A former Pilot on Air India crash report: Foreign media are misleading the public. Wait for the final report
The people of India have a right to know the truth about what happened to Air India Flight 171. The anxiety and confusion among the public following the release of the preliminary report a few days ago are, therefore, understandable. However, it is equally important to remember that the Air India crash report is exactly what it claims to be: Preliminary. Its primary purpose is to establish what happened. The why and how will be addressed in the final report, which is typically released about a year after the incident. While the public's demand for answers is entirely justified, patience remains essential.
There is a rush in certain quarters to blame the pilots. Why should it come as a surprise that blame is already being directed at them? Within just two days of the crash, self-proclaimed aviation 'experts' flooded YouTube — some even donning captain's uniforms — offering detailed theories about the crash without any proximity to the site or access to verifiable information. Unsurprisingly, many of these theories centred on pilot error.
Yes, pilots — like doctors, engineers, or any other professional — are human beings and capable of mistakes. In this case, however, foreign media have jumped the gun. Some agencies have highlighted a section of the report that refers to an exchange between the pilots about the 'cut-off'. But this is a normal inquiry by a pilot in a situation where, during take-off, power fails to build, and there is insufficient thrust. Moreover, all pilots are trained that, in the event of a total engine failure, the correct procedure involves switching the engine off and attempting a restart. According to the report, the pilots attempted exactly that and almost succeeded. There was a relight on one engine. However, by that time, the aircraft was at too low an altitude, which led to it crashing into buildings. It was already too late.
The real question is: Why did both engines fail? The Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) should provide those answers. It is entirely possible for engines to fail without pilot intervention. Modern aircraft rely on computers to calculate fuel flow and engine performance. It is not impossible for the system to malfunction — perhaps due to incorrect fuel ratio calculations — leading to engine failure. These systems are built with safeguards, but like any complex software, they are not infallible. Remember the case of ANA Flight NH985 from Tokyo Haneda to Osaka Itami, which suffered dual engine failure upon landing? Western investigative agencies often default to blaming the pilots, and similar stories are likely to emerge in the coming weeks.
There is no doubt that the preliminary Air India crash report could have offered more clarity; for instance, it would have been helpful if the details from the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) had been made public. I have worked extensively with CVRs and DFDRs, and I know that while data retrieval is one task, proper interpretation is quite another. It takes a team of trained specialists to extract meaning: What time thrust was applied, whether the engine spooled up, how much fuel was injected — every detail can be examined. Interpretation, however, takes time. This is why we must be patient and allow the final Air India crash report to tell the full story. In the meantime, we must continue to ask the right questions.
Having worked with both Boeing and Airbus, including with their production test pilots, I can say with confidence that these professionals are deeply committed to safety. That said, no system is perfect. There is always scope for improvement — and yes, for error. But that's no reason to mislead the public. This is precisely why pilot federations are coming out strongly in defence of the crew, not simply out of solidarity, but because the facts are being selectively interpreted to sensationalise and unfairly suggest pilot error. One such federation is reportedly considering legal action against The Wall Street Journal for its coverage of the crash.
When I transitioned from the Air Force to civil aviation, I was shocked to discover that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had no aviators on its rolls. There may well be brilliant bureaucrats at the helm, but is it too much to ask for a single technical aviation expert? Similarly, there should be certified Boeing 787 pilots on the investigating team. This is one of the key things the Indian aviation ecosystem must urgently address — ensuring that technical expertise is not sidelined.
