logo
Pete Hegseth is skirting law by bringing back Confederate names of army bases

Pete Hegseth is skirting law by bringing back Confederate names of army bases

The Guardian20-07-2025
Since Donald Trump returned to office this year, his secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has ripped the new names off a series of US army bases and brought back their old traitorous Confederate names.
His actions have angered Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress, prompting a rare rebuke of the Trump administration by the Republican-controlled Congress last Tuesday. The GOP-led House of Representatives Armed Services Committee voted on 15 July to block Hegseth from renaming the bases after Confederates. Two Republicans voted with the Democrats on the committee to pass the measure, which was an amendment to the Pentagon's budget bill.
'What this administration is doing, particularly this secretary of defense, is sticking his finger in the eye of Congress,' said Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican representative who voted to stop Hegseth.
Hegseth's move elicited bipartisan anger because it flouted the law; Congress passed legislation in January 2021 to create a commission to choose new names for the bases named for Confederates and mandated that its recommendations be implemented by the Pentagon. That law was passed over a veto by Trump in the final days of his first term, and the name changes were later implemented by the Pentagon during the Biden administration.
The law is still on the books, and so in order to return to the old Confederate names, Hegseth has openly played games with their namesakes.
The secretary claims he has renamed the bases after American soldiers from throughout US history who were not Confederates. But they all conveniently have the same last names as the original Confederate namesakes of the bases. For example, Fort Bragg is now supposedly named for Roland Bragg, who was an army paratrooper in the second world war; Fort Benning is now supposedly named for Fred Benning, a soldier who served in the army in the first world war.
Before the House vote, Hegseth's efforts to skirt the law were also challenged in the Senate. In a hearing in June, Angus King, a senator from Maine, told Hegseth that he was returning the bases to the names of 'people who took up arms against their country on behalf of slavery'. Hegseth insisted that the Pentagon had found non-Confederates with the same names to stay within 'the limits of what Congress allowed us to do'. But during the same hearing, Hegseth briefly dropped the pretense that he wasn't returning to the original Confederate names. He argued that 'there is a legacy, a connection' for veterans with the old names.
King replied that Hegseth's actions were 'an insult to the people of the United States'.
Above all, Hegseth's actions show a troubling ignorance of the lives of the original Confederate namesakes; their easily-researched backgrounds reveal what terrible role models they make for modern American military personnel.
Braxton Bragg was one of the most incompetent Confederate generals of the civil war. His subordinates repeatedly and clandestinely tried to get him fired, with one writing to the Confederate secretary of war that 'nothing but the hand of God can save us or help us as long as we have our present commander'. Bragg finally lost his command after he was out-generaled by Union General Ulysses S Grant and his army was routed at the Battle of Chattanooga in 1863. One of the few biographies written about him is entitled Braxton Bragg, the Most Hated Man in the Confederacy.
And yet Bragg lives on today as the namesake of the largest and most important military base in the United States Army.
Fort Bragg, in Fayetteville, North Carolina was originally built in 1918, as part of a rushed effort by the army to construct new bases after the United States entered the first world war. The site offered the army cheap and abundant land, and it quickly built a base and surrounding military reservation totaling 251 sq miles.
Eager to win local white support, the army agreed to name the new base after a Confederate; Bragg was chosen because he was originally from North Carolina. By the time the base was built, the civil war had been over for more than 50 years, yet the south was still in the grips of the 'the Lost Cause' theory of the war, which romanticized the civil war and held that the south had fought for state's rights, not slavery, and that the Confederacy had fielded better officers and men and had only lost because of the overwhelming resources of the north. By 1918, when Bragg's name was attached to the base, the generation of Confederate officers who hated him were gone, along with the memory of his military blunders.
That pattern held for a series of major bases built throughout the south during the first and second world wars. Fort Benning was also built in 1918 near Columbus, Georgia. At the request of the Columbus Rotary Club, the army named it for Henry Lewis Benning, who was best known as a pro-slavery political firebrand from Columbus who helped draft Georgia's ordinance of secession.
Benning was one of the pre-eminent white supremacists of his day, and he openly admitted that his state seceded because of slavery, not states rights. In one speech, he said that his state seceded because of a 'deep conviction on the part of Georgia that a separation from the North was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery … If things are allowed to go on as they are … we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it supposed that the white race will stand for that?' Benning served in the Confederate army, but it was his political role as a proponent of a southern slavocracy that first brought him fame and prominence.
By the 21st century, there were still 10 army bases that were named for Confederates, and the Pentagon repeatedly resisted efforts to change their names, arguing that tradition outweighed the fact that the bases were named for traitors who had fought to preserve slavery. The Confederate base names were finally changed after the 2020 George Floyd protests; Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty, while Fort Benning became Fort Moore, named for Vietnam War hero Hal Moore and his wife, Julia Moore. (Mel Gibson played Hal Moore and Madeleine Stowe played Julia Moore in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers.)
But those new names didn't survive Trump's return to office.
Hegseth hasn't stopped with army bases. The Pentagon has announced it will strip the name off the US navy ship Harvey Milk, which was named for the gay rights pioneer who was assassinated in 1978, and rename it for Oscar V Peterson, a sailor who won the Congressional Medal of Honor during the second world war.
But one thing is certain: Braxton Bragg's civil war contemporaries would be shocked to discover that a man so widely derided as a loser and a martinet during his lifetime is still at the center of a national debate 160 years after the war ended. During the war, one Confederate newspaper editor described him as a man with 'an iron hand and a wooden head'.
Grant, the man who so badly beat Bragg during the war, took great pleasure in making fun of Bragg and his ridiculous behavior when he later wrote his memoirs. Grant recounted one infamous episode involving Bragg from the time before the civil war when both men served in the small, pre-war US army.
'On one occasion, when stationed at a post … (Bragg) was commanding one of the companies and at the same time acting as post quartermaster … As commander of the company he made a requisition upon the quartermaster – himself – for something he wanted. As quartermaster he declined to fill the requisition and endorsed on the back of it his reasons for so doing. As company commander he responded to this, urging that his requisition called for nothing but what he was entitled to, and that it was the duty of the quartermaster to fill it. As quartermaster he still persisted that he was right … Bragg referred the whole matter to the commanding officer of the post. The latter exclaimed: 'My God, Mr. Bragg, you have quarreled with every officer in the army, and now you are quarrelling with yourself!'
In his memoirs, Grant wrote that Bragg was 'naturally disputatious'.
So maybe Braxton Bragg would fit in perfectly with Donald Trump after all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Another ‘Florida man' scandal presents danger for Mike Johnson and the House GOP
Another ‘Florida man' scandal presents danger for Mike Johnson and the House GOP

