
‘Sight For Sound' Should Be On Every Music Industry Professional's Radar
Sight For Sound initiative by NEVEN Eyewear
Access to affordable healthcare has been a longstanding issue throughout the job market in the U.S. However, as it pertains to the music industry, musicians and industry professionals are rarely provided a healthcare plan in their line of work. And this is an issue across the music industry, whether it's a major label signed artist or a small band signed to an indie label. Just as mental health is often a neglected and overlooked issue in the industry, the same is true when comes to access to healthcare. On the bright side, times are starting to change for the better. Major label artists like Chappell Roan have brought these issues to the forefront in recent months, and there are a number of other artists doing the same.
In the heavy music scene, NEVEN Eyewear, a high quality eyewear company that has roots in the hardcore scene, recently launched a new initiative this year called Sight For Sound. The company was started by Jonathan Strauss, who grew up playing in the New Jersey hardcore scene, and, since launching the company in 2019, NEVEN eyewear has grown to sell over $30 million worth of eyewear annually.
With the recent success NEVEN has seen, Strauss was inspired to launch the Sight For Sound initiative – an initiative that aims to combat the lack of basic eyecare musicians and industry professionals endure by providing presciption glasses to those working in the industry. Simply put, there's no catch to this initiative - NEVEN just asks those who are accepted into the program to share their new glasses on social media to help spread the word. That's it.
As it stands now, the initiative is open to touring professionals (musicians, stagehands, crew) and music industry professionals. Whether you're a guitar tech, guitarist, or if you even work for a guitar company, Sight For Sound is looking to get you covered. Furthermore, NEVEN's director of partnerships is an extreme metal musician – Fit For An Autopsy guitarist, Patrick Sheridan.
Speaking on all things Sight For Sound, Sheridan discusses how this initiative came about and more importantly how industry professionals can get involved.
MADRID, SPAIN - OCTOBER 18: Pat Sheridan of the American extreme metal band Fit for an Autopsy ... More performs on stage at La Riviera on October 18, 2023 in Madrid, Spain. (Photo by Mariano Regidor/WireImage)
Patrick Sheridan: So the owner, Jon Strauss, he played bass in a couple of bands from New Jersey. He was in this band called Redline, Hardcore band from New Jersey, and I was playing in a bunch of hardcore bands back then and we kind of started crossing paths and he was a little younger than me.
He was coming up in the scene, kind of like doing his thing and we met and he was a really nice guy. We had like a loose friendship for years and then Tim, who was also in bands from New Jersey, started working with Jon on the sunglasses side of things. We reconnected and he was like, 'hey, man, like I'm trying to do this cool thing for the music industry, and I need a guy who's, you know, good at talking and is kind of locked into the scene and in all the worlds that I like, we should work together.' And so it legitimately just came from a good friendship.
PS: I don't know if it's a specific story, but I do know that Jon's a really successful guy and he feels that his roots and the way that he works and all of the things that he does, he feels a lot of those lessons came from working in the hardcore scene and from being a part of that world. And I guess, you know, being a successful person, he feels like giving back is important. And he is always trying to find ways to help people and work with people. So when he found out I wore glasses , we started talking about just the fact that he gave me a pair of glasses and how it was pretty incredible to not have to pay hundreds of dollars for something that's of good quality, it just sparked a thing. Whether or not he was thinking about it before, he started talking about helping people and it just evolved.
And he's great at coming up with ways to kind of, put the brand in positions to help people do the things that they do. He's got a lot of great partnerships. He works with people in the music industry and let's be honest, the music industry at this point isn't packed with money anymore. You have to take a lot of alternative ways to make money. And somebody like Jon who's working with people, setting up these partnerships, helping them save money, you know, he works with people on the sunglass side of things. He has partnerships with Gary Holt and Matt [Heafy] from Trivum, and he's got a pair of glasses coming out with Jim Root, but he also works with The Ghost Inside and he's working with Tim [Howley] from my band Fit For An Autopsy.
I also have a pair of sunglasses or two that are going to come out, and it's ways to create revenue and work with bands on a level where you can help these people that may not make a ton of money in the music industry. Some of these guys do, like Gary Holt and these bigger artists are definitely making money, but, you know, when you come to our world, it becomes harder to make money.
