logo
Trump plays down talk of a third term, backing Vance and Rubio

Trump plays down talk of a third term, backing Vance and Rubio

Straits Times05-05-2025
US President Donald Trump has often mused about the idea of a third term. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTTIMES
Trump plays down talk of a third term, backing Vance and Rubio
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump poured cold water on the idea of serving a third term, an idea he has frequently teased but is prohibited by the Constitution.
He instead floated Vice-President J.D. Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio as possible successors in an interview aired on May 4 .
Mr Trump said in the interview, with NBC's 'Meet the Press', that he was reluctant to be drawn into a debate about who could follow him, but he called Mr Vance a 'fantastic, brilliant guy' and Mr Rubio 'great'.
Mr Trump added that 'a lot' of people are great, but said, 'certainly you would say that somebody's the VP, if that person is outstanding, I guess that person would have an advantage'.
Mr Trump has often mused about the idea of a third term, going so far as to say in March that he was 'not joking' about the possibility and suggesting there were 'methods' of circumventing the 22nd Amendment, which says no person may be elected president more than twice.
In April, his family business began selling 'Trump 2028' merchandise – some with the phrase 'Rewrite the Rules' – that added to the speculation.
On May 4 , the interviewer, Ms Kristen Welker, asked Mr Trump about that merchandise, and the president insisted that many people wanted him to seek another term before he played down the idea.
'It's something that, to the best of my knowledge, you're not allowed to do,' he said before adding that he did not know if the prohibition – which is part of the Constitution – was constitutional.
'There are many people selling the 2028 hat, but this is not something I'm looking to do,' he said.
'I'm looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally a great Republican.'
Four years, Mr Trump added, was enough time to do something 'really spectacular'. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House Joins TikTok, Trump Bets Big on App Despite China Concerns
White House Joins TikTok, Trump Bets Big on App Despite China Concerns

International Business Times

timean hour ago

  • International Business Times

White House Joins TikTok, Trump Bets Big on App Despite China Concerns

The White House is now officially on TikTok, in a move that's sure to make the weird times we live in feel even weirder and more Orwellian. The new account, @whitehouse, debuted Tuesday evening with a brief video of President Donald Trump proclaiming, "I am your voice." The caption said, "America, we are BACK! What's up, TikTok?" X TikTok, owned by the China-based company ByteDance, has more than 170 million users in the United States. Trump has embraced the platform, crediting it for helping him win support among younger voters during his 2024 race against Democrat Kamala Harris. His campaign handle, @realdonaldtrump, already has over 15 million followers. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration plans to use the platform aggressively. "The Trump administration," she said, "is eager to keep the American people, through as many audiences as possible, informed of President Trump's historic successes achieved despite a decade of partisan obstruction by the," etc. We are thrilled to be able to capitalize on the campaign's momentum." The decision comes amid fierce political debate in Washington. Lawmakers and intelligence officials have also warned that TikTok's ownership could provide the Chinese government with access to Americans' sensitive data. Previous assessments have indicated that the app could be used to shape American political opinion. By 2024, Congress had passed a law that mandated the Chinese app either divest itself of its U.S. assets or face a nationwide ban by Jan. 19, 2025. ByteDance has yet to finalize a deal, but Trump, who resumed office in January, has raised the deadline several times — first in April and, later, to June and now September 17. These extensions have prompted some lawmakers to push back, accusing the administration of prioritizing politics over national security. Critics say the White House is papering over the risks associated with Chinese ownership of the platform; Trump's allies counter that the app has grown too vital to political communication to cast away. Despite the controversy, Trump remains committed to the multi-platform approach. Next to TikTok, he is an active poster on Truth Social, the social media network he created, and, less frequently, X, once known as Twitter. The White House's official TikTok would feature Trump's policy accomplishments and push his administration's messaging in a more casual and fun format that hopes to connect with the large pool of younger audiences who use the app. With a deadline for TikTok's divestment still less than a week away and a ban on the app's U.S. business looming in order to "address national security threats," the future of the app in the U.S. remains up in the air. For the moment, the White House is counting on the app as a potent tool for expanding its reach, even as the political and security issues hover overhead.

White House Confirms Talks on 10% US Stake in Intel to Bolster National Security
White House Confirms Talks on 10% US Stake in Intel to Bolster National Security

International Business Times

timean hour ago

  • International Business Times

White House Confirms Talks on 10% US Stake in Intel to Bolster National Security

The White House confirmed that the U.S. government is discussing the purchase of a 10% stake in Intel, marking a significant move to bolster national security and economic security. The news comes at a time when the global semiconductor supply chain is under threat, and China is seeking to challenge U.S. leadership in that industry. Intel Reuters The potential investment is one part of a larger strategy to protect the technology sector in the United States, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a briefing on Tuesday. "This initiative is about ensuring that the United States leads the world in semiconductor innovation while protecting our national security interests," she said. Intel, one of the world's largest chip makers, is critical to the production of advanced semiconductors that power everything from smartphones to weapons systems. With rising geopolitical tensions, U.S. officials have expressed growing alarm about reliance on foreign manufacturing, particularly Asia. The government's effort is part of a broader push to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers and increase chip manufacturing in the United States. The discussions also underscore the Trump administration's emphasis on protecting critical sectors. In recent years, the U.S. has pumped billions of dollars toward increasing domestic production capacity under two major acts: the CHIPS and Science Act. Intel's private sector expansion would be even more correlative with national policy goals if the government held a stake in it. The potential 10% investment is expected not just to shore up Intel's fleet of long-term projects but also to bolster the United States in the global race for leadership in semiconductor technology, analysts said. "Semiconductors are the new oil of the digital economy," one industry expert noted. "Control over chip supply chains means control over future innovation and competitiveness." Though the discussions are ongoing, lawmakers from both parties are monitoring them closely. Some have expressed concern about government involvement in private enterprise, while others say the urgency of the semiconductor challenge calls for drastic action. If completed, the deal would be among the largest moves yet by the American government to directly befriend a private technology company. It would also put the United States in a good position to reassure allies and warn would-be global competitors that the United States will compete and lead in the semiconductor industry for decades to come.

Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules
Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, US judge rules

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Judge Richard Berman said the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. NEW YORK - A US judge denied on Aug 20 the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. 'The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials,' Judge Berman wrote. 'The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mr Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Mr Trump's supporters. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study Life Record number of arts patrons in 2024, but overall donation dips to $45.74m Life 'Loss that's irreplaceable': Local film-makers mourn closure of Singapore indie cinema The Projector Singapore Nearly 2 years' jail, caning for man caught with at least 100 sexually explicit videos of children Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Mr Trump instructed Attorney-General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On Aug 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Judge Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her month-long trial four years earlier. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Judge Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store