
Gadhafi's ‘Missing Billions' Stashed in US and Southern Africa, Officials Say
JOHANNESBURG—Billions of dollars stolen by former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi are hidden in clandestine bank accounts and secret vaults in the United States and two southern African countries, say intelligence operatives and financial investigators.
The latest news was first
According to the report, Libya's Asset and Management Recovery Office says at least $50 billion in oil revenues pillaged by Gadhafi between 1994 until his murder in 2011 were invested in 'debt instruments'—including treasury bonds—using front companies, nominees, and banks that
Separately, intelligence agents and a former top government official in Pretoria told The Epoch Times about $20 billion stolen by Gadhafi is spread across banks in South Africa.
They added that $30 million in cash flown by Gadhafi to South Africa in the months before his execution by rebels is now hidden in Eswatini—the small kingdom neighboring South Africa and the continent's last absolute monarchy that was formerly called Swaziland.
The man leading the hunt for Libya's missing public funds, Asset and Management Recovery Office Director-General Mohammed al-Mensli, confirmed that hundreds of billions of dollars were stolen during Gadhafi's brutal military rule.
Related Stories
5/24/2025
5/24/2025
Gadhafi came to power in a coup in 1969 and began ruling Libya through fear, and plundering his country's vast natural resources.
As chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council and Brotherly Leader of the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Gadhafi imprisoned, tortured, and murdered political opponents, and forged close links to global terrorist organizations.
Files lodged at the International Criminal Court detail the starvation of entire populations and the bombardment of towns and villages that were home to perceived political opponents.
Libyans look at war remnants, including the golden fist that was taken from Moammar Gadhafi's compound in Tripoli and transported to Misrata, displayed at a museum set up on Tripoli boulevard in Misrata on Feb.12, 2012.
Mahmud Turkia/AFP via Getty Images
In 2003, Gadhafi's regime accepted responsibility for the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, which killed 259 people, including 190 Americans.
He paid nearly $3 billion in compensation to the families of the victims.
Yet Gadhafi continued to be revered among left-wing nationalists in Africa as an anti-Western, anti-colonialist, and anti-Israel revolutionary.
The United States and its allies
Tripoli tried to evade the sanctions by illicitly channelling oil profits to secret locations across the world, al-Mensli told The Epoch Times.
He said information he uncovered during his investigation will be used by the Libyan government in Tripoli under Prime Minister Abdel Hamid Dubaiba 'to lodge legal claims in the U.S. to retrieve stolen public funds in interest-bearing accounts.'
Al-Mensli said recovery of the funds would be 'vital to rebuilding' the country, which devolved into another civil war in 2014 until an October 2020 U.N.-led cease-fire agreement.
A member of security forces stands behind a weapon, in Tripoli, Libya Feb. 1, 2021.
REUTERS/Ayman Al-Sahili
News Causing Stir in South Africa
News of al-Mensli's investigation has triggered interest in South Africa, where Gadhafi secretly financed the African National Congress (ANC), the party that came to power under Nelson Mandela in 1994 following decades of apartheid white minority rule.
One of Gadhafi's greatest admirers was former ANC leader and South African President Jacob Zuma, who is currently facing
In 2022, a commission of inquiry
Zuma, a Chinese Communist Party and Soviet trained former chief of intelligence for the ANC's armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation), denies all charges and allegations.
In the months leading up to Gadhafi's ouster and murder, Zuma and the Libyan ruler met several times.
Initially, said Zuma's former top advisor and ANC treasurer Mathews Phosa, the brief for the then-president of Africa's largest economy was to convince Gadhafi to surrender power voluntarily to 'facilitate a peaceful democratic transition' in Libya.
But shortly after a meeting with Gadhafi in April 2011, six months before his death at the hands of rebel forces, Zuma 'inexplicably' changed tack, Phosa said.
'He suddenly began insisting that Colonel Gadhafi must remain in power,' Phosa told The Epoch Times.