PS: Well, when Jon came to me and we were talking about him putting me in the position that I'm in, he asked me 'what do you think?' And I was like, well, we work with all these A&R types of people in the industry, you know, I work with some folks like Jackson Guitars or these different companies that I often deal with like, 'hey, I need a guitar' or 'I need something for my rig.' And there are people that basically vet you, make sure that you are worthy of whatever sponsorship or endorsement they're going to give you. And we kind of based it off of that idea.
We came up with a number of shows that we felt reasonably made you a professional. And there's outside things too, like, if you work for a guitar company or if you work for a management company – there's things that will get you in the door. But as a touring musician, you meet the criteria for a certain amount of shows, whether you're putting out music, or if your band is active, and if you are, you get free glasses. That's it. So you fill out a piece of paper, it's a short form, it's got maybe 10 or 12 questions on it, like 'how many shows do you play?' 'Are you signed to a label?' 'How many people follow you in the internet?' It's typical things that would line you up with any endorsement and it just goes from there.
But again, if you are a tech or a stage manager or a tour manager, if you work for a music company like Sweetwater or if you are a guitar builder or a pickup company, there's access for people like that too because they provide the ability to do the job. So Jon was really smart about the way he put it together. We had a lot of discussion about simplifying it so anybody could do it. And that's it, you just go to the website, click the Sight For Sound link, fill it out, and if you fall into the category of being eligible, you get it. That's it.
PS: I don't know an exact number because we haven't gone back and really done a count to see, but I can tell you that we've had hundreds of people jump in and fill out the paperwork. Like at one point, Jon was like, 'yeah, we've had over 200 applications at this point.'
I've gotten messages from some of my peers saying, 'hey, this is great.' I know I'm going to see Scott Vogel tonight, but Scott from Terror got a pair and a handful of other people. This dude Christian Olde Wolbers, who plays bass, he was in Fear Factory and now he's playing for Cypress Hill as there live bass player. He got glasses. Like there's tons of people in the industry, both on the band-artist spectrum and touring spectrum that have gotten access. So it is catching on. It's a little slower than we had kind of anticipated, but it's gotten busier and busier as people talk about it more.
Of course, people are skeptical. You know, that's a big problem. This is leading me into a different side of this conversation, but people think, oh, well, what's the catch? What do I have to do? You just have to post about it on your Instagram page. That's the only thing that we ask — if you get a pair of glasses from NEVEN, take a picture wearing them, post them, say, 'hey, thanks for this thing, this is awesome.' It's advertising.
And how is this a possible thing to do, because it does cost money? NEVEN spends a lot of money with all of these different advertising companies, Meta and all these things to advertise for their company.
But this particular branch of it, Jon came up with the idea of if I can dump a bunch of money into Meta and have profit and that's a proven thing, I can do that, or I can put the money into the industry and have these people who are industry professionals that have all these followers advertise for me. So I can help these people and still push my program forward in the same way that I would if I was dumping a bunch of money into Meta or one of these other platforms to advertise for this particular version of my company. It's a really smart marketing campaign. It's a little slower because, again, you have to get people to believe that there's no catch.
You know, you offer somebody something for free nowadays and nobody, nobody believes it. But it is free and it is smart and all you have to do is share it and get the people that follow you interested because now if Scott Vogel or some other musician posts about it, everybody that looks at their page is going to go, 'oh, this is cool. Let me check out this company.' It's the same way they might see something on Facebook or some advertisement and go check it out.
So it's smart advertising and that's kind of the way that Jon worked it, and I think it's incredible. Because it's a harder move for them, you know? NEVEN has to find the right people. We have to push it to the right hand and hope that it works, but, you know, traditional advertising is a little bit more straightforward. So it's a little more work, but I think it's really cool.
PS: I think people are just generally surprised. It's a little early on to see anything particular that stands out, but I can tell you, Scott Vogel, you know, actually reached out to me and was like, 'dude, this is incredible.' There was also a gentleman that will remain nameless, but he reached out and basically said he's almost blind, and he can't read on a computer without squinting. He has a hard time seeing, but he doesn't make a lot of money and this is going to help him be able to do his job better,. This is a guy that works in the industry.
