Zelensky says 'America's silence only encourages Putin' after deadly air strikes
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky has condemned Russian air strikes as 'terrorist' attacks against civilians. After his people had endured a terrifying night bombarded by 69 missiles and 298 drones in attacks that left 12 people dead and hundreds injured, Mr Zelensky turned his fury on the US.
While Donald Trump was giving a rambling, bizarre speech to US military graduates, his Ukrainian counterpart was blaming his inaction for enabling Vladimir Putin. Mr Zelensky said: 'America's silence, and the silence of others in the world, only encourages Putin.' Three children, aged eight, 12 and 15, had been killed in a town close to the capital Kyiv, and a man in his 70s had died in the southern city of Mykolaiv.
Mr Zelensky said: 'These were deliberate strikes on ordinary cities. Ordinary residential buildings were destroyed and damaged. Rescuers have been working in more than 30 Ukrainian cities and villages following Russia 's massive strike. Each such terrorist Russian strike is a sufficient reason for new sanctions against Russia. Russia is dragging out this war and continues to kill every day.'
Mr Zelensky demanded that the US put more pressure on Putin. He continued: 'Determination matters now, the determination of the US, the determination of European countries, and all those in the world who want peace.'
It was his strongest attack on Donald Trump since their public row in the White House three months ago, when US Vice President JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of being 'disrespectful' to Trump, who told the Ukraine leader he should be more 'thankful' and that he had no 'cards' to play in negotiations with Russia. Both men were later accused of bullying Mr Zelensky.
Last month, Mr Trump criticised Putin and suggested a shift in his stance after a meeting Mr Zelensky before the Pope's funeral.
The scale of the latest missile attacks prompted the EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, to call for 'the strongest international pressure on Russia to stop this war'.
She said: 'Last night's attacks again show Russia bent on more suffering and the annihilation of Ukraine. Devastating to see children among innocent victims.'
Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha said: 'A difficult Sunday morning in Ukraine after a sleepless night. The most massive Russian air attack in many weeks.'
Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko, the former world heavyweight boxing champion, said there had been 'already 10 injured in the capital'.
Mr Klitschko said a student college dormitory in the Holosiivskyi district had been hit by a drone and the building set on fire.
The attacks meant the popular Kyiv Day bank holiday – celebrated on the last Sunday in May – began with residents seeking shelter in metro stations and basements.
Ukraine Minister of Internal Affairs, Ihor Klymenko, said 13 regions had been attacked in a 'ruthless strike aimed at civilians'. It has emerged that Russia is now able to manufacture drones at a much faster rate than before and the weapons are evolving. Shahed drones are now packed with more explosives and have technology enabling them to more successfully evade detection.
Ukraine said that over the entire weekend Russian strikes hit at least 22 separate locations. Russia said it had downed 110 Ukrainian drones.The latest attacks came a day after the Ukrainian capital Kyiv suffered one of the heaviest assaults since the start of the Russian invasion.
Saturday's attacks, which killed 13 people, came as diplomatic efforts resulted in prisoner exchanges. More than 500 Russian and Ukrainian prisoners were exchanged yesterday.
Russia's defence ministry said it was the final phase of the 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange the two sides had agreed to in the meeting between Kyiv and Moscow last week.
The talks in Istanbul were the first time the two sides had met face to face for peace talks since Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Last week, Trump and Putin had a two-hour phone call to discuss a US-proposed ceasefire deal. Trump said he believed the call had gone 'very well', and claimed Russia and Ukraine would immediately start' negotiations toward a ceasefire and 'an end to the war'.
Putin said Russia would work with Ukraine to craft a 'memorandum' on a 'possible future peace', but had not accepted a 30-day ceasefire.