Similar details are contained in Phosa's autobiography, 'Witness to Power,'
'Beginning in 2009, when Gadhafi began to get paranoid about being deposed, I accompanied President Zuma to a number of meetings in a luxury tent near Tripoli,' Phosa said. 'The Colonel promised to donate a lot of money to the ANC, and for Libya to sign military contracts with Mr. Zuma's associates.'
The meetings were held under the guise of Gadhafi's chairmanship of the African Union, which lasted from 2009 to 2010, said the ANC stalwart.
After civil war broke out in Libya in February 2011, Phosa and Zuma also met with rebel leaders to try to broker peace.
'Those leaders told me they would no longer cooperate in any way with Zuma because he had betrayed them by aligning with Gadhafi,' Phosa said.
Two serving and one former South African intelligence agents, speaking anonymously, told The Epoch Times that Zuma also met with Gadhafi a few months before the dictator was executed by rebels in the town of Sirte on Oct. 20, 2011.
'President Zuma offered to fly Colonel Gadhafi to safety in South Africa because the rebel troops were approaching fast,' said one of the operatives. 'Colonel Gadhafi refused and said, 'No; I will die in my own country. If I am captured or killed, please give this money to my loved ones.''
In the months that followed, 'many flights' carrying 'crates of dollars, gold, and diamonds' flew to several locations in South Africa, including a military base near Pretoria, another agent said.
'From there, the loot was transported to Mr. Zuma's compound and hidden in a place that was under the ground,' the agent added. 'Later, when things began to get hot for Mr. Zuma, I hear the cash, etcetera, was moved to Swaziland under the care of the King [Mswati].'
Spokespeople for both Zuma and Mswati denied knowledge of the Libyan cash and valuables.
South African investigative journalist, Jovial Rantao, has previously presented information similar to that provided by the intelligence operatives.
In the Sunday Independent in 2014, Rantao
According to the documents, about $30 million dollars in cash, hundreds of tons of gold, and about 6 million carats of diamonds were transported from Tripoli to South Africa in more than 60 flights.
'What could be the world's largest cash pile is stored in palettes at seven heavily guarded warehouses and bunkers in secret locations between Johannesburg and Pretoria,' Rantao wrote, adding that Gadhafi's treasure was guarded by former apartheid-era Special Forces members.
He said another 260 billion rands (now worth almost $14.4 billion) was deposited in four commercial banks in South Africa.
In April 2019, South Africa's Sunday Times reported that Mswati had confirmed to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa that Zuma had transported $30 million dollars to his country.
The president's spokesperson would not comment on Ramaphosa's meetings with Mswati.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump and Musk cool it — for now
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben LATEST: The Supreme Court this afternoon gave the Department of Government Efficiency unfettered access to the Social Security records of millions of Americans, our JOSH GERSTEIN reports. The justices granted the Trump administration's emergency request to lift a lower court ruling that blocked a DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration from viewing or accessing the personal information in the agency's systems. In a separate order from the high court today, the justices gave DOGE another win, limiting access to its records from outside groups, Josh reports. TGIF: This week started with a question: Will DONALD TRUMP have a call with Chinese President XI JINPING to deescalate a trade war that could prove mutually ruinous to the world's largest economies? And now, it's ending with a new one: Will the president have a call with ELON MUSK to deescalate a war of words that could prove mutually destructive? While the White House is billing today's relative quiet as a détente, Trump allies, ill at ease about the possibility of another blowup at any minute, are calling it something else. 'Reminds me of the Cold War: mutual assured destruction,' said one Trump ally. Even as both men appeared to walk away from the edge, some White House officials and allies are privately acknowledging an uncomfortable truth: Trump is the most politically powerful man in the world, Musk is the wealthiest man in the world, and their fates have become inextricably linked. Musk needs U.S. contracts to support his businesses, and the U.S. needs the services Musk's companies provide. Trump, who overwhelmingly won the popular vote last year and a sizable social media following, has a singular platform he has shown willing to use at any moment to devastate Musk's businesses and send stocks crashing. And Musk, not only as owner of the social media platform X but the top GOP political donor last year, wields immense power to scramble the president's legislative agenda — with vast implications for the country's economic future, Trump's legacy and Republicans' majorities in Congress. Those factors are, at least in part, why Trump allies say the fight hasn't escalated. 