Like I said, like, there's a lot of angles on this industry, and a lot of places that don't make the revenue that you would hope they would. They don't get paid what they deserve, you know, stage hands, these people that work at venues, so this is a really cool thing. Like this person has an issue with their eyes, they know what the problem is, but they don't have insurance. They have kids, they're not making enough money to really go out and buy new glasses every year, you know, $500 a year is a lot of money to some people.
You can't afford that. And so this is helping folks like that be able to do their jobs better. It's the hand feeding the hand, everybody is helping. And, and I'm sure there'll be more stories like that, but that stands out to me. Jon brought that to me and he was like, 'I can't believe how many of these people don't have vision coverage and can't get glasses.' And this is helping. I think, the thing that feels the best is knowing that this is going to help those folks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift's Physical Appearance While Attending Wedding With Travis Kelce is Turning Heads
Taylor Swift's Physical Appearance While Attending Wedding With Travis Kelce is Turning Heads originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Pop star Taylor Swift stole the spotlight over the weekend, not with a performance, but with her stunning look at a private wedding she attended with boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs' star Travis Kelce. The couple was seen in Nashville, Tennessee, at Swift's friend's cousin's wedding, quietly enjoying time among friends and family. However, it was the 14-time Grammy winner's appearance that had fans buzzing online. Photos and videos from the event quickly spread on TikTok and X, showing the pop star in a sleeveless baby blue floral midi dress paired with brown wedges. But what caught fans' attention the most was her hair; styled in soft, loose curls. 'She looks so beautiful! Look at her hair!!' one fan wrote. 'I love the curls omg,' another posted. A fan chimed in, saying, 'HER CURLSSS, I'M IN LOVEEEE.' 'HER HAIR,' another simply said. Others were quick to make the connection to her early music era, with one person exclaiming, 'THE DEBUT CURLS ARE BACK.' One fan also pointed out how the moment felt extra special, writing, 'Yesss we love a pic that Taylor is aware of!! And the curly bangs.' One video showed Swift and Kelce swaying in their seats during the newlyweds' first dance. In the clip, Swift gently bumped Kelce to the beat, prompting a smile from the NFL star as he joined in. Kelce, dressed in a light olive green and white striped short-sleeved shirt and brown pants, kept things casual. A zoomed-in photo later showed Swift standing nearby, chatting with other guests while Kelce walked ahead. Swift and Kelce, who have been dating for nearly two years, have been spotted more often lately. They've had several public dinners in Palm Beach, Florida, and were seen together at Harry's Bar and Buccan just weeks ago. As the wedding video continues to gain views online, fans are showing love for the low-key, joy-filled moment shared by the story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sydney Sweeney Teases ‘Euphoria' Season 3: 'Cassie Is Crazy'
It appears home-wrecking and stage-crashing were just the appetizer for Sydney Sweeney's Cassie Howard on Euphoria. As the 2x Emmy nominee teased Season 3 of Sam Levinson's HBO teen drama, she couldn't reveal much in the way of plot points, but she assured fans that her character is 'even worse' in upcoming episodes. More from Deadline 'Euphoria' Season 3 Production Is Underway Sydney Sweeney Is Euphoric About 'Euphoria' Return Sarah Jessica Parker "Shocked" By Unpopularity Of 'AJLT's Che Diaz, Says She Loved Working With Sara Ramirez 'Cassie is crazy,' said Sweeney on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. 'So, she still is?' asked Fallon, to which she quipped, 'Oh, she's even worse.' After Fallon brought up a leaked on-set photo of Sweeney sporting a wedding dress, the actress avoided any spoilers about whether Cassie is getting hitched. 'Um, I can't confirm or deny. … Who knows, that could be AI,' she told thee host. In Season 2, Cassie's downward spiral includes an affair with her best friend Maddy's (Alexa Demie) ex-boyfriend Nate (Jacob Elordi), culminating with the former pals duking it out on stage, crashing Cassie's younger sister Lexi's (Maude Apatow) auto-biographical play. Nearly three years after the Season 2 finale, Season 3 of Euphoria officially went into production in February. The long-delayed shoot also comes after speculation that the show was coming to an end. During the hiatus, Sweeney has starred in such films as Reality, Americana, Anyone But You, Madame Web, Immaculate, Eden, and most recently, Echo Valley, now in select theaters before premiering June 13 on Apple TV+. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What I'm hearing about NCAA revenue sharing: $40M football rosters, unintended consequences
