
‘I have Star Wars going on outside my window': How Kyiv is coping with upsurge in Russia's attacks
residents who managed to sleep on another night of intense
Russian
air attacks woke to an increasingly familiar scene on Monday morning, as smoke wreathed several districts of the city, hospitals treated the wounded, and damage to civilian buildings and transport infrastructure made journeys to work slower and more stressful.
At least one person was killed and eight injured during a night of drone and missile attacks on the city of 3.5 million. Apartment blocks, office buildings and a kindergarten were set on fire and the entrance to a metro station was hit, sending smoke pouring down on to platforms where people were taking shelter.
Russian drone attacks on Ukraine – and particularly Kyiv – have intensified sharply in recent weeks, and the two heaviest strikes of the war took place this month, peaking overnight from July 8th-9th with the launch of 728 drones and 13 missiles.
Graphic: Paul Scott/ IRISH TIMES GRAPHICS
Ukrainian officials said on Monday morning that Russia fired 426 drones and 24 missiles overnight, most of which were shot down or electronically jammed. But the toll on the country and its people from direct strikes, falling debris and stress and tiredness accumulated over more than three years of full-scale war continues to mount.
READ MORE
A young girl takes a selfie as locals hide in a shelter during an air-raid alarm, near a site of a drone strike on a residential building in Kyiv. Photograph: Sergey Dolzhenko/European Pressphoto Agency
'When people asked me whether I was worried about living in Kyiv, I would say that yes, it's being shelled and bombed, but it's well protected. That's how it felt until a few weeks ago. There were drone attacks every other night but they would hardly reach the actual city – they were usually shot down in the regions,' says Nazar, a Kyiv resident.
'But in the past month there have been lots of occasions when suddenly lots of drones have come into the city. I've started hearing explosions closer and closer, to the point where I couldn't ignore it like before. That's when it started feeling less safe.'
In Kyiv and other towns and cities where air-raid alerts can last for most of the day and night, Ukrainians must decide whether to take a risk by doing what they had planned – from staying in bed and trying to sleep to following a normal work routine – or to seek shelter in a basement, underground car park or metro station.
'Seeing drones over my residential area, over my actual apartment building, is a scary thing. They make a particular annoying, threatening noise, which speeds up as they're about to hit a target. It sounds like something from a second World War movie,' says Nazar, who lives in a 16-floor flat in Kyiv's western Nyvky district.
A local man carries his dog at a damaged stairwell after a drone strike on a residential building in Kyiv on Monday. Photograph: Sergey Dolzhenko/EPA
'Now a few buildings have been destroyed not far from me and you hear about hundreds of these drones coming. You don't feel safe. So now I go to the underground shelter at 3 or 4am.'
The Shahed drones fired at Kyiv and other cities are not the small, light models – similar to hobby drones but carrying explosives – that both sides use on the front line.
The Iranian-made Shaheds are 3.5m long, have a wingspan of 2.5m and weigh 200kg, and can fly for some 2,000km before plunging into a target and detonating a 40kg warhead. Russia now mass produces its own version of the Shahed, called the Geran.
A Ukrainian explosives expert examines parts of a Shahed military drone that fell following an air attack last month. Photograph: Sergey Bobok/AFP
'It's a guessing game. A matter of luck,' Olesya, who lives on the eighth floor of an apartment building in northwestern Kyiv, says of the danger of being killed or hurt.
'While before I would have stayed in my flat during an alert, now, if there are too many drones flying overhead, I go into the corridor of the building (for greater protection) or to a lower floor,' she adds.
'People who have stayed in Kyiv tend to find some kind of rational decision in terms of everyday functioning. So if you stay in your apartment there is a chance that you'll be killed there, but there is also a chance that you'll get a good night's sleep and not be hit ...
But sometimes it's very hard to sleep and function normally afterwards.'
Russia's escalating attacks have coincided with fresh concerns over Ukraine's air defences, as the United States halted supplies of some crucial weaponry and then announced that some would be delivered after all.
That was followed by a White House decision this month to send more air defence systems and other arms to Kyiv via a new deal with Nato. Germany and other European states are expected to provide Ukraine with advanced US-made Patriot air defence units from their stocks and then 'backfill' with equipment bought from the US.
As ever during nearly 3½ years of all-out war – and 11 years of conflict since Russia occupied Crimea and created heavily armed militias in eastern Ukraine – the timing and scale of western help for Ukraine is still unclear.
