
Why Gourmand Fragrances Are Trending This Summer Season
D.S. & Durga's Pistachio is one of the Gourmand trend's best-selling fragrances
The perfume industry is enjoying a surge in gourmand fragrances. This rapidly growing sector is characterized by sweet, edible-like scents that evoke the sensations of delicious food and desserts.
According to MarkWide Research these fragrances have gained significant popularity in recent years due to their unique and indulgent nature. New Beauty claims that the search for gourmand fragrances is predicted to increase by 33.9 % in 2025. Caramel perfume is expected to see the biggest jump within the category, with an over 42 % increase. Other gourmand scents predicted to trend include marshmallow perfume and especially vanilla, which in 2024 took the spotlight as a key ingredient—from creamy, smooth and fluffy vanilla to rich, smoky or even boozy vanilla.
Creme Vanille Le Monde Gourmand
MarieAnna Ferdinand, EVP of fragrance development at Le Monde Gourmand, tells me over email that they are seeing year-on-year growth in gourmand fragrance launches. She attributes this to the fact that consumers are tapping into this olfactive profile as they seek comfort in an uncertain political and economic environment. 'Consumers are looking for glimmers of joy that they can experience every day. Gourmand perfumes often tap into a feeling of nostalgia for happier times, like childhood, a favorite memory, but done in a grown-up way,' she says. A good example of this is their Chai Epice perfume, a grown-up gourmand inspired by a comforting chai latte.
Ellis Brooklyn, founder of Bee Shapiro, concurs and tells me over email that gourmand fragrances satisfy two of our deepest wants right now: comfort and joy. We tend to feel familiar with these scents because they contain notes that we easily recognize, and they are also joyful, as gourmand fragrances tend to be playful. 'They play on the high-low aspect of perfumery.'
This summer, gourmand scents evoke a holiday feel, with increasingly modern fragrances. Ellis Brooklyn's MIAMI NECTAR, for instance, is a tropical formula. 'I love the combination of pink pineapple, watery facets of coconut water with the moss and vanilla underpinning,' says Bee. It's an intense fragrance that is sweet, sophisticated and very contemporary.
Another tropical gourmand is Ormonde Jayne's Montabaco Rio, which combines notes of sun-ripened wild fruits, zesty pineapple, and sweet mango with moss, amber, vanilla, and suede, resulting in a vital fragrance perfect for summer. This is a particularly unisex fragrance, as the subtle sweet notes merge beautifully with the amber, making it a strong scent.
Ormonde Jayne Montalbanco Rio
Jun Lim, founder and creative director of BORNTOSTANDOUT, also tells me that those bright, beachy, borderline edible scents will be stealing the show this summer, as they're both refreshing and mouth-watering. 'Think creamy coconut and sunny citrus blended with gourmand touches, like a twist of salted vanilla, creamy milk, or a hit of tarte tatin. It's as if sunscreen got gourmet," he says.
Sugar Addict, a hero fragrance from BORNTOSTANDOUT, encapsulates this summer spirit in a complex scent that has both depth and freshness, simultaneously.
Kayali Cherry gourmand fragrance
Kayali is another example of summer gourmands. Their Lovefest Burning Cherry is enchanting, and combines succulent cherries, raspberries and sweet caramelized praline with contrasting smoky, earthy notes of palo santo, guaiac wood, and patchouli, making the fragrance unusually sensual. Kayali's Vanilla is another example of a captivating fragrance that opens with a sweet infusion of naturally sourced Madagascan vanilla orchid and creamy jasmine, combined with notes of brown sugar, amber woods, musk, and patchouli, making it a particularly versatile and memorable scent in the collection.
The gourmand fragrance category itself has been around since the early '90s, when perfumes such as Thierry Mugler's Angel were first launched, but the new, updated gourmands are different.
