logo
Report In Hindi Daily 'Dainik Jagran' Describes Iran Before Islamic Revolution: 'Then One Day, A Revolution Took Place, And ... A Modern And Developed Nation Was Transformed Into An Islamic State'

Report In Hindi Daily 'Dainik Jagran' Describes Iran Before Islamic Revolution: 'Then One Day, A Revolution Took Place, And ... A Modern And Developed Nation Was Transformed Into An Islamic State'

Memri8 hours ago

Amid the Iran-Israel war, India's leading Hindi-language daily Dainik Jagran published a report explaining how relatively liberal pre-revolutionary Iran transformed under the Islamic Revolution into a place where women's individual rights are limited and they are forced to cover their heads.
In the report, titled "How Did One Piece Of News In Iran Bring About 'The Islamic Revolution,' Confining Women To Their Homes And Turning Israel Into An Enemy," journalist Mahen Khanna traced the origins of the 1979 Islamic revolution, the theocratic regime led by Ayatollah Khomeini, and Iran becoming an enemy of Israel.
"[Girls] were also free to wear skirts and walk around with dark lipstick. Then one day, a revolution took place, and the entire country changed. A modern and developed nation was transformed into an Islamic state," Khanna narrated.
Iranian women's football team in 1976 (image courtesy: X)
Following are excerpts from the article:[1]
"Girls Had The Right To Study... To Vote And Contest Elections – They Were Also Free To Wear Skirts And Walk Around With Dark Lipstick, Then One Day, A Revolution Took Place, And The Entire Country Changed: A Modern And Developed Nation Was Transformed Into An Islamic State"
"Amid the conditions of war, discussions have arisen about how life was much more prosperous in Iran when it was known as Persia.[2] Girls had the right to study and go to school, the right to vote and contest elections. They were also free to wear skirts and walk around with dark lipstick. Then one day, a revolution took place, and the entire country changed. A modern and developed nation was transformed into an Islamic state.
"Now the question arises: What exactly was the 'Islamic Revolution of Iran' that changed the face, character, and fate of an entire country – turning the open-minded Persia into the Muslim nation of Iran? Let us tell you... This story is long, but we will try to explain it to you in simple words and in a short time.
"Exactly 47 years, five months, and 14 days ago, that is, on the morning of January 6, 1978, a major shift began in the lives of the Iranian people. That morning, people read the newspaper, some tore it up, others threw it away, and some even burned it. That was the spark that ignited the Islamic Revolution, and without much thought, people flooded into the streets.
An Iranian air hostess before the Islamic Revolution (image courtesy: X)
"Now the question arises: what exactly was published in the newspaper that compelled people to take to the streets.
"One News Report And 20 Deaths
"In those days, one of Iran's biggest newspapers, Ettelaat, published a news report that read: 'Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini is a British agent. He is serving colonial interests.' Not only that. The report also questioned Khomeini's Iranian identity and accused him of living an immoral life. Within 12 hours of the article's publication in Ettelaat, it was as if the country caught fire. The police were ordered to shoot rioters on sight. And so, 20 people were shot dead by the police. Several newspapers were placed under censorship."
"[Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini Had A Connection To India: His Grandfather, Sayyid Ahmad Musavi, Was Born In The Village Of Kintoor In Barabanki In [The Northern State Of] Uttar Pradesh"
"Who Was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini?
"Who was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, about whom one news article caused such an uproar that Iran became an Islamic nation? Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was an Islamic cleric... During the 1960s and 70s, he held considerable influence in religious seminaries.
"Also, Khomeini had a connection to India. His grandfather, Sayyid Ahmad Musavi, was born in the village of Kintoor in Barabanki in [the northern state of] Uttar Pradesh, and was a resident there. At the age of 40, he traveled to Iraq to offer prayers at the shrine of Imam Ali – also known as the Mosque of Ali.
"From Iraq, he reached Iran and settled in the city of Khomein, where he chose to stay permanently. Sayyid Ahmad Musavi added Hindi as a suffix to his name, after which he came to be known as Sayyid Ahmad Musavi Hindi. In 1902, Musavi's grandson, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was born – who later went on to become a learned cleric."
"In 1936, The Hijab And Burqa Were Banned... Women Were Allowed To Wear Western Clothes; In 1950, Child Marriage Was Prohibited, And The Legal Age For Marriage Was Set At 18; In 1963, Women Were Granted Voting Rights And The Right To Contest Parliamentary Elections"
