logo
Miriam Haley testifies against Harvey Weinstein once more

Miriam Haley testifies against Harvey Weinstein once more

Yahoo30-04-2025

Five years after she tearfully told a court that Harvey Weinstein sexually assaulted her, former "Project Runway" production assistant Miriam Haley took the stand again Tuesday to revisit the ordeal she alleges she endured at the hands of the disgraced movie mogul.
Haley was back testifying because New York's highest court last year overturned Weinstein's landmark 2020 conviction, which defined the #MeToo movement and helped turn Weinstein into a Hollywood pariah.
Haley had barely started testifying when Weinstein's lawyers began raising objections to her recounting the abuse she says she suffered as a child while she was being raised in Sweden.
Weinstein's defense team had been expected to closely watch the testimony of Haley, who says Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in July 2006, because both she and actor Jessica Mann testified at the 2020 trial. Mann says Weinstein raped her in 2013 in a Manhattan hotel room.
Weinstein is charged with one count of engaging in a criminal sex act in connection with Haley's allegations and one count of third-degree rape in Mann's case.
This time around, Weinstein is also charged with one count of engaging in a first-degree criminal sexual act, accused of assaulting a Polish former model named Kaja Sokola.
Sokola, who was not part of the 2020 trial, claims in a lawsuit that Weinstein performed oral sex on her without her consent at a Manhattan hotel in 2006, when she was 16.
Weinstein, 73, has denied assaulting the three women.
Haley, 47, said she first met Weinstein in 2004 at the after-party for the movie premiere of "The Aviator."
"I introduced myself, saying, 'I'm Mimi,'" she said.
Haley said that several years later, she reconnected with Weinstein at the Cannes Film Festival in France. She said she was looking for an opportunity as a production assistant in New York and agreed to meet him at his hotel.
Once they were there, Haley said, Weinstein commented on her legs and "asked whether I could give him a massage." She testified she said no and later burst into tears.
"I felt taken aback, humiliated," Haley said.
Asked by Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg whether she had any interest in Weinstein 'romantically or sexually," Haley replied: 'No, I did not. I was there to try and find work.'
Still, despite being rebuffed, Weinstein did arrange for her to work on "Project Runway" even though she lacked a U.S. work visa, Haley said before court was adjourned for the day.
Haley is expected to be back on the stand Wednesday and reprise her 2020 testimony about the alleged assault.
During the 2020 trial, Haley testified that not long after she finished working for the show, she visited Weinstein at his lower Manhattan apartment, where, she said, he pinned her down on his bed and forced oral sex on her.
On the stand, Haley told jurors that in the midst of the alleged assault it occurred to her, 'I'm being raped.'
Unsure what to do, Haley said, she weighed her options.
'If I scream 'rape,' will someone hear me?' she said. 'I checked out and decided to endure it.'
Haley testified at the retrial a week after her former roommate and close friend Christine Pressman told jurors that Haley confided in her back in September 2006 that Weinstein had assaulted her.
'I was staying at Lorne Michaels' house in East Hampton, and Miriam was there, as well," Pressman said, referring to the "Saturday Night Live" creator. "She was distraught, crying, very upset, obviously; she was very animated and had a lot of intensity. She said it's Harvey Weinstein. She was in shock. She described what happened, and it was disgusting."
Asked what she advised her friend, Pressman said: "I told her to move past it and not to go to the police at all. I told her she should not to go to police or the authorities about being raped by Harvey Weinstein."
Another former roommate, Elizabeth Entin, said Haley also told her Weinstein assaulted her. But she said she gave Haley different guidance.
'He raped my friend, and I am not happy about that,' Entin said. 'I told her to call a lawyer to navigate the system. I despise anyone who has raped my friend. She is not my only friend that has been raped."
In her opening remarks, Assistant District Attorney Shannon Lucey said Weinstein was a serial sexual predator who used his power as "a titan" in the movie industry to prey on young women, and she then described in graphic terms what he is alleged to have done to them.
'They stayed quiet for years,' Lucey said of the accusers, out of 'their fear of what he might do to them.'
Weinstein's lead attorney, Arthur Aidala, insisted in his opening statement that Weinstein's sexual encounters with the accusers were 'transactional" and 'consensual.'
"The casting couch is not a crime scene," he said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Playground' drama in jury room threatens to derail Harvey Weinstein's NY sex crimes retrial
‘Playground' drama in jury room threatens to derail Harvey Weinstein's NY sex crimes retrial

New York Post

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Post

‘Playground' drama in jury room threatens to derail Harvey Weinstein's NY sex crimes retrial

