Working long hours could alter brain structure, study finds
A new study reveals structural alterations in the brains of those who work more than 52 hours a week. (Envato Elements pic)
PARIS : Like many working people, you may have extended your day at the office, long after your colleagues have left, to answer emails or finish an urgent task. But at what cost?
This habit, deeply rooted in many professional cultures, is gradually undermining personal wellbeing – it feeds chronic stress and weakens mental and physical health, to the point of disrupting the very functioning of the brain.
These are the findings of researchers from Chung-Ang and Yonsei Universities in South Korea. Analysing the effects of overwork on the human brain, they conducted a study involving 110 professionals, mostly from the healthcare sector.
The participants were divided into two groups: the first comprised 32 people working 52 hours or more a week; the second, 78 people with standard working hours. Brain imaging revealed clear differences in grey matter volumes, particularly in areas associated with executive function and emotional regulation.
The results are striking: the scientists found a significant increase in grey matter in certain brain regions as a possible physical effect of burnout. The middle frontal gyrus, which plays a role in attention, memory and advanced cognitive functions, showed a 19% increase in volume in the most overworked workers.
Other areas were also affected, such as the superior frontal gyrus, involved in planning and decision-making, and the insula, essential for self-awareness, emotional management and interpreting social context.
The experts state in a press release that 'the observed changes in brain volume may provide a biological basis for the cognitive and emotional challenges often reported in overworked individuals'.
A joint study by the WHO and ILO in 2021 attributed more than 745,000 deaths a year to overwork. (Envato Elements pic)
What exactly does this mean? For now, the answer remains unclear. 'While the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the exploratory nature of this pilot study, they represent a meaningful first step in understanding the relationship between overwork and brain health,' the researchers say.
For the time being, it is impossible to determine whether these changes are directly caused by overwork, whether they pre-exist it, or whether they are reversible.
Although the study sample remains small – consisting exclusively of South Korean healthcare workers – the results form part of a worrying trend. In 2021, a joint study by the World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization attributed over 745,000 deaths a year to overwork.
The link between long working hours and cognitive decline is now well documented, and at a time when trials of the four-day week are multiplying, these conclusions serve as a wake-up call.
'The results underscore the importance of addressing overwork as an occupational health concern, and highlight the need for workplace policies that mitigate excessive working hours,' the researchers caution.
Concrete measures – legislation, public policy, time limits – therefore need to be considered to protect workers in the long term.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
From brain tumour to Olympic gold: Jeremy Flores' inspiring comeback
PARIS, June 7 — Jeremy Flores faced numerous challenges in the water as he carved himself a hugely successful surfing career but nothing prepared the Frenchman for the tumultuous months that followed his retirement in 2021. Within months of stepping away from competition, Flores, the most successful male European in surfing history, was diagnosed with a brain tumour that turned his life upside down. He survived to tell the tale, after years of silence, in a new documentary 'Dos au mur' ('Backs to the Wall') which premiered in Paris on Wednesday. 'I told myself it was time to talk about it,' he told AFP. 'I needed to get it off my chest, to send a message to my children and others who might need it. This was clearly the hardest ordeal of my life.' Inoperable Flores was born in Reunion, an island in the Indian Ocean which is a paradise for surfers - in spite of the large number of sharks. His father Patrick coached him from the age of three and he duly became one of the best in the world, competing for 15 years on the professional circuit, winning four prestigious championship tour events. Blessed with talent in the tubes, he was also quick with his temper. 'I think I've got the most fines on the professional tour,' he admits in the film which is directed by Julie and Vincent Kardasik. Yet in 2021, having become a father for the second time, he decided to retire without really explaining why. 'For several years, I had a lot of migraines,' he tells AFP. 'I was always tired, unmotivated.' A few months later, he was diagnosed with a tumour at the base of his brain. Worse yet, many surgeons considered it inoperable. 