Those demanding a ceasefire know nothing about the evil of Hamas
of impotence.
Yet Hamas still thinks it is Israel that must surrender. It's like the Nazis calling on Eisenhower to pull back as the Allies crossed the Rhine in 1945. So what does Hamas want? The complete withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza and a guarantee that the war will permanently end, terms that have remained throughout the war.
Despite the extent to which Israel has written it down, Hamas still remains a dangerous terrorist organisation with thousands of armed killers on the books. Of course the IDF can't withdraw in the face of that.
As for a complete end to the war, Netanyahu has said he is willing to begin negotiations for a permanent cessation immediately any ceasefire begins. His terms are that Hamas must disarm, Gaza must be demilitarised and Hamas can no longer maintain any governing or military capability. One option might be for the remaining Hamas terrorists to leave, even with their weapons, and I am sure arrangements for that have already been made should they agree to it.
If Netanyhu's conditions are not achieved through negotiation – and what are the chances of that? – Israel will have to go straight back to the fight after any ceasefire. Some have suggested Trump would not allow that. But we heard the same thing during the last two Gaza ceasefires. Remember how the experts thought Trump would never permit Israel to attack Iran and certainly would not join in? The reality was that Netanyahu and Trump were in complete lockstep and I suspect the same is true now over Gaza.
Another of Hamas's truculent demands is ending aid delivery by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israel-backed organisation that has been distributing food directly to Gazans. They want all aid to be brought in by the UN and its affiliates.
Of course they do: they can sway and exploit the UN. They can't control the GHF, which currently delivers the lion's share of all aid, bypassing the terrorists. It is telling that the GHF is such a major issue for Hamas. That's because it's work has been helping to break their stranglehold over the population.
So what makes Hamas think it still has the muscle to dictate terms to the side that is so obviously winning the fight? It knows it is no longer popular among the citizens of Gaza. There have been some protests that were brutally smashed down.
During a recent visit to the Strip I met around 100 Gazan civilians. Many of them openly told me how much they hate Hamas and want rid of them. So strong was their feeling, cheered by those around them, that I believe it's likely they are representative.
The dreadful truth is that Hamas gets greater encouragement to continue fighting from widespread support in the West and the misguided and unjust condemnation of Israel from many political leaders and international institutions. How often do we hear people such as Keir Starmer demanding Israel stops fighting yet never making any demand on Hamas?
The same is true of attitudes to the GHF. Starmer has also condemned them, as has the UN Secretary General, both speaking in unison with Hamas. And of course it is received wisdom in the West that the population must in no circumstances leave Gaza. Yet that would be the most humane option and should have happened long ago.
The majority of Gazans I spoke to said they want to leave as soon as possible. That's hardly surprising given the misery, bloodshed and destruction brought on them by Hamas's war. Acquiescing with their wishes is obvious. But many in the international community apparently would rather civilians be further endangered than voluntarily and temporarily evacuated. Again, they and Hamas almost speak with one voice.
Our leaders have helped to prolong the war and increase the killing. Instead of looking to reward terrorism by recognising a putative Palestinian state, Macron, Starmer and the rest should be helping to make Hamas give up hope and demand a ceasefire followed by a negotiated end to hostilities on Israel's terms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Trump's groundbreaking crypto bill will affect Americans
Advertisement After a frantic back-and-forth over the nation's most significant crypto legislation to-date President Donald Trump got Republicans in line to pass a first-of-its-kind law. The House OK'd the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act and the The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act on Thursday, both with bipartisan support. The GENIUS Act will create a regulatory framework for stablecoin payments. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are backed 1:1 with an asset, like a U.S. dollar or European euro. The global stablecoin industry has exploded in recent years, reaching a total market size of roughly $250 billion, up from $130 billion just two years ago. The measure provides rules for stablecoin issuers, including mandates that require audits and that the firm can back the assets they give to customers. Stablecoins have become a major player in the world of digital finance, but, until now, the rules have been unclear. The GENIUS Act aims to bring more trust and stability to the industry, ensuring that companies behind these 'digital dollars' are held accountable for managing people's money safely and transparently. 'This piece of legislation is going to make America the crypto capital of the world, and that's what the president promised,' Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said at Thursday's briefing. The 79-year-old president has been a loud advocate for the budding industry, he even spoke at the Bitcoin Conference 2024 and named an ' AI Czar,' David Sacks, to lead a White House team focused on the digital asset class. President Trump is expected to sign the GENIUS Act during a White House ceremony on Friday. These reforms are thought to improve trust in the stablecoin market. For example, Tether, an El Salvador-based crypto firm that is the largest stablecoin issuer globally, has been accused of not backing up its assets 1:1. The GENIUS Act would mean that stablecoins in U.S. markets need to show receipts. Last year the president co-founded his own digital asset company, World Liberty Financial, with his sons Donald Trump Jr., Eric and Barron. The firm is directly involved in various projects, and notably issues its own stablecoin called 'USD1,' according to the company's site. The CLARITY Act passed on Thursday is a market structure bill which aims to provide clear rules for crypto markets by giving oversight to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Under Biden, crypto companies that were subject to SEC enforcement actions complained that former SEC Chair Gary Gensler did not create clear industry guidelines. The CLARITY Act will be taken up by the Senate later this year. In addition to the landmark crypto legislation, the president is also interested in cutting taxes for crypto. The White House indicated Thursday the president supports exempting small cryptocurrency purchases from taxes, aiming to make using cypto for everyday payments - like buying a cup of coffee - more practical. 