‘Please don't put down our dog': Family's plea to council
Mother-of-five Jill Weller said two rangers informed her last Thursday morning that a woman walking her German shepherd past her house had complained to the council that Dozer had allegedly attacked her dog.
She said the council had kept her in the dark about the circumstances surrounding the incident.
'They didn't tell us anything else, no details about what happened, no supporting evidence, nothing,' Ms Weller said.
'They just said another ranger would follow up the investigation.'
The following day, Dozer was seized from the family's home while Ms Weller was out picking up her children from school. Dozer the labrador with some of the Weller children. Credit: Jill Weller
'The ranger never came to ask for our statement or our evidence. She just came onto our property and took Dozer away,' she said.
'She even tried to say Dozer was biting her tyres when she came to seize him. We've never seen him do that.'
The family spent the weekend missing Dozer and building a front fence to meet the council's containment requirements, expecting to collect him on Monday.
However, they were informed that Dozer had been classed as a dangerous dog and would be put to sleep on Wednesday.
'We were absolutely devastated… no evidence has been provided, no further information about the alleged attack,' Ms Weller said.
The papers served by the council also referenced previous incidents — an alleged attack in 2024 and a 2021 event where Dozer was impounded after a gate was left open at a previous address.
'No ranger had ever told us that. No person has ever told us. It just says 2024 — no date, no time, no nothing. We'd never heard of our dog attacking anyone or anything else,' Ms Weller said. Dozer the golden labrador is set to be euthanised on Wednesday after being declared a dangerous dog. Credit: Jill Weller
'It's completely out of character for him. He's always been friendly, great with babies and especially with children and other dogs.'
Dozer has been with the Weller family since he was 18 months old.
'He's around seven. He's basically part of the family. He sleeps inside most nights, plays with my kids in the yard, and people walking past the street will often pat him,' Ms Weller said.
'He's travelled with us caravanning, he's grown up with the kids … everyone knows him.'
The council informed the family that, in order to reclaim Dozer, they would need to meet strict containment requirements, including 1.8 metre high solid fencing, muzzles, dangerous dog collars, warning signs, and pay $250 for a dangerous dog inspection.
With work commitments and an upcoming move, Ms Weller said it was impossible to satisfy the requirements in time.
'I felt like we had no choice but to surrender him. I didn't want him to be stuck in a cage indefinitely,' Ms Weller said.
'We were beside ourselves all weekend, but still very hopeful we'd get him back. And then yesterday, that was just gut-wrenching.'
She also explained frustration over the lack of communication from the council regarding the investigation. Dozer the labrador with his family. Credit: Jill Weller
'The ranger assigned to the case never came to get my video footage, didn't preserve any evidence, didn't ask for a statement. She just served me with the declaration,' Ms Weller said.
'I want to see the body camera footage. Unless they can prove it to me, it still doesn't make him a dangerous dog.
'I was told that I'll get the fines in the mail, $400 for the dog attack. He said that they have reasonable evidence. They would never just willy nilly give a dangerous dog declaration unless they had evidence to take it to court.
'And he said that they have evidence and that the fines are up to $10,000. It felt threatening to me.' Dozer the golden labrador is set to be euthanised on Wednesday after being declared a dangerous dog. Credit: Jill Weller Dozer the golden labrador. Credit: Jill Weller
A hearing is scheduled for Friday. Dozer will be kept at the council facility until an outcome for the appeal is reached.
City of Greater Geraldton CEO Ross McKim confirmed 'the city has no intentions of euthanising the dog in question on Wednesday.'
As the matter is an active and ongoing investigation, he said no comment could be made about the details of the incident.
'We take community safety extremely seriously and when investigating dog attacks, the welfare of our community is paramount,' he said.
'For owners to reclaim a dog that has been declared dangerous, they must meet all requirements of the Dangerous Dog Declaration.'
Mr McKim said the city was continuing to work with the owners who had been given the declaration and all the provisions had been explained, including the right of appeal to both the city and the State Administrative Tribunal.