Speaking to Aitana López de Carrión, global fine fragrance development manager, over Zoom, we discuss how nuts, salted caramel, cocoa, honey, and milk are all ingredients that are rising in popularity, as are bakery-inspired notes, with fragrances that evoke desserts like banana split, crème brûlée, tiramisu or cinnamon rolls, many of which are going viral on platforms such as TikTok. The rise of 'neo-gourmands' scents, however, goes beyond traditional sweet notes and incorporates savory elements, bitter touches or umami flavors, inviting us to explore global culinary cultures. Aitana explains that this year we will continue to see scents inspired by liquors and cocktails.
Éclat d'Ombre by Maison Psyche
Maison Psyché—the luxury perfume house from the Rémy Cointreau group—fits into this new trend with its unique approach to fragrance: aging perfume essences inside Cognac barrels to create scents of unparalleled depth and complexity. Éclat d'Ombre, crafted by Master Perfumer Sophie Labbé and Rémy Martin Cellar Master Baptiste Loiseau, embodies this new technique and captures the essence of Cognac's historic cellars.
Bee Shapiro tells me that several years back, gourmand perfumes were directed to a younger demographic, but today that has completely changed. 'Today gourmands are for everyone—gourmands have also evolved quite a bit. Sure, there are the cake-like scents, but there are a wide variety of vanillas for every scent taste,' she says.
Jun Lim agrees and adds that gone are the days of candy-sweet celebrity perfumes. He tells me that today's gourmands have broken many old boundaries: they're unisex, multicultural, and global, and if you don't take yourself too seriously, you can enjoy a gourmand at any age. 'It's less about age or gender, more about your vibe,' he tells me.
In his words, the gourmand genre is growing up. 'Think of it as the gourmand palette expanding beyond just 'sugar' into a whole experimental kitchen,' he says, and cites many new flavours including buttered popcorn, salted caramel, BBQ sauce, or even touches of cheese or truffle, which are making their way into fragrances. 'Consumers' noses have gotten more sophisticated; they still love sweet, but they want it with a twist. So you'll get a floral marshmallow with a hit of pepper, or a chocolate scent infused with shiso leaf. Neo-gourmand is all about contrast and surprise.'
Sugar Addict BORNTOSTANDOUT
As we have seen with other fragrance trends, layering scents to further personalise them is very much in vogue. Bee explained to me that all fragrances can be layered, but with gourmands, if they are focused on a few very specific opening notes, the process is easier. Vanilla and caramel tend to be warm and cozy, and sweet fruits with vanilla tend to be more candy-like and summery. 'You can easily add on different fruits via different fragrances, for example,' Bee says.
When I asked Jun Lim about layering these scents he told me that in today's fragrance scene, it's actually encouraged and that perfume lovers are becoming their own mixologists. 'You can take a rich chocolatey scent and layer a smoky cedar or sheer musk over it to tone down the sweetness and add depth. And suddenly you've got a sexy s'mores vibe going on,' says Jun.
