logo
Replacing butter for some plant oils could significantly lower risk of mortality, new study finds

Replacing butter for some plant oils could significantly lower risk of mortality, new study finds

CNN06-03-2025

Swapping your daily butter intake for certain plant-based oils may help reduce your risk of death, a new study finds.
These findings challenge the growing social media trend that attacks seed oils in favor of butter, ghee and animal fats.
'Seed oils are one of the most unhealthy ingredients we have in foods,' said US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an Instagram video in 2024, who continues to promote the slogan 'Making Frying Oil Tallow Again.'
Many other influencers have supported similar claims, including Dr. Paul Saladino, who promotes an animal-based diet and has amassed 2.6 million Instagram followers.
'Butter is a health food with amazing nutrients,' he said in a post, adding that butter is good for the gut, brain, cardiovascular health, and overall health and vitality.
The evidence doesn't support that view, according to study coauthor Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.
'For some reason that is not clear to me, a myth has been floating around the internet that butter is a healthy fat, but there is no good evidence to support this,' said Willett, who has authored over 2,000 articles and numerous books and has spent 40 years studying the impact of diet on the development of major diseases, via email.
Willett and his team's latest research revealed that higher butter consumption was associated with a 15% higher risk of mortality, whereas higher intake of plant-based oils — including soybean, canola and olive oil — was linked to a 16% reduction in total mortality, according to the study published Thursday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.
In addition, substituting just 10 grams (0.35 ounces) of butter with these plant-based oils daily was associated with a 17% lower risk of both total mortality and cancer-related deaths.
'Seventeen percent is quite a big change, especially when you look at the public health perspective,' said Dr. Yu Zhang, study coauthor and researcher at the Channing Division of Network Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital. 'Imagine how many deaths we can reduce in the general population.'
Comparing butter and plant-based oils
The study analyzed 33 years of dietary data from more than 221,000 participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study.
Participants self-reported their dietary habits every four years, allowing researchers to track changes over time and calculate long-term intake averages. Researchers adjusted their findings to account for variables such as age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, total calorie intake, as well as other dietary patterns using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index.
Butter intake included any amount used in cooking and baking, as well as any extra butter spread on food. Plant-based oil consumption was estimated based on the type of oil used in frying, sautéing, baking or making salad dressings.
Dr. Marion Nestle, Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health Emerita at New York University, noted the new study is correlational and shows association, not causation.
'Even so, it's consistent with decades of evidence linking saturated fat to health risks and demonstrating quite substantial health benefits of substituting plant oils (including seed oils) for animal fats,' she said.
Seed oils are derived from plant seeds, whereas plant-based oils are extracted from a variety of different plant parts. All oils examined in the study fall under the seed oil category, except for olive oil.
'Olive oil, canola oil, and soybean oil were each more consistently associated with benefit: a lower risk of dying,' said cardiologist Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. 'These findings add to a large body of scientific literature on the health benefits of these plant oils, whose positive effects have been demonstrated in both large observational studies and dozens of randomized trials.'
Should you eliminate butter from your diet?
While the study indicates that some plant oils lead to better health outcomes, Zhang clarified that this doesn't mean butter should be eliminated altogether.
'We are not suggesting that people should avoid butter entirely, but we are recommending that even a small reduction in butter in replacement for plant-based oils in a daily diet could lead to very substantial, long-term health benefits,' Zhang said.
The choice to use butter may depend on available options for the consumer, Willett said. If given the choice between butter and a partially hydrogenated plant oil rich in trans fats, he said, butter might be a better option.
Despite the 2015 ban on trans fats passed by the US Food and Drug Administration, manufacturers can still use up to a half of gram of trans fat per serving. That can add up fast in a daily diet, according to the Mayo Clinic.
However, if the decision is between butter and beef tallow — which has been promoted by Kennedy as a healthier substitute for seed oils — canola, soybean and olive oils are the superior choice, Willett said.
'Although beef tallow was not examined in this study, on the basis of its composition we would expect it to be no better than butter,' Willett said, pointing to a previous analysis he authored that found fat from red meat, which is mostly composed of beef fat, was marginally worse than dairy fat in regards to mortality or cardiovascular disease.
'Butter is very high in saturated fat, approximately 2/3 of the fat, and it contains almost none of the beneficial, essential polysaturated fats,' Willett said in an email.
'Our findings don't mean that we should never consume butter, but it is best to use it just when its specific flavor is important, not as a primary source of fat,' he added. 'For me, this is the several times a year that I have lobster … butter is absolutely essential!'
Which plant-based oil is the best?
If you're looking to make the switch to plant oils or debating which ones to use, it's all about finding a balance to include some of the essential nutrients your body needs.
Olive, canola and soybean oils had the most beneficial impact on health outcomes in the study, according to Zhang, which comes from their high levels of anti-inflammatory omega-3 fatty acids. Omega-3s maintain the body's cells, provide energy, maintain immune defense and reduce inflammation when it's at optimal levels (like most things, too much omega-3 may be harmful).
Other seed oils such as corn, peanut, safflower and sunflower contain higher levels of omega-6 fatty acids, which are also necessary to maintain good health.Omega-6 molecules stimulate hair and skin growth, regulate metabolism, support bone health, and in some cases, may even have anti-inflammatory properties.
However, omega-6s can also be converted into molecules such as prostaglandins that signal the initiation of inflammation — not a bad thing when your body is trying to quickly repel an invader or tumor, but devastating if left smoldering for long periods without resolution.
Americans have an overabundance of omega-6s in their bodies due to their use in ultraprocessed foods and eating at fast food establishments. One omega 6, linoleic acid, is the most common omega-6 in the US food supply.
'We need both omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids; soybean and canola oil have both,' Willett said. 'Corn and sunflower oil have very little omega-3 fatty content; these can be part of a mix of different oils, but should not be relied upon as a sole source of plant oil.'
No matter which oils you're using in your diet, it's best to use them sparingly, Nestle said.
'I'm always for varying food intake to the extent possible and that goes for oils, as well,' she said. 'All oils, no matter which, provide about 120 calories per tablespoon so are best used in the proverbial moderation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nurses to vote on pay deal as potential strike looms
Nurses to vote on pay deal as potential strike looms