'Of course,' the Trump ally added, 'the MAD deterrence worked — there was no nuclear war.' By today, mutual friends had pulled both back from the brink after a spat over the Trump-backed megabill and who should get credit for Trump winning the 2024 presidential election quickly escalated into a firestorm of personal insults and accusations. Musk on Thursday called for Trump's impeachment and suggested he has more links to a well known sex offender than previously known, while Trump threatened to cancel the billions of dollars in government contracts that form the foundation of Musk's businesses. Emblematic of Trumpworld's intervention, hedge fund manager BILL ACKMAN in a post on X urged the men to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' adding that 'we are much stronger together than apart,' a point that Musk in a separate post conceded was 'not wrong.' Trump, meanwhile, in multiple telephone interviews with reporters over the last 24 hours, including POLITICO, claimed he 'wasn't even thinking about Elon' and that the two wouldn't speak 'for awhile.' Amid rampant speculation about whether a call between the two men would happen, one White House official told POLITICO it was 'very possible' the two wouldn't speak today, adding that it was the 'most predictable schism ever.' Musk on Thursday night was hinting at his desire to call a truce after a dive in Tesla's stock price and Trump's threats to cancel his SpaceX contracts made clear the financial stakes. As for Trump, advisers and Hill leaders are likely to push him to refocus on passing his megabill — an effort that's likely to be far more difficult if he continues to goad Musk and the billions of dollars at his disposal. Read the full story here. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER In 1979, what tennis scandal embroiled JIMMY CARTER? (Answer at bottom.) Musk Radar SOMEBODY THAT I USED TO KNOW: JAMES FISHBACK, the chief architect behind the proposal to send 'DOGE checks' to Americans, told Sophia today that he's stepping back from the movement after Musk trashed the president. 'The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the president, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay,' Fishback said. 'What's not okay is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump.' Fishback, the founder of an investment firm, made headway in conservative circles after proposing sending $5,000 payments to taxpayers funded by a share of DOGE's projected savings. Though Fishback never formally joined DOGE, the idea gained support from Musk and the president. CAN WE TAKE A STEP BACK? Republicans in Congress really want this détente between Trump and Musk, our GISELLE RUHIYYIH EWING, RACHAEL BADE, NICHOLAS WU and MEREDITH LEE HILL report. 'I just hope it resolves quickly, for the sake of the country,' said Speaker MIKE JOHNSON on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' this morning. 'Oh, it's OK,' Trump told POLITICO in a brief telephone call on Thursday when asked about the breakup. 'It's going very well, never done better.' A senior administration official and person close to the White House said Trump had been convinced that continuing to brawl with Musk would be counterproductive and a distraction from a host of good news the White House should be focused on, including his talks with the Chinese leader. Still, the president has continued his subtle jabs at Musk. He told ABC News this morning that the billionaire had 'lost his mind' and that he is 'not particularly' interested in engaging with him. Trump also told CNN that 'the poor guy's got a problem.' DOGE caucus chair Rep. AARON BEAN (R-Fla.) said he was 'shocked and dismayed' to see his 'two friends fighting,' but remains optimistic that the two men can mend relations. 'I believe there's a Diet Coke in their future, that they can settle it and cooler heads will prevail,' Bean said. 'We need them together. We need to be united, and we're stronger together.' In the Courts HELP US OUT: The Trump administration today asked the Supreme Court to green light its mass firings at the Department of Education, Gerstein reports. In an emergency appeal filed this morning, Solicitor General JOHN SAUER asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction issued last month. While Trump has pledged to eliminate the department in its entirety, Sauer insisted that the reductions in force only target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to tear down the agency. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge MYONG JOUN's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their role. Agenda Setting CALIFORNICATION: The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California as soon as today, CNN's ANNIE GRAYER and GABE COHEN report. Agencies are being told to start looking for grants the administration can withhold from the state. On the Hill, at least one committee was told recently by a whistleblower that all research grants to California are going to be terminated. DANCING ON MY OWN: The fallout between Trump and Musk has left Tesla on a political life float, our DAVID FERRIS reports. Trump on Thursday threatened to pull all subsidies for his companies and just like that, Tesla's stock suffered its largest one-day drop in history. The share price fell more than 14 percent, lopping off more than $150 billion from its market value. According to Bloomberg, it tanked Musk's personal net worth by $34 billion. ONE WINNER: THE MOON … The U.S. moon mission suddenly has a brighter future following Musk and Trump's fallout, our SAM SKOVE reports. Musk has argued against returning astronauts to the moon. But the forced exit of Musk's handpicked nominee to lead NASA, JARED ISAACMAN, and Musk's rupture with the president, has landed moon backers in Congress and industry an opening. 