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Another ‘Florida man' scandal presents danger for Mike Johnson and the House GOP

Mike Johnson's math problems may become much more difficult in the weeks to come. Already, the House GOP leader is stuck with an unruly caucus whose disparate factions have made the passage of most legislation an arduous process typically involving Donald Trump bullying one or more groups of lawmakers into line. The House of Representatives instead chose to cram many of the president's priorities into 'one big, beautiful bill' (a Trump nickname adopted by Congress) and passed it on a party-line basis in early July. The chamber came within a one-vote margin of the bill failing. Now, the growing scandal enveloping Rep. Cory Mills, a Republican from Florida's 7th congressional district, threatens to turn that margin against Johnson and GOP leadership and make the passage of future bills an even greater hurdle for the president's party. Mills, 45, is in his second term as a congressman. Having won re-election last year, the Seminole County representative was looking forward to a second term defined by his new chairmanship of a House subcommittee. Instead, he's being accused by the current reigning Miss United States of sextortion — she claims he threatened to release intimate images and videos of her after they broke up. Mills denied the allegations and argued in a statement on Wednesday that the woman's attorney, his former primary challenger, 'weaponized' the claim to damage his reputation. But the scandal is just one of several buzzing around the congressman. He's also accused of racking up tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid rent and is under a totally separate House Ethics Committee investigation looking into whether he improperly benefited from federal contracts. An incident at Mills's DC residence also led to a police investigation of Mills for assault earlier this year, though both he and the alleged victim denied an assault occurred. In short, Mills's baggage is becoming a problem. At the bare minimum, it's providing a target for Florida Democrats to go after as the 2026 midterms approach. But if he's forced out sooner, Johnson's problems become a lot bigger. The Cook Political Report rates Mills' district as +5 Republican, giving the GOP an edge but no guarantee of victory in an election over the next two years. Should Gov. Ron DeSantis be forced to call a special election, that could be a real issue for the GOP: Democrats have been consistently overperforming in special elections in 2025, even in districts with strong Republican bents. Three have already announced plans to run for the seat next year. The drip-drip of headlines is already making Mills's colleagues nervous, Politico reported on Wednesday. Mills's bad press marks the third time since the 2024 elections that a 'Florida Man' member of the House has caused headaches for Mike Johnson and the caucus as a whole, and earned the derisive label synonymous with chaotic, bad decision-making and trashy behavior. First, the surprise resignation of Matt Gaetz just weeks after his successful re-election threw the House into a pre-Trump tizzy. The spat over his Ethics Committee report, which looked into allegations that he pursued underage girls for sex, led to Gaetz's failed bid to become Trump's attorney general and a special election, while casting a massive shadow over the president's transition. Gaetz denied the allegations, but dodging efforts to investigate them cost him his political career. Then, another Florida congressman, Randy Fine, earned a condemnation from a fellow Republican, Marjorie Taylor Greene, after tweeting 'starve away' in response to reports of widespread famine and devastation in Gaza; Fine is one of Israel's most vocal supporters in the House, even among Republicans. Since joining the House, he's also made racist statements about Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Muslim and Somali-American congresswoman from Minnesota. Those won't cause him much trouble with Republican leadership, who rarely punish that sort of thing, but could earn him a censure or even expulsion if they continue under a Democratic speaker in 2027 or beyond. As Mike Johnson and Donald Trump look for ways to expand their single-digit majority with help from unprecedented gerrymandering attempts in Texas and other GOP states, one has to wonder whether the caucus would be served by examining why members from one reddening state keep giving them so much trouble.