'That explained why I wasn't feeling my best. The news shattered me,' admits Flores. Brain tumour survival rates do not make pretty reading: just a third make it through five years although that figure improves for people under 40, according to medical figures in France. In theory Flores stood a fighting chance if he could find a surgeon who would operate. Fortunately he did. In 2022, he finally underwent brain surgery in Montpellier supervised by pioneering neurosurgeon Hugues Duffau. Flores was awake for all of it. 'The operation went well,' he recalls, still traumatised by the operation and the effects. 'After that, it was a mission. I'd been warned. I had to relearn how to speak, write, and read. 'I suffered significant memory loss. My children had become strangers to me.' But with the constant support of his wife Hinarani de Longeaux, a model and former Miss Tahiti winner, Flores began to rebuild. He also had the support of the surf community, notably his old friend and rival Kelly Slater. 'He called me almost every day, before, during, and after the operation,' says Flores. 'I was lucky to have great support.' Olympic gold A little over a year after the operation, he was invited by the French Surfing Federation to manage the surf team at the 2024 Olympics: the event was to take place in Teahupo'o, Tahiti, where he had lived for several years. 'I thought: why not? This will allow me to stimulate my brain, and surfing is what I do best,' he says. The team consisted of four surfers who included his sister-in-law Vahine Fierro, and a young Tahitian Kauli Vaast who, according to Flores, was a natural on the pro tour. The veteran turned coach convinced them that they had what it took to win everything. And it worked. Fierro won the Tahiti Pro in 2024, the first French winner since Flores in 2015 while the team picked up two Olympic medals. Johanne Defay took bronze in the women's shortboard while Vaast went on to win gold in the men's shortboard, with Flores screaming his support from the water during every round. 'It was truly special, the highlight of my career,' says Flores. 'He's my little brother, and I'm very attached to the notion of passing on the knowledge. I experienced it as a cycle.' Three years after his operation, Flores' memory is 'gradually returning'. The tumour, however, is still there, a reminder of the dark days of 2021 even if it no longer haunts him. 'I continue to monitor it with MRIs every three months,' says Flores with a clear-eyed calm. 'You have to keep an eye on its size, take it seriously, but above all, you have to keep moving forward.' — AFP
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
TotalEnergies on trial: Greenwashing claims could set legal precedent in France
PARIS, June 6 — Environmental groups took TotalEnergies to court yesterday in a landmark Paris trial, accusing the French oil and gas giant of misleading consumers with ads that overstate its climate commitments and fossil fuel transition. It is the first such case in France targeting a major energy company and could set a legal precedent for corporate environmental advertising, which is starting to face tighter regulations in the European Union. The civil case stems from a March 2022 lawsuit by three environmental groups accusing TotalEnergies of 'misleading commercial practices' for saying it could reach carbon neutrality while continuing oil and gas production. The plaintiffs took that legal route as 'greenwashing', or the act of claiming to be more environmentally responsible than in reality, is not specifically covered under French law. Starting in May 2021, TotalEnergies advertised its goal of 'carbon neutrality by 2050' and touted gas as 'the fossil fuel with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions'. At the time, the company had changed its name from Total to TotalEnergies to emphasise its investments in wind turbines and solar panels for electricity production. The plaintiffs allege that TotalEnergies made around 40 'false advertisements' in their lawsuit. 'For the average consumer, it is impossible to understand that TotalEnergies is actually expanding fossil fuel production,' said Clementine Baldon, a lawyer for the NGOs. The company's strategy 'will not help the energy transition', Baldon told the court. 'It delays it, even prevents it, and it contributes to putting the objectives of the Paris accord at risk,' she added, referring to the international agreement aimed at curbing climate change. TotalEnergies maintains it has not engaged in misleading commercial practices. 'Greenwashing would be to promise that the petrol sold in service stations is carbon neutral,' said the company's lawyer, Francoise Labrousse. TotalEnergies had 'never said its products are good for the climate', she added. TotalEnergies also insisted that the messages are part of its institutional communications regulated by financial authorities and not consumer law. It also argued the NGOs are misusing consumer protection rules to challenge its corporate strategy, and that no consumer organisation is party to the case. The NGOs want the Paris court to rule on the legality of ads presenting natural gas as essential to the energy transition. Climate experts say methane leaks from the gas industry have a powerful warming effect on the atmosphere. But TotalEnergies noted Greenpeace Belgium had previously considered natural