Last night it was reported that Putin is amassing 50,000 troops for a fresh summer offensive on Kharkiv, Ukraine's second largest city.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lithuania to build 'defence line' along Baltic borders
Lithuania has revealed plans to dig a 30-mile-wide ribbon of defences on its borders with Russia and Belarus that will include minefields and bridges set to blow up in case Russia invades. The plans are part of a Baltic-wide push for more defence, amid increasing aggression from Russia and its allies. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, alongside Poland, have been fortifying their borders, adding obstacles and redoubts to existing fences. All four are also looking for EU funding for these projects. When complete, having been in the works since early last year, the Baltic defence line is estimated to be more than 940 miles long and will limit Russia's ability to launch attacks from its own territory, Kaliningrad and Belarus. Lithuania, in particular, began setting up dozens of so-called 'engineering parks' filled with 'counter-mobility' equipment. These initially included razor wire, concrete roadblocks, Czech Hedgehogs (a type of anti-tank barrier), as well as dragon's teeth (concrete pyramids). But Lithuania has now said that it is looking to further layer its defences, stretching them wide enough to protect Vilnius, the capital. Lithuania's border with Kaliningrad and Belarus is over 590 miles long. The new ribbon will be made of three layers. The first, estimated to be three miles wide, will begin with an anti-tank ditch next to the border fence. This will then be followed by an embankment, strips of dragon's teeth and minefields, and then two layers of strongpoints for defending infantry. The second and third layers will see bridges primed with explosives that can be detonated at will, as well as more lines of infantry. Lithuania is also planning on felling trees along the roads leading to towns and cities, which is expected to assist in destroying Russian armoured vehicles. The aim of the new project is to slow down land attacks and push enemy forces into easier battlegrounds, not to entirely prevent attacks. Lithuania currently has 23,000 professional soldiers, along with 104,000 reservists. It has raised its defence spending to 5.5%, one of the highest rates of any NATO nation. But war games last year suggested that Lithuanian troops would struggle to fight off an invasion from Russia, until other members of NATO stepped in to deliver reinforcements. Things would be far worse if Russia seized the Sulwalki gap, the Lithuania-Poland border that is NATO's land connection to the Baltics. Lithuania is expected to also implement anti-personnel mines, mines designed for use against people as opposed to vehicles and equipment, after Lithuania pulled out of the Ottowa Convention along with several other NATO members. However, it has also placed a €10million (£8.6million) order for anti-tank mines on top of prior deals to buy 85,000 of them at the cost of €50million. It has also replenished its arsenal of 155mm artillery shells, the NATO standard, and has ordered 44 top-of-the-line Leopard 2A8 battle tanks from Germany. It has also bought €6million worth of Israeli Spike LR2 anti-tank missiles. This included €70.3billion for munitions, €52.5billion for combat vehicles and €36.6billion for naval vessels and equipment. In June, Germany's defence chief has starkly warned that NATO should be prepared for a possible attack by Russia in the next four years. General Carsten Breuer said Russia poses a 'very serious threat' to the Western defence bloc, the likes of which he has never seen in his 40-year military career. Breuer pointed to the massive increase in Vladimir Putin's armoury and ammunitions stock, including a massive output of 1,500 main battle tanks every year as well as the four million rounds of 152mm artillery munition produced in 2024 alone. He said that not all of these additional military equipment was going to Ukraine, which signalled a possible building up of capabilities that could be used against the NATO bloc, adding that Baltic states were at a particularly high risk of being attacked. 'There's an intent and there's a build up of the stocks' for a possible future attack on Nato's Baltic state members,' he told the BBC. General Carsten Breuer said Russia poses a 'very serious threat' to the Western defence bloc, the likes of which he has never seen in his 40-year military career.' 'This is what the analysts are assessing - in 2029. So we have to be ready by 2029... If you ask me now, is this a guarantee that's not earlier than 2029? I would say no, it's not. So we must be able to fight tonight,' he said. Breuer said that the Suwalki Gap, a region that borders Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Belarus, was particularly vulnerable to Russian military activity. 'The Baltic States are really exposed to the Russians, right? And once you are there, you really feel this... in the talks we are having over there,' he said. The Estonians, he said, had given the analogy of being close to a wildfire where they 'feel the heat, see the flames and smell the smoke', while in Germany 'you probably see a little bit of smoke over the horizon and not more'. Earlier this year, Latvia's intelligence agency, the Constitution Protection Bureau (SAB), released a shocking report claiming that 'Russian intelligence and security services are currently developing their capabilities to organize sabotage in Europe' in preparation 'for a possible military confrontation with NATO in the long term'. Should a peace deal play out to 'freeze' the conflict in Ukraine along existing battle lines, Moscow 'would be able to increase its military presence next to NATO's north-eastern flank, including the Baltics within the next five years', the report claimed. 