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nurses to vote on pay deal as potential strike looms

Almost 350,000 nursing staff in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will be asked to vote from Monday on a 3.6% pay increase. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has already dismissed the award as "grotesque" and says the vote will be crucial in determining the next steps which could include a ballot for strike action. A bitter pay dispute saw nurses striking in England, Wales and Northern Ireland from late 2022 and through the winter. Some members of other health unions also staged walkouts over pay. With the possibility of another round of industrial action looming, the vote is being billed as the biggest single vote by the profession ever launched in the UK. Ministers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland all announced pay awards following review body recommendations. There was a 5.4% average increase for resident doctors, formally known as junior doctors, 4% for consultants and other senior doctors, and 3.6% for nurses and other health workers. RCN General Secretary Professor Nicola Ranger said that the government had "once again put nursing at the back of the queue when it comes to pay". "Nursing is an incredible career, but despite being the most valued profession by the public we continue to be weighted to the bottom of the NHS pay scale and are set to receive one of the lowest pay awards." According to the Ranger, nursing staff in England have endured "over a decade of pay erosion", which has resulted in "skyrocketing" numbers of nurses quitting. "It is time to show that nurses are valued and, from today, hundreds of thousands of nursing staff working in the NHS will give their verdict on whether 3.6% is enough," Ranger will say. Resident doctors in England are already being balloted on strike action over pay. Other health unions are organising votes on the pay awards. All this may cast a shadow over a government 10-year plan for the NHS in England due in the next few weeks. The Scottish government has already agreed a two-year 8% pay offer with health unions.

NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors to maintain supply
NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors to maintain supply

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NHS calls for 200,000 new blood donors to maintain supply

The NHS has warned that it continues to face a "challenging" blood shortage as it calls for 200,000 new donors to come forward. Concern over blood stocks prompted the health service to issue an "amber alert" last year, meaning supplies were running low enough to have an impact on patient treatment. Supplies have remained low ever since, with officials warning there is a "critical" need for more donors who have O negative blood, which can be given to the majority of patients. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), the body that oversees England's blood donation system, said the number of regular donors needs to rise from around 800,000 to more than one million to maintain a safe and reliable supply. NHSBT chief executive Dr Jo Farrar said: "Our stocks over the past 12 months have been challenging. If we had a million regular donors, this would help keep our stocks healthy - you'd truly be one in a million." There is a pressing need to avoid a "red alert", which would mean demand far exceeds capacity, threatening public safety, NHSBT added. Health Minister Baroness Merron said the NHS was in "urgent need" of more blood donors from all backgrounds. "We are working alongside NHS Blood and Transplant to make donating blood easier than ever before, opening up new donor centres and making appointments available closer to home," she added. NHSBT stressed the need for more black donors in particular, as they are more likely to have specific blood types which can help treat people with sickle cell disease. Just 2% of the population keep the nation's blood stocks afloat by donating regularly, the body said. Donors are defined as regular if they have donated in the last 12 months. The number of people registering as donors rose in 2024, but only 24% of them went on to donate. The appeal comes almost a year after the NHS issued an amber alert for only the second time in its history, last July. It was caused by what the NHS called a "perfect storm" of unfilled appointments at donor centres and increased demand following a cyber-attack, which affected services in London. At that time, stocks of O negative stood at just 1.6 days, and 4.3 days for all types of blood. Two thirds of the blood collected by NHSBT is used to treat people who rely on regular blood transfusions, including people with cancer and blood conditions.

NHS spends £1.8bn a year on private firms, says GMB in call to end outsourcing
NHS spends £1.8bn a year on private firms, says GMB in call to end outsourcing

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

NHS spends £1.8bn a year on private firms, says GMB in call to end outsourcing

A trade union is stepping up calls to end privatisation in the NHS after its research suggested health trusts spend at least £1.8 billion a year on private companies. The GMB said requests using freedom of information laws to more than 200 trusts show they spend £1,831,105,580 annually on outsourced contracts. Almost half the trusts did not respond so the true figure could be far higher, it is claimed. A separate investigation found ambulance trusts across England spent £290 million on private ambulances during the past three years. The total annual spend has almost doubled since 2021/22, according to the data. The GMB said it wants to send a message to the Government from its annual congress in Brighton on Monday. Ambulance worker Mo Akbar will tell delegates: 'GMB members demand an end to privatisation. 'We must bring all outsourced services like cleaning, catering, and facilities back in-house. 'We demand real-terms restorative pay from the 14 years of brutal austerity. 'Workers and communities should have more say in how the NHS is run, ensuring decisions focus on patient care, not financial targets. Health outcomes are tied to poverty, housing, and working conditions, so NHS rebuilding must also address these inequalities. 'This Labour Government will have a crisis of legitimacy if they choose a path of further privatisation of the NHS, which would put at risk the sense of the collectivism that is at the heart of our health service 'We must be resolute in fighting for our National Health Service.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store