The House v. NCAA settlement, granted final approval Friday, has been touted as a means of restoring order to this Big Money Era of college sports. Starting this summer, Power 4 and other Division I schools can begin directly paying their athletes via an annual revenue sharing pool capped at roughly $20.5 million per school in year one. But because schools have been preparing to navigate this new world order — and how to gain a competitive edge under it — many in the industry expect the budding NIL arms race to continue at the top of the sport, and at a price point much higher than the cap. Advertisement 'The top (football) teams are going to cost $40-50 million a year,' said one power conference personnel director. 'That's where this is going. Anyone who thinks different is nuts.' That projected 'budget' includes additional NIL (name, image and likeness) payments from collectives and outside organizations to athletes on top of the capped revenue sharing from the school. It would be a steep increase from the market-setting $20 million in NIL money Ohio State funded its roster with last season on the way to a national championship. But most significantly, a number of industry sources believe that $40 million-$50 million rate will continue beyond this upcoming season, where a number of top-end rosters have been uniquely built with front-loaded, pre-settlement NIL deals. This cuts directly against the intent of the settlement, which is designed to stamp out the unspoken pay-for-play deals that have hijacked the NIL marketplace and keep ballooning roster budgets in check. 'No chance,' the personnel director said. Advertisement It's one of the many changes, intended and unintended, coming to college sports under the House settlement. Schools opting in have spent the past year bracing for the financial reckoning this settlement will bring, including where the revenue share money will come from and how it will be distributed. College athletics have been trending in this direction, and to the benefit of most athletes, particularly those in revenue sports who will receive a bigger cut of the billions in television, sponsorship and ticket revenues that pour into power conference athletic departments. Many of those same departments, however, are already struggling with the challenges of this transition. 'We're all just trying to figure it out as we go through it,' said one power conference head football coach. 'The whole deal is to make it a level playing field, but I don't think that will ever be realistic.' Advertisement spoke with more than a dozen sources across each of the Power 4 conferences about how they plan to approach this new revenue sharing model and all that will come with it — including in-fighting between coaches at the same school, why 'tanking' could factor into college sports and how programs will continue to bend rules and find competitive advantages in a post-settlement era. The sources include athletic directors and administrators; coaches, general managers and personnel staffers in football and men's basketball; and others involved in NIL and collectives. All were granted anonymity in exchange for their candor. 'F— Deloitte. This is going to get even crazier' The $20.5 million revenue sharing cap goes into effect July 1 and covers every sport under a school's athletic department. The most prominent football programs expect to have about $15 million of that pool at their disposal, with top programs supplementing that budget with third-party, 'over-the-cap' NIL deals. Advertisement But not so fast, my friends. The settlement includes a new oversight and enforcement arm — named the College Sports Commission — that requires outside deals from collectives and other associated companies and organizations to reflect a valid business purpose and fall within an approved range of compensation. The settlement establishes a clearinghouse, dubbed NIL Go and managed by the accounting firm Deloitte, which instructs athletes to self-report any third-party NIL deals worth $600 or more for review. The idea is that any of those deals that fail to meet a valid business purpose and/or fall within an approved range will be flagged, and must be adjusted or taken to arbitration. From the perspective of the NCAA and power conference leadership, this new enforcement is meant to bring competitive balance and transparency to a lawless, untenable NIL marketplace. But among those who have witnessed the NCAA's inability to police that marketplace in the past, there's a lot of skepticism that the settlement will change things. 'It all sounds great in theory, but how will it actually work?' asked one power conference athletic director. Industry sources familiar with the clearinghouse and enforcement plan insist it will have more (and swifter) latitude and punitive power than the NCAA wielded in the NIL era. Until it actually drops that hammer, it's done little to scare off coaches and recruiting staffs with passionate, deep-pocketed donors. Advertisement A number of sources questioned whether athletes will even report their third-party deals, or do so accurately. Others suggested that deals getting challenged by the clearinghouse — or the fact that they have to be disclosed at all — could spark more antitrust legal action from collectives. Other sources were outright dismissive. 'If you tell a booster or business owner they can't give a star player $2 million, there will be lawsuits,' said the personnel director. 'There's no enforcing this. Fair market value? F— Deloitte. This is going to get even crazier.' A legit enforcement arm with some teeth — perhaps in the form of suspensions or ineligibility — might change that sentiment, and multiple athletic directors suggest that if the clearinghouse merely serves as a minor deterrent to egregious pay-for-play payments, it will be better than pre-settlement circumstances. But others think the undertow of NIL and collectives is too strong to turn back now. 