The Internet System Elon Musk Installed at the White House Is Causing Concerns
Elon Musk's lackeys at his so-called Department of Government Efficiency installed a Starlink terminal on the roof of the White House — and then totally blew off the major security concerns raised by communications experts, the Washington Post reports.
This is the latest example of the security risks arising from DOGE's sweeping access to federal systems, alongside the high-profile blunders made by key figures in Trump's cabinet.
According to insiders, it sounds like the White House communications experts were totally circumvented by Musk's group: they were given no notice that DOGE was installing the Starlink terminal — and once the satellite-based internet service was online, they had no way of actually monitoring the connections. When they voiced these concerns, the communications experts were ignored.
At one point, things got heated. The installation of the Starlink roof terminal caused a confrontation between DOGE staffers and the Secret Service, according to WaPo.
There was a lot for them to complain about. According to WaPo sources, a "Starlink Guest" WiFi network that first appeared in February is still active. It asks only for a password, with no username requirement or other form of authentication.
This is not — or at least, shouldn't be — standard practice. Personal phones on a guest network at the White House typically need a username and a password, which are tracked and expire after a week, per WaPo. Starlink's network, by contrast, sounds more like the free Wi-Fi at Starbucks.
"Starlink doesn't require anything. It allows you to transmit data without any kind of record or tracking," an insider told WaPo. "White House IT systems had very strong controls on network access. You had to be on a full-tunnel VPN at all times. If you are not on the VPN, White House-issued devices can't connect to the outside."
"With a Starlink connection, that means White House devices could leave the network and go out through gateways. … It's going to help you bypass security," another insider told WaPo.
Starlink is generally considered more secure than traditional telecommunication networks in the US, according to the reporting. But they're not impenetrable, and security experts aren't relishing the fact that they're being kept in the dark about what data is being transmitted in and out of the White House via the satellite network.
It's unclear if the rooftop terminal remains installed, or if anything will change now that Musk has stepped back from his role as a "special government employee." That's a substantial loose end, because Musk has recently demonstrated a legendary petty streak that saw him lash out at Donald Trump and seemingly burn all bridges with the administration.
If Musk is willing to threaten to cut off the US government's space access using his company's spacecraft, what else would he be willing to do? We've seen Musk personally intervene in Starlink's operations in the past for political reasons. When the Ukrainian military launched an ambush on the Russian naval fleet stationed near the Crimean coast, the billionaire ordered his engineers to shut down Starlink in the region to disrupt the attack.
Starlink did not respond to WaPo's request for comment. The Secret Service said it could not discuss specific technology systems for security reasons.
"We were aware of DOGE's intentions to improve internet access on the campus and did not consider this matter a security incident or security breach," Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi told WaPo.
More on Elon Musk: Trump Confronted Musk in Private Before Their Blowout Public Fight
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla Stock Was Slumping Again Today
One Wall Street analyst downgraded Tesla stock today. CEO Elon Musk's feud with President Trump may hurt the EV company. Expectations for Tesla's upcoming robotaxi reveal event may be too high. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) stock had a rough week last week, dropping nearly 15%. Shares fell again today with its robotaxi launch in Austin, Texas, coming soon. While the company hasn't confirmed the specific June date for the launch, reports say it could be Thursday, June 12. One Wall Street analyst thinks investors are going to be disappointed by the much-hyped event. That helped push Tesla stock lower by as much as 4.5% early Monday. Shares had recovered from that drop and even turned slightly positive at 12:33 p.m. ET. Baird analyst Ben Karrow downgraded Tesla shares from a buy to a hold rating for reasons that include high expectations for the upcoming robotaxi launch as well as the very public feud CEO Elon Musk had with President Trump last week. Regarding the robotaxi introduction, Musk has said much of his company's value should be based on Tesla's self-driving technology. Investors anticipating that event have helped push Tesla stock higher by more than 12% in the past month, even including last week's decline. The Baird analyst thinks lofty expectations for the event are already built into Tesla's share price. He also cited uncertainty and potential blowback from the public spat between Musk and President Trump, reports Barron's. Tesla needs government support in the form of favorable autonomous driving regulations, among other matters, beyond any electric vehicle (EV) credits that have been used to help spur demand for its products. More news came from the EV leader this weekend, too. Milan Kovac, Tesla's executive in charge of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics segment, said on Friday that he is moving on from the company. He started at Tesla in 2016 and reported directly to Musk. Kovac expressed confidence in Tesla's future, and Musk thanked him for his "outstanding contributions." That just adds more uncertainty for investors, though, as Optimus is another key future catalyst for Tesla. For now, all eyes will be on the robotaxi news coming soon. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $367,516!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,712!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $669,517!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Howard Smith has positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Tesla Stock Was Slumping Again Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Musk's administration allies become targets