The key is to have fun, experiment with different notes, and spray with confidence. With the gourmand trend underway, whether you enjoy sweet or savory perfumes, the world now really is your oyster.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Olympian Ilona Maher reveals personal detail about fashion show appearance
Ilona Maher helped the United States Olympic women's rugby sevens team to a bronze medal finish during the 2024 Paris Games and raised her profile with hilarious and heartfelt social media posts. Maher became a fan favorite during the Olympics and her increased celebrity led her to shine as a Sports Ilustrated Swimsuit model. She was in Miami Beach over the weekend walking down the aisle in a reddish-orange bikini and a turquoise one-piece that flashed her arms. "Men think they are tough but they'll never do Miami Swim Week wearing only bikinis while on their period like I did," she revealed in an Instagram reel on Tuesday. She captioned the post, "I applaud myself." The Americans defeated Australia 14-12 to win the bronze medal in the event. New Zealand won gold and Canada finished with silver. Maher played in six matches, finishing with 15 points and three tries. She was not the only athlete to walk down the runway for the fashion show. Former LSU Tigers gymnast, Olivia Dunne, was also at the event as one of the cover models for the swimsuit edition of the magazine. She stunned the crowd when she performed a split at the end of her routine. "I got triple dog dared," Dunne wrote on X afterward. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Nectar Mattress Review: A Good Value That's Comfortable And Supportive
Nectar is one of the most popular online mattress brands known for its comfortable and pressure-relieving memory foam beds that come with attractive price tags. In this Nectar mattress review, we explore the ins and outs of the Classic Memory Foam model after our team tested it alongside 12 other top-rated mattresses, including others from the Nectar lineup. This allowed us to see how the mattress directly compares to similar models from the perspective of multiple body types, genders, sleeping positions and pain points. Our Nectar Classic review details our different testing experiences with the mattress and offers ... More insight into its most comfortable features. Our team took a careful look at different performance metrics like motion isolation, support, pressure relief, temperature regulation and more. In addition to our group testing, a tester's been sleeping on the Nectar Classic Mattress in-home to get a better look at how it performs over an extended period of time. Below, find a blend of our insights and recommendations from multiple testers of the Nectar Classic Memory Foam Mattress. Nectar Forbes Vetted Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence. Type: Memory foam | Nectar's firmness rating: Medium-firm (6.5 out of 10) | Trial period: 365 nights | Warranty: Lifetime | Height: 12 inches Best for: Skip if: The exact construction of the Nectar Classic Mattress depends on the model you choose, but the memory foam model is an assembly of alternating foam layers with different densities. A closer look at the layers of the Nectar Classic Memory Foam Mattress. The hybrid model, on the other hand, has a similar construction with steel coils as a base layer rather than high-density foam. You never quite know what you are going to get with a memory foam mattress, whether it's going to be dense and doughy or more airy and responsive. Most of our testers found the Nectar Classic Memory Foam model to be on the firmer, denser side of the spectrum with a medium-firm profile that the brand rates around a 6.5 out of 10. 'Upon first touch, this mattress feels much more firm than I was anticipating,' says one tester. 'I'm a big fan of firm mattresses and was pleasantly surprised when I noticed it had a lot of support. It definitely isn't as plush as some of the other mattresses in terms of how much it sinks.' Another adds, 'This Nectar Mattress simultaneously feels dense but cushiony—an ideal amount of sinkage that's not too much and not too little.' For this reason, our group testers and long-term tester, who slept on the Classic memory foam model for over 30 nights, primarily recommend the mattress for combination, back and stomach sleepers. We found it may be a little too firm for side sleeping, but the memory foam Nectar Luxe (previously known as the Premier Copper Mattress) scored a 9 out of 10 for this position. Our testers noted that the hybrid model has a similar feel, but it offers more support and bounce. To test the Nectar Classic's pressure relief performance, we spent time lying in each sleeping position (side, stomach and back). In the end, we found the memory foam model is most pressure relieving for back, stomach and combination sleepers. Tester and updates writer Alex Garrett says, 'Back sleeping on the Nectar Classic feels awesome. It's firmer than the Nectar Ultra, so my back feels much more supported yet still hugged. It also feels like it elongates my spine and relieves the pressure I previously felt from other mattresses.' Though, if you're a heavyweight back or stomach sleeper, we recommend the Nectar Hybrid for added spinal support and relief. We found the hybrid to be a more pressure-relieving choice overall as we scored it an 8 out of 10 in this category. Now that the Nectar Classic is woven with cooling fibers (the brand recently upgraded the model), it's shown improvement in temperature regulation, according to our long-term tester. 