Reform-led Durham county council scraps climate emergency pledge
Durham county council, which has had an overwhelming Reform majority since the May local elections, passed a motion to rescind a declaration made in 2019 More than 300 local authorities have declared a climate emergency.
It voted instead to declare a County Durham care emergency, a move described as 'cynical and insulting' by the Liberal Democrat councillor Mark Wilkes.
He said there was a financial case as well as an environmental case for keeping the declaration.
Wilkes said the council's climate action had helped save more than £13m in the last year alone. He added that stopping work on tackling the climate crisis would risk the loss of external funding. It 'risked less money to invest in social care,' he said. 'This is not an either, or.'
During a sometimes fractious and bad-tempered debate on Wednesday, the Reform council leader Andrew Husband said the authority was now driven by data and common sense.
'During the Roman-occupied era not far away from County Durham, around 45AD, there is evidence of Roman vineyards along Hadrian's Wall. This is because the Roman period in Britain is known for having a relatively warm climate which would have been conducive to growing grapes. Mind, how the climate has changed,' he said.
Kenny Hope, a Reform councillor, accused the Lib Dems of being in favour of adult and child slave labour. He said the mining of material for lithium batteries was 'rife with child slavery' as was the production of solar panels in China.
'I do not believe in child or adult slave labour and I believe the guys on this side of the house also do not believe in it. But I believe the guys on the other side must believe in adult or child slave labour because they have not took that into consideration,' he said.
Darren Grimes, a former GB News presenter, prolific tweeter and now deputy leader of the council, proposed the motion and accused his opponents of wanting to make local residents 'colder and poorer … shame. Shame. Shame.'
He said Durham was done 'with expensive virtue-signalling tripe' and said the 2019 declaration was 'a feel-good' one chasing 'net-zero rainbows while the likes of China belch out coal more than Sauron's Mordor.'
Afterwards, Jonathan Elmer, one of the council's two Green members, described some of what he heard in the debate as 'bonkers'.
He said the vote represented 'a very dark day' for the council. 'Eighty per cent of the population do believe in the climate emergency and want to do something about it. Durham has an administration that doesn't. They've got a head in the sand, don't look up approach,' Elmer said.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Wilkes said he was concerned for his nine-year-old son. 'I want to know he can grow up and live in a country and on a planet that is safe. There is a personal aspect to everything, isn't there?'
On Monday, the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, warned MPs about the climate crisis, saying he would explicitly call out politicians who rejected net zero policies for betraying future generations.
The duration of the Durham council debate was short because of rules limiting it to 30 minutes. A move by Wilkes to have a fuller debate was voted down by Reform.
The rules also meant there was no time for another motion by Grimes to strengthen what he described as free speech protections in the code of conduct for elected members.
Before the debate, about 200 protesters gathered outside county hall with banners and placards highlighting the climate crisis.
'Reform is asking you bury your head in the sand,' read one. 'Our children need a healthy world,' said another.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Swinney calls for legal referendum if SNP secures majority at Holyrood election
First Minister John Swinney has called for a 'legal referendum recognised by all' on Scottish independence if the SNP secures a majority at the Holyrood elections. Writing in a column in the Daily Record, Mr Swinney said that in the 17 years since the 2008 financial crash 'people feel like they are working harder than ever, but not seeing any improvement in their living standards'. He said the UK economy is 'fundamentally failing to deliver for ordinary people' as well as generating insufficient funding for public services. The SNP leader called for the May 2026 Holyrood elections to be 'a springboard for Scotland taking charge of our own destiny'. He said the situation had got worse since the 2014 referendum, and wrote: 'Think what could have been achieved had we not been forced to spend so much time and money trying to mitigate the ongoing damage of Brexit. 'Or the carnage unleashed by Liz Truss's mini-budget. Or the years of austerity, or Westminster cuts like the Winter Fuel Payment. 'We were told we didn't need independence and we just needed a Labour government – but look how that has turned out.' He wrote that 'independence is the catalyst that will deliver a better future for us all' and that 'with Scotland's energy resources in Scotland's hands, we can reduce bills for consumers and cut costs for businesses'. Mr Swinney revealed he hoped to deliver an SNP majority similar to 2011 in a bid to 'secure a legal referendum recognised by all' and had submitted a motion to the SNP conference proposing that 'we work to deliver a majority of SNP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament to secure that referendum'. He pledged to unveil 'radical policies that we know will transform Scotland' in the coming months, and to 'break the logjam and end this frustration that we all feel'. Mr Swinney added: 'We must be ready to follow the path which we know can lead us to an independent state.' Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'John Swinney is like a broken record. In a bid to silence internal critics of his weak leadership, he has thrown diehard nationalists some more red meat on the one issue they all agree on: independence. 'Ordinary Scots are sick and tired of the SNP's obsession with breaking up the UK. 'The public want John Swinney to focus on fixing the damage his government has done in decimating essential services such as schools and the NHS at the same time as making Scotland the highest taxed part of the UK.'
