
Tougher sentences for criminals who abuse LGBT people ‘vital step forward'
More than 100 cross-party MPs backed the proposed amendment, originally put forward by Rachel Taylor, which would create the new offences if violent crimes are motivated by hostility toward's a person's sexuality, transgender identity or disability.
Mr Collier said: 'I know what it means to think twice how you walk down the street, to pause before holding somebody's hand, to wonder whether that shout from across the road is something you can ignore or something you can't afford to.
'And I know that I'm not alone in that.
'I've spoken to my constituents and people from far beyond who tell me that they don't feel safe in reporting hate when it happens. They don't believe that they'll be taken seriously and there's a profound failure of trust, and one that we in this House have a duty to repair.'
The Burton and Uttoxeter MP also told the Commons: 'I think it's also fitting that we are introducing this amendment in Pride Month, and in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling which has caused so much anguish amongst the trans community.'
He said the move 'represents a vital step forward in the protection of some of the most marginalised people within our society' and added: 'Too many victims still believe that the system is not on their side and this new clause gives us the opportunity to change that. It gives police and prosecutors a clear route to charge and convict offenders in a way that truly reflects the nature of these crimes.'
Mr Collier said the proposed change was 'about dignity, about recognising that whether you're a trans teenager being punched in the park, a gay couple being spat on on the Tube, or a disabled man being harassed on his way to work, all people deserve the full protection of the law'.
Aggravated offences would also offer 'vital protection for disabled people, who often remain far too invisible in the public conversation around hate crime', he added.
The law already provides for aggravated offences, if they are motivated by hostility towards a victim's race or religious group membership.
'That discrepancy cannot be right. We cannot as a society say that some forms of hatred are more evil than others,' Ms Taylor told the Commons.
The Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth added she was 'at university when section 28 was introduced', part of the Local Government Act 1988 which banned town halls from promoting or teaching 'the acceptability of' homosexuality in schools.
'I remember it vividly, it was more than the law, it was an attack on the right of people like me to live openly,' she said.
'It stigmatised lesbians, gays and bisexual people, it pushed us out of public life.
'I got into politics to fight that cruel law and everything it represented.'
Ms Taylor said her amendment would be 'an important step forward for equal rights'.
Marie Tidball, the Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge who also backed the amendment, said the proposal 'would foster respect and equality for all by ensuring justice for disabled victims of hate crime'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Benefits bill on course to rise by £18billion a YEAR without reform - equivalent to more than the entire police budget
Spending on sickness benefits is on course to rise by £18 billion without reform – more than the entire police budget. Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall is facing a furious backlash from Labour MPs and campaigners who warn that 'cruel' cuts to disability benefits will drive hundreds of thousands into poverty. But official figures published alongside the Government's long-awaited welfare legislation yesterday reveal that spending on benefits will continue to soar even if the reforms survive a Commons rebellion, with many Labour MPs threatening the first big revolt of Keir Starmer 's premiership. An impact assessment reveals that spending on sickness and disability benefits for working-age adults is set to jump by £18 billion a year to £70 billion by the next election, if nothing is done to trim the bill. The report adds: 'The increase alone is more than the entire police budget.' The 2025-26 police budget is £17.4 billion. A Whitehall source said the surge in spending underlined the need for reform, adding: 'These figures show that the current welfare system is unsustainable.' Ms Kendall's reforms will trim £5 billion from the total unless they are blocked by mutinous Labour MPs. But spending on personal independence payments (PIP), which is at the centre of Labour's civil war on welfare, will rise by £8 billion to £31 billion – an increase of more than a third. Despite a tightening of eligibility criteria, the Department for Work and Pensions estimates another 750,000 will be claiming the benefit by the next election. Ms Kendall said the welfare package 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. The cuts were needed to put the welfare budget 'on a more sustainable path'. 'This is about ensuring fairness for people who need support and fairness for the taxpayer too,' she added. But Labour critics warned there was 'no moral case' for taking benefits away from people currently classed as 'disabled'. Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy said the scale of the cuts 'would have made George Osborne blush'. She added: 'We cannot underestimate their human and political cost. The public will not forgive us if we remove support from those most in need of it.' Fellow Left-winger Richard Burgon said: 'These cruel cuts will drive hundreds of thousands of people into poverty. These cuts should have been dropped – now they should be voted down.' More than 100 Labour MPs have raised concerns about the proposals with party whips, but ministers are privately confident they can avoid a humiliating defeat in the Commons early next month. The most controversial cut involves ending eligibility for PIP payments for 800,000 people, who will lose around £4,500 each. The Government's own assessment suggests this will drive 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children. The package also involves 'rebalancing' Universal Credit (UC) payments to end the 'perverse' incentive that makes it attractive for people to claim they are too sick to work. The standard UC payment of just over £400 a month will be increased by more than inflation, while the 'health element', currently worth an extra £423, will be frozen. The changes will hit around three million people. The Policy Exchange think-tank has warned that the sickness benefits bill will hit £100 billion by 2029/30 – meaning £1 in every £4 of income tax will be spent on it.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Former Labour MP calls for party to ditch 'rigged' voting system