'In the first model I tested, both Charlie (the dog) and I woke up very hot on more than one occasion," she says. "We did not wake up hot this time around, so I feel like Nectar made improvements in this category. My human bed partner agreed with our cooling assessment.' While it may not be actively cold like a cooling mattress, it does help you sleep more temperature neutral, especially in comparison to traditional memory foam beds. The Nectar Classic has a cool-to-the-touch cover that stays neutral throughout the night. Memory foam is known to be good at deadening movement, a plus for couples who sleep with a partner or furry family members. Fortunately, the Nectar Classic doesn't disappoint. Our testers scored motion isolation an 8.5 out of 10 after placing a water glass at the edge of each model and making sporadic movements near it to analyze its sloshing. 'The motion isolation is superb,' says one tester. 'The glass of water did not spill at all and barely even moved. Overall, due to its firmness [and materials], the water was able to stay upright.' Our long-term tester adds, 'I was happily surprised to find that the motion isolation was even better [than the previous model]. I could barely feel the animals jumping on and off the bed and wasn't bothered by my human partner's movements.' This is an important characteristic for a mattress to ensure it offers proper spinal alignment and prevents sagging. The hybrid model of the Nectar Classic offers better spinal reinforcement because of its layer of pocketed steel coils in the base, so we especially recommend it to people with back pain or sleepers over 250 pounds for the long-term. That said, both models can support up to 650 pounds, according to the brand. As far as edge support goes, we discovered in testing that the Nectar Memory Foam Mattress performs better in this category than competing all-foam beds. We scored the memory foam model an 8 out of 10, which is better than the 7.5 scores that many all-foam models get. 'The Nectar Classic seems to have some of the best edge support of all the [memory foam] mattresses I tested so far today. While near the edge of the bed, I don't just feel supported—I feel sturdy and almost unmovable,' says Garrett. The hybrid model, on the other hand, was given a 9 out of 10 for edge support. Memory foam has a reputation for making you feel stuck. The material responds to heat and pressure to mold to the body, which can make it hard to change positions. 'I found the Classic to be a bit more responsive to position adjustments than the original [model],' says our long-term tester, and our group testers agree. They scored ease of movement an 8 out of 10 for the memory foam model and an 8.5 out of 10 for the hybrid version, noting that the one with coils is more bouncy and responsive. 'It's very easy to traverse this mattress,' says one tester. 'I think it's because this mattress doesn't sink in as much, it gives you enough support to be able to move from one side to the other.' The Nectar Classic Memory Foam Mattress offers excellent motion isolation, even with cats and dogs ... More jumping on it. Nectar is part of the Resident Home portfolio, a parent company to other popular mattresses like DreamCloud, Siena and Awara. All of Nectar's foams are CertiPUR-US certified, and it stands by its products by providing a 'Forever Warranty' against defects in construction or materials. The brand also no longer uses fiberglass in its mattresses, a fire retardant material many consumers want to avoid. Nectar recently redesigned its entire mattress lineup, which is why you can find insight into the earlier generation throughout our review. The new collection of beds have a fresh look and an updated construction with enhanced materials. Nectar offers free shipping for all of its mattresses (except for Alaska and Hawaii, which incur a shipping cost of $250 per large item ordered). Nectar also offers white glove delivery for $199, which includes the setup of two items and the option to have your existing mattress removed. Nectar offers a lengthy trial of 365 nights, which is more than the average 100 to 120 nights that most brands offer. That means you get a full year to try out the mattress in your own home; Nectar just asks that you try it for at least 30 nights