logo
The Story Of The Robert Charles Riots In New Orleans

The Story Of The Robert Charles Riots In New Orleans

Source: ilbusca / Getty
Race riots have stained the fabric of American history, leaving behind tragic stories of violence, terror and resistance.
From the New York City Draft Riots of 1863 to the Red Summer of 1919, these uprisings gave white supremacist violence a space to spill from the nation's pores into Black communities already struggling to find their place in a changing America.
One lesser-known flashpoint that rarely receives the attention it deserves is the Robert Charles Riots of 1900 in New Orleans—a pivotal moment at the dawn of Jim Crow, marked by individual Black defiance and a white backlash that almost tore a city apart.
To understand the chaos that would engulf New Orleans in the summer of 1900, you first have to understand the man at the center of it all: Robert Charles.
Robert Charles was a self-educated Black laborer who believed deeply that Black people had a right to defend themselves, so much so that it would eventually cost him his life.
Like many other Black people during that period, Charles moved from New Orleans to Mississippi in search of work and a better life. Like much of the South, Mississippi was simmering with racial tension, and Charles' self-defense beliefs would soon collide with the brutal machinery of white supremacy, igniting one of the most violent episodes in New Orleans history. Source: Historical / Getty
According to 64 Parishes, on the evening of July 23, 1900, Robert Charles sat on a stoop in a predominantly white neighborhood with his friend Leonard Pierce. Around 11 pm, three white New Orleans police officers—Sgt. Jules C. Aucoin and Officers Joseph D. Cantrelle and August T. Mora—approached and began questioning him. The encounter quickly escalated.
After being harassed for a bit, Charles decided to stand up from the stoop when he was struck in the head with a baton by one of the officers.
Reacting to the sudden violence and fearing for his life, Charles pulled out a firearm and exchanged shots with officer Mora. Both men received injuries, but Charles was able to flee and escape police custody. Police later used Pierce to track Charles to a nearby residence—but the bloodshed was far from over.
From 64 Parishes:
Yet Charles, likely aware of the violent fate that often awaited Black men who killed white men, determined not to give himself over to the police. Charles fired his Winchester rifle at the group of officers as they approached his door. Two officers fell dead. Charles somehow managed to escape the police once again.
That day, Robert Charles killed two police officers and wounded another, sparking one of the largest manhunts in the city's history. As police failed to locate him in the hours that followed, white outrage spread like wildfire.
By the next day, that rage had taken physical form, leading to hundreds of angry white people mobbing up in front of the residence where Charles had killed officers the night before. On July 24, the crowd turned its anger toward the broader Black community of New Orleans, launching sporadic attacks on Black residents throughout the city
By July 25, the violence became more organized. Around 8 p.m., the white mob mobilized at what was then known as Lee Circle and began another coordinated rampage throughout the city, all under the guise of helping police track down Charles. The mob killed three Black people and left six others so badly wounded they had to be hospitalized.On July 27, police received an anonymous tip about Charles' location. When officers attempted to storm the apartment on Saratoga Street where he was hiding, Charles opened fire again—killing two more policemen. Word of the shootout spread quickly and the same armed white mob that terrorized the city descended on the building.
Charles and the armed mob exchanged gunfire for several hours. According to reports, Charles killed three residents from the mob before police set the building on fire. He was eventually killed trying to flee the burning building, but the mob wasn't finished.
After his death, they dragged his lifeless body through the streets, riddling it with bullets and blows—shooting him over thirty times—before authorities transported his remains to the morgue.
Before the Robert Charles Riots ended, the white mob also burned down the Thomy Lafon School—one of the most esteemed Black schools in the state—capping four days of racial violence and terror.
The Robert Charles Riots are a brutal reminder that justice in America once looked like mob rule— and white vengeance often brought terror to Black communities. When truth is blinded by fear, fear too easily transforms into violence and hate.
SEE ALSO:
The Ghost Of Willie Earle And The Haunting Of Pickens County Museum
The Antebellum Tale Of Black Slave Girl Molly And The Haunting Of Sorrel-Weed House
SEE ALSO
The Story Of The Robert Charles Riots In New Orleans was originally published on newsone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NFL can be put on trial over bombshell Brian Flores discrimination claims against league, Giants
NFL can be put on trial over bombshell Brian Flores discrimination claims against league, Giants

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NFL can be put on trial over bombshell Brian Flores discrimination claims against league, Giants

