Junior doctors in England announce 5-day strike over pay demand
LONDON : Junior doctors in England will go on strike from July 25-30, their trade union said today, after the British government said it could not meet their demands for an improved pay deal this year.
Junior doctors, also known as resident doctors and who make up a large share of the medical workforce, were offered an average 5.4% pay rise but are asking for 29%, which they say is necessary to address years of salary erosion in real terms.
Health minister Wes Streeting called the strikes 'completely unreasonable' in a statement after the five-day walk-out was announced.
He had said in a letter to the British Medical Association, the doctors' union, earlier that the government could not go any higher on pay this year.
'The NHS recovery is hanging by a thread, and the BMA are threatening to pull it,' he said.
'The BMA should abandon their rush to strike and work with us to improve resident doctors' working lives instead.'
The doctors had accepted a 22% pay rise last year covering 2023-2025, which had ended months of previous strikes.
The new strikes threaten to once again disrupt thousands of appointments and procedures at Britain's hospitals just as the government said it had started to improve services at the state-funded National Health Service.
'Without a credible offer to keep us on the path to restore our pay, we have no choice but to call strikes,' the co-chairs of the BMA's resident doctors' committee said in a statement.
The BMA said it had met Streeting today but that the government wanted to focus on improving the non-pay elements of doctors' work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
18 hours ago
- The Star
China reports record wave of mosquito-borne chikungunya virus
Guangdong province has launched stricter anti-mosquito measures, including urging residents to clear stagnant water. -- PHOTO: UNSPLASH via The Straits Times/ANN BEIJING (Bloomberg): A city in China's southern industrial hub has recorded 3,195 chikungunya cases so far this month, the country's biggest outbreak of the mosquito-borne virus since it first emerged in the mainland nearly two decades ago. Foshan city - in Guangdong Province, just north of Hong Kong - first reported an imported chikungunya case earlier in July, China's national broadcaster CCTV said, citing briefings from local authorities. Infections have soared by more than 2,700 in the past week alone. While Chinese health officials have yet to explain what's behind the outbreak, Guangdong has launched stricter anti-mosquito measures, including urging residents to clear stagnant water and make sure drainage channels remain unobstructed. Chikungunya, first identified in 1952 in Tanzania, is transmitted to humans by infected mosquitoes, the World Health Organization says. The virus causes fever and severe joint pain, and other symptoms can include headaches, muscle pain, vomiting and fatigue. The outbreak in Guangdong, an often hot and humid area of southern China, is the latest sign that tropical diseases - from dengue to malaria and zika - are expanding their reach, as climate change lets mosquitoes live in new territories that have become warmer and wetter. Increased international travel and low population immunity are also helping the spread. An explosion in cases in the Indian Ocean since the start of 2025 has sparked concerns of a spread to other countries, leading the WHO to issue an urgent call to action this week, Reuters reported. France and Italy, thousands of miles from the region, have both found locally-acquired chikungunya cases this year. "The surge in chikungunya cases is likely due to favorable climatic conditions that allow blooms of the Aedes mosquito population,' said Robert Jones, Assistant Professor in the Department of Disease Control at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. "These are aggressive, day-biting mosquitoes that thrive in warm, wet conditions.' More than five billion people live in areas across 119 countries at risk from chikungunya, the WHO told reporters in Geneva, Reuters said. Some 220,000 cases and 80 related deaths have been reported in 14 countries and territories globally so far this year, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. China recorded its first chikungunya case in 2008, an imported infection detected at an airport in Guangdong. The first locally transmitted cases - infecting 253 people - were reported in the province two years later. Since then, only sporadic cases have been found, in Yunnan and Fujian provinces. Globally, population susceptibility is likely elevated in areas where chikungunya outbreaks haven't tended to occur, said Patricia Gallego Delgado, Associate Director at London-based disease forecasting firm Airfinity Ltd. The wave is "attributable to lower levels of population immunity as individuals in these regions may have had limited or no prior exposure to the virus,' she said. -- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
More British babies born via IVF, showing changing landscape of fertility care
IVF births in Britain have increased from 1.3% in 2000 to 3.1% in 2023. Photo: Freepik The equivalent of almost one child in every classroom in Britain is now born as a result of in-vitro fertilisation or IVF fertility treatment, new figures suggest. Almost 21,000 babies were born from IVF in 2023, compared to 8,700 in 2000, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) said. The authors of the fertility regulator's latest report wrote: "IVF births are making up a higher proportion of all British births over time, increasing from 1.3% in 2000 to 3.1% in 2023. "This means around one in 32 British births in 2023 were via IVF – roughly one child in every classroom – compared to one in 43 in 2013.' The HFEA said that its latest figures show the "changing landscape' of fertility care in Britain. Overall, 52,400 patients had ,ore than 77,500 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles at British fertility clinics in 2023. Some 11% of births to women aged 40-44 were a result of IVF, increasing from 4% in 2000 and accounting for 0.5% of all births, HFEA said. The data also reveal a rise in the proportion of women freezing their eggs – a rise from 4,700 in 2022 to 6,900 in 2023 – but the HFEA said that the number of patients using their stored frozen eggs in treatment remains "low.' Meanwhile the HFEA also said that in 2023, around 820 babies were born following donor insemination (DI) treatment. The figures also show a reduction in the number of IVF treatments funded by the NHS. The proportion of NHS-funded IVF cycles declined from 35% in 2019 to 27% in 2023. Racial disparities The HFEA also raised concerns about racial disparities in IVF. It said that in recent years, Asian and Black patients have had lower birth rates compared to white patients and those from a mixed ethnic background. Julia Chain, chairwoman of the HFEA, said: "IVF is helping more people have babies