before making a return. If you're unsatisfied with your sleep, you can initiate a free return through the brand. Nectar offers a 'Forever Warranty,' which means the company replaces your mattress for free within the first ten years of ownership if it has a manufacturing defect. After ten years, the brand will completely repair or replace the mattress if it has manufacturing defects, but you are responsible for a $50 shipping fee each way. The warranty covers your mattress for as long as you have it if you're the original owner. Removing the cover voids the warranty, so the company recommends spot cleaning. Nectar Forbes Vetted Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence. The Nectar Hybrid Mattress is highly rated by our testers for having good ease of movement, motion isolation and pressure relief. It's 12 inches tall, like the memory foam model, but it has a layer of coils for added edge support, airflow and durability. In our Nectar Hybrid Mattress review, our long-term tester says it strikes a nice balance between softness and support. Nectar Forbes Vetted Forbes Vetted ratings are based on thorough evaluations by our editorial team to help you choose the best products with confidence. The Nectar Luxe is a few notches up from the Nectar Classic in terms of design and features, as it offers more memory foam pressure relief, cooling fibers and a slightly softer profile. It's 14 inches tall and promises the same great motion isolation with even more memory foam comfort. For a wallet-friendly memory foam mattress, the Nectar Classic offers a stellar value, as it's one of the most affordable memory foam mattresses on the market. At the same time, it's made with high-end materials like a cooling cover and cushiony-yet-responsive memory foam that make it one of our editors' favorite memory foam mattresses. With a medium-firm profile, our testers found that it suits back, stomach and combination sleepers the best. It's also a good option for couples, since the bed offers top-notch motion isolation and better edge support than other all-foam beds our team has put to the test. However, we think that sleepers over 250 pounds or those looking for extra support should opt for a hybrid mattress. It's also a little too firm for side sleepers, who should consider the Nectar Luxe or Nectar Ultra instead. The Nectar Classic Mattress has undergone a few rounds of testing, one with 12 different team members including senior mattress and sleep editor Bridget Chapman, and another with a long-term tester who slept on it for over a month. Through these processes we were able to gain a better understanding of its performance metrics from multiple perspectives and a real-life scenario. We looked at a variation of features including: For more insight into our testing methodology, see our full guide on how we test and score mattresses. Nectar mattresses are a great value for budget-conscious sleepers looking for a memory foam feel. Our testers found the Nectar Classic in particular to be good for back, stomach and combination sleepers. Your Nectar Mattress should last seven years or more if you properly take care of it, which includes rotating the head of the bed to the foot every six months to ensure even wear and tear. Tempur-Pedic uses higher-end materials and offers more advanced features than Nectar, but its beds are much more costly. They are more than double the price of the base-level Nectar Classic, but they offer a similar dense memory foam feel.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
6 big questions for the 2025 NBA Finals and why Thunder will beat Pacers
So … are we really in a new era of NBA playoff outcomes? These next two weeks may tell us emphatically. For the last couple of postseason cycles, I've noted that postseason results have diverged from those of the regular season to a much greater degree. Chalky postseasons of yore have given way to teams seeded eighth, fifth and fourth making the last three NBA Finals. A team seeded sixth or lower has made it to the conference finals in each of the last three years (Minnesota Timberwolves, Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Heat); a team seeded fifth or lower has done it six times in five years. Advertisement Overall, this postseason is tracking to be another outlier in terms of lower seeds advancing. The team without home-court advantage has already won five series this year (Indiana Pacers twice, Timberwolves, Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks), and the Pacers upsetting the Oklahoma City Thunder in the NBA Finals would make it six. Historically, that number of upsets has been between three and four per year, but not lately. In the six post-pandemic postseasons, we've had five, five, three, seven, six and now five again with a potential for six — an average of over six a year, or nearly double the historic upset rate. Remember, there are only 15 playoff series a