Tuesday. Alloa and Grangemouth MP Leishman said: "Concessions being made on the UC and PIP Bill is not enough because disabled people will still become poorer. "The government should withdraw the Bill and work with organisations and charities to create a welfare system that looks after people. " That's the real Labour thing to do." The bill would make it harder for disabled people with less severe conditions to claim personal independence payment (Pip), with forecasts predicting the overall changes will plunge 50,000 children into poverty. The amendment supported by the rebels would give them an opportunity to reject the welfare reform bill. The wording backs the 'need for the reform of the social security system' but criticises the lack of a 'formal consultation' with disabled people and warns of the impact on poverty levels. They also hit out at their own Government for not publishing an 'assessment of the impact of these reforms on health or care needs'. The Scottish Labour sceptics are Richard Baker, Scott Arthur, Euan Stainbank, Brian Leishman, Lilian Jones, Tracy Gilbert, Elaine Stewart, Kirsteen Sullivan and Ferguson. Maureen Burke, Martin Rhodes and Irene Campbell have since added their names. The Record understands there are other MPs who have not signed the amendment who may not back the cuts in a vote next week. There are 11 Scottish MPs in the UK Government - plus two other MPs who are 'mission champions' - who would almost definitely have to resign from their roles to rebel.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Is all this talk about war an attempt from Starmer to impress Donald Trump?
So Sir Keir Starmer is ramping up the rhetoric and re-upping on the UK's defence weaponry. The Prime Minister has announced a £1billion deal to buy 12 nuclear-ready F35A jets from the US. That will warm the hearts of the millions of UK citizens unaware of where their next meal will come from. Or the voters bracing themselves for welfare cuts. As the legendary rapper Tupac Shakur once said: 'They got money for wars but they can't feed the poor." The government is warning us to prepare for war on home soil for the first time since the German occupation of the Channel Islands during the Second World War. But why? The National Security Strategy document, out earlier this week, is suggesting there are threats from nukes, troops, terrorism, chemical warfare and so much much more. A country like the UK would have threats against it all the time. But if there is a specific, credible worry to us then surely they should be telling us, shouldn't they? Because it smells worryingly like an attempt to confect an appetite for war. Anyone able to think for themselves could be forgiven for noting a similarity with the flawed dossier used in 2003 to justify joining the US-led Iraq war. And it really does appear that we in this country have learned nothing from that devastating conflict. On the basis of 'sexed up' evidence - parroted on TV, radio and in print by every lapdog politician and his or her dog back then - Tony Blair's Labour government joined George for a conflict that the then-United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, would later describe as 'illegal'. Around 150,000 people - 120,000 of them civilians - died as a result. It was a war that would create new martyrs, new terrorists, new dangers, death and destruction in the west. Dissenters at the time were dismissed as unpatriotic as this country leaned into the bloodlust of which the current climate is frighteningly reminiscent. So, again, the question now is the same as it was then. Where is the evidence? Or was it an attempt to roll up his sleeve and flex his bicep to prove to US President Donald Trump that Starmer too is able to flex? Because, on the basis of historic Anglo-American foreign policy, a number of countries around the world have been burning flags and saying unkind things about the west for decades now. Far from ideal, but there you go. So what else? Iran, which hasn't attacked anyone directly for decades, has supposedly been three months away from a nuclear bomb for 30 years. They weren't even involved this whole caboodle until Israel starting bombing them last week. Now we hear that the US intelligence reports suggest the bombing raids over the weekend were nowhere near as successful in 'obliterating' the core component's of Iran's nuclear capability as Donald Trump has been suggesting. The US President has stuck to his guns and has adopted his favourite strategy of shooting the messengers, the media contingent willing to point out that actually, the Emperor isn't wearing any clothes. But sadly, while he and his ago remain intent on hunting down a Nobel Prize, the appetite here appears to be to foment that appetite for conflict. Even to characterise the Iranians as a clear and present danger - even though precisely nobody was talking in those terms even a month ago - is fascinating. Starmer seems determined to turn some of the attention onto himself, and it feels like an attempt to elbow his way into a conversation that doesn't concern this country. Throw in the fact that we in Britain love to invoke wartime rhetoric, and that Starmer can frame himself as the PM able to keep this country safe, and here we are. But we are whipping up fear when the facts completely contradict the narrative that our leaders in this country, across Europe and Stateside are pushing. And, worryingly, it has left Iran doing exactly what many feared: pulling out of talks to keep weapons inspectors apprised of what they are up to. You'd have to assume they will also carry on exploring the nuclear option after being told they cannot have one by the west - most of whose countries have one themselves. If Iran wanted to create any kind of WMD, for example, they'll have had the capability to do so - and use one - for years, wouldn't they? And even if you didn't want to surmise, what about the actual US Intelligence stating (until Trump's intervention) that there was no evidence the Iranians were knee deep in malign intent? What about the International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi who remains adamant that the Iranians had not been building a nuclear weapon? At what point did we stop listening to the experts in favour of the leaders keen to evoke war - euphemistically described as 'peace through strength' - on vibes? The big picture is that Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO, is so desperate to keep Trump from pulling America out of the Alliance that his performance at Wednesday's media briefing was embarrassing. So much so that he needed a torch to climb out of the President's tradesman's entrance. It was little surprise, then, to see him soothing the ego of Trump by insisting the President and his utterly unqualified acolytes were right, you can bomb a mountain and wipe out materials buried so deep underground you'd need to enter another time zone to find them. It is the theatre of the absurd but whatever the truth of the matter, Starmer should be better than this. Much better. Ends
