&w=3840&q=100)
IOC and Int'l federations consulted for National Sports Bill: Mandaviya
Addressing the one-day 'Khelo Bharat Conclave', featuring representatives from the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), National Sports Federations (NSFs), the corporate world and athletes, the minister reiterated his commitment to have the bill passed for which he has even held discussions with former sports minister and Congress leader Ajay Maken.
The monsoon session of the Parliament will start on July 21.
"I did a series of consultations with NSFs, athletes, coaches, also got 600 inputs from the public when the draft was put online for suggestions. I also had a three-hour meeting with sports lawyers to understand their perspective," Mandaviya stated in his address.
"The IOC (International Olympic Committee) was consulted as well along with international sports federations. FIFA had a query and I sent an officer to their headquarters to discuss things with them. The National Sports Bill is now ready and will be in parliament during monsoon session," he added but did not go into the specifics.
The bill seeks to make the country's sports administrators more accountable with the provision of a regulatory board which would have the power to grant recognition and decide funding to NSFs based on their adherence to provisions related to good governance.
The board will also be responsible for ensuring compliance with the highest governance, financial, and ethical standards.
In addition, the bill proposes the establishment of Ethics Commissions and Dispute Resolution Commissions to ensure transparency in governance.
It has been opposed by the IOA, which feels that a regulatory board would undermine its standing as the nodal body for all NSFs.
"I spoke to Ajay Maken (senior Congress leader) too. He made a good effort to have this bill passed," said Mandaviya, referring to Maken's aggressive push for cleaner sports governance during his eventful tenure that lasted a little over one year.
Governance reforms, which focus around timely elections, have been a thorny issue with prominent NSFs like the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) being accused of dragging their feet on polls that have been long due.
The minister avoided taking names but urged the administrators to rise above their personal interests.
"Main nahi hum (We, not I), that should be the way forward. We have to introspect whether it's enough to just grab the chair. We have to let go of ego. Give the seat to someone better if you see one," he said.
"Reforms is a step by step process," he asserted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Government introduces two Bills in Lok Sabha, seeks to transform sports governance landscape
NEW DELHI: Keeping an eye on India's bid for the 2036 summer Olympic games, the govt on Wednesday introduced two sports related proposed legislations in the Lok Sabha. It includes the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 that proposes to institute a national-level Board which will have sweeping powers to lay down rules to ensure accountability and oversee the functioning of federations, including the cash-rich cricket body the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The other Bill - National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025 - pertains to amending the existing legislation (National Anti-Doping Act, 2022) to make the country's law in sync with the international best practices and the World Anti-Doping Code. 'It is the endeavour of India to host major international sports events in the country and preparation for the same are underway. Also, as a part of the preparatory activities for the bidding of Summer Olympic Games 2036, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation...,' said Union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya in the National Sports Governance Bill's statement of objectives. Both the Bills were introduced in the House by Mandaviya in a din as the opposition members indulged in noisy protests against the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. Besides having a provision of establishing a National Sports Board, the National Sports Governance Bill also provides for setting up a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court to dispose of sports related disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. There will, however, be a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court against any order of the Tribunal, unless the International charters and statutes provide for appeal before the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Once the Bill becomes a law, all recognised national sports bodies, including BCCI, will come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005. The move has long been opposed by the BCCI since it is not dependent on government funding. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The Bill also has provision of restricting the use of national name and insignia for any competition without obtaining necessary approval. Establishment of the National Sports Governing Bodies for the respective recognised sports organisations, and setting up a National Sports Election Panel consisting of former members of the Election Commission of India or the State Election Commission to oversee the conduct of free and fair elections to the executive committees and the athletes committee of the national sports bodies are other key provisions of the Bill. The other bill - National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill-2025 - seeks to incorporate the changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which had in the past objected to government interference in the functioning of the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). 'It has been the constant endeavour of the government of India to strengthen the anti-doping framework and the amendments to the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 are proposed in keeping with the need to align the said Act with the international best practices and the World Anti-Doping Code,' said Mandaviya in the Bill's statement of objectives. The Bill also seeks to enhance institutional and operational independence of the National Anti-Doping Appeal panel and the National Anti-Doping Agency to ensure autonomy in their decisions pertaining to operations, investigations and enforcement activities.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Govt working to form committee to probe allegations against Justice Verma: Sources
The centre is working to form a committee to probe allegations levelled against Justice Yashwant Verma, government sources said on Wednesday. A total of 145 Lok Sabha members signed the impeachment motion against Justice Varma under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution.(PTI) Amid the ongoing monsoon session of Parliament, government sources also said that the government was not yet mulling any discussion in Parliament on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise being carried out by the Election Commission in Bihar. This comes after Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Sunday that signatures of over 100 MPs have been collected for the impeachment process against Justice Verma, who is currently under scrutiny after burnt cash was discovered at his residence. "The signature (collection) is underway, and it has crossed 100 already," Rijiju said while responding to a question about the status of the requisite signatures of MPs for the impeachment exercise against Justice Verma. When asked about whether the Parliament will take up the issue in this monsoon session scheduled to start on July 21, the Union Minister said, "In the Justice Varma case, the process will be undertaken together by all parties. This is not the move by the government alone. "I can't comment on any business in terms of priority until and unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with the approval of the chair. It is difficult to make an announcement outside," he added. On Monday, Members of Parliament submitted a memorandum to the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to remove High Court Justice Yashwant Varma in connection with the cash discovery row. A total of 145 Lok Sabha members signed the impeachment motion against Justice Varma under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution. MPs from various parties, including Congress, TDP, JDU, JDS, Jan Sena Party, AGP, SS (Shinde), LJSP, SKP, CPM, etc., signed the memorandum. Notable signatories include MPs Anurag Singh Thakur, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, Rajiv Pratap Rudy, PP Chaudhary, Supriya Sule, KC Venugopal, and others. Earlier, the sources had informed about the formation of a committee that is likely to include a judge of the Supreme Court, a chief justice from any of the High Courts and a distinguished jurist. The notices for removal of Justice Varma were given on the first day of the monsoon session of Parliament.