"What Is The Story Behind Iran Becoming An Islamic Nation?
"Persia – that is, present-day Iran and the Persian Empire. This dates back to the time of the First World War. Britain wanted to make Persia its protectorate, but one of the young men in the Persian army, Reza Shah, did not let that happen.
"Reza Shah gradually rose through the ranks within the military and was given important responsibilities in the army. Reza Shah was obsessed with strengthening Iran's national identity. For this reason, he adopted the ancient language name Pahlavi as a surname.
Iranian women before the Islamic Revolution (image courtesy: X)
"In 1925, Reza Shah took on the title Pahlavi, marking the beginning of the Pahlavi dynasty. Reza Shah Pahlavi ruled Persia until 1941. By the end of his reign, Persia had undergone significant transformation. Among the most notable changes was the renaming of Persia to Iran. It is said that the local people had long referred to the region as Iran, so Reza revived this historic name after many years and officially changed Persia to Iran.
"Reza Shah Pahlavi tried to establish Iran as a centralized, Western-style secular state and one that was pro-women. He brought about several reforms in the interests of women, including in education, politics, employment, clothing, and by raising the legal age of marriage.
"What Rights Did Women Have In Iran During The Pahlavi Era?
"Girls and women were given the right to attend schools and universities.
"In 1936, hijab and burqa were banned. Women were allowed to wear Western clothes.
"In 1950, child marriage was prohibited, and the legal age for marriage was set at 18.
"In 1963, women were granted voting rights and the right to contest parliamentary elections.
"Women could become judges, ministers, doctors, lawyers, stewardesses, soldiers, and teachers.
"Reza Shah ruled Iran until 1941. After him, his son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi became the Shah of Iran. From 1925 to 1953, Iran functioned as a constitutional monarchy, with a Prime Minister as head of government and a Supreme Commander as head of state. Reza Shah and later his son typically held the position of Supreme Commander themselves."
"In 1964, Anti-Government Protests Took Place, In Which [Ayatollah] Khomeini Was At The Forefront – Referring To Shia Islam, He Presented Himself As A Protector Of The People's Interests – He Soon Gained The Support Of Many Islamic Clerics"
"Under The Leadership Of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi
"*In the 1960s, Iran witnessed the White Revolution.
"*Land reform laws were introduced
"*Education and healthcare reforms were implemented.
"*Women's rights were expanded.
"*Measures for industrialization were carried out.
"Why Did Public Discontent Grow In Iran?
"Mohammad Reza Pahlavi introduced many reforms. Yet, instead of decreasing, economic inequality in the country grew. The rich became richer, and the poor became poorer. Unemployment and inflation reached extreme levels. This gave rise to public anger.
An Iranian woman by the seaside (image courtesy: X)
"And as history has often shown, when people grow discontented, a new leader emerges. In Iran's case, that leader was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who was mentioned earlier.
"In 1964, anti-government protests took place, in which Khomeini was at the forefront. Referring to Shia Islam, he presented himself as a protector of the people's interests. He soon gained the support of many Islamic clerics."
"Khomeini Used Reza Shah's Alliance With America As A Weapon To Provoke The Public – He Fiercely Criticized Both America And Reza Shah, And He Opposed The Diplomatic Immunity Granted To American Soldiers"
"How Did The Pahlavi Era Collapse
"Mohammad Reza Shah had established good relations with Israel and the United States. Israel's first prime minister had believed that, due to Israel's enmity with Arab nations, friendship with Iran would be difficult. Yet Reza Shah extended a hand of friendship, and the two countries became allies.
"At that time, American military personnel stationed in Iran were granted certain diplomatic privileges. One such provision stated that if any American soldier was involved in a criminal case during their deployment in Iran, they would be tried in an American court, not an Iranian one.
"Khomeini used Reza Shah's alliance with America as a weapon to provoke the public. He fiercely criticized both America and Reza Shah, and he opposed the diplomatic immunity granted to American soldiers. As a result, Khomeini was arrested in November 1964 and imprisoned for six months.
"Khomeini Disappeared For 14 Years After His Sentencing
"After being released from prison, Khomeini was brought before then-Prime Minister Hassan Ali Mansur. The Prime Minister asked Khomeini to apologize. When Khomeini refused, an enraged Mansur slapped him hard across the face.