'Proper processes need to be followed, and dog owners have a responsibility to ensure their dogs are in a properly secured yard and not left to wander. This is to protect not only people, but other animals,' he said.
'We will continue to work with the dog's owners to ensure provisions are made and their property is suitable to contain the dog.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
12 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Convicted neo-Nazi now in women's prison after gender change under new German self-ID law
A notorious neo-Nazi jailed for hate speech is now serving time in a women's prison after changing gender under a new self-identification law. Sven Liebich, 50, legally changed name and gender to Marla-Svenja after sentenced to 18 months behind bars for inciting hatred, defamation and public insult in August 2024 in Germany. The Justice Ministry in Saxony told German news outlet BILD the inmate 'must be admitted' in line with their new gender identity. Liebich now has to report to the Women's prison in Chemnitz. The controversial transfer was enabled by Germany's new Self-Determination Act, which took effect in November 2024. The law allows individuals aged 14 and over to legally change their name and gender with a simple declaration at the registry office without any medical assessments, hormone therapy or surgery required. The Self-Determination Act aims to make the process easier for transgender and intersex individuals by removing previous requirements such as psychiatric evaluations and family court approval. The old system was criticised by many affected individuals as intrusive and degrading. But now, there is neither a plausibility check nor a counselling requirement. Critics are calling it a legal loophole, noting Liebich had previously mocked gender diversity and 'woke' policies. One viral quote shows Liebich attacking 'gender idiocy' — yet now benefits from the very legislation he opposed. Prosecutors confirmed Liebich had changed gender and relocated to Saxony, thereby placing legal responsibility for their imprisonment with the state. Liebich will now serve time in the same prison as convicted NSU terrorist Beate Zschäpe, a German far-right extremist and a member of the National Socialist Underground (NSU), a neo-Nazi terrorist organisation. The prison will decide where exactly Liebich is housed, including any safety or isolation measures. The justice department has not commented on whether Marla-Svenja will be placed in a shared cell. Under German law, prisons must recognise official gender status and cannot override identity by personal history. Initially, authorities had planned to place the inmate in a men's facility, but the legal gender update forced a reversal.
The Advertiser
17 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Paul Weller sues after being dropped by accountants
Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the British singer because they were offended by comments he made alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. Weller is also performing a sold out "Gig For Gaza" in London with other musicians in October. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included the reason for severing the relationship. "It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide," it said. "Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views." Lawyers for Weller say that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs, including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said he had 'always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide". "What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe," he said. "I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. "Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship - it's complicity. "I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people." Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter says. Weller's lawyer Cormac McDonough, says the case "reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights". "Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza," he said. Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the British singer because they were offended by comments he made alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. Weller is also performing a sold out "Gig For Gaza" in London with other musicians in October. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included the reason for severing the relationship. "It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide," it said. "Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views." Lawyers for Weller say that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs, including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said he had 'always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide". "What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe," he said. "I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. "Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship - it's complicity. "I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people." Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter says. Weller's lawyer Cormac McDonough, says the case "reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights". "Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza," he said. Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the British singer because they were offended by comments he made alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. Weller is also performing a sold out "Gig For Gaza" in London with other musicians in October. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included the reason for severing the relationship. "It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide," it said. "Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views." Lawyers for Weller say that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs, including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said he had 'always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide". "What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe," he said. "I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. "Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship - it's complicity. "I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people." Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter says. Weller's lawyer Cormac McDonough, says the case "reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights". "Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza," he said. Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the British singer because they were offended by comments he made alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. Weller is also performing a sold out "Gig For Gaza" in London with other musicians in October. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included the reason for severing the relationship. "It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide," it said. "Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views." Lawyers for Weller say that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs, including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said he had 'always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide". "What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe," he said. "I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. "Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship - it's complicity. "I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people." Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter says. Weller's lawyer Cormac McDonough, says the case "reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights". "Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza," he said.