Scottish Labour members have said they are concerned the system could be manipulated to block left-wing candidates. A former Labour MP has called for the party to halt the use of a controversial computer system which is part of a Met police fraud probe. Beth Winter said she was appalled to learn that Scottish Labour has been using the Anonyvoter system to help select candidates for the next Holyrood election. It comes after the Sunday Mail revealed that members in Scotland had contacted the party over fears the computer software could be manipulated to block left-wing candidates from standing as MSPs. Similar concerns emerged about Labour's selection process for the 2024 general election with the Met police currently investigating reports of voter fraud in a London Labour branch. Winter said: ' The system shouldn't be used for any future contests because of the concerns that I and others have already raised. There's no independent oversight whatsoever. 'The system is highly questionable and it should not be used under any circumstances. It is not transparent at all.' Winter, former MP for Cynon Valley in Wales, called for an independent investigation into the Anonyvoter system after she lost her selection process in 2023 as did Sam Tarry - the partner of Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner. Despite winning the majority of votes from those who attended their selection contests in person, both Winter and Tarry lost via the online vote. Scottish Labour members have said they are concerned the system could be manipulated to block left-wing candidates standing for Holyrood and pointed to a recent selection in Dundee between MSPs Mercedes Villalba and Michael Marra. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Despite winning the vote in person Villalba lost to Marra due to the online votes with Marra receiving a significantly higher number of votes through Anonyvoter. Members who contacted the party asking for reassurance or for another system to be used were either ignored or told that there had been no issues in Scotland and Anonyvoter would continue to be used in selections. Winter said those hoping to stand for election for Labour should demand a contest without the computer system. She said: 'The best advice is to insist on an in-person hustings and a paper ballot because once Anonyvoter is included then there is no independent oversight. 'There needs to be independent tellers overseeing the count, trade union people involved as well. That is the only way that any trust can be had in the selection process because I have absolutely no trust in Anonyvoter whatsoever.' In March last year Winter instructed lawyers in an effort to understand what happened in her selection process. She said despite reassurances the party failed to provide data they had previously agreed to hand over. She quit Labour in November 2024, accusing party bosses of 'protecting the ruling class' and having an 'authoritarian agenda'.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Scotland's prosecutors using offender's chosen gender to record crimes
Prosecutors have been accused of 'protecting the egos of offenders' by recording their self-declared gender in official figures. Hate crime data produced by the Crown Office reflects a mix of gender based on physical appearance as recorded by police officers, and self-ID. The Crown Office insists that 'information regarding the sex or gender of accused persons is not essential to prosecute crime' – and that it will respect the 'pronouns of an accused person'. It comes after the Supreme Court ruled that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, rather than chosen gender. Last night Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'This confirms how entrenched the SNP 's gender self-ID obsession is in Scotland's justice system and will undoubtedly lead to further confusion in how crimes are recorded. 'The Crown should have the scope to focus on what really matters, rather than being forced to waste time protecting the egos of offenders.' A Crown Office report on hate crime says 'sex can be considered to refer to whether someone is male or female based on their physiology and genetic make-up', while 'gender' represents a 'social construct or sense of self that takes a wider range of forms'. The Crown said 'in this report we refer to ''sex'' rather than ''gender'' because this better reflects recording practices in relation to this information'. But the report also says: 'In reality, it is likely that recording includes a mixture of physiological and personal identity. 'The sex of a small number of accused is not recorded, where the police have not provided this information to COPFS [Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service].' The report adds: 'Sex, as referred to in this bulletin, is generally identified by a police officer based on their assessment of whether a person presents as male or female – in most cases, this is based on the physiology of a person rather than self-identified gender. 'It is recorded for operational purposes, such as requirements for searching. It is also included in the information reported to COPFS. 'However, in most cases, information regarding the sex or gender of accused persons is not essential to prosecute crime. 'It would only be essential where it is material to the proof of the crime.' The Crown said it 'will respect and use the chosen name and pronouns of an accused person in all communications with them'. Last night Dr Kath Murray, of gender-critical think-tank Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, said: 'The corruption of criminal justice data on sex has come about through a blinkered reliance on activists in pursuit of gender self-identification.'