
Trump attacks New York Times and CNN over Iran reporting
Donald Trump 's administration conducted military strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, with Trump asserting the action 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program.
The New York Times and CNN published reports based on a preliminary assessment indicating the strikes only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months.
Trump responded by threatening to sue both media outlets, demanding a reporter's termination, and accusing them of undermining his credibility.
Trump 's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, sent a letter to The New York Times threatening legal action, claiming the reporting was 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic' and demanding a retraction.
Both The New York Times and CNN refused to retract their stories, while later, the Secretary of Defense confirmed the preliminary report's existence, and other officials presented new findings claiming severe damage to Iran's program.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
19 minutes ago
- Sky News
US Supreme Court curbs injunctions that blocked Trump's birthright citizenship plan
Donald Trump's administration will be allowed to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship in the US following a decision by the Supreme Court. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. Under the current rules, nearly anyone born on US territory has automatic citizenship rights - commonly known as "birthright citizenship". But, on his first day back in the White House, Trump signed an executive order aimed at ending that right. A series of lawsuits followed, with district courts issuing nationwide injunctions aiming to block the order from taking effect. The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship, handing a major win to the government. The court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part in the states that challenged it, as well as those that did not. The Supreme Court decision was on cases filed in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. The policy remains blocked for now in one additional state, New Hampshire, as a result of a separate lawsuit that is not before the Supreme Court. Please refresh the page for the latest version.


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia ask judge to keep him in jail over deportation concerns
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge in Tennessee on Friday to delay his release from jail because of 'contradictory statements' by President Donald Trump 's administration over whether or not he'll be deported upon release. A federal judge in Nashville has been preparing to release Abrego Garcia to await trial on human smuggling charges. But she's been holding off over concerns that U.S. immigration officials would swiftly detain him and try to deport him again. Abrego Garcia's attorneys are now asking the judge to continue to detain him following statements by Trump administration officials "because we cannot put any faith in any representation made on this issue by" the Justice Department. 'The irony of this request is not lost on anyone,' the attorneys wrote. Abrego Garcia, a construction worker who had been living in Maryland, became a flashpoint over Trump's hard-line immigration policies when he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March. Facing mounting pressure and a Supreme Court order, Trump's Republican administration returned him this month to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Justice Department spokesman Chad Gilmartin told The Associated Press on Thursday that the department intends to try Abrego Garcia on the smuggling charges before it moves to deport him, stating that Abrego Garcia 'has been charged with horrific crimes, including trafficking children, and will not walk free in our country again.' Hours earlier, Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn told a federal judge in Maryland that the U.S. government plans to deport Abrego Garcia to a 'third country' that isn't El Salvador. Guynn said there was no timeline for the deportation plans. Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in their filing on Friday that Guynn's statements were the 'first time the government has represented, to anyone, that it intended not to deport Mr. Abrego back to El Salvador following a trial on these charges, but to deport him to a third country immediately.' The filing by Abrego Garcia's lawyers also cited a post on X on Thursday from White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson: 'Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States to face trial for the egregious charges against him," Jackson stated. "He will face the full force of the American justice system — including serving time in American prison for the crimes he's committed.' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote Friday the Trump administration brought Abrego Garcia back 'only to convict him in the court of public opinion.' 'In a just world, he would not seek to prolong his detention further,' his attorneys wrote. 'And yet the government — a government that has, at all levels, told the American people that it is bringing Mr. Abrego back home to the United States to face 'American justice' — apparently has little interest in actually bringing this case to trial.' Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken expulsion to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers without luggage. U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville wrote in a ruling Sunday that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. During a court hearing Wednesday, Holmes set specific conditions for Abrego Garcia's release that included him living with his brother, a U.S. citizen, in Maryland. But she held off on releasing him over concerns that prosecutors can't prevent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting him. Holmes ordered Abrego Garcia's lawyers and prosecutors to file briefs on the matter Thursday and Friday respectively. ___
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
CNN host warns of ‘slippery slope' to ‘autocratic' rule in Trump White House's outrage over Iran nukes report
CNN anchor Abby Phillip sounded the alarm on Thursday night over the White House's efforts to punish the media for reporting on a preliminary intelligence assessment of the Iran military strikes represent a 'slippery slope to the autocratic governing that Donald Trump claims to be against.' Philip's warning comes after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's fiery press conference on the effectiveness of 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' which featured the one-time Fox News morning host assailing CNN and other news outlets – including a former Fox colleague – for covering an intel report that indicated the bombing raid on three underground facilities only set Iran's nuclear program back a few months. Besides railing against the 'fake news' for publishing articles on the assessment issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon chief outright told journalists on Thursday what they should report and how they should report it. 'How many stories have been written about how hard it is to, I don't know, fly a plane for 36 hours? How about we celebrate that?' Hegseth demanded. 'How about we talk about how special America is, that only we have these capabilities?!'At one point, he even told the press corps: 'Wave an American flag. Be proud of what we accomplished because Americans are responding to [Trump] as commander in chief.' Meanwhile, the president has demanded that CNN fire reporter Natasha Bertrand for breaking the intel assessment story, a call his press secretary Karoline Leavitt has echoed. He's also threatened to sue the network and The New York Times for reporting on the DIA report – which contradicts the president's boast that Iran's nuclear program was 'totally and completely obliterated.' In letters to the Times and CNN, Trump's lawyers claimed the news reports had damaged the president's reputation and demanded that the outlets 'retract and apologize for' the stories since they were 'false' and 'unpatriotic.' A lawyer for the New York Times, however, told the president's legal team that 'no apology will be forthcoming' and 'no retraction is needed,' while CNN responded in similar fashion. At the top of her roundtable show on Thursday night, Phillip took aim at the administration's anti-media campaign amid questions over the effectiveness of the airstrikes in Iran, worrying that the goal is to force the free press to act as state-run propagandists. 'When the state tells you what you should report, say and do, that's a slippery slope to the autocratic governing that Donald Trump claims to be against,' the CNN anchor began. 'But that's what's happening in this surreal episode of outrage over an early intelligence report from his administration, his intelligence community, about his military operation against Iran, a report that CNN and other media outlets are simply reporting the existence of and not casting aspersions at the military operation was a failure,' she continued. Noting that the 'very early assessment' contradicts the president's claims of 'total obliteration of the nuclear program,' which was the reason the administration gave for striking Iran in the first place, Phillip added that the president and his acolytes were taking cues from a well-worn playbook. 'Now, it's nothing new that Trump and his allies will go to great lengths to protect him from scrutiny, but they are now using the military as a shield and the media as a punching bag,' she concluded. 'They want everyone singing from the same songbook, and if you're not compliant, you're in their crosshairs.' Indeed, besides ranting that the coverage of the Iran assessment was 'defamatory' because early intelligence reports are 'almost always wrong,' the White House has also painted CNN and other news organizations as hating the troops because of their reporting. 'I just want to thank our pilots. You know, they were maligned and treated very bad, demeaned by fake news CNN, which is back there, believe it or not, wasting time,' Trump fumed on Wednesday. 'So they just waste a lot of time, wasting my time. And The New York Times, they put out a story that, 'well, maybe they were hit, but it wasn't bad.' Well, it was so bad that they ended the war. It ended the war!' In response to the administration's allegations that CNN was looking to 'demean' the US military, anchor Pamela Brown called the claims 'blatantly manipulative,' 'absolutely false,' and a 'straw man argument.'