In 1964 protests, Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as a defender of Shi'ite Islam (image: Jagran).
"Just two months after this incident, Prime Minister Mansur was brutally assassinated by unknown attackers on his way to parliament. The killing was attributed to a group of Khomeini supporters, which the government labelled an extremist group. Four people were sentenced to death for the act. Khomeini went underground and remained out of public sight for 14 years.
"During this time, Mohammad Reza Shah created a secret intelligence agency called SAVAK. It was widely whispered among the people that SAVAK was funded by the Americans. Khomeini-aligned clerics began to tell the public that SAVAK was responsible for worsening the situation in the country and suppressing people's voices.
"Gradually, anger against Mohammad Reza Shah grew. Protests became more frequent. In 1978, a massive arson attack occurred as part of the unrest, in which more than 450 people lost their lives. To stop such events, the Iranian government imposed martial law in September 1978.
"On September 8, 1978, a large religious demonstration took place in Tehran. SAVAK forces arrived at the protest site and opened fire, killing over 100 people. This day is remembered in Iran as the Black Friday Massacre. It is said that many of the demonstrators did not even know that martial law had been declared."
"By The End Of 1978, The [Shah] Government Appeared Increasingly Unable To Suppress The Mounting Opposition"; "Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi Left Iran On January 16, 1979"; "Khomeini Returned To Iran After 14 Years"
"The Shah Left, And The Khomeini Era Began
"Meanwhile, the Ettelaat newspaper published the controversial report labeling Khomeini a British agent, a piece that further fueled pro-Khomeini and anti-government sentiments. By the end of 1978, the [Shah] government appeared increasingly unable to suppress the mounting opposition.
"As the situation worsened, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi left Iran on January 16, 1979. Most Iranian newspapers carried the headline: 'The Shah has gone.' In his place, the Shah left behind a weak leader named [Shapur] Bakhtiar.
In Tehran, women turned out in large numbers to protest against Khomeini's law requiring women to wear burqa
"On the other side, Khomeini returned to Iran after 14 years. In the capital city of Tehran, millions gathered to welcome him. Sensing the momentum and the shifting tide, even the Iranian armed forces declared their neutrality. With the support of both the public and the military, Khomeini led the establishment of an Islamic Republic in Iran, an event that came to be known as the Islamic Revolution.
"To eliminate any future possibility of opposition, Khomeini held a national referendum in March 1979, even before officially declaring the Islamic Republic. In this referendum, 98 percent of voters approved replacing the constitutional monarchy with an Islamic Republic, which led to the formation of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
"A new constitution was drafted in which Khomeini was declared the Supreme Leader. In the constitution adopted in December 1979, all democratic processes were ultimately placed under the authority of the Supreme Commander and the Council of Guardians [led by the clerics]."
"The Greatest Impact Of Iran Becoming An Islamic Republic And The Implementation Of The New Constitution Was Felt By Women"; "Wearing The Hijab And Burqa Was Made Mandatory, And The Legal Age Of Marriage Was Lowered"
"Who Was Most Affected?
"The greatest impact of Iran becoming an Islamic republic and the implementation of the new constitution was felt by women. Women were prohibited from attending schools, colleges, and universities, from working outside the home, and from practicing professions like law.
"Wearing the hijab and burqa was made mandatory, and the legal age of marriage was lowered. Women were banned from professional roles and were confined entirely to domestic responsibilities.
Iranian women before and after the 1979 Islamic Revolution (image courtesy: X)
"Seizure Of The American Embassy
"With the change in power in Iran, its international relations also shifted. Iran's ties with the United States, Israel, and other Western countries deteriorated. That same year, when Mohammad Reza Shah fell seriously ill and went to the U.S. for treatment, Khomeini's faction saw this as an American conspiracy to bring the shah back to power.
"As a result, in 1979, Khomeini's supporters seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, taking 52 diplomats hostage for 444 days.
"On the other hand, Iran aligned itself with the Palestinian movement, with the goal of eliminating Israel. Since then, tensions between Iran and Israel have persisted – frequently escalating and at times erupting into direct conflict, as seen in recent events."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Houthis' Red Sea blockade remains in force
Houthis' Red Sea blockade remains in force