'Playground' drama threatened to tank Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial on Friday — when one juror asked off the case after claiming childish antics had made deliberations 'unfair and unjust.' Juror No. 7, described as a 25-year-old 'computer kid,' told the judge he'd heard other members of the panel gossiping about one of their own in an elevator at Manhattan Supreme Court after deliberations Thursday. 4 AP Advertisement 'The experience I've had in the day-and-a-half here, in good conscience, I don't think this is fair and just,' the juror told the court Friday morning when he was brought to the witness box to explain why he wanted to be dismissed. He described the chaotic scene behind closed doors as 'playground stuff,' with some on the panel of seven women and five men ignoring fellow jurors as they weighed the charges against Weinstein. 'There's a bit of shunning happening,' the young man said — before pleading for Judge Curtis Farber to dismiss him from the case. Advertisement Farber told the juror that there was no backing out, reminding him he 'took an oath' of service and that the trial would 'fall apart' if he left now. One of the 12 jurors was excused on Thursday after complaining of illness, and replaced with an alternate. The remaining three alternate panelists were then dismissed, meaning there would be no one to step in for Juror 7 if he was let off. Weinstein, 73, sat in his wheelchair and stared ahead without any visible reaction during the judge's questioning of the juror. When the court reconvened after the lunch break, Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, asked for a mistrial claiming that the judge should have questioned the juror further and asked more in-depth queries to get to the bottom of the elevator beef and the drama inside the jury room. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorney Arthur Aidala moved for a mistrial after a juror complained about 'playground' drama inside the deliberation room. Michael Nagle 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' the attorney said theatrically, launching into a 10-minute monologue as the judge quietly flicked through papers. Aidala described the juror as a '25-year-old kid who lives with his grandmother who is a computer kid' — and who had the 'guts' to go to the court with his concerns, which should not be minimized. 'He looked at me right in the eyes and said, 'What's going on in there is not fair and unjust!'' Aidala railed. Advertisement Prosecutors said Weinstein's attorneys were 'grasping for straws' in their latest attempt at a mistrial, the sixteenth such bid Aidala has made so far in the case. The judge didn't even blink before he quickly shot down the bid to derail the trial. 'Nothing in his statement stated that the tensions in the jury room were abnormal tensions during deliberations,' Farber shot back at Aidala. 4 Polish model Kaja Sokola said that Harvey Weinstein molested her when she was 16. Steven Hirsch The jury began deliberating at 11:30 a.m. Thursday morning after hearing five weeks of testimony from three accusers — former TV production assistant Miriam 'Mimi' Haley, Polish model Kaja Sokola and former actress Jessica Mann — who all said that Weinstein had raped them. The panelists, so far during their deliberations, have asked for readbacks of testimony from two victims about the alleged sexual attacks. Weinstein's attorneys claim that the former Miramax boss is the 'poster boy' of cancel culture and that his relationships with the alleged victims were 'transactional,' consensual sexual encounters. Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said during closing arguments that Weinstein — accused of sexual conduct by more than 80 women — wielded his 'power and influence' to rape the three accusers. Advertisement 4 Weinstein's attorneys' attempt of a mistrial has been denied more than a dozen times at trial. AP Weinstein, who maintains his innocence, was originally found guilty at trial in 2020 of criminal sex act and rape and given a 23-year prison sentence — but New York's highest court tossed the conviction last year. If convicted at the retrial, Weinstein would face up to 25 years in prison on two counts of first-degree criminal sexual act, and four years in prison on third-degree rape. The Hollywood creep was separately convicted in California of raping an Italian model at a film festival in 2013, where he is currently serving a 16-year prison term. He has appealed that conviction.

Benicio Del Toro: Imagination runs amok in 'Phoenician Scheme'
Benicio Del Toro: Imagination runs amok in 'Phoenician Scheme'

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Benicio Del Toro: Imagination runs amok in 'Phoenician Scheme'