'Of course, right now, that cannot happen, but with the de minimis exemption, perhaps it could in the future,' Leavitt said. Senator Cynthia Lummis (pictured) is leading an effort to pass a bill that would set a $300 threshold for untaxed crypto transactions, allowing purchases under $300, up to $5,000 per year, to be made without triggering taxes. The bill also aims to eliminate double taxation for crypto miners and stakers, provide equal tax treatment for digital assets compared with traditional investments, and clarify how lending digital assets is taxed.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Listen up, weaklings: there's no Epstein client list – and definitely no cover-up. Yours, Donald J Trump
You have to feel for Donald Trump's Maga base. The one huge secret they didn't want disclosed was that he actually really hates them. All populists despise their people, obviously – but please, Mr President, respect the playbook! You're supposed to do it quietly. Regrettably, no one could accuse Trump of hiding his spite under a bushel after a week in which he described those of his supporters who want him to simply do what he repeatedly promised, and release the so-called Epstein files, as 'weaklings' and 'stupid people'. This is quite the (public) volte face from the guy who originally swept to office declaring 'I love the poorly educated'. Most of you are unlikely to need a recap at this stage, but Jeffrey Epstein is the sex-trafficking financier and socialite, who conveniently died in jail while awaiting trial, apparently by suicide. A woman, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted of conspiring with him to sexually abuse minors, and is currently serving 20 years in a low-security Florida prison. But no big-hitting or even small-hitting male associate in the US has so much as been arrested for participating in what I believe the dead paedophile would have encouraged us to call his 'lifestyle'. This second Trump administration didn't just sweep to power while repeatedly screaming about the 'cover-up' of this story, but it spent a good portion of its early months assuring its ravenous base that Epstein's supposed 'client list' was on a desk waiting for release approval. Yet now, Trump and his associates say there is no list. Nope. Never even was a list. Where did these weakling idiots get that idea? To summarise his administration's position: 'We took a look at the deep state and it turns out to be very shallow. Seriously, I'm standing in it right now and it doesn't even come up to my knees.' Understandably, a significant proportion of the Maga crowd are not taking this well at all. One of the key takeouts of Trump's rise has been that as long as you tell people that up is down or black is white in an engaging or sufficiently discombobulating fashion, truth is an extremely low-status commodity in contemporary politics. But, contrary to perceived trends, it seems that there do still exist some subjects on which you can only push even your own people so far. Maybe the ancient political adage still holds true: live by the paedo conspiracy, die by the paedo conspiracy. Late on Thursday, as footage of people burning Maga hats spread online, a palpably frustrated Trump announced that he was instructing the attorney general, Pam Bondi, to seek release of the Epstein grand jury testimony, 'based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein'. Though you'll note the president failed to add the two key words: 'by me'. Still, it's good to hear Trump characterising what's currently happening as 'publicity', confirming that he sees even the desire to see justice served on a suspected paedophile sex-trafficker and his associates as a form of limelight – which, like all limelight, should by rights be his. It feels harder to sustain the idea that there is nothing to see here, especially when leading wingnuts such as the Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, far-right activist Laura Loomer, Fox host Laura Ingraham, talkshow queen Megyn Kelly, Maga whisperer Steve Bannon and even the US House speaker, Mike Johnson, are out there pushing the base conviction that, actually, there might well be something to see here. 'It's definitely a full reversal on what was all said beforehand,' observed Marjorie in a once-in-a-career alignment with fact, 'and people are just not willing to accept it.' We have to take our laughs where we can, meanwhile, so do please consider the cavalcade of podcasters and Maga influencers who got jobs like 'director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation' and 'deputy director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation' and are now discovering that life comes at you fast. FBI chief Kash Patel spent the election campaign pushing Epstein conspiracies, and is now believed to be hiding under his big important desk wetting his pants. 'Listen,' his deputy, Dan Bongino, used to instruct his podcast listeners. 