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's farm tax architect calls for fresh capital gains raid
The adviser behind Labour's inheritance tax raid on farmers has called on Rachel Reeves to raise capital gains tax to plug gaps in public finances. Arun Advani, of the left-leaning Centre for the Analysis of Taxation think tank, said that the Government should 'start by fixing capital gains tax' if it wanted to 'tax wealth better'. It comes as business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, ruled out Labour MPs' 'daft' demands for a 'magic wealth tax', urging backbenchers to 'be serious'. The Chancellor has already raised the rate of capital gains tax to 24pc for higher rate taxpayers, and 18pc for basic rate taxpayers. But Mr Advani, an economics professor at the University of Warwick, told the Mail on Sunday that Labour could double its tax take if it brought capital gains tax in line with income tax. He said: 'The current way capital gains tax is used encourages tax avoidance. If the Government were looking at taxing wealth better, it would be much better to start by fixing capital gains tax.' Labour ministers have previously admitted that Mr Advani's research formed the basis of the inheritance tax raid on farms. The economics professor, who also sits on the advisory board for the Office for Budget Responsibility, wrote a report in 2023 calling for agricultural property relief and other 'loopholes' to be scrapped. A year later, in her maiden Budget, Ms Reeves announced that inherited farms worth more than £1m would be taxed at a rate of 20pc after having been shielded from the levies for decades. A 20pc rate will also be charged on inherited business assets over £1m when someone dies. Mr Advani has since urged Labour to go further and halve agricultural property relief to £500,000. Shadow business secretary, Andrew Griffith, told the Mail that capital gains tax was 'a wealth tax by another name', and that the tax further punished people 'on the higher inflation Labour is causing'. It comes as official figures show a sharp drop in capital gains tax receipts following successive cuts to allowances, suggesting they have backfired. Data published by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on Friday showed the Government's capital gains tax take fell by 18pc to £12bn in the 2023-24 financial year, as the Conservatives halved the annual tax-free allowance to £6,000. HMRC suggested receipts in 2024-25 would drop a further 10pc to £13.1bn as a result of the allowance being cut again – to £3,000. Sarah Coles, of wealth manager Hargreaves Lansdown, said there was 'a decent chance that an awful lot of investors were just sitting on gains'. She added: 'It's a classic example of tweaking a tax in order to raise money – and then ending up with less in the long term.' Critics argue that increasing capital gains tax would undermine the Chancellor's drive for economic growth by discouraging investment. Jason Hollands, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said: 'If taxes on gains are seen to be too punitive, people will conclude the rewards aren't worth the risk, which would undermine the economy.' However, the OBR predicts capital gains tax receipts to almost double over the next five years to £25.5bn by 2029-30. Laith Khalaf, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said: 'Receipts largely reflect selling activity in the previous tax year, and plenty of people took fright ahead of last October's Budget and decided to sell up, in case of a capital gains tax raid. 'As things turned out, the Chancellor's changes to capital gains tax for individuals were relatively modest, but those who disposed of assets at a substantial profit ahead of the Budget will still be on the hook for capital gains tax, especially now the annual amount of gains you can make before paying the tax has been cut to just £3,000.' The Treasury was approached for comment.