year; underdogs are winning more than 40 percent of them! What is this, the NHL? However, even with all those upsets, one piece of the equation has held: The champions were a regular-season monster, at least to some extent. Every champion but one since 1980 — including the last 29 in a row — has been a top-three seed that won at least 52 games (prorated to an 82-game season). Lately, though, we've had several close calls. Four straight finalists and five of the last six have violated that condition, but so far, none have prevailed in the finals: Miami in 2020 (a 49-prorated-wins fifth seed), Boston in 2022 (51 wins), Miami in 2023 (a 44-win eighth seed), Dallas in 2024 (a 50-win fifth seed) and now Indiana (a 50-win fourth seed). Thus, an Indiana win over Oklahoma City would be icing on the cake for the idea that regular-season records just don't matter as much as they used to in predicting playoff performance. The Thunder had one of the greatest regular seasons of all time, winning 68 games with a historic scoring margin. Indiana … did not. The Pacers were 9-14 at one point. Of course, we could be headed for the opposite narrative: a third straight season in which upsets in other series allow a favorite to steamroll through a broken bracket of crooked-number seeds. Following Denver in 2023 and Boston in 2024, the Thunder could make it a three-peat for No. 1 seeds coasting to a title against remarkably soft opposition — not facing a single team that was either seeded in the top three or won more than 50 games. Advertisement It's not just a disparity in wins and scoring margin in these finals, though. There's also the element of the JV conference playing the varsity. Oklahoma City went 29-1 against the Eastern Conference this year (the Thunder's loss to Milwaukee in the NBA Cup final didn't count in the standings), dropping a January game in Cleveland. The Pacers, meanwhile, were the only one of the East's playoff or Play-In teams to fare better against the West (21-10) than their own conference. So, as we head into our small-market fever-dream NBA Finals of pesky 10-deep squads that swarm and scrap and run and press and are generally the league's two most annoying teams to play against, that's my biggest question: Will an Indiana upset be the final, definitive proof that the regular season's predictive value for the postseason has diminished? Or will a Thunder romp to the title prove that the rule of 52 wins and a top-three seed still holds? That's the overarching storyline, but I've got five others that are a bit more micro as we look at this series. The biggest hurdle for this series being remotely competitive is whether Indiana can avoid turning the ball over against the Thunder's voracious, swarming defense that appears to have six players and about 14 arms. The good news is that the Pacers were largely successful in this one regard in the regular season. In their two meetings against the Thunder, they turned it over on only 10.9 percent of possessions, which would be a near league-leading figure and is far below the league-best 14.9 percent the Thunder forced from their frazzled opponents in the regular season. That shouldn't be a huge surprise; Indiana had the league's third-lowest turnover rate in the regular season, and its two All-Stars, Tyrese Haliburton and Pascal Siakam, both had individual turnover rates below 10 percent in the regular season. Haliburton averaged more than five assists for every turnover in both the regular season and the playoffs. Advertisement The importance of avoiding those miscues is two-fold: First, it gives the Pacers more chances to score but also takes away the Thunder's ability to run on the Pacers. Oklahoma City's speed and skill in transition are deadly, but the Thunder are a much more manageable foe playing station-to-station in the half court. Second, if the Pacers can keep the ball from prying hands long enough, they can unlock more of the open corner 3s that are the Achilles heel of the Thunder's defensive scheme. The bad news for the Pacers: Even with the turnover management, they still lost both games. The Thunder blew them out 132-111 in Oklahoma City on March 29. They also rallied for a 120-114 win in Indiana in a game that was played on Dec. 26 because the NBA needed to show us four lottery teams on Christmas Day. (I jest, but not having the Thunder on Christmas in particular was an own goal by the league that was readily apparent at the time.) If the Pacers can avoid turnovers and still can't beat the Thunder, what hope do they have? We'll get into that in a bit, but let's pivot to their opponent first. The Thunder start two bigs in Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein, but coach Mark Daigneault abandoned that lineup early and often in the postseason, particularly in the conference finals. It's notable in this case because the Pacers like to play fast, and because the Thunder don't seem to have a readily