7NEWS
17 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Geraldton family rallies to save golden lab Dozer from being put down, questions dangerous dog declaration
A Geraldton family are desperate to save their beloved golden labrador Dozer from death row after rangers seized him and declared him a dangerous dog. Mother-of-five Jill Weller said two rangers informed her last Thursday morning that a woman walking her German shepherd past her house had complained to the council that Dozer had allegedly attacked her dog. She said the council had kept her in the dark about the circumstances surrounding the incident. 'They didn't tell us anything else, no details about what happened, no supporting evidence, nothing,' Ms Weller said. 'They just said another ranger would follow up the investigation.' The following day, Dozer was seized from the family's home while Ms Weller was out picking up her children from school. 'The ranger never came to ask for our statement or our evidence. She just came onto our property and took Dozer away,' she said. 'She even tried to say Dozer was biting her tyres when she came to seize him. We've never seen him do that.' The family spent the weekend missing Dozer and building a front fence to meet the council's containment requirements, expecting to collect him on Monday. However, they were informed that Dozer had been classed as a dangerous dog and would be put to sleep on Wednesday. 'We were absolutely devastated… no evidence has been provided, no further information about the alleged attack,' Ms Weller said. The papers served by the council also referenced previous incidents — an alleged attack in 2024 and a 2021 event where Dozer was impounded after a gate was left open at a previous address. 'No ranger had ever told us that. No person has ever told us. It just says 2024 — no date, no time, no nothing. We'd never heard of our dog attacking anyone or anything else,' Ms Weller said. 'It's completely out of character for him. He's always been friendly, great with babies and especially with children and other dogs.' Dozer has been with the Weller family since he was 18 months old. 'He's around seven. He's basically part of the family. He sleeps inside most nights, plays with my kids in the yard, and people walking past the street will often pat him,' Ms Weller said. 'He's travelled with us caravanning, he's grown up with the kids … everyone knows him.' The council informed the family that, in order to reclaim Dozer, they would need to meet strict containment requirements, including 1.8 metre high solid fencing, muzzles, dangerous dog collars, warning signs, and pay $250 for a dangerous dog inspection. With work commitments and an upcoming move, Ms Weller said it was impossible to satisfy the requirements in time. 'I felt like we had no choice but to surrender him. I didn't want him to be stuck in a cage indefinitely,' Ms Weller said. 'We were beside ourselves all weekend, but still very hopeful we'd get him back. And then yesterday, that was just gut-wrenching.' She also explained frustration over the lack of communication from the council regarding the investigation. 'The ranger assigned to the case never came to get my video footage, didn't preserve any evidence, didn't ask for a statement. She just served me with the declaration,' Ms Weller said. 'I want to see the body camera footage. Unless they can prove it to me, it still doesn't make him a dangerous dog. 'I was told that I'll get the fines in the mail, $400 for the dog attack. He said that they have reasonable evidence. They would never just willy nilly give a dangerous dog declaration unless they had evidence to take it to court. 'And he said that they have evidence and that the fines are up to $10,000. It felt threatening to me.' ENCOURAGING DEVELOPMENT A hearing is scheduled for Friday. Dozer will be kept at the council facility until an outcome for the appeal is reached. City of Greater Geraldton CEO Ross McKim confirmed 'the city has no intentions of euthanising the dog in question on Wednesday.' As the matter is an active and ongoing investigation, he said no comment could be made about the details of the incident. 'We take community safety extremely seriously and when investigating dog attacks, the welfare of our community is paramount,' he said. 'For owners to reclaim a dog that has been declared dangerous, they must meet all requirements of the Dangerous Dog Declaration.' Mr McKim said the city was continuing to work with the owners who had been given the declaration and all the provisions had been explained, including the right of appeal to both the city and the State Administrative Tribunal. 'Proper processes need to be followed, and dog owners have a responsibility to ensure their dogs are in a properly secured yard and not left to wander. This is to protect not only people, but other animals,' he said. 'We will continue to work with the dog's owners to ensure provisions are made and their property is suitable to contain the dog.'