'Elon was the main reason for the fork in the road for NASA's human exploration plans,' said CLAYTON SWOPE, a former congressional adviser on space. 'With his exodus from D.C., there's a good chance NASA will refocus back to the moon with the plan: moon then Mars.' A number of major space companies, excluding SpaceX, are now launching a television ad campaign going big on the moon. What We're Reading Elon Musk goes on a warpath against Trump and the GOP (POLITICO's Andrew Howard and Adam Wren) MAGA Faithful Shrug Off the Trump-Musk Dust-Up (POLITICO's Ben Jacobs) Trump races to fix a big mistake: DOGE fired too many people (WaPo's Hannah Natanson, Adam Taylor, Meryl Kornfield, Rachel Siegel and Scott Dance) Silicon Valley isn't joining Musk's Trump-bashing — yet (POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio and Christine Mui) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER When Carter first arrived in Washington, he played tennis 'more than any other single thing.' But that became a source of controversy after former White House speechwriter JIM FALLOWS said that requests to use the tennis court on the White House grounds needed to be approved directly by the president, according to the White House Historical Association. 'I have never personally monitored who used or did not use the White House tennis court,' Carter said of the accusation. He did admit to letting his secretary, SUSAN CLOUGH, receive requests from White House staff 'so that more than one person would not want to use the same tennis court simultaneously.'

Los Angeles Times
36 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the DOGE team that had been led by Elon Musk to examine Social Security records that include personal information on most Americans. Acting by a 6-3 vote, the justices granted an appeal from President Trump's lawyers and lifted a court order that had barred a team of DOGE employees of freely examining Social Security records. 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances,' the Social Security Administration, or SSA, 'may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in an unsigned order. In a second order, the justices blocked the disclosure of DOGE operations as agency records that could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The court's three liberals — Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — dissented in both cases 'Today, the court grants 'emergency' relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans,' Jackson wrote. 'The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful.' The legal fight turned on the unusual status of the newly created Department of Governmental Efficiency. This was a not true department, but the name given to the team of aggressive outside advisors led by Musk. Were the DOGE team members presidential advisors or outsiders who should be not given access to personal data? While Social Security employees are entrusted with the records containing personal information, it was disputed whether the 11 DOGE team members could be trusted with same material. Musk had said the goal was to find evidence of fraud or misuse of government funds. He and DOGE were sued by labor unions who said the outside analysts were sifting through records with personal information which was protected by the privacy laws. Unless checked, the DOGE team could create highly personal computer profiles of every person, they said. A federal judge in Maryland agreed and issued an order restricting the work of DOGE. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, Obama appointee, barred DOGE staffers from have accessing to the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. But her order did not restrict the Social Security staff or DOGE employees from using data that did not identify persons or sensitive personal information. In late April, the divided 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to set aside the judge's order by a 9-6 vote. Judge Robert King said the 'government has sought to accord the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) immediate and unfettered access to all records of the Social Security Administration ('SSA') — records that include the highly sensitive personal information of essentially everyone in our country.' But Trump Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court and said a judge should not 'second guess' how the administration manages the government. He said the district judge had 'enjoined particular agency employees — the 11 members of the Social Security Administration (SSA) DOGE team—from accessing data that other agency employees can unquestionably access, and that the SSA DOGE team will use for purposes that are unquestionably lawful. ... The Executive Branch, not district courts, sets government employees' job responsibilities.' Sauer said the DOGE team were seeking to 'modernize SSA systems and identify improper payments, for instance by reviewing swaths of records and flagging unusual payment patterns or other signs of fraud. The DOGE employees 'are subject to the same strict confidentiality standards as other SSA employees,' he said. Moreover, the plaintiffs 'make no allegation that the SSA DOGE team's access will increase the risk of public disclosure.' He said checking the personal data is crucial. 'For instance, a birth date of 1900 can be telltale evidence that an individual is probably deceased and should not still receive Social Security payments, while 15 names using the same Social Security number may also point to a problem,' he said.

Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOGE can access sensitive Social Security records, Supreme Court rules
The Department of Government Efficiency can have unimpeded access to sensitive Social Security records for millions of people, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. The justices granted the Trump administration's emergency request to lift a lower-court order that had blocked a DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration from viewing or obtaining personal information in the agency's systems. The court's majority provided no detailed explanation for its ruling, but in a three-paragraph unsigned order, the majority wrote: 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented. In a 10-page dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the decision creates 'grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' Trump administration lawyers claimed the DOGE team members needed unfettered access to Social Security's data in order to detect and halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that the breadth of DOGE's access violated federal law and put the data at risk of intentional or unintentional disclosure. The legal fight over DOGE's access to Social Security data is one of several that broke out in the early weeks of Trump's second term as the budget-slashing team overseen by Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk fanned out across the federal government. In response to lawsuits, federal judges also limited DOGE access to sensitive databases at the Treasury and Education departments, as well as the Office of Personnel Management. Some of the restrictions have been eased over time as the Trump administration convinced the judges that adequate safeguards were in place to avoid disclosure of personal information. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, a Baltimore-based Obama appointee, blocked DOGE's access to Social Security's databases, which include tax and wage reports as well as retirement and disability payments. In her March ruling, she concluded that the access granted to the cost-cutting team violated the Privacy Act because agency officials did not show that it was necessary to include identifying information in order to carry out the search for fraudulent payments. Justice Department lawyers defending the move offered only 'cursory, circular statements' to justify the DOGE team's access, the judge said. However, Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court that the limits Hollander imposed interfered with President Donald Trump's ability to carry out his 'critically important' agenda to eliminate wasteful spending and update archaic systems at federal agencies. 'Employees charged with modernizing government information systems and routing [sic] out fraud, waste, and abuse in data systems plainly need access to those systems,' Sauer wrote. 'District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads.' In her dissent Friday, Jackson said the government had presented 'next to nothing' to explain what harm the DOGE operation or the Social Security Administration would suffer if the limits the lower-court ordered remained in place. The Biden-appointed justice also contended that her conservative colleagues were bending the court's usual standards to allow the Trump administration to pursue its favored course of action. 'It seems as if the Court has truly lost its moorings,' Jackson wrote, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. 'The Court is … unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.' Justice Elena Kagan also dissented from the court's order, but did not provide any explanation of her views. Among the projects DOGE staffers were working on at Social Security was one targeting improper payments to dead people. Trump has frequently falsely claimed that large numbers of deceased people receive Social Security checks, including earlier this year during a high-profile address in March to a joint session of Congress. 'One person is listed at 360 years of age … More than 100 years older than our country,' Trump said. 'But we're going to find out where that money is going, and it's not going to be pretty.' Musk also made staggering claims, suggesting in a social media post that 20 million people over 100 years of age were receiving Social Security. However, computer experts said most of the outlandishly implausible ages were the product of a default setting in the 60-year-old COBOL programming language, which interprets incomplete or missing age data as the system's oldest possible date in 1875. Musk's term as a special government employee ended last week with Trump hosting an Oval Office send-off for the tech entrepreneur. While the pair were upbeat and complimentary there, Musk's escalating attacks on Trump's budget bill currently before Congress led to a spectacular flame-out of the relationship in recent days, with Trump threatening to cut government contracts to Musk's businesses and Musk accusing Trump of delaying the release of FBI records that could be embarrassing to him.