&w=3840&q=100)
IOC and Int'l federations consulted for National Sports Bill: Mandaviya
Addressing the one-day 'Khelo Bharat Conclave', featuring representatives from the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), National Sports Federations (NSFs), the corporate world and athletes, the minister reiterated his commitment to have the bill passed for which he has even held discussions with former sports minister and Congress leader Ajay Maken.
The monsoon session of the Parliament will start on July 21.
"I did a series of consultations with NSFs, athletes, coaches, also got 600 inputs from the public when the draft was put online for suggestions. I also had a three-hour meeting with sports lawyers to understand their perspective," Mandaviya stated in his address.
"The IOC (International Olympic Committee) was consulted as well along with international sports federations. FIFA had a query and I sent an officer to their headquarters to discuss things with them. The National Sports Bill is now ready and will be in parliament during monsoon session," he added but did not go into the specifics.
The bill seeks to make the country's sports administrators more accountable with the provision of a regulatory board which would have the power to grant recognition and decide funding to NSFs based on their adherence to provisions related to good governance.
The board will also be responsible for ensuring compliance with the highest governance, financial, and ethical standards.
In addition, the bill proposes the establishment of Ethics Commissions and Dispute Resolution Commissions to ensure transparency in governance.
It has been opposed by the IOA, which feels that a regulatory board would undermine its standing as the nodal body for all NSFs.
"I spoke to Ajay Maken (senior Congress leader) too. He made a good effort to have this bill passed," said Mandaviya, referring to Maken's aggressive push for cleaner sports governance during his eventful tenure that lasted a little over one year.
Governance reforms, which focus around timely elections, have been a thorny issue with prominent NSFs like the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) being accused of dragging their feet on polls that have been long due.
The minister avoided taking names but urged the administrators to rise above their personal interests.
"Main nahi hum (We, not I), that should be the way forward. We have to introspect whether it's enough to just grab the chair. We have to let go of ego. Give the seat to someone better if you see one," he said.
"Reforms is a step by step process," he asserted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
44 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Why wait until now to challenge inquiry in cash row: SC to Justice Varma
The Supreme Court on Monday asked Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma why he had waited until now to challenge the procedure adopted after half-burnt Indian currency notes were discovered in an outhouse of his residential premises. 'Did you take a chance of a favourable finding? You are a constitutional authority. You cannot say, 'I don't know',' the judges told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for Varma. Varma, who was a judge of the Delhi High Court when the cash was found, told the court that former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna's recommendation, based on a three-judge enquiry report, cannot form the basis for his removal. He also contended that a sitting judge's conduct cannot be part of public discourse before the legislative process begins—a constitutional mandate that was defied in his case. CJI Khanna had set up the three-member committee following the discovery of the cash at Justice Varma's official residence. The fact-finding committee was constituted under the in-house inquiry procedure to assist the CJI in acting on complaints against High Court or Supreme Court judges. The three-member panel, in its report, said the cash found at Justice Varma's residence was unaccounted for and that he was unable to explain its source—grounds that justified impeachment. This led CJI Khanna to advise Justice Varma to resign, which he refused to do. The CJI then forwarded the report to the President and the Prime Minister for further action. 'The entire case has become political,' Sibal told the court on Monday, adding that Justice Varma, a sitting judge, had been declared guilty even before the commencement of statutory proceedings—under which only Parliament can remove a sitting judge. During the hearing, the bench also asked Sibal why he believed that former CJI Khanna's decision to forward the report to the President and Prime Minister was not constitutionally valid. Sibal argued that the CJI, under the in-house procedure, was not authorised to recommend a judge's removal. The court reasoned: 'The President is the appointing authority and, therefore, the matter was placed before it (the President's office). Since the President acts as per the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and the Prime Minister is the leader of the Council of Ministers, forwarding to the Prime Minister is also not problematic.' The court also said that the former CJI's approach did not imply he was 'trying to persuade the House (Parliament) to act based on his recommendation.' Sibal, however, clarified that Justice Varma had not moved against the judgment but was aggrieved by how the entire investigation had unfolded. The bench then fixed Wednesday to hear the case again and asked Justice Varma to place the three-member in-house enquiry panel report on record for its perusal.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"No PM-Trump Call In April 22-June 17": S Jaishankar On Trump Claims