'That Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal, please do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this.' Will do, Dan. Incidentally, a lot of people spent the weekend speculating feverishly that Bongino would sensationally quit his job – but in the end, he just came into work a bit late on Monday. What a tough guy. Make America Deep State Again! Other developments? That are perhaps not unrelated? The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump had served as a contributor to some kind of cursed 50th birthday scrapbook for Epstein, compiled by Maxwell, for which he'd sent a 'bawdy' letter. This missive was reportedly typed inside a drawing of a naked woman's silhouette, in which the famous Trump signature served as a kind of scribble of pubic hair. So far, so FDR. Unfortunately, particularly in the circumstances, the letter itself is said to conclude: 'Happy birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Alas, the current president is not thrilled by this report, denying it completely, adding that he has never in his life 'wrote a picture'. (It goes without saying that all Donald Trump statements, always, are very much [sic].) Much more promisingly, Trump is furious with the WSJ owner, Rupert Murdoch, and threatening to 'sue his ass off'. Oh please don't, Mr President! His ass is 94 years old and incredibly wrinkled. Also, half of Britain's political class still lives up it. Then again, perhaps Trump v Murdoch is very much the desiccated-dick-waving contest the world … wants? Needs? Will have to endure? Unclear which of those applies at this stage, but let's hold out for the possibility that both men are wholly – and indeed literally – consumed by it. Angles-wise, however, there are already signs that the Wall Street Journal might just be the common enemy the Magas need as an off-ramp for their civil war, allowing people who are obsessed with paedophiles to find common cause both with people who don't care about paedophiles, and also with people who may actually have been close personal friends with paedophiles. There'll probably only be one casualty, and it'll probably be Pam Bondi. Women are great at taking these falls. Furthermore, the whole conflagration would once more pit a billionaire president against one of his billionaire buddies – exactly the kind of better world his supporters voted for, and a true testament to how truly, truly deeply he values them. Marina Hyde is a Guardian columnist
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Syria: UN says it has credible reports of summary executions in Suweida
The UN human rights chief says his office has received credible reports indicating widespread violations and abuses, including summary executions and arbitrary killings, during the recent violence in the southern city of the alleged perpetrators were members of the security forces and individuals affiliated with the interim government, as well as local Druze and Bedouin armed elements, Volker Türk said in a statement."This bloodshed and the violence must stop," he warned, adding that "those responsible must be held to account".Almost 600 people are reported to have been killed since sectarian clashes between Druze militias and Bedouin tribes erupted in the province on Sunday. Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government responded by deploying its forces to the predominantly Druze city of Suweida for the first time since Islamist-led rebels overthrew President Bashar al-Assad in December, ending 13 years of civil war.A fragile truce appeared to be holding in Suweida on Friday, two days after the government announced that it had agreed the military would pull out and responsibility for security would be handed to religious elders and some local the fighting escalated and government forces were accused by residents and activists of killing Druze civilians and carrying out extrajudicial to Türk, the UN human rights office has documented the unlawful killing of at least 13 people on 15 July, when "armed individuals affiliated with the interim authorities deliberately opened fire at a family gathering"."On the same day, they reportedly summarily executed six men near their homes in two separate incidents," he office has also documented the public humiliation of a Druze men, including the forcible shaving of his moustache, which is an important cultural symbol for the Druze community."My office has received accounts of distressed Syrians who are living in fear for their lives and those of their loved ones," Türk said. "The deployment of state security forces should bring safety and protection, not add to the fear and violence."The BBC has contacted the Syrian government and security forces about allegations of summarily killings and other violations. In a televised address early on Thursday, Sharaa vowed to hold the perpetrators accountable and promised to make protecting the Druze a "priority"."We are eager to hold accountable those who transgressed and abused our Druze people because they are under the protection and responsibility of the state," he went on to blame "outlaw groups", saying their leaders "rejected dialogue for many months".He also said the government had agreed that the military would pull out of Suweida and responsibility for security would be handed to religious elders and some local media have also cited authorities and tribes as accusing "outlaw groups" of carrying out "massacres" of Bedouin fighters and civilians and other UN human rights chief said there must be "independent, prompt and transparent investigations into all violations, and those responsible must be held to account, in accordance with international standards"."It is crucial that immediate steps are taken to prevent recurrence of such violence. Revenge and vengeance are not the answer," he added.Türk raised concerns regarding reports of civilian casualties resulting from Israeli air strikes on Suweida, Daraa and in the centre of Damascus, where the defence ministry's headquarters and a site near the presidential palace were said it carried out the strikes to stop government forces from attacking the Druze and to force the military to withdraw from Suweida Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) said on Thursday night that it had documented the killing of at least 594 people during the UK-based monitoring group reported that 300 members of the Druze religious minority were killed, including 146 fighters and 154 civilians, 83 of whom were "summarily executed" by members of the interior and defence ministry's least 257 government personnel and 18 Bedouin fighters were also killed, while three Bedouin civilians were summarily killed by Druze fighters, it added.