The NFL can be put on trial over civil claims that Brian Flores and other Black coaches face discrimination, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, rejecting the league's attempt to force Flores into arbitration with Commissioner Roger Goodell as the arbitrator. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld Judge Valerie Caproni's ruling that Flores can proceed with claims against the league and three teams: the Denver Broncos, the New York Giants and the Houston Texans. Advertisement In a decision written by Circuit Judge Jose A. Cabranes, the appeals court said the NFL's arbitration rules forcing Flores to submit his claims to arbitration before Goodell do not have the protection of the Federal Arbitration Act because it 'provides for arbitration in name only.' The 2nd Circuit said the NFL constitution's arbitration provision 'contractually provides for no independent arbitral forum, no bilateral dispute resolution, and no procedure.' Brian Flores is the Vikings' defensive coordinator. Getty Images 'Instead, it offends basic presumptions of our arbitration jurisprudence' by forcing claims to be decided by the NFL's 'principal executive officer,' the appeals court said. Advertisement NFL spokesperson Brian McCarthy said: 'We respectfully disagree with the panel's ruling, and will be seeking further review.' Messages for comment were sent to lawyers who argued before the appeals court. In February 2022, Flores sued the league and several teams, saying the league was 'rife with racism,' particularly in its hiring and promotion of Black coaches. Advertisement Two other coaches later joined the lawsuit, which seeks to proceed as a class action, although Caproni ruled that their claims could go to arbitration based on the language in contracts they signed with teams. After filing his lawsuit, Flores said he believed he was risking the coaching career he loves by suing the NFL, but he said it was worth it for generations to come if he could succeed in challenging systemic racism in the league. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell. Getty Images Flores is currently the defense coordinator for the Minnesota Vikings after working previously as a coach for the New England Patriots from 2008 to 2018, the Miami Dolphins from 2019 to 2021 and the Pittsburgh Steelers in 2022. He joined the Vikings in 2023. Advertisement Caproni said in a March 2023 decision that descriptions by the coaches of their experiences of racial discrimination in a league with a 'long history of systematic discrimination toward Black players, coaches, and managers — are incredibly troubling.' 'Although the clear majority of professional football players are Black, only a tiny percentage of coaches are Black,' she said.

ICE Arrests of Migrants Without Criminal Records Surge Nearly 200 Percent
ICE Arrests of Migrants Without Criminal Records Surge Nearly 200 Percent

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

ICE Arrests of Migrants Without Criminal Records Surge Nearly 200 Percent

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A far larger share of non‑criminal migrants have been arrested as part of the Trump administration's expanded immigration enforcement campaign, according to new federal and independent data. The director of the Deportation Data Project told Newsweek that he found it "impossible" for the president to keep his promise of mass deportations of "criminals." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, however, told Newsweek, in part, "It is not an accurate description to say they are 'non-criminals.' This deceptive categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public. Let us remind you that being here illegally is in fact a crime (8 USC 1325)." Why It Matters President Donald Trump emphasized a prioritization of the removal of violent offenders and the "worst of the worst" during his presidential campaign; however, data shows growing arrests of people without U.S. criminal charges or convictions, raising legal and policy questions about resources, detention capacity and humanitarian oversight. Recent cases involving nonviolent immigrants lacking criminal records have exacerbated concerns and led to broader discussions of whether immigrants, in certain instances, who lack citizenship but have abided by all other U.S. laws, should be removed. NYPD officers arrest protestors for blocking traffic on Broadway as they protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outside of the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 08, 2025, in New York City. NYPD officers arrest protestors for blocking traffic on Broadway as they protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outside of the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 08, 2025, in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images What To Know Federal and independent datasets show that ICE arrested substantially more people overall during the Trump administration's first six months in office than during the final six months of the Biden administration. Researchers at the the University of California at Berkeley's Deportation Data Project, which compiles federal data, found that roughly 37 percent of ICE arrests in July 2025 were of people with no U.S. criminal convictions or pending charges—doubling to about 92,000 during the first six months of the Trump administration compared with the final half‑year of the Joe Biden administration. That 37 percent figure is up from 13 percent during Biden's last full month in office in December. "As the [Trump] administration increases immigration arrests, it will inevitably sweep in many people with no criminal record," Davis Hausman, a law professor and faculty director of the Deportation Data Project, told Newsweek via email on Thursday. "There just aren't many noncitizens with criminal records, so the promise of mass deportations of criminals is an impossible one to keep." The Trump administration has dramatically increased arrests of people who have never been convicted of a crime in the US, accounting for a little more than 60 percent of ICE arrests during his first six months in office, roughly equating to 188 days, compared to the 44 percent of arrests during Biden's last six months as president. Of the Trump administration's approximate 132,485 arrests, 39 percent had criminal convictions; 31 percent had criminal charges pending; and 30 percent had no criminal charges. In comparison, the Biden administration's approximate 52,334 arrests included 56 percent with criminal convictions, 28 percent with pending criminal charges, and 16 percent with no criminal charges. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email that the Deportation Data Project "is being cherry peddle a false narrative." Multiple independent analyses and reporting showed the detention population rose to record levels in June and July, with estimates of roughly 55,000 to 59,000 people held in ICE facilities during late June and July, according to The Guardian—noting that ICE arrests have more than doubled in 38 states and are most prevalent in states with large immigrant populations including California, Florida and Texas. Southern and western states that have embraced Trump's agenda have also experienced higher arrests. During a White House meeting in May, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller urged ICE agents to aim for as many as 3,000 arrests per day. A recent case involving a Chinese immigrant and small-business restaurant owner, Kelly Yu, in Arizona has led to bipartisan calls for her release from ICE detainment. DHS has refuted statements in her defense. "Lai Kuen Yu, an illegal alien from Hong Kong, has had a final deportation order from a judge since 2005," Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email. "She was arrested illegally crossing the border by U.S. Border Patrol in Arizona on February 4, 2004, and two days later was released into the country." DHS said that in November 2013, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed her appeal and upheld her final order of removal. On August 23, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied her appeal. On June 12 of this year, the Board of Immigration Appeals granted her a temporary stay of removal while it considers her motion to reopen. She will remain in ICE custody pending her removal proceedings. "ICE does not deport U.S. citizens," McLaughlin said. "It's her choice. Parents are asked if they want to be removed with their children or ICE will place the children with someone the parent designates." What People Are Saying Davis Hausman, a law professor and faculty director of the Deportation Data Project, told Newsweek via email on Thursday: "As the [Trump] administration increases immigration arrests, it will inevitably sweep in many people with no criminal record. There just aren't many noncitizens with criminal records, so the promise of mass deportations of criminals is an impossible one to keep." Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of public affairs at DHS, told Newsweek via email on Thursday: "This data is being cherry picked by the Deportation Data Project to peddle a false narrative. Many of the individuals that are counted as 'non-criminals' are actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters and more; they just don't have a rap sheet in the U.S. Further, every single one of these individuals committed a crime when they came into this country illegally. "It is not an accurate description to say they are 'non-criminals.' This deceptive categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public. Let us remind you that being here illegally is in fact a crime (8 USC 1325). We are putting the American people first by removing illegal aliens who pose a threat to our communities." What Happens Next Lawmakers have sent oversight letters raising priority questions for enforcement, and legal groups filed suits challenging arrests at courthouses and expanded detention practices, indicating litigation and hearings were likely to follow. The administration has sought expanded detention capacity and funding to sustain higher arrest rates, with federal budget allocations and proposals under discussion as the enforcement campaign continues.