Elon Musk's allies inside the Trump administration are newly vulnerable after the mogul's bitter public breakup with the president. MAGA loyalists are taking advantage of the Trump-Musk rift to threaten the standing of anyone in the administration who's perceived as too close to the Tesla CEO. Leading that charge is former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, whose long-running animosity toward Musk peaked last week with the former calling to deport Musk from the US and the latter deeming Bannon a 'Communist retard.' Among the potential Bannon targets: David Sacks, the venture capitalist tapped by Trump as artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency czar. Sacks has invested in Musk's SpaceX and, like Musk, is a member of the so-called PayPal Mafia (early PayPal employees and founders who are a Silicon Valley force). 'You're dangerous. It's all about you, not the country,' Bannon recently said on his War Room podcast of Sacks and his All-In Podcast co-hosts. But the administration's close ties to the crypto industry and Sacks' help to the Trump campaign mean he's likely to avoid the chopping block. 'As a trusted ally and early supporter of President Trump, David Sacks sacrificed a thriving entrepreneurial career to serve as the President's AI and Crypto Czar,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement, adding that Sacks 'is deeply committed to advancing the president's vision' on both issues. That leaves lesser-known figures brought in by Musk to bear the brunt of the speculation about more exits — talk that Silicon Valley is monitoring closely, and with good reason. One person familiar with the situation told Semafor that there are ongoing conversations inside the administration 'regarding the future of some of these big names that came to the federal government in that wave of Elon coming here.' This person described possible forthcoming departures as more of a 'mutual separation' than a forced ouster. A number of Musk allies are still working with the Department of Government Efficiency, and officials are said to be cognizant of those who may now have conflicts of interests or dualing loyalties. The White House's longer-term goal in the wake of the Trump-Musk spat is to underscore that DOGE 'isn't just a fad,' this person added, and some in the administration are discussing ways to separate its mission from 'the personality behind the original initiative.' 'Maybe we don't call it DOGE,' the person suggested. 'The mission is what we want to stay focused on.' Sacks hosted Trump for a fundraiser last summer at his home on San Francisco's Billionaire Row, cementing his role as a tech industry conduit to the White House. He's got a rare office in the White House complex, two sources told Semafor, and is playing a lead role in shepherding crypto legislation through Congress — as well as drafting a long-awaited administration report, expected in July, that will shape other industry-friendly policies. Sacks 'brought Silicon Valley to the table with him well before Musk jumped on board' the Trump campaign, one tech industry insider said. Since then, 'he has avoided all of the third rails that Musk grabbed' by focusing his efforts on cementing crypto-friendly policy and competing with China on AI. That hasn't stopped Bannon from going after him, particularly after the All-In podcast — co-hosted by Sacks and a favorite stop for administration officials — scrapped plans to release an episode about the Trump-Musk battle. 'Folks like Bannon are trying to drive a wedge between tech right and MAGA right,' said one crypto executive, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'I don't see it sticking.' A spokesperson for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, where part of Sacks' work is housed, did not respond to requests for comment. A number of other top DOGE staffers departed the administration when Musk did, including Katie Miller — the wife of Trump's influential deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller. It's clear that, even before Trump and Musk traded barbs last week, the administration expected a shift in staff once the tech mogul left Washington. But any remaining administration players who are tied to Musk can't be breathing entirely easy yet, given that conversations are ongoing about how to shape DOGE more in Trump's image than his former friend's. In that sense, the MAGA right may not have to push too hard to get some people Musk hired out of the administration. Still, it seems unlikely Bannon will succeed in expanding his manhunt to people as senior as Sacks, who was Team Trump long before Musk — and who has ties to industries like crypto that the administration wants to keep close. Bannon will need the backing of much heavier hitters if he wants to bring down Sacks. Bannon and his wing of the GOP — including agitator Laura Loomer — have proved more influential than initially predicted. 'Influence comes from the people. When you have the people's support, you're influential,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said in February. 