The writer is the founder of the Federation of Indian Pilots and a former Air Force and Air India pilot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Plane still moving': Viral Air India video shows passengers 'ignoring' crew; sparks civic sense row
Snapshots from viral video A video from an Air India flight has gone viral, showing several passengers standing and moving around while the plane was still moving, ignoring instructions from the crew. The video was shared by a passenger who had just landed in Delhi from Bangkok. It shows people opening overhead bins and walking in the aisle, even though the cabin crew kept asking everyone to stay seated. The incident has raised concerns about passenger discipline and safety on board. "Just landed in Delhi from Bangkok on an Air India flight. The plane was still moving, the cabin crew was still strapped, and yet... passengers started standing, opening overhead bins, ignoring every single safety instruction," the passenger wrote while sharing the clip, which was captioned, "Why the world hates us (part 1)." In the footage, the cabin crew can be heard repeatedly requesting passengers to stay seated as the seatbelt sign was still on. However, the pleas were ignored. 'Cabin crew kept pleading. People kept ignoring. This isn't a lack of awareness. It's a lack of basic civic sense,' the user added in the post. The video has garnered nearly 4 million views so far, drawing widespread criticism online and sparking a fresh debate about the behaviour of Indian flyers. 'There should be a fine at every level. Only then will people follow rules,' commented one user. Another wrote, 'They will stand for 10 minutes in the aisle to save 15 seconds, and then wait 30 minutes at the baggage belt.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Doha-bound Air India Express flight develops technical snag, returns to Calicut airport
An Air India Express flight bound for Doha from Calicut International Airport on Wednesday returned a couple of hours after takeoff due to a technical fault. An Air India Express aircraft on a runway.(Reuters) An airport official told PTI that flight IX 375, which had 188 passengers, including the pilots and crew, took off from Calicut at around 9.07 AM but returned to the same airport two hours later at 11.12 AM. "There was some technical issue in the aircraft's cabin AC. It was not an emergency landing," the official said. The passengers safely deboarded the plane. According to airport authorities, either the technical issue would be rectified or another aircraft would be arranged for the travellers to resume their journey. An Air India Express spokesperson said that it was a "precautionary landing" due to a technical error, and an alternative flight would be arranged for the passengers by 1:30 p.m. "Till then all arrangements, like food and water, have been made for the passengers at the airport," he said. Air India plane's tail caught fire in Delhi The latest incident involving an Air India flight comes just a day after the tail of the carrier's flight caught fire shortly after landing at Delhi's Indira Gandhi Airport (IGI) from Hong Kong on Tuesday. Though the aircraft sustained some damage, passengers and crew members disembarked safely. The aircraft in question was a two-year-old Airbus aircraft previously operated by Vistara. According to the airline, Hong Kong to Delhi Flight AI 315 suffered an auxiliary power unit (APU) fire shortly after landing and parking at the gate on Tuesday, July 22. Air India hit the headlines for two different aircraft incidents on Monday. A Kolkata-bound Air India plane had to abort takeoff due to a technical snag at the Delhi airport. In another incident, Air India flight AI2744, operating from Kochi to Mumbai, veered off the runway while landing at the Mumbai airport in heavy rain.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Air India crash: British families ‘receive wrong remains' of victims
Family members of the deceased British nationals in the tragic Air India crash have reportedly been sent the wrong bodies of their loved ones, said a Times of India report quoting the Daily Mail. Two such instances have come up so far where grieving families learnt that some of their loved ones' remains were misidentified before being returned to the UK. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MBA Public Policy PGDM Data Science MCA Finance Product Management Technology others Cybersecurity healthcare Digital Marketing Operations Management Leadership CXO Project Management Data Analytics Degree Management Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence Data Science Others Skills you'll gain: Financial Management Team Leadership & Collaboration Financial Reporting & Analysis Advocacy Strategies for Leadership Duration: 18 Months UMass Global Master of Business Administration (MBA) Starts on May 13, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Analytical Skills Financial Literacy Leadership and Management Skills Strategic Thinking Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Online MBA Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details In one instance, a family was apparently forced to cancel funeral arrangements upon discovering that the coffin they received held the body of an unidentified passenger, not their relative, as per the Daily Mail. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Clever Trick to Cool Any Room Without Expensive AC AiraBreeze Learn More Undo In another incident, the 'commingled' remains of multiple crash victims were reportedly mistakenly placed in a single casket. The errors came to light after Dr Fiona Wilcox, an inner west London coroner, began verifying the identities of the repatriated British nationals after cross-checking their DNA with samples provided by families. 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back,' said Healy-Pratt, who is responsible for investigating and uncovering the complete circumstances surrounding the tragedy, reported the Daily Mail. Live Events 'But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation,' he added. "Family X have no-one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains," Pratt said, referring to the family who had to cancel funeral arrangements. The family who received the 'commingled' remains was eventually able to have them separated and proceed with a funeral service, reports the Daily Mail. Although the remains of nearly all the victims are believed to have been recovered within the three days of the incident, the extreme 1500°C heat during the crash left most bodies severely burnt and unrecognizable. Others were mutilated or fragmented by the violent impact of the crash. This meant that a lot of the families received the remains of their near ones in plastic containers, instead of coffins from the Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad, reports the Daily Mail. In the most severe cases, matches were made using dental records to aid in the identification process. After the crash, nearly 40 officials from across Gujarat, including teams from the Directorate of Forensic Science (DFS) and the National Forensic Sciences University (NFSU), worked to match DNA samples. More than 50 experts from departments including Forensic Medicine, Community Medicine, Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Pathology were involved in the testing. At BJ Medical College, rigorous blood sample collection was carried out. Out of the 261 lives lost in Air India Flight 171 that crashed just seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad en route to London's Gatwick airport, 52 were British citizens. (With TOI inputs)
