
US judge clears the way for imminent deportation of 8 migrants to South Sudan
WASHINGTON : Eight migrants lost their last-ditch effort to halt their deportation to South Sudan by the Trump administration on Friday afternoon, clearing the way for their imminent transfer after a judge in Massachusetts denied their request.
Lawyers for the US justice department said the men were scheduled to be flown to South Sudan on Friday at 7.00pm Eastern Time after two courts considered the request on an emergency basis on July 4, when courts are otherwise closed for the Independence Day holiday.
The group of migrants had filed new claims in Washington late Thursday after the US Supreme Court clarified that Judge Brian Murphy in Boston could no longer require the US department of homeland securityy to hold them.
US district judge Randolph Moss in Washington paused the deportation briefly on Friday when lawyers for the migrants filed new claims in his court and sent the case back to Boston, where Murphy denied the claim.
Lawyers for the migrants and a spokesperson for homeland security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The administration has detained the men for six weeks on a military base in Djibouti rather than bring them back to the US.
The order was the latest round in the fight over the legality of the Trump administration's campaign to deter immigration through high-profile deportations to countries where migrants say they face safety concerns, which has already gone from lower courts to the Supreme Court twice.
Department of justice attorney Hashim Mooppan told Moss during the hearing that court orders halting agreed-upon deportations pose a serious problem for US diplomatic relations and would make foreign countries less likely to accept transfers of migrants in the future.
The group of men have been convicted of various crimes, with four of them convicted of murder, the department of homeland security has said.
South Sudan has long been dangerous even for locals. The US state department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The UN has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018.
The eight men, whose lawyers said are from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Burma, Sudan and Vietnam, argue their deportations to South Sudan would violate the US Constitution, which prohibits 'cruel and unusual' punishment.
Moss said that he would transfer the case to Massachusetts rather than hear it himself but remarked that if they proved their allegations that US authorities had sought to subject the migrants to potential abuse after deportation as a form of punishment, they would likely have a valid claim.
'It seems to me almost self-evident that the US government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others,' Moss said during the hearing.
The Friday effort to prevent the deportations came after months of back and forth between a Boston judge, the Supreme Court, and the Trump administration.
US district judge Brian Murphy in Boston in May blocked the US from immediately moving the men to South Sudan after he found that officials had violated his earlier ruling in a class action lawsuit concerning the due process rights of migrants.
That ruling, in April, had blocked the administration from sending migrants to countries where they have no ties without giving them the chance to raise safety concerns.
The Supreme Court on June 23 put Murphy's April injunction on hold. But Murphy that same day said the high court ruling did not apply to his May order.
Calling Murphy's decision a 'lawless act ofdefiance',' the justice department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify its decision.
The nine-member Supreme Court on Thursday, over the dissent of two of its liberal justices, sided with the Trump administration and said its decision serves to reverse Murphy's May order blocking the deportations to South Sudan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
17 minutes ago
- The Star
Lawyers for Brazil's Bolsonaro say he did not violate social media ban
BRASILIA (Reuters) -Lawyers for former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that he did not violate a court-ordered social media ban, after the top judge accused him of breaching the order and demanded an explanation from his lawyers. In a document sent to Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing an investigation into allegations that Bolsonaro plotted a coup, Bolsonaro's lawyers asked the court to clarify the exact scope of the social media ban. Moraes ordered the ban on Friday, along with mandating he wear an ankle bracelet, among other measures, alleging he courted the interference of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro. On Monday, Moraes accused Bolsonaro of violating the order by giving an interview to journalists, pointing to clips the news outlets later posted on their social media accounts. The judge gave Bolsonaro's legal team 24 hours to explain the media appearance, warning that failure to comply could lead to an arrest warrant. Earlier on Monday, Moraes had issued a clarification of Friday's ruling, which stated that Bolsonaro's use of social media included use through third parties. The clarification generated debate among legal experts regarding if it would include interviews to news outlets. Bolsonaro's lawyers on Tuesday argued that media outlets sharing his remarks on social media was an "uncontrollable" development beyond their client's control. They have asked the justice to clarify the exact scope of the order and whether it prohibits giving interviews to the press. The lawyers added that Bolsonaro will make no further public remarks until the court provides that clarification. (Reporting by Lisandra Paraguassu in Brasilia; Writing by Andre Romani; Editing by Sarah Morland and Brendan O'Boyle)


Malay Mail
9 hours ago
- Malay Mail
How Trump turned his Truth Social app into a megaphone