Shafaq News

time3 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Houthis' Red Sea blockade remains in force

Shafaq News – Sanaa Yemen's Houthi (Ansarallah) movement is maintaining a full naval blockade on Israeli-affiliated shipping in the Red Sea, the group's leader confirmed on Thursday. In a televised address, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi said his forces had launched 309 ballistic and hypersonic missiles, along with drones, at Israeli targets since the second phase of operations began in mid-Ramadan (March 2025). He further characterized the Iran-Israel ceasefire as a 'military defeat' for Tel Aviv, claiming Israel failed to achieve its objectives in the strikes on Iranian territory. Iran's missile barrages, he added, created 'unprecedented fear,' driving Israeli civilians into shelters. Al-Houthi framed Tehran's response as a strategic victory for the region, hailing Iran's leadership, Revolutionary Guard, and public for their resilience, and asserted that toppling Iran's Islamic system was 'impossible.' The Houthis, backed by Iran and in control of northern Yemen, began targeting Israeli-linked vessels in late 2023 in response to the Gaza war. Their attacks disrupted traffic through key trade corridors in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, prompting a US-led naval response aimed at securing international shipping routes.

New Syrian Government Distanced Itself From Israel-Iran War
New Syrian Government Distanced Itself From Israel-Iran War

Memri

time3 hours ago

  • Memri

New Syrian Government Distanced Itself From Israel-Iran War

In contrast to many Arab countries that condemned Israel for its war on Iran between June 13-24, 2025, Syria under its new government – helmed by President Ahmed Al-Sharaa (formerly known as Abu Muhammad Al-Joulani, head of the Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) organization) – stood out for choosing to remain neutral and refrain from expressing any position on the Israel-Iran war.[1] Syria is apparently uninterested in showing solidarity with either of the warring sides. Iran is seen as a rival of the new Syrian government due to its longstanding support for the deposed regime of Bashar Al-Assad, which fell on December 8, 2024, and its participation in fighting against Assad's opponents. As for Israel, Syria's relations with it are complicated. Since Al-Sharaa's rise to power, Israel has expanded its airstrikes in Syria, eliciting numerous condemnations from the new government. Nevertheless, with American encouragement, the two sides have held indirect contacts – and reportedly also direct ones – in an effort to reach an agreement.[2] The current priority of the Al-Sharaa government is to consolidate Syria's security and stability in order to rehabilitate its economy and rebuild the country in accordance with the government's vision. Hence, it made significant efforts to distance Syria from the Israel-Iran war and to prevent the hostilities from spilling over into Syrian territory. However, Syria's geographic location does not allow for complete disengagement. During the war Israeli warplanes, as well as Iranian missiles and drones, passed through Syrian airspace on a daily basis, and the interception of Iranian weapons over Syria occasionally caused casualties and damage there, sparking criticism against the Syrian government. Moreover, Iran made active efforts to expand the war into Syria and other countries in an effort to reduce the Israeli strikes against it. In this context, it reportedly attempted to mobilize its affiliated militias within Syrian territory to carry out security provocations, including attacks on American bases in the country. In addition, officials of the former Syrian regime sought Iran's assistance to act against the new Syrian government and against Israel. In response, the Syrian government increased its military presence in areas where pro-Iranian elements remain and tool action against them. Parts of an Iranian drone intercepted by Israel in the western Daraa Governorate in southern Syria (Image: June 20, 2025) This report reviews the position taken by the Al-Sharaa government on the Israel-Iran war, the attempts made by Iran to escalate the situation in Syria and other countries in order to expand the scope of the conflict, and the Syrian government's response to these efforts. New Syrian Government Maintained Neutrality While Syrian Airspace Remained Exposed Throughout the Israel-Iran war, the Syrian government maintained complete silence about it, and circles close to the government conveyed that it did not wish to be involved in the conflict in any way. Sources familiar with the government said that, 'given the fragile situation in Syria and the desire to rebuild the country, it is not possible to issue uncalculated statements about two rivals who have both contributed to Syria's destruction.' The sources emphasized that the Syrian government was 'extremely cautious' regarding the war in the region and was unlikely to issue condemnations of either side—unless Syria itself was directly harmed.[3] Another source close to the government suggested that the war could even be a positive development for Syria, since it caused both the Israelis and the Iranians to cease their interference in Syria's affairs.