'There are a lot of rich people that can't buy a professional sports franchise, but they can give a ton of money to their alma mater,' said a power conference administrator. 'And if you're telling millionaires and billionaires what they can and can't do with their money, you're probably going to lose that battle.' Finding the money The over-the-cap arms race is for high rollers only. It will attract the premier programs that expect to win national championships, but for most schools, even in the power conferences, their focus is on how they will fund a new $20 million budget item. Advertisement Power conference athletic departments operate as self-sustaining organizations with $100 million budgets, where expenses more or less line up with revenues. Operating this way, even as millions upon millions in annual television revenue flowed in, is how the conferences and NCAA became ensnared in so much legal trouble to begin with. Untangling those norms is an admittedly first-class problem, but will require significant budgetary adjustments, including new revenue growth and cost cutting. Most schools are leaning on fundraising and seeking new or increased assistance from campus subsidies or student fees. Virginia Tech, for example, recently announced it will increase student fees and direct a larger portion to athletics to help fund revenue sharing, a path plenty of other schools are considering. Iowa State athletic director Jaime Pollard referenced as much in a recent interview, while noting that Cyclones athletics receive no financial subsidies from the university. 'Iowa State does not have that (additional) $20 million, but if we don't pay it for this coming year, we have big problems, right? So we're going to pay it,' said Pollard. 'Would you pay a bigger fee (as a student) … to go to school here so that a member of our men's basketball team could get paid $1.5 million in addition to their scholarship, their room and board, and all the services they get for being a student on campus? That's the fundamental question we're going to have to ask ourselves. Because if we don't do that, then what we're saying is that we're not going to have the athletics program that we're having.' Even with increased fees and fundraising, there will also be widespread belt-tightening on things like administrative staffing and athlete benefits within athletic departments, such as eliminating Alston payments and reevaluating meal offerings in the facility. Advertisement 'If a player is making $500,000 a year, why am I still paying for three meals a day?' said another power conference administrator. There could be new revenue streams from things like on-field logos or naming rights. Long term, departments might get creative, whether that's an in-stadium restaurant that's open year-round, purchasing its own housing complexes for athletes or inviting private equity. Last December, Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy and Florida State coach Mike Norvell each restructured lucrative contracts, returning a portion of their salary to the school after disappointing seasons. Kentucky recently announced it is transitioning its athletic department to a nonprofit LLC. Fans will feel it too. Schools such as Tennessee and Arkansas have already increased ticket or concession prices to fund revenue sharing. Some may pass processing fees onto customers, or explore local restaurant and hotel taxes. And the fundraising calls won't stop. Fully eliminating non-revenue varsity sports is another last-resort option for most athletic directors, but it's already begun, at least outside the power conferences. UTEP discontinued women's tennis. Cal Poly did the same with men's and women's swimming and diving. Saint Francis (Pa.) announced plans to reclassify all athletics from Division I to Division III, just one week after its men's basketball team played in the NCAA Tournament. Utah shuttered its women's beach volleyball program, though it did not mention the House settlement and rather cited conference realignment. Advertisement 'I know for a fact schools are definitely talking about it,' said an administrator. By any route, the ability for schools to spend the full amount of that annual revenue sharing cap — which will be essential to staying competitive, particularly at the highest levels — is a significant financial undertaking, and one few athletic departments can cobble together without upending their standard operating procedure. 'Right now it feels like Monopoly. We're planning to spend to the cap, but we have to figure out how we're getting there,' said the power conference athletic director. 'If you cut a million somewhere, sure that helps, but if you cut $5 (million) or $10 million, you're really hurting your department.' Everyone wants their share Generating the money is the first hurdle. Then schools have to decide how to distribute it among their sports. Most FBS athletic departments plan to use the settlement's backpay formula as a blueprint, with roughly 75 percent earmarked to football ($15 million), 15-20 percent to men's basketball, 5-10 percent to women's basketball and whatever is left to the non-revenue sports. Advertisement Certain universities, like Texas Tech, have been transparent with the percentage of funds going to each sport and how those are calculated. But because there are no stipulations for how the pool must be allocated, it will vary between schools. And could create some dicey internal dynamics. 