Allahabad HC rejects plea to refer Mathura's Shahi Idgah as ‘disputed structure'
The Allahabad High Court on Thursday (July 3, 2025) dismissed a plea seeking that the Mathura-based Shahi Idgah mosque be referred to as 'disputed structure' in all future proceedings.
A Bench of Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra dismissed the plea filed by advocate Mahendra Pratap Singh, who requested the court to direct the stenographer concerned to use the word 'disputed structure' in place of 'Shahi Idgah Mosque' in all further proceedings of this original suit, and other related cases.
Objecting to the plea, counsel representing the mosque submitted that by moving this application, the plaintiff was trying to introduce a new case through the backdoor and negate the admitted fact that 'Shahi Masjid Idgah' was a mosque.
While dismissing the plea, Justice Mishra said, 'In pleadings of the parties also, the structure in question is referred as Shahi Masjid Idgah and at this stage where hearing of the suits is yet to commence and even issues have not been framed, it is neither desirable nor expedient to issue any direction to stenographer, as prayed by the applicants, to refer Shahi Masjid Idgah in judgments and orders as 'disputed structure'.'
The Allahabad High Court was presently hearing a total of 18 suits, clubbed together in 2023, that seek the removal of Shahi Idgah, which they claimed was an encroachment in the premises of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura, known as the birthplace of Hindu god Krishna. The plea alleged that Mughal emperor Aurangzeb demolished the Krishna temple and constructed the mosque over it.
The High Court, in December 2023, allowed a plea seeking the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the mosque; this decision was stayed by the Supreme Court in January, 2024.
It was in 1968 when a the committee of Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan and management of Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah decided to allow both places of worship to operate simultaneously. The petitioners, later, challenged the validity of this agreement, terming it invalid by law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
"I May Be Marathi But...": Bal Thackeray's Old Video Viral Amid Language Row
Mumbai: An old video of the late Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray - in which he says "I may be Marathi in Maharashtra but I am Hindu in Bharat" - has resurfaced online amid the squabble between his successors, son Uddhav Thackeray and nephew Raj, and the ruling Mahayuti alliance, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party, over the primacy of the state language against the 'imposition' of Hindi. In the video Bal Thackeray, with a saffron shawl draped over his shoulders, identifies himself as a 'Marathi' and a 'Hindu', and adds, "We must embrace Hindutva over linguistic identities." The clip was posted on X Saturday night, hours after Uddhav and Raj, estranged for two decades, came together for a 'victory rally' in Mumbai. The cousins were 'celebrating' forcing the state to roll back orders making Hindi the default language for primary school students. Uddhav Thackeray - who faces an ongoing battle to be viewed as the successor to his father's political ideology, particularly against the Sena faction led by Eknath Shinde that broke away and joined the BJP - also said Raj and he would contest the Mumbai civic body election together. "I may be Marathi in Maharashtra but I am Hindu in Bharat. We must embrace Hindutva over linguistic identities" Balasaheb Thackeray — Kashmiri Hindu (@BattaKashmiri) July 5, 2025 Echoing his father's words, Uddhav Thackeray said his cousin and he would not let the BJP 'impose Hindi on the people', and called for unity between all of the Marathi population. Raj Thackeray was more forceful in his comments, declaring "Try to touch Maharashtra and see what happens." He also claimed the federal government's three-language push - part of the 2020 National Education Policy and which has triggered political and linguistic protests in Tamil Nadu too - was a "precursor to the plan of separating Mumbai from Maharashtra". The 'speak Marathi' row gained fresh impetus after the state's April order making Hindi mandatory for students from Class I to V. Pro-Marathi groups saw it as 'Hindi imposition' and protests broke out. Last month the order was modified - Hindi was made the 'default' third language unless at least 20 students (an impossible threshold, education experts said) opted out. Pro-Marathi groups continued to protest as the issue quickly became a political face-off between the ruling alliance and the opposition. All of this also led to violence in the name of Marathi; members of Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena attacked a Mumbai shopkeeper and a man in Pune, while a video from inside the office an Uddhav Thackeray party MP showed staff of a mobile phone store being slapped.2 The attacks were triggered by the victims not speaking Marathi and criticising Raj Thackeray, and generated outrage, particularly since the MNS goons responsible haven't been arrested yet. All seven, in fact, were only briefly 'questioned' by the police before being released on bail. The Maharashtra government, meanwhile, walks a tightrope between following through on the centre's push to make Hindi the default language nationwide, particularly in the south, and alienating pro-Marathi voters - who have considerable voting clout - during an election year. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has called for strict action against goons from Raj Thackeray's party, but also declared the Marathi language should be 'respected' in the state.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
RTI Reveals Kerala Govt Sponsoring Visit Of Spy Suspect Jyoti Malhotra