1 of 5 | Benicio Del Toro attends the photo call for "The Phoenician Scheme" at the Cannes Film Festival on May 19. Photo by Rune Hellestad/UPI | License Photo NEW YORK, June 6 (UPI) -- Oscar-winning actor Benicio del Toro says writer-director Wes Anderson meticulously plans every scene in his movies, but still welcomes input from his cast. "The approach is the same approach that I do on any movie I do. Just, I think, Wes wants you to be in the moment. He wants you to tell the truth, whatever that means," Del Toro, 58, said in a recent virtual press conference to promote his second collaboration with Anderson, The Phoenician Scheme, in theaters nationwide on Friday. "You have all this dialogue," Del Toro said, "but you can still bring a piece of yourself into it. And there's room for the imagination, too, to run amok. And you've got to have fun. Even if you're drowning, you've got to have fun." Co-starring Scarlett Johannson, Michael Cera, Bryan Cranston, Bill Murray and Tom Hanks, the espionage comedy is set in 1950 and follows Zsa-zsa Korda (Del Toro), an industrialist and arms dealer who wants to bring his estranged daughter Liesl (Mia Threapleton) -- a Catholic nun -- into his dangerous, top-secret business. It's Wes Anderson's world, we're just scheming in it. Focus Features (@FocusFeatures) June 6, 2025 "It's layered. It's full of contradictions, which makes it really yummy for an actor to try to bring to life," Del Toro said. "There is an element of my character wanting a second chance at mending a broken relationship. And I think that in the process in order to achieve that, he has to change and he does change. And I like to think that people can change. Not everyone changes, but I think some people can, and for the better." After previously working with Anderson on the 2021 hit The French Dispatch, Del Toro is used to the filmmaker's dense, quirky language. But, this time around, he has a larger role and a lot more to say. "There were a couple of moments where I went up to Wes and I said: 'Well, maybe we can take this dialogue out.' And, then, I went back to it and it wasn't as good," Del Toro recalled. "I had to go up to him and go like, 'I think you need to put it back because we're passing information that I think you need.' But that's why I couldn't join these people [in the cast] every day for dinner. I had to go up into my room and talk to myself." "You had a lot to say," Anderson agreed. "You took the time to absorb everything." Del Toro said another contribution he made to the project concerned Michael Cera's character Professor Bjorn, the tutor of Zsa-zsa's nine sons, who has a habit of sticking around when sensitive information is being shared. "I remember telling Wes, 'Well, I'm giving a lot of private information to my daughter and there is this stranger sitting right there. I feel uncomfortable as the character, giving all this information in front of a stranger. I'm telling her about my bank accounts and my everything, deals, with secrecy,'" Del Toro said. "Wes said to me, 'Well, we'll polygraph him.' And I went, 'Well, OK.' And, very quickly, he came up with this idea of a lie detector, which is a portable pocket polygraph," he added. "In 1950, it was probably the size of this building, but he made it into the pocket version." Despite the heightened reality, Anderson said this is essentially a father-daughter tale. "His whole business plan is really a mechanism for him to get back together with her," Anderson said of Zsa-zsa and Liesl. "He's acting like he's making her his successor and, really, it's more about what's going to happen between the two of them right now," Anderson added. "The business plan almost becomes like a ritual for him to be reunited with his daughter. ... In that sense, his plan goes great." Anderson first approached Del Toro about starring in this film after they wrapped up The French Dispatch. "I had a sort of the idea of a Euro tycoon, somebody who would've been in a [Michelangelo] Antonioni movie or something, that visual," Anderson said. "I did have this idea that he was probably hurting, that he was going to be in physical distress. Somehow, that was the image of this guy who you sort of can't kill." Over the course of time, however, this fictional man with a plan in a suit started mixing with Anderson's father-in-law Fouad Malouf, who, the filmmaker described as "an engineer and a businessman and he had all these different projects and different places." "He was a kind, warm person, but very intimidating," Anderson said. "He had all his business in these shoe-boxes. He walked [Anderson's wife] through his work at a certain point, because he thought if he is not able to see everything through, she needs to know what he's got. "And her reaction was what you say in the movie," Anderson turned to Threapleton, who immediately chimed in, "This is just crazy." "So, yeah, it was a mixture of those two things," Anderson quipped. "Fouad and whatever the first thing I said was."

Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains
Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge denies Harvey Weinstein's bid for mistrial after juror complains

NEW YORK (AP) — A juror in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes trial asked to be removed from the case Friday because he felt his fellow jurors were treating a member of their panel in an 'unfair and unjust' way, but the judge told him he had to keep deliberating. Judge Curtis Farber later denied a defense request for a mistrial, saying he believed the juror was simply expressing discomfort in the deliberation process, noting that he's the youngest on the 12-person panel. 'This is nothing other than normal tensions during heated deliberations,' Farber told the lawyers after the juror rejoined his peers. 'Perhaps his youth makes him uncomfortable with conflict.' The juror said he wanted to be excused from the trial because he was uncomfortable with how some jurors were acting toward another juror. But Farber denied the request, saying there were no more alternate jurors to replace him and, in any case, his concerns did not warrant being dismissed. The juror insisted, calling the treatment 'unfair and unjust' even as he described the tension as 'playground stuff' with jurors shunning another juror and talking behind their back. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala argued that the jury should be told to stop deliberating while the court found out more about the concerns. He criticized the judge's questions to the concerned juror as 'anemic at best.' 'You didn't ask him one follow-up question,' Aidala said. Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg said the judge acted appropriately by reminding jurors about the expectations for them — including that they not speak to anyone about the case unless all members of the jury are deliberating. Whatever the dispute is, she added, it does not appear to be hindering the jury's work, as the panel requested an additional readout of testimony, this time from the third accuser in the case. The Manhattan jury ended its first day of deliberations Thursday without reaching a verdict. Sexual misconduct allegations against Weinstein propelled the #MeToo movement in 2017. The panel has reheard some testimony and viewed medical records and emails. The jury of seven women and five men is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape against the 73-year-old Oscar-winning movie producer, with the criminal sex act charges the higher-degree felonies. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty. Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes in New York and California, but the New York conviction was overturned last year, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy testimony from three accusers. ___ Follow Philip Marcelo at Philip Marcelo, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store