New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has squashed any speculation US President Donald Trump played a role in negotiating an India-Pakistan ceasefire to end Operation Sindoor. "There was no call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump between April 22 (the Pahalgam terror attack) and June 17 (the date the ceasefire was announced)," Mr Jaishankar said Monday evening during a volatile Parliament discussion on Pahalgam and Op Sindoor. The remarks follow repeated Mr Trump claiming he coaxed Delhi and Islamabad into stopping a conflict that escalated after missile strikes on terrorist bases in Pak and Pak-occupied Kashmir. India has firmly, and repeatedly, shot down Trump's claims, and also rebuffed his offer to 'mediate' a settlement to Pakistan's continued illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. In fact, Prime Minister Modi himself delivered this message in a phone call with the American leader in mid-June. India has also dismissed Trump's heavy-handed linking of the India-US trade deal and the ceasefire; the US leader, during one of his credit grabs, said he told Mr Modi and Pak officials ' fellas, let's not trade nuclear missiles... let's trade the things you make so beautifully'. He also claimed to have " sure as hell helped settle the India-Pak problem". Mr Jaishankar's remarks today echo those he made on July 1, when he revealed he was with Mr Modi when US Vice President JD Vance spoke to him on the phone. Then too there had been no talk linking trade and ceasefire as far as India was concerned, the Foreign Minister said. On July 1 Mr Jaishankar told an American publication that Mr Modi spoke to Mr Vance on the night of May 9 to warn him of "a very massive assault on India" by Pakistan. The next contact, he said, was shortly before Pakistan's military called to ask for peace. Mr Jaishankar said that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told him 'the Pakistanis are ready to talk'. And, hours later, Pak's Director-General of Military Operations reached out to India. The emphatic delinking of US and the India-Pak ceasefire is in response to repeated jabs by the opposition, mainly the Congress, which had criticised the government for allowing a foreign power to dictate foreign policy, and said India's diplomatic power had been "shattered". Meanwhile, during his speech - interrupted by the opposition on more than one occasion, which provoked Home Minister Amit Shah to rise to his colleague's defence - Mr Jaishankar said India would not tolerate terrorist activity on its soil and reserves the right to defend its citizens. "It was important to send a strong and resolute message after Pahalgam... a red line was crossed, and we had to make it clear there will be serious consequences," he said, outlining the steps taken by the government, beginning with diplomatic censures and the suspension of the critical 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, which irrigates over half of Pakistan's farms.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'LoP Took Briefing From China': Jaishankar Brings Up Doklam In His Swipe At Rahul Gandhi
Last Updated: EAM S Jaishankar accused the opposition of choosing what other countries have to say about national security and diplomatic matters over India's elected foreign minister Launching a blistering attack on the opposition over national security and diplomatic matters, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Monday accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of relying on the Chinese ambassador's 'briefing" during the 2017 Doklam standoff. Jaishankar was reacting to the opposition's questions on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha during the ongoing monsoon session in Parliament. Referring to US President Donald Trump's 'curfew" claims to end the India-Pakistan military standoff, he said he was rather surprised that the opposition chooses what other countries have to say over India's elected foreign minister. 'The leader of the opposition did not take a briefing from the government or the MEA (ministry of external affairs), but from the Chinese ambassador during Doklam. It is surprising that they do not choose to listen to the elected foreign minister of the country, but wants to listen to the people from other countries," Jaishankar said while addressing Parliament. Jaishankar further attacked the opposition, questioning how it has the 'temerity" to question the government that 'brought down Bahawalpur and Muridke terror sites". On 'warnings" over 'China-Pakistan collaboration", he asked what the previous governments were doing when 'this has been going on for 60 years". 'The opposition lectures us on dealing with China but they allowed 2G and 3G from China; our government made indigenous 5G. I did not go to China for the Olympics, secret deals (in another aside to Rahul Gandhi); we went there to make India's stand clear on terror, trade and de-escalation," he said. 'We are getting warnings about Pak-China collaboration, when this has been going on for 60 years." But he did not stop at this. He taunted the Congress for claiming to be 'custodians of national security" but not doing anything while it was in office. 'It is very easy for anyone to sit and keep commenting, but they should be prepared to listen to the truth. You should very politely explain to the opposition leaders that they need to sit down and listen…if our members get excited, we will not be able to stop them. We had 60 years of neglect on India's borders, which has been reversed today…our border infrastructure has gone up four times," he added. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