India Today
40 minutes ago
- India Today
National Sports Bill vs National Sports Code: What's the difference?
In a landmark move to reform sports governance in India, the Union Government on Wednesday introduced the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha. The bill, once enacted, is expected to replace the existing National Sports Development Code of India (2011), ushering in a new era of transparency, accountability and institutional oversight in Indian sports the 2011 Sports Code served as a guiding framework for good governance, it lacked the legal backing needed to enforce critical reforms. The new bill aims to fill that gap with several key departures from the code, including the creation of statutory bodies and revised eligibility norms for sports Differences: Sports Code vs Sports Bill1. From Guidelines to Law The Sports Code was essentially a set of executive guidelines issued by the Sports Ministry. In contrast, the Sports Bill is a formal piece of legislation. Once passed, it will carry legal authority and make governance norms enforceable through statutory mechanisms.2. Age and Tenure RelaxationUnder the Sports Code, the age limit for office-bearers was capped at 70. The new bill allows those under 70 at the time of filing nominations to complete their terms. It also introduces a five-year relaxation if permitted by international federation terms of tenure, the code allowed the President to serve three terms, with a mandatory cooling-off period after two. The new bill permits three consecutive terms, up to 12 years, for the President, Secretary General and Treasurer, followed by a cooling-off period before becoming eligible for election to the Executive Committee again.3. Greater RepresentationThe 2011 Code had no mandatory provision for gender or athlete representation. The bill requires at least four women and two athletes of outstanding merit in the Executive Committee of National Sports Federations (NSFs), increasing inclusivity and athlete voice in decision-making.4. Independent Regulatory BodiesOne of the most significant changes is the establishment of three new statutory institutions:National Sports Board, which will oversee the functioning and compliance of NSFsNational Sports Tribunal, to handle disputes related to governance and athlete issuesNational Sports Election Panel, to ensure fair and transparent elections in sports bodiesThese bodies are designed to reduce ministerial overreach and address long-standing issues of internal politics, mismanagement and election Long Road to ReformThe introduction of the bill is the result of more than a decade of efforts to clean up Indian sports governance. The reform journey began in 2011, when then Sports Minister Ajay Maken introduced the first Draft National Sports Development Bill, which faced strong opposition from within the political and sports establishment due to its strict age and tenure the following years, multiple attempts were made to revise and reintroduce the bill. These included:A 2013 draft released for public comments, which was not pursued 2017 Draft Code for Good Governance in Sports, prepared by a committee under Sports Secretary Injeti Srinivas, with members like Olympic gold medallist Abhinav Bindra and international athletes Anju Bobby George and Prakash Padukone.A 2019 expert committee led by Justice (Retd.) Mukundakam Sharma, which was stayed by the Delhi High Court and remains inactive due to ongoing October 2024, the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports released the Draft National Sports Governance Bill for public feedback. The government received more than 700 responses from athletes, federations, legal experts, private sports bodies and international stakeholders including the IOC, FIFA, World Athletics and the International Hockey Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, who oversaw the final consultation process, acknowledged the contribution of Ajay Maken, stating that the former Congress minister "did good work in shaping the National Sports Code, 2011." Mandaviya noted that the new bill builds on that foundation but gives it stronger enforcement Comes NextOnce passed by Parliament, the National Sports Governance Act will replace the 2011 code and establish a comprehensive legal framework for sports governance in India. The bill is expected to bring Indian sports administration in line with global best practices, similar to countries like the United States, United Kingdom, China and Japan, all of which have formal sports laws in India emerging as a growing sporting power on the global stage, the bill could mark a turning point in ensuring that the country's athletes receive the support, transparency and professionalism they deserve.- EndsMust Watch