[4] Syrian commentators conveyed, in a similar vein, that since both sides of the fight were adversaries of Syria, the Syrian government had no reason to take an explicit position on the war. Wael Alwan, a Syrian researcher with the Turkey-based institute Jusoor for Studies, noted that Iran supported the Assad regime and is hostile to the new Syria, and that Israel likewise views the Syrian government as an adversary and continues its attacks on Syria and its incursions into its territory.[5] Hence, he said, the Syrian government had no reason to side with either of these countries. Similarly, Syrian pollical analyst Bassem Suleiman told the Syrian website Enab Baladi: "The best position for Syria to take is a neutral one. Why should Syria stand with Iran against Israel, or vice versa?"[6] Nevertheless, Syria could not completely distance itself from the war, given that, due to its geographical location, both the Iranian missiles and drones and the Israeli planes passed through its airspace. Shrapnel from Iranian weapons intercepted by Israel fell in Syria, especially in its southern region, killing one woman, injuring several people and causing extensive damage. Residents of southern Syria expressed concern about this situation, and some even demanded international protection of Syria's airspace.[7] Some also directed criticism at the Syrian government. While they expressed understanding of the government's inability to prevent the infiltration of the country's airspace, due to the absence of the necessary military infrastructure, they nevertheless condemned the lack of assistance for residents whose homes had been destroyed.[8] Iranian Efforts To Exacerbate The Situation In Syria In Order To Minimize Attacks In Iran Iran, for its part, sought to expand the escalation in the region into Syria and other Arab countries, so as to at least minimize the attacks in its own territory. To that end, it tried to mobilize its affiliated forces and armed operatives in other countries. The Saudi daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat quoted sources in Damascus who claimed that the Syrian government had been warned that Iran would mobilize armed groups and militia operatives with past ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) to carry out provocations from Syrian soil. Although Al-Sharaa's government has announced on several occasions that Iran and its militias no longer have a presence in Syria,[9] according to some reports, Iran still has sleeper cells in several parts of the country, as well as some affiliates who remain active, mostly smuggling arms and drugs.[10] According to these sources, the concern was that these groups and militias would attack forces of the U.S.-led Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS that are deployed in several parts of northeastern Syria.[11] Indeed, U.S. forces reportedly intercepted Iranian missiles aimed at their bases in northeast Syria, which had been equipped in advance with radar and aerial defense systems as a preventative measure against attacks from Iranian forces or their proxies.[12] Furthermore, the Euphrates Post news agency, which covers eastern Syria, reported on June 16 that Al-Haj Askar – a prominent IRGC commander who was formerly in charge of the Al-Bukamal area in Deir Al-Zor in eastern Syria, where Iran maintained a significant presence of its affiliates – secretly met in Iraq with elements from the Deir Al-Zur countryside to develop plans for destabilizing security and stability in Syria. It was also reported that a shipment of light weapons had entered Syria from Iraq for affiliates of Iran.[13] At the same time, some operatives and groups within Syria sought to seize on the Israel-Iran war as an opportunity to upset security in Syria and work against both the new government and Israel. Notable among these operatives was Ghiath Dalla, an Alawite former senior officer in the Syrian army's Forth Division, which was close to Iran during Bashar Al-Assad's rule. According to the Emirati daily The National, Dalla sought hundreds of millions of dollars in support from Iran to form a militia comprising former soldiers of Assad's army which would fight against the new Syrian government and also carry out attacks on Israeli targets. Reportedly, there is a pool of at least 100,000 Alawite former soldiers from which Dalla could recruit – especially given the Alawites' growing fear of the new Syrian government in the wake of the massacres against them on the Syrian coast this past March.[14] According to a Syrian security source, Dalla believed that the Israel-Iran war was "a golden chance to unite the Alawites and form a resistance force supported by Iran, " The source added that "the south [of the country] has remnants of Iranian proxies whom Dalla can re-activate to resume the attacks."[15] Additionally, a Syrian militia, Formidable in Might – Islamic Resistance Front in Syria, established in January 2025 as resistance to the new Syrian government and to Israel, called for acting against Israel in response to its attacks on Iran. Most of the militia's activity appears to be in the south of the country, and according to its characteristics it likely has links to the Shi'a and to the Iran-led resistance axis.