available foil for Siakam at power forward in particular. We don't know the answers here because Holmgren didn't play in either regular-season game, but in the second one, Daigneault leaned heavily on small ball. Hartenstein played 14 minutes, and Kenrich Williams played 26; forget two bigs, OKC wasn't even playing with one. This is a sometimes-wrinkle that Daigneault loves and could use heavily against a Pacers team lacking post threats. While he's been highly flexible with his sub patterns, one consistent pattern has to been to end first and third quarters with Kenrich Williams as the only 'big' in a small lineup captained by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander while Jalen Williams and Holmgren rest, then start second and fourth quarters with Gilgeous-Alexander resting, Jalen Williams and Holmgren in the game and Aaron Wiggins replacing Kenrich Williams for more offensive support. There's an opposite point here for Indiana, which might not have much incentive to continue using a 10-man rotation whose last two players (Ben Sheppard and Thomas Bryant) have mostly been ineffective in the playoffs (yes, I saw Game 6 against New York). Playing Bryant, in particular, might be a non-sequitur if the Thunder are playing small anyway, which would theoretically make Obi Toppin as a backup center much more appealing. Advertisement I kind of buried the lede here. In the two regular-season meetings, Indiana had nothing for the league MVP. Gilgeous-Alexander had two brilliant games against the Pacers, finishing with 45 points and eight assists on 15-of-22 shooting in a tight win in Indiana in December. He then posted 33 points and eight dimes in just 31 minutes in a blowout win in March. He had one turnover combined in the two games. Aaron Nesmith missed the first game and played only 23 minutes in the second, but he's likely to get first crack at Gilgeous-Alexander because of his superior screen navigation, and Andrew Nembhard is so good off the ball that it sometimes feels like a waste to put him on the ball. However, the Pacers likely will have a similar plan to the one they threw at Jalen Brunson in the conference finals, attempting to wear him down by rotating multiple defenders who pick him up 94 feet throughout the game. Sheppard, Bennedict Mathurin and perhaps even T.J. McConnell will all get turns. The Pacers even tried Toppin on Gilgeous-Alexander in the regular season. Indy likely will sprinkle in dollops of zone, too, after Denver used it successfully against the Thunder in the second round. (Minnesota's inability to muster an effective zone defense despite its individual defensive talent was one reason the Western Conference finals weren't closer.) One other micro-thing to watch is something I call the 'Shai shoulder.' The Thunder guard is very good at getting just enough contact with a defender to knock him off balance without hitting hard enough for it to be an offensive foul, opening space for his stepback middies. Watch here, for instance, as Sheppard gets both shoulders before the MVP rises from his office at the free-throw line: Indiana seemed primed for this in the Cleveland series against the Cavs' Ty Jerome, who had a similar ploy to get into his floaters. Nembhard, in particular, is a master of sidestepping opponents' attempts to put a shoulder into him. It didn't help at all in the first two meetings, but with more time to prepare for one specific opponent, it's possible the Pacers could use this trick in their favor. Advertisement The battle of the point guards is the main attraction, but the All-Star forwards in this series could have just as much to say about the outcome. Siakam was the MVP of the Eastern Conference finals, an indefatigable force who tormented the Knicks with his 94-foot sprints to the cup. Jalen Williams, meanwhile, has been a worthy second star in the Thunder's run through this postseason after falling short in the same role a year earlier in Oklahoma City's upset loss to Dallas. On paper, the matchups would seem to favor Siakam, but he wasn't good in either game in the regular season. The Thunder have no natural matchup for him in terms of size — the one thing they lack in their Noah's Ark of a roster is a true power forward — and may end up leaning on a combination of Holmgren, Williams and Alex Caruso to check him. If the Thunder stay big (see above), Siakam could exploit the Holmgren matchup at the start of halves, similar to the way Minnesota's Jaden McDaniels did during the Wolves' best moments in the conference finals. On the flip side, Siakam is much less prone to backing down and turning his back to the defense than some other fours, which could make siccing Caruso on him slightly more problematic than doing the same against, say, Julius Randle. On the flip side, Williams is a problem that doesn't lend itself to great answers from Indiana's end, particularly if Nesmith is on Gilgeous-Alexander. Nembhard