People with their belongings leave a damaged metro station after a Russian attack in Kyiv last week. Photograph: Oleksii Filippov/AFP
'I live on the 14th floor and I have Star Wars going on outside my window. Not just tracers but I can see Shaheds flying past,' says Viktoriya, whose flat on the eastern bank of the Dnipro river is on an approach route for many drones and missiles targeting Kyiv.
'Before, the majority was repelled. But now I don't think we have enough air-defence assets or manpower to track everything, so they do get through,' she adds, calling Russia's tactics 'terror for the sake of terror'.
'Now I see more people going at night to metro stations and other shelters with sleeping bags, mats, dogs, backpacks and other necessities. They're becoming more systematic and going fully prepared. But there are also those who don't go, and feel the chance of being hit while going to the shelter is higher than when being at home.'
On July 8th – the night of the heaviest Russian air attack so far – 32,000 people took refuge in Kyiv's metro stations, including almost 2,200 children, according to city officials. Figures for night-time visits to the metro system in July are expected to surpass those for June, when 165,000 visits were recorded, up from 65,000 in May.
A man carries a dog in a damaged metro station following a Russian attack in Kyiv last week. Photograph: Oleksi Filippov/AFP
Russia has also launched intense drone and missile strikes on western Ukraine this month, shaking the residents of cities that are 1,000km from the frontline: the mayor of Ivano-Frankivsk said it had suffered its heaviest attack of the war in the early hours of Monday, and that four people had been injured in nearby villages.
There is fear in Kyiv and other cities, just as there is anger at the West's failure to back up rhetoric with action, but such feelings are by now familiar to Ukrainians – as are Russia's demands for a settlement that would amount to capitulation.
'I wouldn't say there's a catastrophic shift in how it feels ... But it does feel very targeted, very instrumentalised, this terror against civilians,' Olesya says. 'It feels very thought-out, to make people scared and panic and potentially put pressure on the authorities and demand talks – any talks just to stop this. I don't feel this is working for now, at least on a mass scale.'
'I don't think we are depressed or saying this is the end of Ukraine,' says Nazar. 'Surprisingly, I have more resilience than I thought, and I think people are on same page in that way.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Sisters of rapist Richard Brennan want witnesses in trials to get paid leave from work
The sisters of a man who sexually abused them have called for reform of the legal system over leave for witnesses in trials. At the Central Criminal Court earlier this month Richard Brennan was given a sentence of eight years for offences against his three sisters in the 1970s and 1980s in Dublin . Brennan, with an address in Montana in the US, admitted days into his trial last March to 24 offences against Yvonne Crist, Paula Fay and Catherine Wrightstone. Now Ms Fay and Ms Wrightstone have called for witnesses to be given paid leave, the same as jurors, in trials. READ MORE Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Oliver Callan show, Ms Fay said when she told her employer she was going to be a witness in a trial and that it could take three weeks she was told all she was entitled to was annual leave or unpaid leave. 'There was nothing in law to protect me as a witness,' she said. 'I was completely committed to this process from the very beginning, and I feel that we need to be treated differently.' Ms Fay said witnesses, like jurors, were also doing their civic duty and as such should be treated the same as them. The abuse was committed by Brennan in the family home in Rathfarnham when he was aged between 16 and 24 and included four offences of rape against Ms Fay and two of rape against Ms Wrightstone when both women were minors. Following the trial the sisters voiced their 'deep disappointment' over the 'leniency' of his eight-year sentence. Speaking on the show, Ms Wrightstone said: 'I think Irish courts seem to have broad discretion over such cases as ours and lenient sentences, especially in historical sexual abuse cases, are sometimes justified on the basis of remorse, time elapsed. 'In terms of reform, I would love to see an introduction of mandatory binding sentencing guidelines that treat sexual abuse and rape as serious offences regardless of the time elapsed and create a statutory offence under sexual assault for sibling sexual abuse.' During sentencing, Mr Justice David Keane said among the mitigatory factors were Brennan's 'very late' plea of guilty, his apology to his sisters, his expression of remorse, his lack of previous convictions, that the offences occurred 40 years ago and that he was considered at low risk of reoffending. Ms Wrightstone told the radio show that 'one of the things that I find a little bit disturbing is the offender's recent good character as stated in character references provided by family and friends, who only know what that person allows them to know'. She said she and her sisters were trying to 'give voice' for those who could not come forward. 'We understand that it's a really challenging thing to do. We want to provide hope, that our legal system will help and that the gardaí will help and that hopefully other changes will happen,' she said. 'But we do recognise that there have been some that have lost their life under the weight of trauma, so we're here to give voice to those and we thank all of those brave women that came before us.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Was Keir Starmer pushed on Palestinian statehood or did he wait for right moment?