Trump signs order requiring colleges to provide admissions data
Trump signs order requiring colleges to provide admissions data

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump signs order requiring colleges to provide admissions data

President Donald Trump has signed a directive compelling colleges and universities to provide detailed demographic data on their incoming classes to the Department of Education. The directive mandates a revamp of the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) to expand reporting requirements for the racial composition of student bodies. The White House states the measure aims to verify that admissions do not involve unlawful discrimination, aligning with a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that banned affirmative action in higher education. The administration will implement increased accuracy checks on submitted data and take remedial action for any incomplete or inaccurate submissions. This memorandum is part of a wider series of actions by the Trump administration to reverse programs intended to benefit racial minorities and to end Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives.

Donald Trump biographer casts doubt over President's latest golfing heroics
Donald Trump biographer casts doubt over President's latest golfing heroics

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump biographer casts doubt over President's latest golfing heroics

Former Sports Illustrated and ESPN writer Rick Reilly once again blasted President Donald Trump 's golf game - further accusing Trump of lying about his accolades. Reilly has written multiple books on the sport of golf, including one about Trump titled 'Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump'. The latest jab the acclaimed sports writer delivered comes in the context of Trump posting a video of a putt of his on Truth Social with the caption, '36 Club Championships!' Reilly took a screen grab of that video and captioned it: 'Number of "championships" he said he had last time: 24 Number he says he suddenly has now: 36 Number that his twisted ego just skipped: 11. Number of actual "championships" he's won: 0 #CommanderInCheat'. While Trump isn't the only President that Reilly has accused of nefarious scores (having previously accused Bill Clinton of similar behavior), Reilly's book on Trump became a New York Times Bestseller when it was released in 2019. The notes for the book's listing on Amazon reads, 'Based on Reilly's own experiences with Trump as well as interviews with over 100 golf pros, amateurs, developers, and caddies, "Commander in Cheat" is a startling and at times hilarious indictment of Trump and his golf game.' Reilly took the chance to suggest again that Trump lied about his prowess on the course The notes also detail how Trump 'cheats (sometimes with the help of his caddies and Secret Service agents), lies about his scores (the "Trump Bump"), tells whoppers about the rank of his courses and their worth (declaring that every one of them is worth $50million), and tramples the etiquette of the game (driving on greens doesn't help).' Some MAGA followers blasted Reilly for his critique, with one reading, 'Stick to sports. Wtf'. Reilly's post comes roughly a week-and-a-half after video of Trump appearing to benefit from a favorable lie went viral on social media. Video taken from inside a building showed the moment the US president rolled up in a golf cart left of the fairway at Turnberry - with a bunker in front of him and some light fescue to his left. As two caddies walked by, the camera captured one of them stopping, bending down slightly, and dropping a ball in front of the president. Trump got out of his golf cart with a club and approached the dropped ball in what appeared to be an attempt to hit it. The video stops before he takes a swing. The clip went viral on social media, with multiple commenters calling out the 79-year-old for 'cheating'. 'Who needs a foot wedge when you have a personal ball dropper???' wrote one commenter on X, formerly Twitter. Another account posted, 'Him and Kim Jong Un would be INSANE scramble partners'. One account which appears to belong to a PGA professional commented, 'Such a perfect metaphor for our Commander-in-Cheat.' ' like I need these fellas as Caddies with the way I hit it anymore,' another post joked. Reilly is not the only person who has publicly accused Trump of cheating Earlier this year, film star Samuel L. Jackson accused him of cheating when the pair played a round together. Asked who the better golfer was, the Pulp Fiction actor said: 'Oh, I am, for sure. I don't cheat.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store