PARIS, July 22 — Donald Trump has turned his obscure Truth Social platform into a megaphone in his second presidential term—constantly posting everything from major policy announcements to personal threats and unashamed self-promotion. To mark his first six months back in power, Trump unloaded around 40 posts Sunday on the app he owns and can use unfettered by moderators, censors or fact-checkers. The deluge was characteristic of the way he has transformed Truth Social, despite being a minnow in the social media world, into the White House's primary means of communication. AFP analysed over 2,800 Truth Social posts by @realDonaldTrump from his inauguration on January 20, 2025 up to July 20 to get a better idea of how the Republican communicates. Sidelining the White House press office, the president speaks straight to his hardcore base, posting an average of 16 messages a day, many in all-caps rants peppered with exclamation marks and the odd expletive. Although Truth Social is tiny compared to X, Trump can post to 10.5 million followers knowing that he is being followed by the media and political establishment, with much of what he says quickly being reposted to rival platforms. Trump repays the favour, helping to create a right-wing media ecosystem that invariably circles back to him. Since January 20, he has shared Fox News articles 101 times, and the New York Post and Breitbart News 51 times each. 'The minute he puts something on Truth Social, others pick it up and echo it,' said Darren Linvill, a social media and disinformation specialist at Clemson University in South Carolina. Alternative to Twitter In his first term, Trump relied in a similar way on what was then known as Twitter—renamed X on being purchased by Elon Musk. But after Trump's attempt to overthrow his loss in the 2020 election, he was banned by Twitter and Facebook and briefly persona non grata in Washington. Although once more present on the bigger alternatives, Trump continues to prefer Truth Social. The posts vary wildly in content, all part of Trump's brand of mixing politics with entertainment. And the style deliberately mimics Trump's verbal ticks—the bombast, salesmanship and exaggeration. 'Vladimir, STOP,' he posted on April 24, after Russia launched an especially heavy bombing of Kyiv. Russian President Vladimir Putin did not stop, but Trump's two-word plea earned heavy media coverage. Half of his posts used at least one exclamation point and 155 were written in all-caps. One post on March 23, promoting his cryptocurrency $Trump, read: 'I LOVE $TRUMP—SO COOL!!! The Greatest of them all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!' Controlling the narrative Trump's posts are a way for him to keep the public on its toes and to change the narrative by giving journalists a new 'rabbit hole' to follow when needed, said presidential historian Alvin Felzenberg. The leader of the world's biggest economy knows investors are paying equally close attention. As markets plunged following Trump's tariffs announcements, he used Truth Social on March 10 to pump out articles predicting optimistic economic outcomes. On April 9, just as stock prices were tanking, he posted: 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!' And hours later, he announced a 90-day suspension of additional tariffs against dozens of countries, triggering the best day for the S&P 500 index since the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis. The timing led to accusations from Democrats of an insider trader scheme. 'Truth Social doesn't quite have the firepower that I think Twitter had..., but it's still impactful enough that it can at times move the market,' says Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management. — AFP


Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Halal rules non-negotiable in US tariff talks, says Tengku Zafrul
Investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz stressed that Malaysia won't compromise on trade sovereignty, national interest or key policies in US tariff talks. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Malaysia's halal certification standards are among the non-negotiable issues in ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington, says investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz. He said if the US wanted to have its halal certification recognised, it must comply with the guidelines set by the Islamic development department (Jakim), Berita Harian reported. 'The guidelines we've drawn up reflect lessons from past experiences,' he told the Dewan Rakyat during question time. 'If their halal standards are in line with Jakim's requirements, and the process is consistent with what we accept from other countries, then we can agree (to it), but Jakim must recognise it.' Tengku Zafrul was responding to a question from Syahir Sulaiman (PN-Bachok), who asked about the clear boundaries or 'red lines' Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently said would not be crossed during the negotiations. The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) previously cited Malaysia's halal import rules and Bumiputera equity requirements as barriers leading to the 24% tariff initially imposed on April 2. In its 2025 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers, the USTR said Malaysia's halal standards exceeded international norms, requiring dedicated halal-only facilities and involving complex registration processes, which raised costs and delayed exports. Tengku Zafrul also said Malaysia's negotiation approach would be shaped by past experiences, taking into account both local sensitivities and US concerns. He emphasised that the government remains open to fair and constructive dialogue, but certain matters were not up for compromise. 'These include the Bumiputera policy in terms of local ownership and participation in strategic sectors, as well as the preference for local and Bumiputera companies in government procurement. Those are red lines,' he added. Tengku Zafrul reiterated that Malaysia would not yield on matters of trade sovereignty, national interest, or socioeconomic policy, whether in talks with the US or with multinational corporations. 'All of this is to protect Bumiputera interests and ensure balanced national economic development,' he added.