Brian Flores' lawsuit against New York Giants can proceed, Circuit Court rules
Brian Flores' lawsuit against New York Giants can proceed, Circuit Court rules

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Brian Flores' lawsuit against New York Giants can proceed, Circuit Court rules

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan has upheld a previous ruling by Judge Valerie Caproni, allowing Brian Flores' claims against the NFL and three of its teams, including the New York Giants, to proceed. In addition to the Giants, the Houston Texans and Denver Broncos are named in the lawsuit that was initially filed in 2022, claiming the league was "rife with racism" and that the hiring/promotion of minority coaches is intentionally flawed. ESPN reports that the decision came on Thursday. The NFL can be put on trial over civil claims that Brian Flores and other Black coaches face discrimination, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, finding insurmountable flaws with a league arbitration process that would permit commissioner Roger Goodell to serve as arbitrator. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld Judge Valerie Caproni's ruling that Flores can proceed with claims against the league and three teams: the Denver Broncos, the New York Giants and the Houston Texans. In a decision written by Circuit Judge Jose A. Cabranes, the appeals court said the NFL's arbitration rules forcing Flores to submit his claims to arbitration before Goodell do not have the protection of the Federal Arbitration Act because they provide for "arbitration in name only." At the time of his original filing, Flores claimed he was "humiliated" by the Giants for running him through a "sham interview." The team had just hired Brian Daboll as their next head coach, choosing him over Flores, who was a finalist for the job. Flores was informed of the Giants' decision through an accidental text by then-New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick. Giants co-owner John Mara denied Flores' claims, defended the decision to hire Daboll, and vowed to fight the allegations in court. "I'm not settling," Mara said at the time, via the New York Post. "Because the allegations are false and we're very comfortable with our hiring process. It was a fair process and we ended up making the decision we made based on a lot of factors, none of which had anything to do with race." Flores, who currently serves as defensive coordinator of the Minnesota Vikings, felt he was risking his NFL career after the filing, but claimed it would be worth the trouble to help establish better hiring practices for minority coaches. "The significance of the Second Circuit's decision cannot be overstated," Flores' attorneys -- Douglas H. Wigdor, David E. Gottlieb and John Elefterakis -- said in a statement. "For too long, the NFL has relied on a fundamentally biased and unfair arbitration process -- even in cases involving serious claims of discrimination. This ruling sends a clear message: that practice must end. This is a victory not only for NFL employees, but for workers across the country -- and for anyone who believes in transparency, accountability and justice." The NFL sees things differently. "We respectfully disagree with the panel's ruling, and will be seeking further review," spokesperson Brian McCarthy said. The Giants have yet to issue a statement following Thursday's ruling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store