New Delhi: The Kerala government has come under heavy fire after it was revealed that Jyoti Malhotra, a social media influencer recently arrested on espionage charges, had visited the state as part of a government-sponsored tourism promotion campaign. Malhotra, a Haryana-based vlogger, is now accused of leaking sensitive information to Pakistan. Shockingly, her entire trip across Kerala was facilitated and funded by the state's Tourism Department under an official influencer outreach initiative. Documents obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act confirm that her travel, accommodation, food, and even filming arrangements were handled by a private agency contracted by the department. She was among 41 influencers selected to promote Kerala as a global tourist destination. During her multi-city visit, Malhotra toured Kochi, Kannur, Kozhikode, Alappuzha, Munnar, and Thiruvananthapuram. She arrived in Kerala via Kannur airport after travelling from Delhi to Bengaluru. Her vlogs included visuals of Theyyam performances and scenic locations, all of which were shared on her YouTube channel Travel with Jo and other social media platforms. She eventually returned to Delhi by train. At the time of her visit, no suspicions had been raised regarding her activities. However, her arrest in May 2025 under the Official Secrets Act has now cast a shadow over the episode. Central intelligence agencies are probing whether her video content may have served as a cover for intelligence-gathering. Investigators are also examining whether she accessed strategically sensitive locations or communicated with Pakistani handlers during her stay. Adding to the growing alarm, Haryana Police have confirmed that Malhotra had visited Pakistan shortly before the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir - raising serious questions about her potential ties to ISI operatives. Amid the controversy, Kerala's Tourism Minister P.A. Mohammed Riyas defended the decision to bring Malhotra to the state. He insisted that the program was launched with good intentions and followed the precedents set by previous governments. 'This was part of a larger influencer campaign aimed at promoting Kerala. Everything was done transparently and in good faith,' Riyas said. 'This is not a government that facilitates espionage. The media must understand how government systems work. No one could have foreseen this.' However, opposition parties were quick to respond. Both the Congress and the BJP criticised the state's failure to conduct adequate background checks on the influencers invited under official programs. They demanded accountability for what they termed a 'serious lapse in judgment' that could have had national security implications. The ongoing investigation has triggered a wider debate on the intersection of tourism promotion and national security. Many are now calling for more rigorous vetting procedures for individuals participating in government-sponsored initiatives, especially those involving sensitive travel routes or infrastructure. With Malhotra still in custody and the probe expanding, the Kerala government finds itself on the defensive, scrambling to contain the fallout from what is now being called one of the most embarrassing intelligence lapses linked to a state-sponsored tourism effort.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Row after Sukhbir declared ‘tankhaiya': Golden Temple head granthi extends support to jathedar Giani Gargaj
Amid the ongoing confrontation with 'panj pyaras' (five beloved ones of Guru) of Takht Patna Sahib, estranged head granthi of the Golden Temple Giani Raghbir Singh on Sunday extended support to Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj, the acting jathedar of Akal Takht. Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj paying obeisance at the sanctum sanctorum of the Golden Temple in presence of head granthi Giani Raghbir Singh in Amritsar on Sunday. (HT Photo) A day after denouncing the Takht Patna Sahib 'panj pyaras' move to declare Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Singh Badal 'tankhaiya' (guilty of religious misconduct) for failing to appear before them, Giani Gargaj paid obeisance at the sanctum sanctorum of the Golden Temple during presence of Giani Raghbir Singh. Giani Raghbir Singh, ever since being removed as Akal Takht jathedar unceremoniously a few months ago by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) executive committee, has avoided meeting his successor. However, on Sunday he wished Giani Gargaj with folded hands when the latter paid obeisance. He also presented Giani Gargaj with a 'siropa' (robe of honour), garland of flowers and prasad. In an official communique, a spokesperson of the Akal Takht secretariat termed this gesture as an act of backing and cooperating with the acting jathedar on the matter of Akal Takht's supremacy. The official statement claimed that during the meeting of Sikh clergy presided over by Giani Gargaj at Akal Takht, the highest temporal seat of the Sikhs, over the issue, Giani Raghbir Singh extended his support by sending his junior granthis—Giani Sultan Singh, Giani Rajdeep Singh and Giani Kewal Singh—for the meeting. Giani Raghbir Singh has been unhappy since he was removed by the SAD-controlled gurdwara body allegedly in wake of December 2 edict of the Sikh clergy led by him, that called for change of the party leadership, comprising Sukhbir Singh Badal, and constituted a panel to reorganise the party, besides stripping Sukhbir's father and former CM Parkash Singh Badal title of 'Panth Rattan-Fakhr-e-Qaum'. On Saturday, Sikh clergy from Akal Takht rejected the Patna Sahib's edict that declared Sukhbir tankhaiya for not responding to their summons. Earlier, the Bihar-based Sikh temporal seat had declared Giani Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib jathedar Tek Singh Dhanaula tankhaiya.