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Algerian criminal can stay in UK because he would be ‘mocked for being trans'
An Algerian criminal has won the right to stay in Britain after claiming he would face ridicule and abuse in his home country for being transgender. The 27-year-old has been jailed for robbery and committed multiple offences including burglary, theft and battery since being granted refugee status in the UK in 2013. In arguing against his deportation, the repeat offender – identified only as MS – claimed he would be targeted in Algeria because of his sexuality, described to a court as 'gay, transvestite and/or transgender'. An asylum judge agreed, upholding his appeal against the Home Office's revocation of his refugee status. Convict's father threatens to kill him Upper tribunal Judge Christopher Hanson said: 'Were MS to return to Algeria and be open about his sexuality, he would be at risk of mockery, harassment, discrimination and potential harm from non-state actors. 'Were he to wear women's clothes and makeup, he would certainly draw negative attention to himself, and would likely be subjected to ridicule, hostility and possible harm. 'While there are some transvestites and transgender individuals in Algeria... they have suffered abuse and harm. 'Algerian society would not generally accept men dressing as women or asserting that they are transgender. Indeed, [his]'s account... of being ridiculed for wearing women's clothes and make up in public areas is entirely plausible, as are his father's threats to kill him on account of his behaviour. 'A family would deem such actions as deeply shameful and humiliating, and would do their utmost to prevent their son from bringing embarrassment and shame in this way. If MS chooses to dress in women's clothing or make up, this would heighten the threat of abuse.' The case is the latest to be revealed by The Telegraph from immigration court documents. It comes as Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is drawing up new laws to restrict the rights of foreign criminals and illegal migrants to use human rights laws to avoid deportation. She is also tightening the rules to allow the Government to reject asylum applications of sex offenders and give ministers more discretion to block the claims of other offenders. The Upper Tier Tribunal (UTT) of the Asylum and Immigration Chamber was told that the MS is a gay man who had been recognised as a refugee 'who was and is a transvestite and/or is transgender'. Prolific criminality However, since his arrival in Britain 12 years ago, he had been convicted of numerous crimes, including four convictions for offences including burglary and theft; attempted burglary with intent to steal; using threatening, abusive, insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause fear or provocation of violence; and theft. MS received a warning letter from officials in September 2015, after the decision was taken not to deport them due to Algeria's 'situation'. He received eight further convictions between May 2016 and June 2018 for offences including 'theft; resisting or obstructing a constable; failing to surrender to custody at appointed time and various driving offences'. In August 2018 he was convicted for offences including theft and racially aggravated provocation. In February 2019, he was issued 'administrative removal papers as an overstayer' following the expiry of his refugee limited leave to remain. MS was in and out of prison after this point, and came to the attention of authorities in January of the following year after being convicted for offences including battery. He was sentenced to four years and three months in prison after receiving a conviction for robbery and breaching a criminal behaviour order. 'Grant of international protection' A deportation order was made in August 2022, and he was served with a notice of the decision to revoke his refugee status in the same month. The Home Office asserted in July 2023 that the situation in Algeria had changed and that MS would no longer be an 'individual who would face treatment amounting to persecution' in the country. However, a 'country expert' told the tribunal that while 'homosexuality is not illegal in Algeria engaging in homosexual acts is a punishable offence', and those who do not hide their sexuality are at risk of 'physical violence'. Judge Hanson said: 'I find a holistic assessment of the evidence shows there is sufficient to justify the maintaining of the grant of international protection.' The judge found the lower court had made a legal error because it did not consider the 'protected characteristics' for which the asylum seeker has been 'recognised as a refugee'.