'There is absolutely in-fighting (between coaches),' said an administrator. Head coaches at the same school are essentially vying with one another for a bigger chunk of revenue share. One power conference administrator said their school plans to direct as much as 25 percent to men's basketball, which means less for football. There have also been rumblings about how this could benefit the best-resourced basketball programs in the Big East or WCC that don't have to share with football. 'There are going to be some challenging and difficult conversations,' said another power conference AD. 'Coaches will be paying more attention to the revenue figures of their program than ever before. Everybody wants to make a case why their rev share should increase.' Agreements and innovative approaches Once a school allocates its revenue share dollars, it's up to teams to build out the roster accordingly. 'Rev cap management,' as one AD phrased it. Advertisement Many schools have already signed athletes to preliminary revenue share agreements — whether through collectives or the actual university — specifying that payments will transfer to the athletic department on July 1. In addition to the wave of frontloaded NIL deals in recent months, as collectives emptied the coffers ahead of the settlement, schools are inserting notable caveats into these agreements. Some have buyout clauses, where athletes would have to pay money back to a school if they leave before the end of the agreement, similar to coaching contracts. Some suggest that because compensation is based on NIL, it can be adjusted up or down based on performance and/or playing time. Others have strict injury clauses. 'With some negotiations, we were very direct that if you're not healthy, you're not getting the money,' said another power conference personnel director. Whether any of these stipulations hold up in a legal sense remains to be seen, but it's clear that after years of schools and coaches feeling they were on the short end of the NIL power dynamic, they are attempting to wrest back that control. Still, numerous people consulted for this story said the vast majority of initial revenue share agreements will be for one season until there's clarity on how legally binding these agreements truly are. Repeats of the Nico Iamaleava holdout saga might be less likely for the time being, but there could be standoffs over payment disputes. Unlike in the NFL, where there is a rookie salary scale and fairly transparent free agency, college football teams are still navigating best roster-building practices. How much money do you set aside for high school recruits? For transfers? Which positions do you value most in your particular system? How should you structure a player's payments? This could lead to more GM hires in the mold of Andrew Luck or pro-style executives who have administrative power over head coaches and can maintain philosophies across coaching changes. Advertisement Further complicating matters is the fact that the settlement and revenue share calendars operate on the academic fiscal calendar, which runs July to June. This means each football season is split across two separate rev share budgets. 'If you spend all $15 million on players for the 2025 season, then you aren't going to be able to pay anyone for the 2026 season until July 1, 2026,' explained the personnel director. This will require thoughtful budgeting, and could spark some innovative approaches — some more palatable than others. 'Tanking' has been an issue unique to professional sports, but revenue sharing could usher it into the college ranks. If a team has glaring roster holes at quarterback or other key positions, it could elect to save its revenue share money and go all-in on the transfer portal when the season ends, with a bigger war chest than most of its competitors. 'I do think you will see teams try to manipulate the cap in different ways,' said another power conference personnel director. Ongoing issues From a legal perspective, the lawsuits and court battles won't stop in the wake of the House settlement. A number of states already have NIL laws that contradict the settlement, and the Johnson v. NCAA case regarding athlete employment is still ongoing. Advertisement From a competitive perspective, the dollars going up means the competitive imbalance will too. This isn't a new problem in college sports, but a settlement negotiated with heavy input from the power conferences isn't going to change that, regardless of how well the clearinghouse works. 'It's going to separate, even more, the haves and the have-nots,' said an administrator. Big picture, athletic departments will be forced to adapt, financially and operationally, as college sports lean further away from amateurism and toward a more professional model. 'For the longest time, these athletic departments acted like nonprofits,' said another administrator. 'Now they have to act like businesses.' Advertisement In the meantime, power and non-power programs alike are hoping for some degree of stability in an industry that has had very little in recent years. 'At some point,' said a personnel director, 'maybe we'll get two years in a row where we know what's going on.' This article originally appeared in The Athletic. College Football, Men's College Basketball, Sports Business, Women's College Basketball 2025 The Athletic Media Company