including patients of different ages and family types. "One in 32 of all British births are from IVF and 11% of all UK births are to women aged 40-44 who had IVF. "These findings highlight the changing landscape of the fertility sector and how it could develop in the years to come. "However, we are very concerned to see that Black and Asian patients continue to have lower IVF birth rates compared to other patient groups, and our recent survey found that Asian and Black patients are less likely to report being satisfied with their fertility treatment.' Data from the Office for National Statistics show that the fertility rate in England and Wales in 2023 was 1.44 children per woman – the lowest level on record. Commenting on the HFEA data, a spokesperson from the fertility charity Fertility Network UK said: "This important report from the HFEA reflects how essential fertility treatment has become for growing families and underlines not just the scientific advances in fertility care, but also the profound social impact of helping people realise their dreams of parenthood. "Delays in accessing treatment – whether due to long GP referral times or inconsistent NHS funding – can have a devastating emotional and biological impact. We call for fair and timely access to fertility services for all, wherever they live and whatever their background.' – dpa
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Floating babies, cosmic radiation and zero-gravity birth: What space pregnancy might actually involve
LONDON, July 24 — As plans for missions to Mars accelerate, so do questions about how the human body might cope. A return trip to the red planet would give more than enough time for someone to become pregnant and even give birth. But could a pregnancy be conceived and carried safely in space? And what would happen to a baby born far from Earth? Most of us rarely consider the risks we survived before birth. For instance, about two thirds of human embryos do not live long enough to be born, with most losses happening in the first few weeks after fertilisation; often before a person even knows they're pregnant. These early, unnoticed losses usually happen when an embryo either fails to develop properly or to implant successfully in the wall of the womb. Pregnancy can be understood as a chain of biological milestones. Each one must happen in the right order and each has a certain chance of success. On Earth, these odds can be estimated using clinical research and biological models. My latest research explores how these same stages might be affected by the extreme conditions of interplanetary space. Microgravity, the near-weightlessness experienced during spaceflight, would make conception more physically awkward but probably wouldn't interfere much with staying pregnant once the embryo has implanted. However, giving birth, and looking after a newborn, would be far more difficult in zero gravity. After all, in space, nothing stays still. Fluids float. So do people. That makes delivering a baby and caring for one a much messier and more complicated process than on Earth, where gravity helps with everything from positioning to feeding. At the same time, the developing foetus already grows in something like microgravity. It floats in neutrally buoyant amniotic fluid inside the womb, cushioned and suspended. In fact, astronauts train for spacewalks in water tanks designed to mimic weightlessness. In that sense, the womb is already a microgravity simulator. But gravity is only part of the picture. Radiation Outside Earth's protective layers, there's a more dangerous threat: cosmic rays. These are high-energy particles — 'stripped-down' or 'bare' atomic nuclei — that race through space at nearly the speed of light. They're atoms that have lost all their electrons, leaving just the dense core of protons and neutrons. When these bare nuclei collide with the human body, they can cause serious cellular damage. Here on Earth, we're protected from most cosmic radiation by the planet's thick atmosphere and, depending on the time of day, tens of thousands to millions of miles of coverage from the Earth's magnetic field. In space, that shielding disappears. When a cosmic ray passes through the human body, it may strike an atom, strip its electrons, and smash into its nucleus, knocking out protons and neutrons and leaving behind a different element or isotope. This can cause extremely localised damage — meaning that individual cells, or parts of cells, are destroyed while the rest of the body might remain unaffected. Sometimes the ray passes right through without hitting anything. But if it hits DNA, it can cause mutations that increase the risk of cancer. Even when cells survive, radiation can trigger inflammatory responses. That means the immune system overreacts, releasing chemicals that can damage healthy tissue and disrupt organ function. In the first few weeks of pregnancy, embryonic cells are rapidly dividing, moving, and forming early tissues and structures. For development to continue, the embryo must stay viable throughout this delicate process. The first month after fertilisation is the most vulnerable time. A single hit from a high-energy cosmic ray at this stage could be lethal to the embryo. However, the embryo is very small — and cosmic rays, while dangerous, are relatively rare. So a direct hit is unlikely. If it did happen, it would probably result in an unnoticed miscarriage. Pregnancy risks As pregnancy progresses, the risks shift. Once the placental circulation — the blood flow system that connects mother and foetus — is fully formed by the end of the first trimester, the foetus and uterus grow rapidly. That growth presents a larger target. A cosmic ray is now more likely to hit the uterine muscle, which could trigger contractions and potentially cause premature labour. And although neonatal intensive care has improved dramatically, the earlier a baby is born, the higher the risk of complications, particularly in space. On Earth, pregnancy and childbirth already carry risks. In space, those risks are magnified — but not necessarily prohibitive. But development doesn't stop at birth. A baby born in space would continue growing in microgravity, which could interfere with postural reflexes and coordination. These are the instincts that help a baby learn to lift its head, sit up, crawl, and eventually walk: all movements that rely on gravity. Without that sense of 'up' and 'down,' these abilities might develop in very different ways. And the radiation risk doesn't go away. A baby's brain continues to grow after birth, and prolonged exposure to cosmic rays could cause permanent damage — potentially affecting cognition, memory, behaviour and long-term health. So, could a baby be born in space? In theory, yes. But until we can protect embryos from radiation, prevent premature birth, and ensure babies can grow safely in microgravity, space pregnancy remains a high-risk experiment – one we're not yet ready to try. — Reuters