'This scenario would significantly increase Russia's military threat to NATO,' the SAB assesses. Denmark last year came to a similar conclusion, that Russia could attack a NATO country within three to five years and 'test' the bloc's Article 5 commitment of mutual defence. Dr Kenton White, politics and international relations expert at the University of Reading, told the Daily Mail that NATO is right to be concerned about the Russian threat. 'Russia has a long history of learning from military failures,' he said. 'NATO should not underestimate that ability. Lithuania's announcement comes after Russia wounded at least 14 people, including a family with three children, in an overnight attack on Ukraine's northern region of Sumy. The strike took place at a time of intense efforts by US President Donald Trump to bring an end to the Russian war in Ukraine. Russia launched 15 drones in an assault on the Okhtyrka area in the early hours of Wednesday, local prosecutors said on the Telegram messaging app. The children injured in the attack, which struck a residential neighbourhood in the town, were aged 5 months, 4 years and 6 years, Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko wrote on X. 'Russia continues to manifest its fears through acts of pure terrorism across Ukraine, once again targeting the homes of families and their sleeping children,' she said. Russia has repeatedly said it does not attack civilians or civilian infrastructure. Overall, Russia launched a total of 93 drones and two missiles to attack the country overnight, the Ukrainian air force said, adding it downed 62 drones and one missile, and recorded hits at 20 locations. Ukraine's State Emergency Services reported a 'massive drone strike' on the southern region of Odesa, saying one person was wounded and a large fire erupted at a fuel and energy facility.
Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Spectator
Putin hasn't made any real concessions yet
After the jaw-dropping spectacle of the Putin-Trump summit in Alaska, there was another full day of theatre on Monday as Trump hosted European leaders and President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House. Yet the results of this three-day diplomatic pageant are embarrassingly modest. One of Trump's trumpeted achievements is Russia's alleged agreement to western security guarantees for Ukraine. It was President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff who first announced this breakthrough, with some fanfare, in an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper. 'We sort of were able to… get an agreement,' Witkoff said, 'that the United States could offer Article 5 protection [for Ukraine], which was the first time we had ever heard… the Russians agree to that.' The word 'sort of' does a lot of heavy lifting here because Russia's unprecedented concession is not a concession at all, or certainly not Russia's concession. It is the United States that, ignoring Zelensky's pleas, has refused to provide tangible security guarantees to Ukraine for fear that doing so could lead to a direct conflict with Russia. But, ever the salesman, Trump has managed to sell a US concession to Ukraine as Russia's major concession and an indication that Putin is willing to talk peace. As for Putin, it remains to be seen what he has actually agreed to. During his joint press conference with Trump, the Russian President referred vaguely to the importance of assuring Ukraine's security. 'Of course, we are willing to work on this,' he offered. But it is important to remember that already in the spring of 2022, during the ill-fated talks in Istanbul, the Russians provisionally agreed to a security mechanism for Ukraine that would involve the United States and other western powers. However, Putin made it clear then that he expected to have the right to veto any collective action to help Ukraine. It is unclear whether this expectation was brought up during his brief interaction with Trump in Anchorage. Thus constrained, any US security guarantee would not be worth the paper it's written on. The other major uncertainty pertains to Russia's willingness (or not) to permit Western contingents in Ukraine as part of a peace settlement. Moscow has repeatedly rejected the idea of troops on the ground in Ukraine if these troops are from Nato member states. The latest rebuttal came even as Trump was meeting European leaders in Washington in the form of a scornful comment by the eccentric spokesperson of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova who criticised Great Britain – which, along with France, has been one of the leaders of the so called 'coalition of the willing' and has broached the subject of sending contingents to Ukraine – for 'risky and ill-thought-through geopolitical gambits' and for trying to 'obstruct the careful work of the Russian and American negotiators.' Helping Maria Zakharova's case, President Trump has not been very forthcoming with concrete details of US participation. His