[16] In an announcement, it said: "It is the [Israeli] enemy, which has eliminated commanders in Damascus, Baghdad, Beirut, and today Tehran, that is waging a soft and hard war against the peoples of the entire [Islamic] nation, and therefore we must stand united against it, escalate [the resistance on] the front and intensify the attacks... [The options are] either resistance that will change the balance of power, or surrender that will leave us without honor or a homeland."[17] However, so far there has been no escalation against Israel from Syrian territory. Syria Worked To Prevent The War From Spilling Over Into Its Territory Against the backdrop of these reports and the warnings it received, the new Syrian government made efforts to prevent the war from expanding into Syrian territory. As part of this, security reinforcements were sent to southern Syria to prevent any attempt to carry out an attack on Israel from the region, and it was also reported that the Syrian security forces had seized and confiscated a weapons depot in the area.[18] In addition, Syrian forces have increased their presence around the border with Iraq in order to act against people and cells affiliated with Iran and against Iran-backed Iraqi forces – primarily led the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU), a military body parallel to the Iraqi army comprising mainly pro-Iran militias – and to prevent these forces from infiltrating into Syrian territory. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported on June 14 that tensions between the two sides had increased after the PMU fired a rocket at a Syrian military post, wounding a Syrian soldier. Syrian forces responded with heavy fire, and international coalition helicopters circled simultaneously along the Syrian-Iraqi border.[19] According to the Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, the Syrian government ordered its forces on the Iraqi border to respond to any attempt by the PMU to launch rockets at U.S. bases in northeastern Syria.[20] At the same time, the Syrian government conducted a security operation in the city of Al-Mayadeen in the Deir Al-Zor governorate, formerly considered a stronghold of pro-Iran forces; during the operation, it arrested 21 people from Iranian militia sleeper cells. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the arrests were due to fears that they would carry out attacks in response to the Israel-Iran war.[21] In this context, the commander of the Syrian security forces in the Deir Al-Zor governorate, Dirar Al-Shamlan, announced that members of the Assad regime and those associated with it were forbidden to possess weapons of any kind.[22] Syrian forces have also stepped up alertness on the Lebanon border in order to thwart weapons smuggling. It was reported on June 19 that in the Talkalakh area, in western Homs governorate near the border, Syrian security forces seized a shipment of Grad rockets intended for smuggling into Lebanon.[23] Even before the Israel-Iran war, on June 5, Syrian forces intercepted the smuggling of anti-tank missiles into Lebanon.[24] Amid this, Syrian sources reported that the smuggled weapons were often Iranian and that the smuggling network was helmed by former operatives of the Assad regime who were closely coordinating with the IRGC, and that this was taking place under the direct oversight of Iranian officers. According to the Lebanese daily Nidaa Al-Watan, such smuggling increases the risk of severe escalation in the region.[25] * O. Peri is a research fellow at MEMRI.

IAEA: Iran holds uranium for 12 nuclear bombs
IAEA: Iran holds uranium for 12 nuclear bombs

Shafaq News

time4 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

IAEA: Iran holds uranium for 12 nuclear bombs

Shafaq News – Vienna/Tehran Iran possesses enough enriched uranium to produce approximately 12 nuclear warheads but has not assembled any, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Thursday. Rafael Grossi, Director General of the UN nuclear watchdog, told France Inter radio that Iran's atomic facilities suffered 'serious damage' from recent airstrikes but remain functional. 'It's inaccurate to claim the program has been eliminated,' he noted, referring to US-Israeli strikes on sites including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. He confirmed that centrifuges at the Fordow enrichment facility were knocked out, while declining to provide updates on other locations. Grossi also flagged growing friction with Tehran, citing Iranian accusations that the agency had lost its impartiality. 'There is clear tension with Iran,' he remarked. On June 25, Iran's parliament passed a bill to halt cooperation with the IAEA—pending final approval by the Guardian Council—effectively requiring any inspections to be authorized by the Supreme National Security Council. Under the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA), Iran was restricted to enriching uranium to 3.67%. It now enriches up to 60%, just short of the 90% level required for nuclear weapons. The IAEA has previously reported Tehran as non-compliant.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store