'He's a big voice of MAGA, and that's helpful for the President's agenda. He's someone that pushes back when people aren't in line.' Some DOGE staffers are worried about being cut in the wake of the Trump-Musk feud, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. Trump and his administration remain firmly behind DOGE's efforts despite the drama with Musk himself, The New York Times reported. Trump pulled NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally, shortly after the tech billionaire left the White House, Semafor scooped.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Brown Student Went Full DOGE Over How His $93,000 Tuition Is Spent. The Fallout Was Predictable—and Wrong.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Brown University sophomore Alex Shieh had a good idea. Inspired by Elon Musk's efforts to reduce supposed staffing inefficiencies in the federal government, Shieh wondered if there were a way to quantify and combat an analogous trend at his university. So with the help of A.I. and a number of publicly available databases, he compiled a list of the university's nearly 4,000 non-faculty employees, grouped them by category, and mocked up working job descriptions for each. Then he wrote emails to all of them, asking them to describe their value to the university. Shieh hoped the project would be the basis for a reporting project that would anchor the first few issues of the Brown Spectator, a defunct conservative student newspaper he and two classmates hoped to relaunch. Shieh's project had the erstwhile DOGE chief's fingerprints all over it, but there's one big difference between the two men: Musk will be able to start drawing on Social Security (if, of course, it's still solvent) in under a decade, while Shieh can't yet legally drink. Shieh's idea, even if it did have roots in our raging national culture wars, was quite ambitious, strong work for a young man with less than half of a degree under his belt. The authorities at Brown, however, didn't see it that way. Upon getting wind of the provocative email blast, they launched a conduct-code investigation and accused Shieh and his partners of trademark violations. And although all charges were eventually dropped, the university's intent was clear: They came to bury Shieh, not to praise him. They couldn't have been more wrong to do so. And it's not just Republicans who think so. I've been teaching sophomores for over a decade and a half, and while Shieh's project is certainly undergraduate work, it's of a particularly high caliber. It is timely, relevant, and enterprising, and it asks a pressing research question. Brown shouldn't have met him with disciplinary threats. Instead, the university should have offered him the best resources an elite institution can provide: academic mentorship and access to top-flight faculty research. If I'd had the opportunity to work with Mr. Shieh, I would have begun by praising him for identifying and focusing on a pressing problem for American higher education in a time of rising tuition costs: administrative bloat. According to a report by the Progressive Policy Institute's Paul Weinstein Jr., non-faculty hiring has exploded over the past 50 years, and today, at the nation's top 50 universities, there is on average 1 non-faculty employee for every 4 students. This trend is particularly acute at Brown, where the ratio nears 1 to 3. But then I would challenge this student to reconsider his methodology—and to research whether Musk's approach is advisable. I would remind him that Musk's efforts to trim the fat at Twitter probably contributed to a giant drop in that company's valuation. And I would add that some experts believe that DOGE's cuts to the federal workforce may actually end up costing taxpayers money. (I would also admit that either initiative might bear fruit in the longer term.) I would then leverage the interdisciplinary connections available at a large research institution, sending Shieh to colleagues in the business school to learn about other approaches to considering and enacting substantial layoffs. If Shieh and his partners persisted, I would have sent them to professors in sociology and communications to figure out best practices for designing a survey that didn't inspire one recipient to respond, 'Fuck off.' (His email, which only garnered 20 responses, allegedly included the too-pert question 'What do you do all day?') If he wanted, in good faith, to get results, he should have recognized that he was operating inside a highly polarized, charged environment, sending a survey to adults who pay their bills with these jobs, and modulated his approach accordingly—something the university's many experts in rhetoric could have helped him see. As a onetime writing instructor, I would also advise him that it is misleading to refer to that profane recipient as an 'administrator [at] Brown' in Congressional testimony, when he is really a relatively low-level functionary in the events planning office. And by the way, I would have done all these things not because I agree with Shieh. Indeed, I don't think I do. Rather, I would have supported him because he had a serious academic question and the drive to think it through as part of an ambitious, time-intensive project. The fact that Brown University responded so aggressively only lends ammunition to those on the right who believe—often correctly—that American academia is hostile to conservative viewpoints. (This despite the fact that, as Shieh himself said, 'It's not inherently conservative to want to make education more affordable.') Now, perhaps Brown would have done some of these things had they been given ample notice of Shieh's plans, or if Shieh had registered the Spectator with the university in advance. As it was, it seems they were blindsided, and ended up reacting, rather than acting. So now, instead of boasting about high-profile conservative-leaning student research, they're trying to put out a political firestorm and opening themselves to attack at a moment when Elon Musk's old boss is gunning for the Ivy Leagues.