gas useful for the energy transition and noted the group still uses fossil fuels in its boats. Correcting ads Environmental groups in recent years have turned to the courts to establish case law on companies misleading consumers by appearing more eco-friendly than they are. In Europe, courts ruled against Dutch airline KLM in 2024 and Germany's Lufthansa in March over misleading consumers about their efforts to reduce the environmental impact of flying. In Spain, utility Iberdrola failed to secure a conviction against Spanish oil and gas company Repsol over similar allegations of 'false' environmental claims. A greenwashing case against Australian oil and gas producer Santos, challenging its claim to be a 'clean fuels' company, has been ongoing since 2021. Other fossil fuel companies, under pressure from advertising regulators or legal complains, have had to scrap or correct ad campaigns. Shell, for example, received a warning in the UK and had to stop promoting 'carbon-neutral' gasoline in several countries, including Germany, the Netherlands and Canada. New European laws now ban vague, generic environmental claims such as 'green' or '100 per cent natural' product, and aim to require brands to more strictly substantiate environmental claims on labels and in advertising. TotalEnergies has said it plans to show that its messages 'about its name change, strategy and role in the energy transition are reliable and based on objective, verifiable data'. At the end of the hearing, the judge said a ruling would be given on October 23. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
‘Snowplough managers' could be preventing you from stepping up
'Snowplough managers' struggle to delegate tasks. (Envato Elements pic) PARIS : Imagine a manager who takes the lead on everything, anticipates problems, oversees the smallest details, and saves you the trouble of dealing with things. Put like that, it may sound great. But by taking on too much of your work and refusing to delegate, they're actually preventing you from learning, from making mistakes, from growing. This is what is known as 'snowplow management.' This expression was coined by the teams at Owl Labs, a company specialising in video-conferencing tools. Its CEO, Frank Weishaupt, describes this management style as similar to overprotective parenting. '[It] resembles snowplough parenting, where a parent removes as many challenges from their child's life as possible,' he told Fast Company. In concrete terms, these managers want to control everything. They take the important decisions, keep strategic projects to themselves, and leave the simpler tasks to their teams. They renege on assignments, cancel meetings without explanation, and keep their staff out of discussions with management. They have good intentions, of course. But by doing everything for their team, they end up holding people back instead of helping them move forward. Managerial stress and fear of failure So why might they feel this need to do everything themselves? Probably because the pressure is on, especially for managers. Juggling remote work, ever-higher targets and unclear expectations, they are among the employees most exposed to stress. According to Owl Labs' 2024 report on hybrid working, their stress level is 55% higher than that of their subordinates. Some fear for their jobs, others simply want to prove they're in control. Almost all are convinced – often in good faith – that they'll get things done faster if they take them in hand themselves. While it may feel reassuring, trying to be in total control can have negative effects. By seeking to centralise everything rather than delegate, snowplough managers curtail people's independence, stifle initiative and hamper team dynamics. Employees stagnate, ideas fizzle out, and collective energy is depleted. The problem intensifies in times of crisis or restructuring. Middle managers, often the target of redundancy plans, try to prove that they are indispensable by taking care of everything. But this strategy ultimately wears them down – and their teams. So, how should you deal with a ' snowplough manager'? The key is to engage in frank, constructive discussion. It's not a question of pointing the finger, but of making suggestions. Take the initiative to express your desire to get more involved: ask to pilot a project, share an idea, offer to help with an unfinished project. Show that you're reliable, motivated and capable of taking on responsibilities without making them a burden. And if the situation remains deadlocked despite your best efforts, it's best to explore other avenues by taking part in cross-functional projects or in-house training. This can be a simple, practical way to keep moving forward, even when things seem to be at a standstill. 'Snowplough management' often reflects a good, misguided intention: to protect, secure and avoid mistakes. But it's by leaving room for attempts, mistakes and autonomy that teams gain in strength. Progress requires the right to fail. Trust, the ability to delegate, and openness to the unexpected are the keys to enabling employees to take flight. And for managers to finally free themselves from the role of snowplough.