In the end, Keir Starmer acted. After an emergency cabinet meeting lasting about 90 minutes on Tuesday, the British prime minister put the UK on an path to recognising Palestine as a state, probably as soon as September. For Labour MPs and cabinet ministers who have lobbied Starmer to take this decisive diplomatic step for months, there was huge relief, coupled with frustration that it had taken so long. 'He was pushed,' one senior Labour MP said. That is strongly denied by Starmer's allies, who insisted the prime minister was just waiting for the moment when recognition of a Palestinian state would have the most impact. 'It was always when, not if,' one said. Starmer has frustrated many in the Labour Party – not just left-wingers – over his handling of the Gaza crisis and what some MPs have seen as a lack of urgency in his response to the grim scenes unfolding there. READ MORE When French president Emmanuel Macron announced last week he would recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in September, that frustration with Starmer turned to anger. 'Number 10 had loads of incoming fire over the weekend,' one minister said. More than 130 Labour MPs signed a letter calling on Starmer to move now to Palestinian state recognition. Starmer's aides insisted the end result of Tuesday's cabinet meeting was '100 per cent unity' behind a position that is most likely to see Britain recognise a Palestinian state around the time of the UN General Assembly. 'One way or another you get to Palestinian recognition,' one Starmer ally said, after the prime minister set out a 'UK plan' for a stable peace between Israelis and Palestinians, which he hopes will win wide international support. Under Starmer's plan, Britain will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza', agrees to a ceasefire and commits to a long-term, sustainable peace based on a two-state solution. Emily Thornberry, Labour chair of the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, said bluntly: 'That's not going to happen.' She said the only way it could conceivably happen would be if Israel changed its government before September. But even in the extremely unlikely event that Binyamin Netanyahu , Israel's prime minister, agreed with Starmer's 'conditions', that would still create a pathway for Britain recognising Palestine as part of a two-state solution. Starmer has been advised throughout by Jonathan Powell, his national security adviser, who has stressed the importance of holding back recognition until it might make some difference. He notes that more than 140 countries have already recognised a Palestinian state to little effect. Powell, an architect of the Northern Ireland peace process, wanted Britain to act with other allies, but Macron's surprise decision to announce the French position last week left Starmer looking like he was being buffeted by events. Starmer has been suspected by some inside the Labour Party of being too soft on Netanyahu ever since an LBC interview in October 2023, when he was asked whether Israel's right to self defence extended to cutting off power and water to Gaza. 'I think that Israel does have that right,' Starmer replied. He subsequently claimed he was answering a previous question and was not backing the cutting off of crucial supplies to Gaza, but the perception stuck. YouGov polling found that of those Labour voters in 2024 who had subsequently switched their support to the Greens, some 25 per cent named the ruling party's stance on Gaza as a reason. A new party set up by Jeremy Corbyn , the former leftwing Labour leader, will be mining the same seam of voters. Ministers as well as Labour MPs have been frustrated with Starmer. After Macron announced his stance on Palestinian statehood, one minister said: 'The block is Keir himself as well as his senior advisers and their desire to stay close to the US.' Downing Street officials admitted the United States might react negatively to Starmer's ultimatum to Netanyahu. Marco Rubio , US secretary of state, said last week that Macron's move was 'a reckless decision that only serves Hamas propaganda'. Donald Trump was less hostile to the idea during his meetings with Starmer in Scotland this week, suggesting that he would not be too upset if the UK went down the same route as France. The US president's comments on scenes of 'real starvation' in Gaza also changed the mood. On the way back from Scotland aboard Air Force One, Trump said he had 'no view on that' when asked about the UK's announcement – claiming Starmer had barely raised the matter of Palestinian statehood – while also appearing to question the case for pressuring Israel. Starmer hopes his plan will garner support from allies – he is due to speak shortly to Canada's Mark Carney – and that he can answer his Labour critics by putting himself at the forefront of a fresh push for peace. But Trump is wary of the UK plan, while Germany's Friedrich Merz is unlikely to back a Palestinian state any time soon. Nor is there any sign that Netanyahu will change his approach to Gaza and endorse a peace process based on a two-state solution for fear of Britain and France formally recognising a Palestinian state in September. However, Starmer's plan was backed by the British public in a poll by YouGov released on Tuesday, which showed that 45 per cent of people supported recognition of a Palestinian state, with only 14 per cent opposed. Starmer, who is also trying to galvanise an international aid effort, has belatedly aligned himself with his party and the public on Palestinian statehood. Many Labour figures wish it had just happened sooner. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