gives up size, and using him on Williams diminishes his strength as a help defender, while Haliburton is too vulnerable as a one-on-one defender. Putting Siakam on Williams and Nembhard or Haliburton on Holmgren is another possibility; in theory, the Thunder could post up Holmgren on one of those two guards, but in practice, he couldn't even post up Mike Conley last round. Williams also gets a lot of run with the second unit to begin the second and fourth quarters, and the Pacers need to think carefully about how the bench rotation looks against him. Mathurin has the physical tools to check him, but he can be erratic in practice; Sheppard is dogged but undersized. This is where the injury to Jarace Walker in Game 6 against the Knicks stings; he'd be perfect for the bench minutes against Williams but will be out for at least the first two games after a gruesome ankle sprain. The Pacers and Thunder both play fast and use more players than most teams. In Indiana's case, it's part of a programmatic strategy to wear down opponents throughout a game and a series. Advertisement The Pacers run after opponent made baskets, pressure the ball full-court following their own and get into their offense as quickly as any team in the league. The flip side of that is that they use a 10-man rotation, even if the back end of that rotation isn't particularly good. They're gambling that the bad minutes from their ninth and 10th men will be more than offset by the diminishment of the opponents' best players over 48 exhausting minutes. Indiana didn't lead the league in pace, but both the Pacers and Thunder were in the top seven. In the Thunder's case, it's more of a pure track meet effect from the speed of their transitions after turnovers and missed shots. Oklahoma City also spams subs throughout the evening, with Daigneault often using 10 or even 11 players in a single half, even in the playoffs. What's remarkable and less discussed, however, is each team's strength going back the other way. Oklahoma City and Indiana were first and second in opponent fast-break points this season and had been even stingier in the playoffs: The Thunder have allowed just 9.3 per game and the Pacers 9.4 in a league where the median team gave up 15.3 in the regular season. One way for the Pacers to pull off the upset is to extend the series enough that they wear out the Thunder. But it's much harder to play this game against the youth and depth of the Thunder than it is against, say, New York, and the schedule of the finals is much more spread out, with two days off between every game except Games 3 and 4. Contrast that with the every-other-day schedule of the second round and conference finals that helped them exhaust the Knicks the past two seasons. It's also possible the Thunder turn the tables a bit. It's easy to see a scenario where Pacers' back-end-rotation players like Sheppard and Bryant prove unplayable in this series and Indiana's top eight ends up overextended, or one where the Thunder dial up the heat on Haliburton so much that it empties his tank. I want this to be a great series as much as anyone. The Pacers are a remarkable story of a finals team built with no tanking and a series of shrewd moves in a flyover market, and they have adopted as unique a style of play as any team in the league. The Thunder may be building an all-time juggernaut, and it may or may not be even better when they remove all their tall people and just let five perimeter players run around like crazy. For however long this series goes, it should be fun. I'm just not sure that it's going to go that long. There are hints of places where the Pacers could find an advantage, be it via avoiding turnovers, finding corner 3s or utilizing Siakam's matchup. Rick Carlisle is a certified warlock who will max out whatever edges he can find and throw out wild Plans E and F if the first few ideas don't work. Advertisement Unfortunately, Indiana didn't seem to have great answers for Oklahoma City's attack in the regular season, and that was with Holmgren missing both games. This Thunder squad might be embarking on the first chapter of the NBA's next dynasty. They had arguably the third-most dominant regular season in NBA history (only the 1996 Bulls and 2016 Warriors have an ironclad case that theirs was better) and have followed it up with a playoff run that has included wins by 51, 43, 32, 26 and 30. I think we're looking at a first championship for the Thunder franchise (say 'Seattle,' and you lose a finger) and a third straight five-game finals. Emotion alone likely gets the Pacers a win in one of their two home games, but this series shapes up as a coronation. If so, we can hold off on declaring a new era of playoff outcomes … and instead introduce the Thunder Era. Oklahoma City in 5 (Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Joe Murphy, Nathaniel S. Butler / NBAE; Gregory Shamus / Getty Images; Alonzo Adams / Imagn Images)