message – as he put it in a joint press conference with President Zelensky – is that Europe would be 'the first line of defence… but we're gonna help them out also.' What that 'help' may amount to remains to be seen. For now, at least, Trump's security promise sounds rather hollow. So, the big question – what kind of security guarantees Russia has agreed to, and what kind of security guarantees the United States might be willing to offer – remains completely obscure. In the absence of a breakthrough on this important question, Trump's diplomacy is little more than a fireworks show: it offers a momentary distraction from the gruelling reality of war. Trump has now kicked the ball back over to the Russians and the Ukrainians. He expects Putin and Zelensky to meet in person and just work it out among themselves. In a middle-of-the-night phone call with Trump, Putin promised – per Russian readout – to 'consider the possibility of raising the level of representatives of Ukrainian and Russian sides… participating in direct negotiations.' In the meantime, Russian forces continued pummelling targets across Ukraine. Putin has offered no concrete evidence that he is willing to make a deal on terms that would fall short of Ukraine's capitulation. 'If there aren't concessions, if one side gets everything they want, that's called surrender,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared on August 17, shortly after Alaska. But he has failed to show what concessions Putin has made. By all indications, Putin has promised nothing in the way of substance, yet just enough for Trump to drop all talk of 'severe consequences' for Russia if he continued to drag his feet. Shortly before his meeting with European leaders, Trump was caught in hot mic moment: 'I think he wants to make a deal for me,' he said. 'Do you understand? As crazy as it sounds.' Trump may be crazy to believe Putin's good intentions, but he has had us all glued to TV screens in the hope that somehow, against all evidence to the contrary, he will in the end pull a rabbit out of the hat and finally deliver peace. There has been nothing in the hat so far.
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Is this where Putin and Zelensky talks could be held?
Talks of a breakthrough in Russia's war in Ukraine have rumbled before – but now the prospect of Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky sitting face to face no longer feels entirely out of reach. Geneva – a historic venue for peace talks – is emerging as a contender to host the high-stakes summit. After all, the Swiss city witnessed the historic handshake between Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US president Ronald Reagan, which was the first step towards ending the Cold War. Emmanuel Macron was the first to raise the possibility of a peace summit being held in Europe, in 'a neutral country, maybe Switzerland'. The French president said in an interview on LCI: 'I am pushing for Geneva.' He added: 'Or another country. The last time there were bilateral discussions, it was in Istanbul (Turkey). For Russia and Ukraine, a meeting in the city would be more than symbolic. If confirmed, it would be the first time that Putin and Zelensky would face each other since the start of the Russian invasion in an attempt to sketch out the mechanics of a peace deal. The Russian leader is also a subject to an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant for war crimes, so entering Switzerland should – technically – result in his arrest. Macron added t hat 'we must make ' an exception for Putin if the meeting takes place in a country that recognizes the ICC. He said: 'The work of justice must come, we are ourselves signatories to these treaties. 'But he is the sitting president, he has a principle of immunity. Peace must move forward, so we must find a place.' Swiss foreign minister Ignazio Cassis told a press conference that, under certain circumstances, Putin would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland. Last year, the Swiss government defined 'the rules for granting immunity to a person under an international arrest warrant.' Cassis explained: 'If this person comes for a peace conference, not if they come for private reasons.' He added that Switzerland was fully prepared to host such a meeting and highlighted the militarily-neutral country's long expertise in the field. Yesterday, important talks took place in Washington with the President of the United States and European leaders. This was truly a significant step toward ending the war and ensuring the security of Ukraine and our people. We are already working on the concrete content of the… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 19, 2025 Neighbouring Austria has also been flagged as a possible arena for the summit. More Trending Chancellor Christian Stocker said should peace talks take place on its soil, it would get in touch with the ICC 'to make it possible for Putin to attend'. He said he had already offered Vienna as a possible venue for negotiations to Zelensky during the Ukrainian president's visit in June. He added: 'Our capital has a long tradition as a place of dialogue.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Vienna is one of Europe's most expensive cities, but I know how to do it on the cheap MORE: Eurovision Song Contest 2026 date and host city revealed MORE: What could happen if Zelensky and Putin actually meet?