US president Donald Trump 's August 1st tariff deadline has been hanging over the global trading system and Europe's transatlantic trade with the US for months. The deal struck by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump last weekend puts an end to a lot, but unfortunately not all, of the speculation. Much of the detail has yet to be ironed out and there is still confusion over how certain parts will work in practice. For example, a 'fact sheet' published by the White House seems to suggest the tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be paid by the EU when in fact they will be borne by US businesses and consumers. Is there something in this deal for both sides? READ MORE On paper and despite the positive spin coming from Brussels about 'trade certainty', it's a very a one-sided deal in favour of the US. It imposes, from Friday, a baseline 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports into the US, including approximately €70 billion worth goods exported from Ireland, while committing the bloc to major purchases of US energy and armaments. The EU, for its part, has reduced its tariffs on most US imports, in some cases to zero, giving US exporters much greater access to Europe's 450 million-strong consumer market. This is far cry from the zero-for-zero deal initially offered by Brussels. Based on last year's trade figures, the deal might be expected to net the US government roughly $90 billion in tariff revenue. What will it mean for the Irish economy? For a small, export-led economy that relies heavily on trade with the US, it's undoubtedly a negative. But Government ministers are playing up the fact that it avoids the 30 per cent tariff rate initially threatened by Mr Trump, keeps the trade doors open and avoids a mutually destructive trade war. Critics will say the EU gave in too easily and that it failed, as gatekeeper to the most lucrative consumer market in the world, to wield its economic might. According to one estimate, the tariff deal will knock 0.5 per cent off EU GDP (gross domestic product). What has been the reaction from Irish business? 'Irish exporters and importers will not have to operate under cumbersome and very expensive WTO [World Trade Organisation] rules. However, there will still be changes and increased costs to trade,' the chief executive of the Irish Exporters Association, Simon McKeever, says. Employers' group Ibec says a 15 per cent tariff represents 'a substantial burden for many industries' and has called on Government to consider providing supports to vulnerable businesses similar to those rolled out during Brexit. Does that mean an economic slowdown here? On the basis of a 10 per cent tariff on EU goods exports to the US with an exemption for pharmaceuticals, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) had forecast the economy here would grow, in modified domestic demand terms, at a slower rate of 2.3 per cent this year, down from 3 per cent previously. Now that the actual deal involves pharma and a higher baseline tariff rate, the slowdown in headline growth is expected to be larger though not enough to trigger a recession. The Government's budgetary numbers, which are also based around a 10 per cent tariff rate, may also have to be scaled back. Does the different tariff rate in Northern Ireland present a problem? The divergence in tariff treatment between the EU and the UK (15 per cent versus 10 per cent) will also create cost differentials and other issues on the island of Ireland, between Northern Ireland and the Republic, particularly in areas like food and drink which will play out in way we perhaps can't see at this stage. Will the deal damage inward investment here? The nightmare scenario for Ireland would be for an Apple or an Intel to up sticks and leave in the face of Trump's protectionist agenda. There's no way of telling how these policies are influencing decision-making in the boardrooms of these companies. Like everyone else, they are probably adopting a wait-and-see approach. The Government will hope that the increased cost of trading with the US (from Ireland) doesn't outweigh the attraction of the Irish economy for US business. What else? Of course, the big question surrounding Trump's protectionist trade agenda is how will it impact the US economy. A major slide in performance there – with tariffs expected to lead to higher prices for US consumers – and the global economy (including Irish exports) could suffer. Trump is already hounding Federal Reserve boss Jay Powell to reduce interest rates to cushion any impact of tariffs but with inflation ticking up, that's unlikely. And, as always, there will be continued uncertainty over whether the US president will stick by this accord or decide that other action is needed.